Q.Calculate the solubility of A 2X3 in pure water, assuming that neither kind of ion reacts with water. The solubility product of A 2X3, Ksp = 1.1 × 10⁻²³.
Concept understanding — Solubility Product Constant
Solubility Product Constant: From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you drop a pinch of salt into a glass of water. The salt crystals disappear — they dissolve. But what if you keep adding salt, spoonful after spoonful? At some point, the water can't hold any more; the extra salt just sits at the bottom, undissolved. That's a saturated solution — the maximum amount of solute has dissolved at that temperature.
Now, here's the key question: even in that saturated solution, is everything static? Not at all. At the microscopic level, salt ions are constantly leaving the solid crystal and entering the solution (dissolving), while other ions in solution bump into the crystal and stick back (precipitating). At saturation, these two processes happen at exactly the same rate. The system is in dynamic equilibrium.
A saturated solution is not "full" in a static sense — it's a busy, balanced dance between dissolving and precipitating.
The Intuition: A Crowded Dance Floor
Think of a dance hall with a capacity limit. The "dancers" are ions (like Na⁺ and Cl⁻ from table salt). The dance floor is the solution. When the floor is empty, dancers easily find space — dissolution is fast. As more dancers arrive, they start bumping into each other and some leave the floor (precipitate). At the maximum capacity, the number of dancers entering equals the number leaving. That equilibrium number of dancers is what we call solubility.
But here's the twist: for many salts, the "dancers" come in different types — say, positive ions and negative ions. The equilibrium isn't just about the total number; it's about the product of their concentrations. Why product? Because the chance of a positive and a negative ion meeting to form a solid depends on both their concentrations. If you double the concentration of positive ions, the chance of a collision doubles. If you double both, it quadruples.
That product — at equilibrium, for a saturated solution — is a constant. That's the solubility product constant, Ksp.
The Precise Statement
For a sparingly soluble salt that dissociates in water as:
AmBn(s)⇌mAn+(aq)+nBm−(aq)
the solubility product constant is defined as:
Ksp=[An+]m⋅[Bm−]n
where the square brackets denote molar concentrations (mol/L) at saturation (equilibrium with the solid).
The solid AmBn does not appear in the expression. Its concentration is constant (pure solid) and is absorbed into Ksp. Never write [AmBn] in the Ksp expression.
What Ksp Tells You
- Small Ksp (e.g., 10−30): The salt is very insoluble. Only a tiny amount dissolves.
- Large Ksp (e.g., 10−2): The salt is relatively soluble.
- Ksp is temperature-dependent — always quote the temperature (usually 25°C).
Ksp is an equilibrium constant. It only applies to saturated solutions in contact with undissolved solid. If no solid is present, the solution may be unsaturated (Q<Ksp) or supersaturated (Q>Ksp), but Ksp itself doesn't change.
A Concrete Example: Silver Chloride
Silver chloride, AgCl, is a classic sparingly soluble salt. Its dissolution:
AgCl(s)⇌Ag+(aq)+Cl−(aq)
The Ksp expression:
Ksp=[Ag+][Cl−]
At 25°C, Ksp=1.8×10−10. This tiny number means that in a saturated solution, the product of the two ion concentrations is only 1.8×10−10.
If you know the solubility of AgCl is s mol/L, then [Ag+]=s and [Cl−]=s, so:
s2=1.8×10−10⇒s=1.8×10−10≈1.34×10−5 M
That's about 0.0000134 moles per litre — barely any dissolves.
The Common Mistake: Forgetting the Stoichiometry
For a salt like calcium phosphate, Ca3(PO4)2:
Ca3(PO4)2(s)⇌3Ca2+(aq)+2PO43−(aq)
The Ksp is:
Ksp=[Ca2+]3[PO43−]2
If the solubility is s mol/L, then [Ca2+]=3s and [PO43−]=2s, so:
Ksp=(3s)3(2s)2=108s5
Students often forget the coefficients as exponents and the stoichiometric factors in the concentrations. Always write the balanced dissociation equation first, then construct Ksp.
