Q.Which of the following is called daily wage worker?

Understanding employment trends in India requires looking beyond just the number of people employed and focusing on the quality and nature of employment. The Indian labour market has historically been characterized by a large informal sector, and the evolution of employment patterns often reflects structural changes in the economy, as well as challenges in providing decent work.

Let's examine each option in the context of India's labour market:

• (A) Progressive increase in the share of permanent salaried employees: An increase in permanent salaried employees is generally considered a positive development. These jobs typically offer better wages, job security, and social security benefits (like provident fund, gratuity, health insurance). A progressive increase would indicate a formalization of the economy and an improvement in the quality of employment. Therefore, this is not an "issue" but rather a desirable trend, though its pace in India has been slow.

• (B) Increase in the proportion of casually employed individuals: This option highlights a significant and persistent issue in India's labour market. Casual employment refers to workers who are hired on a daily or short-term basis, often without formal contracts, job security, or social security benefits. An increase in this proportion means a larger segment of the workforce is vulnerable to income fluctuations, lacks social protection, and faces uncertainty about their future employment. This trend is often associated with the informalization of the economy and a lack of adequate formal job creation, making it a highly relevant concern for policymakers and workers alike.

• (C) Expansion of self-employment avenues in all regions: Self-employment is a dominant category of employment in India, encompassing a wide range from highly skilled professionals to subsistence-level workers (e.g., small farmers, street vendors). While self-employment can be a source of entrepreneurship and livelihood, a significant portion of it, especially in rural and semi-urban areas, is often characterized by low productivity, low income, and a lack of social security. If the expansion is primarily in these low-quality, distress-driven self-employment avenues, it can be an issue. However, the option states "expansion of self-employment avenues," which can also include growth in productive entrepreneurship. Compared to the direct negative implications of casualization, this option is less definitively an "issue" without further qualification about the quality of self-employment. …