CA Foundation 2025 · Paper 4 · Business EconomicsQ32 · 1 mark↻ Appears in 2 of 6 yearsOfficial key verified
Suppose that a sole proprietor is earning total revenue of ₹ 120,000/- and is incurring explicit cost of ₹ 95,000/-. If the owner could work for another company for ₹ 30,000/- a year, which of the following statement is false ?
Figure for question 32
Single correct — pick one, then checkICAI format
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Economic cost = explicit ₹95,000 + implicit ₹30,000 = ₹1,25,000 (not ₹30,000), so statement (C) is FALSE.

Step 1 — List the data

  • Total revenue: TR=₹1,20,000TR = ₹1,20,000
  • Explicit (accounting) cost: ₹95,000₹95,000
  • Implicit cost = owner's foregone salary elsewhere: ₹30,000₹30,000

Step 2 — Accounting profit

Accounting profit=TR−Explicit cost=1,20,000−95,000=₹25,000\text{Accounting profit} = TR - \text{Explicit cost} = 1{,}20{,}000 - 95{,}000 = ₹25{,}000

Step 3 — Economic cost and economic profit

Economic cost=Explicit+Implicit=95,000+30,000=₹1,25,000\text{Economic cost} = \text{Explicit} + \text{Implicit} = 95{,}000 + 30{,}000 = ₹1{,}25{,}000

Economic profit=TR−Economic cost=1,20,000−1,25,000=−₹5,000  (a loss)\text{Economic profit} = TR - \text{Economic cost} = 1{,}20{,}000 - 1{,}25{,}000 = -₹5{,}000\;(\text{a loss})

Step 4 — Test each statement

  • (A) Economic loss of ₹5,000 — TRUE (Step 3).
  • (B) Accounting profit ₹25,000 — TRUE (Step 2).
  • (C) Total economic costs are ₹30,000 — FALSE: economic cost is ₹1,25,000; ₹30,000 is only the IMPLICIT portion.
  • (D) Total accounting costs are ₹95,000 — TRUE (the explicit cost). …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.

← Back to the Paper 4 · Business Economics 2025 paper