Why This Matters
Ksp is the foundation for:
- Predicting whether a precipitate will form when solutions are mixed (compare Q to Ksp)
- Understanding the common ion effect (adding one ion shifts equilibrium, reducing solubility)
- Designing qualitative analysis schemes in chemistry labs
- Controlling water hardness and scaling in pipes
Start with the dance floor analogy, remember the equilibrium nature, and always respect the stoichiometry. That's the solubility product constant.
This topic is commonly searched as "Solubility Product Constant 11 chemistry important questions" or "Solubility Product Constant formula and examples", and it maps cleanly onto the Class 11 Chemistry portion of the NCERT/CBSE syllabus. Because solubility product constant shows up repeatedly in JEE Main, NEET and state CET Chemistry papers, mastering the underlying idea (not just the formula) is genuinely worth the extra time.
The key idea is the solubility product constant (Ksp), which relates the equilibrium concentrations of the ions in a saturated solution.
Step 1: Write the dissolution equilibrium.
For A2X3:
A2X3(s)⇌2A3+(aq)+3X2−(aq)
Step 2: Relate solubility to ion concentrations.
Let the molar solubility of A2X3 be s mol/L. Then:
[A3+]=2s,[X2−]=3s
Step 3: Write and solve the Ksp expression.
Ksp=[A3+]2[X2−]3=(2s)2(3s)3=4s2⋅27s3=108s5
Given Ksp=1.1×10−23:
108s5=1.1×10−23
s5=1081.1×10−23≈1.0185×10−25
s=(1.0185×10−25)1/5
Step 4: Compute the fifth root.
Since 10−25=10−5×5, the fifth root of 10−25 is 10−5.
1.01851/5≈1.0037 (very close to 1).
Thus:
s≈1.0×10−5 mol/L
The solubility of A2X3 in pure water is 1.0×10−5 mol/L.
The solubility of A2X3 in pure water is found by relating its dissociation stoichiometry to the Ksp expression. For A2X3(s)⇌2A3++3X2−, if solubility is s mol/L, then [A3+]=2s, [X2−]=3s, and Ksp=(2s)2(3s)3=108s5. Solving 108s5=1.1×10−23 gives s≈1.0×10−5 M.
Why the solubility product approach works
When a sparingly soluble salt like A2X3 dissolves in water, it establishes an equilibrium between the solid and its ions in solution. The solubility product constant Ksp is the equilibrium constant for this dissolution. The key insight: Ksp is not the solubility itself — it’s the product of ion concentrations at saturation, each raised to the power of its stoichiometric coefficient. To find solubility, we must connect the ion concentrations to the amount of salt that dissolved.
For A2X3, each formula unit releases 2 cations (A3+) and 3 anions (X2−). So if s moles of A2X3 dissolve per litre, the ion concentrations are directly proportional to s — but not equal to s. This stoichiometric link is the heart of the calculation.
A common mistake is to set [A3+]=s or [X2−]=s. Always check the subscripts: the ion concentrations are multiples of s, not s itself.
Step-by-step solution
1. Write the dissolution equilibrium
A2X3(s)⇌2A3+(aq)+3X2−(aq)
The solid does not appear in the Ksp expression (its activity is 1).
2. Define the variable
Let s = solubility of A2X3 in mol/L. This means s moles of the salt dissolve per litre of water.
3. Express ion concentrations in terms of s
From the stoichiometry:
- Each mole of A2X3 gives 2 moles of A3+, so [A3+]=2s
- Each mole of A2X3 gives 3 moles of X2−, so [X2−]=3s
Think of it as: the concentration of each ion equals (coefficient) × (solubility). The coefficients come from the balanced equation.
4. Write the Ksp expression
Ksp=[A3+]2[X2−]3
Substitute the expressions from step 3:
Ksp=(2s)2(3s)3
5. Simplify the algebra
(2s)2=4s2
(3s)3=27s3
Ksp=4s2×27s3=108s5
Ksp=108s5
6. Insert the given Ksp value and solve for s
108s5=1.1×10−23
s5=1081.1×10−23
Compute the division:
1081.1≈0.010185
So s5≈1.0185×10−25
Now take the fifth root. Since 10−25=(10−5)5, we expect s to be around 10−5.
s=(1.0185×10−25)1/5
s=(1.0185)1/5×10−5
Now (1.0185)1/5 is very close to 1 (since 15=1 and 1.0185 is only 1.85% above 1). A quick check: 1.00375≈1.0186, so the factor is about 1.0037.
Thus:
s≈1.0×10−5 mol/L
The fifth root of 10−25 is exactly 10−5, and the small numerical factor (1.0037) rounds to 1.0 given the single significant figure in Ksp=1.1×10−23.
The solubility of A2X3 in pure water is approximately 1.0×10−5 mol/L.
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.The mass of CaC2O4 (in g) to be dissolved in distilled water to make 1.0 L of saturated solution is (KSP of CaC2O4=2.5×10−9 mol2L−2, molar mass of CaC2O4=128 gmol−1) (A) 0.0064 (B) 0.0032 (C) 0.0128 (D) 0.0640
›Reveal solutionSolution
A standard solubility-product calculation for a 1:1 salt; the mass dissolved in 1.0 L is 0.0064 g.
Concept and Intuition
For a sparingly soluble salt MX that dissociates 1:1, the solubility product Ksp=[M2+][X2−]=s2, where s is the molar solubility. Once s is known, converting to mass just needs the molar mass and the volume of solution.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Dissociation: CaC2O4(s)⇌Ca2+(aq)+C2O42−(aq); both ions appear with coefficient 1, so Ksp=s2.
- s=Ksp=2.5×10−9=25×10−10=5×10−5 mol/L.
- Moles in 1.0 L =5×10−5×1.0=5×10−5 mol.
- Mass = moles × molar mass =5×10−5×128=6.4×10−3 g =0.0064 g.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to take the square root (using Ksp directly as the solubility).
- Arithmetic slip converting 5×10−5×128.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 0.0064.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.The minimum volume of water (in L) needed to dissolve 1.5 g of CaSO4 (molar mass = 136 gmol−1) at 298 K is (Ksp(CaSO4) at 298 K = 9×10−6) (A) 6.37 (B) 7.37 (C) 3.67 (D) 3.73
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests using Ksp to find molar solubility, then using solubility as a concentration ceiling to find the minimum volume needed to dissolve a given mass without exceeding saturation. The minimum volume is 3.67 L.
Concept and Intuition
"Minimum volume needed to dissolve" a given mass of a sparingly soluble salt means: what's the smallest volume in which this mass, fully dissociated, still doesn't exceed the saturation concentration set by Ksp? At exactly this volume, the solution is saturated (just at the point of precipitation) — any less volume and the salt could not stay fully dissolved.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Moles of CaSO4: n=136 gmol−11.5 g=0.011029 mol.
- For a 1:1 dissociation CaSO4⇌Ca2++SO42−, if molar solubility is s, then Ksp=[Ca2+][SO42−]=s2.
- Solve for s: s=Ksp=9×10−6=3×10−3 molL−1.
- Minimum volume so the given moles don't exceed this concentration: V=sn=0.0030.011029≈3.676 L.
- Rounding to the given precision, V≈3.67 L.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting that CaSO4 dissociates 1:1, so Ksp=s2 (not 4s3 as for a 1:2 salt).
- Arithmetic slip converting mass to moles (dividing by the wrong molar mass).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 3.67.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-AN1 markMCQQ.The molar solubility of PbI2 in 0.2 M Pb(NO3)2 solution in terms of Ksp (solubility product) is (A) (0.2Ksp)1/2 (B) (0.4Ksp)1/4 (C) (0.8Ksp)1/2 (D) (0.8Ksp)1/3
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the common-ion effect on solubility product calculations; molar solubility works out to (0.8Ksp)1/2.
Concept and Intuition
When a sparingly soluble salt like PbI2 is dissolved into a solution that already contains one of its constituent ions (here, Pb2+ from Pb(NO3)2), Le Chatelier's principle tells us the equilibrium shifts to suppress dissolution — this is the common-ion effect. Since the pre-existing Pb2+ concentration (0.2 M) is much larger than the tiny extra amount contributed by the sparingly soluble PbI2, we can treat [Pb2+] as essentially fixed at 0.2 M.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Dissolution equilibrium: PbI2(s)⇌Pb2+(aq)+2I−(aq).
- Let molar solubility of PbI2 in this solution be s. This contributes s mol/L of Pb2+ and 2s mol/L of I−.
- Since 0.2 M Pb2+ already exists in solution and s is very small compared to 0.2, total [Pb2+]≈0.2+s≈0.2 M.
- [I−]=2s.
- Ksp=[Pb2+][I−]2=(0.2)(2s)2=0.2×4s2=0.8s2.
- Solving: s2=0.8Ksp⇒s=(0.8Ksp)1/2.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to square the 2s term for I− concentration (the stoichiometric coefficient 2 must be squared, not just multiplied).
- Including s in the Pb2+ concentration instead of approximating it away, which would give a messier non-matching expression.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — (0.8Ksp)1/2.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-27-FN1 markMCQQ.At T(K) Ksp of two ionic salts MX2 and MX is 5×10−13 and 1.6×10−11 respectively. The ratio of molar solubility of MX2 and MX is (A) 12.5 (B) 1.25 (C) 6.25 (D) 7.50
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar solubility must be derived from each salt's own dissociation stoichiometry (Ksp=4s3 for MX2, Ksp=s2 for MX) before comparing — doing that gives a solubility ratio of 12.5.
Concept and Intuition
Ksp values of two salts with different dissociation patterns cannot be compared directly to get a solubility ratio — the exponent and stoichiometric factor in the Ksp expression depend on how many ions of each type are released. MX2⇌M2++2X− gives Ksp=[M2+][X−]2=s(2s)2=4s3, while MX⇌M++X− gives Ksp=s⋅s=s2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For MX2: Ksp=4s13=5×10−13⇒s13=1.25×10−13=125×10−15.
- s1=3125×10−15=5×10−5 mol/L.
- For MX: Ksp=s22=1.6×10−11⇒s2=16×10−12=4×10−6 mol/L.
- Ratio s2s1=4×10−65×10−5=12.5.
Common Mistakes
- Comparing Ksp values directly (as if both salts had the same dissociation stoichiometry) instead of first solving for s from the correct Ksp expression for each salt type.
- Dropping the factor of 4 in Ksp=4s3 for a 1:2 electrolyte.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 12.5.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.The solubility of barium phosphate of molar mass 'M' g mol−1 in water is x g per 100 mL at 298 K. Its solubility product is 1.08×(Mx)a×(10)b. The values of a and b respectively are (A) 7, 5 (B) 5, 7 (C) 5, 5 (D) 7, 7
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing the Ksp expression for Ba3(PO4)2 in terms of molar solubility and converting units carefully gives exponents a=5, b=7.
Concept and Intuition
Ksp depends on the stoichiometric powers of the ions in the dissolution equilibrium. The trick in this problem is purely unit conversion: solubility is given as grams per 100 mL, but Ksp needs molar concentration (mol/L).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Dissolution: Ba3(PO4)2(s)⇌3Ba2++2PO43−.
- If molar solubility is s mol/L: [Ba2+]=3s, [PO43−]=2s.
- Ksp=(3s)3(2s)2=27s3×4s2=108s5.
- Given solubility =x g per 100 mL with molar mass M: moles per 100 mL =x/M, so moles per litre s=Mx×1001000=M10x.
- Substitute: Ksp=108(M10x)5=108×105×(Mx)5.
- 108×105=1.08×102×105=1.08×107.
- So Ksp=1.08×(Mx)5×107, giving a=5, b=7.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to convert from 'per 100 mL' to 'per litre' (missing the factor of 10, which becomes 105 after raising to the 5th power).
- Using the wrong stoichiometric powers (mixing up 3 and 2 for Ba2+ and PO43−).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 5, 7.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.At T(K), Ksp of AgCl, AgBr and AgI is 1.8×10−10, 5×10−13 and 8.3×10−17 respectively. A 1L solution contains 10−5 moles each of NaCl, NaBr and NaI. This solution was titrated with 10−6 M AgNO3 solution, till all the Cl−, Br− and I− are precipitated as silver salts. The order of precipitation of these respectively are (A) AgCl, AgBr, AgI (B) AgI, AgBr, AgCl (C) AgI, AgCl, AgBr (D) All the three salts are precipitated simultaneously
›Reveal solutionSolution
Comparing [Ag+] required to reach each salt's Ksp at the same anion concentration shows AgI needs the least silver ion and precipitates first, followed by AgBr, then AgCl.
Concept and Intuition
For a set of sparingly soluble salts sharing the same cation being slowly titrated in, and starting with equal anion concentrations, the salt that requires the smallest [Ag+] to reach its solubility-product threshold will start precipitating first. This required concentration is [Ag+]required=Ksp/[anion] — so the salt with the smallest Ksp (given equal anion concentrations) precipitates earliest.
Step-by-Step Solution
- [Ag+] needed for AgCl to start precipitating: 10−51.8×10−10=1.8×10−5 M.
- [Ag+] needed for AgBr: 10−55×10−13=5×10−8 M.
- [Ag+] needed for AgI: 10−58.3×10−17=8.3×10−12 M.
- The smallest required [Ag+] is reached first as AgNO3 is added dropwise: AgI (needs only 8.3×10−12 M) precipitates first, then AgBr (needs 5×10−8 M), then AgCl (needs 1.8×10−5 M) last.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming the salt with the largest Ksp precipitates first (it's the opposite — a smaller Ksp salt saturates at a lower ion concentration and so precipitates first).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — AgI, AgBr, AgCl.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.Observe the following solutionsi) 1L of 10−6 M AgNO3 ii) 1L of 10−7 M AgNO3 iii) 1L of 10−9 M AgNO3iv) 1L of 10−3 M AgNO3 v) 1L of 10−5 M NaCl Which of the above two solutions when mixed will give a white precipitate, AgCl? (Given Ksp of AgCl = 1×10−10) (A) (i),(v) (B) (ii),(v) (C) (iv),(v) (D) (iii), (v)
›Reveal solutionSolution
A precipitate forms only when the ionic product [Ag+][Cl−] (after mixing and dilution) exceeds Ksp; checking each pairing shows only 10−3 M AgNO3 mixed with 10−5 M NaCl exceeds Ksp=10−10.
Concept and Intuition
Whether a precipitate forms when two solutions are mixed is decided by comparing the "ionic product" (reaction quotient Qsp) of the relevant ions, at the moment of mixing, to the solubility product Ksp. If Qsp>Ksp, the solution is supersaturated and precipitation occurs; if Qsp≤Ksp, no precipitate forms — the solution remains unsaturated (or just saturated).
Step-by-Step Solution
- When 1 L of an AgNO3 solution is mixed with 1 L of the NaCl solution (v), the total volume becomes 2 L, so each original concentration is halved on mixing.
- Compute Qsp=[Ag+][Cl−] after mixing for each AgNO3 option with (v) 10−5 M NaCl (halved to 0.5×10−5 M):
- (i) 10−6 M AgNO3 → [Ag+]=0.5×10−6: Qsp=0.5×10−6×0.5×10−5=2.5×10−12 — less than Ksp=10−10, no ppt.
- (ii) 10−7 M → [Ag+]=0.5×10−7: Qsp=2.5×10−13 — no ppt.
- (iii) 10−9 M → even smaller Qsp — no ppt.
- (iv) 10−3 M → [Ag+]=0.5×10−3: Qsp=0.5×10−3×0.5×10−5=2.5×10−9 — this exceeds Ksp=10−10, so a precipitate forms.
- So only pairing (iv) AgNO3 with (v) NaCl gives Qsp>Ksp, producing the white AgCl precipitate.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to halve the concentrations upon mixing equal volumes — using the original (un-diluted) concentrations would wrongly suggest more pairs precipitate.
- Not comparing against Ksp correctly (e.g., comparing individual concentrations rather than their product).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — (iv), (v).
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-07-AN1 markMCQQ.The solubility products of NiS, ZnS, CdS and HgS are 4.7×10−5, 1.6×10−24, 8×10−27 and 4×10−53 respectively. An aqueous solution contains Ni2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+ of equal concentration. H2S gas was passed into this solution very slowly. The first and the last ions that precipitate as sulphides are respectively (A) Ni2+, Hg2+ (B) Hg2+, Cd2+ (C) Zn2+, Hg2+ (D) Hg2+, Ni2+
›Reveal solutionSolution
When H2S is passed slowly into a mixture of metal ions at equal concentration, the sulfide with the smallest Ksp precipitates first and the one with the largest Ksp precipitates last. Here: Hg2+ first, Ni2+ last.
Concept and Intuition
As H2S dissolves slowly, [S2−] rises gradually from near zero. A given sulfide MS starts to precipitate as soon as the ion product [M2+][S2−] exceeds its Ksp. Since all the metal ions start at the same concentration, the sulfide requiring the least [S2−] to reach its Ksp threshold — i.e., the one with the smallest Ksp — crosses that threshold first. The largest-Ksp sulfide needs the most [S2−] and so precipitates last.
Step-by-Step Solution
- List Ksp: NiS =4.7×10−5, ZnS =1.6×10−24, CdS =8×10−27, HgS =4×10−53.
- Order from smallest to largest: HgS < CdS < ZnS < NiS.
- Smallest Ksp (HgS) needs the least [S2−] to precipitate → precipitates first → Hg2+.
- Largest Ksp (NiS) needs the most [S2−] → precipitates last → Ni2+.
Common Mistakes
- Reasoning backwards, thinking a larger Ksp (more "soluble" in the everyday sense) precipitates first.
- Mixing up which ion belongs to which sulfide.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — Hg2+, Ni2+.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-08-AN1 markMCQQ.A 1.0 L of aqueous solution contains 1×10−8 M NaBr, 1×10−8 M NaCl and 1×10−8 M NaI. To this solution, 1×10−10 M aqueous AgNO3 solution is added drop wise. The order of precipitation of Ag X (X = Cl, Br, I) is (KSP(AgCl)=1.8×10−10; KSP(AgBr)=5×10−13; KSP(AgI)=8.3×10−17) (A) AgBr, AgCl, AgI (B) AgCl, AgBr, AgI (C) AgI, AgBr, AgCl (D) AgBr, AgI, AgCl
›Reveal solutionSolution
With equal halide concentrations, the salt with the smallest solubility product needs the least added Ag⁺ to precipitate, giving the order AgI, then AgBr, then AgCl.
Concept and Intuition
When Ag⁺ is added slowly to a solution containing several halide ions at known concentrations, each silver halide begins to precipitate once the ion product [Ag+][X−] exceeds that salt's Ksp. Since all three halides here start at the same concentration (10−8 M), the required [Ag+] to trigger precipitation is Ksp/[X−] — directly proportional to Ksp. The salt with the smallest Ksp needs the smallest [Ag+], so it precipitates first as Ag⁺ concentration slowly rises; the salt with the largest Ksp needs the most Ag⁺ and precipitates last.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Required [Ag+] for AgI to start precipitating: 10−88.3×10−17=8.3×10−9 M.
- Required [Ag+] for AgBr: 10−85×10−13=5×10−5 M.
- Required [Ag+] for AgCl: 10−81.8×10−10=1.8×10−2 M.
- Ordering by increasing required [Ag+] (i.e., order of precipitation): AgI first (needs least), then AgBr, then AgCl last (needs most).
Common Mistakes
- Assuming the salt with the largest Ksp precipitates first — it's actually the opposite: smaller Ksp means the salt is less soluble and saturates (precipitates) sooner.
- Getting confused by the very dilute AgNO₃ concentration given (10−10 M) — that detail describes how it's added (dropwise, gradually), not the comparison itself, which only needs the relative Ksp values.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — AgI, AgBr, AgCl.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-FN1 markMCQQ.The solubility of AgBr(s), having solubility product 5×10−10 in 0.2 M NaBr solution, equals (A) 5×10−10 M (B) 25×10−10 M (C) 0.5 M (D) 0.002 M
›Reveal solutionSolution
The common-ion effect from 0.2 M NaBr fixes [Br−]≈0.2 M, so AgBr's solubility (=[Ag+]) works out to 2.5×10⁻⁹ M = 25×10⁻¹⁰ M. Answer (B).
Concept and Intuition
When a sparingly soluble salt dissolves in a solution already containing one of its constituent ions (here Br− from NaBr), the common-ion effect suppresses the salt's own dissociation, sharply reducing its solubility below the value in pure water. Because NaBr fully dissociates and is present at a concentration vastly larger than AgBr's own solubility, [Br−] can be taken as essentially fixed at the NaBr concentration.
Step-by-Step Solution
- AgBr(s)⇌Ag(aq)++Br(aq)−, with Ksp=[Ag+][Br−]=5×10−10.
- In 0.2 M NaBr, [Br−]≈0.2 M (the tiny extra Br⁻ from AgBr's own dissolution is negligible next to 0.2 M).
- Solubility of AgBr =[Ag+] (each formula unit that dissolves releases one Ag+).
- [Ag+]=Ksp/[Br−]=0.25×10−10=2.5×10−9 M.
- Expressed to match the option's form: 2.5×10−9 M =25×10−10 M.
Common Mistakes
- Using Ksp (the formula for solubility in pure water) instead of accounting for the common-ion suppression — that would badly overestimate the solubility here.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 25×10−10 M.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-FN1 markMCQQ.If the concentration of Ag+ ions in the saturated solution of Ag2CO3 is 1.20×10−4 mol.L−1, then find the solubility product of Ag2CO3. (A) 5.30×10−12 (B) 4.50×10−11 (C) 2.66×10−12 (D) 6.90×10−12
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using the molar solubility of Ag2CO3 (s=1.2×10−4) with the dissociation stoichiometry Ag2CO3→2Ag++CO32− gives Ksp=4s3≈6.9×10−12.
Concept and Intuition
Ag2CO3 dissociates as Ag2CO3⇌2Ag++CO32−. If s is the molar solubility of the compound, each formula unit that dissolves releases 2 silver ions and 1 carbonate ion, so [Ag+]=2s and [CO32−]=s — the factor of 2 (squared, since it enters Ksp as [Ag+]2) is the key stoichiometric detail this problem tests.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Dissociation: Ag2CO3→2Ag++CO32−.
- Let molar solubility =s=1.20×10−4 mol/L.
- [Ag+]=2s=2.4×10−4, [CO32−]=s=1.2×10−4.
- Ksp=[Ag+]2[CO32−]=(2s)2(s)=4s3.
- 4s3=4×(1.2×10−4)3=4×1.728×10−12=6.91×10−12.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the factor of 2 for [Ag+] relative to solubility s, which would badly underestimate Ksp.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 6.90×10−12.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-AN1 markMCQQ.If the molar solubility (in mol.L−1) of a sparingly soluble salt AB4 is 'S', and the corresponding solubility product is 'Ksp', then S in terms of Ksp is given by the relation ______ (A) S=(128Ksp)1/4 (B) S=(256Ksp)1/5 (C) S=(256Ksp)1/5 (D) S=(128Ksp)1/4
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing the dissociation of AB4 in terms of molar solubility S and substituting into the solubility-product expression gives S=(Ksp/256)1/5.
Concept and Intuition
For a sparingly soluble salt ABn that dissociates into one An+ ion and n B− ions, the solubility product Ksp is the product of ion concentrations, each raised to its stoichiometric coefficient. Since each mole of salt that dissolves produces 1 mole of An+ but n moles of B−, the B− concentration is n times the molar solubility, and this multiplicative factor gets raised to the nth power in the Ksp expression — producing a large numerical coefficient.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Dissociation: AB4⇌A4++4B−
- If molar solubility is S (mol/L of AB4 dissolved), then:
[A4+]=S,[B−]=4S
- Solubility product expression:
Ksp=[A4+][B−]4=S×(4S)4
- Expand (4S)4=256S4:
Ksp=S×256S4=256S5
- Solve for S:
S5=256Ksp⇒S=(256Ksp)1/5
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to raise the coefficient 4 (from [B−]=4S) to the 4th power — writing Ksp=4S5 instead of 256S5.
- Using the wrong overall power (using 1/4 instead of 1/5 for the final root, forgetting that both ions' exponents — 1 for A4+ and 4 for B− — sum to 5 total ions in the expression).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — S=(256Ksp)1/5.
ANSWER: B
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.