Q.E⊖ values of some redox couples are given below. On the basis of these values choose the correct option.
E⊖ values: Br2/Br^- = +1.90; Ag^+/Ag(s) = +0.80; Cu^2+/Cu(s) = +0.34; I2(s)/I^- = +0.54
Concept understanding — Standard Electrode Potentials
Standard Electrode Potentials: A Number for "How Badly It Wants Electrons"
Dip a zinc rod into a zinc-salt solution and a tiny tug-of-war begins at the surface:
metal atoms tend to dissolve as ions (leaving electrons behind on the rod) while ions
from the solution tend to deposit as metal (consuming electrons). The rod ends up with
a characteristic electrical potential relative to the solution — the electrode potential. It is a direct measure of the tendency of that redox couple to gain or
lose electrons.
The Core Idea
Different couples pull electrons with very different strengths. Copper's ion grabs
them readily; zinc's barely wants them. Put a number on each couple and you can
predict, before mixing anything, who will oxidise whom.
Two conventions make the numbers comparable:
- Standard conditions. Every species at unit concentration (1 M), any gas at 1 atm, temperature 298 K. The potential measured then is the standard electrode potential, written E⊖.
- A common zero. Potentials can only be measured as differences, so one electrode is defined as the reference: the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), 2H++2e−→H2, is fixed at exactly 0.00 V. Every E⊖ is the voltage of a couple measured against it.
By convention the values are tabulated for the reduction direction:
Oxidised form+ne−→Reduced formE⊖ (in volts, at 298 K)
Reading the Table
The standard-potential table (Table 7.1 in the Class 11 chapter) runs from
F2/F− at +2.87 V down to Li+/Li at −3.05 V.
Two rules unlock it:
- More positive E⊖ → stronger oxidising agent (the oxidised form is hungrier for electrons). F₂ tops the table; that is why fluorine oxidises almost everything.
- More negative E⊖ → stronger reducing agent (the reduced form gives electrons up most easily). Li, K, Ca, Na at the bottom are the great electron donors. A negative E⊖ means the couple is a stronger reducing agent than the H⁺/H₂ couple; a positive one, weaker.
Predicting Whether a Reaction Goes
For any proposed redox reaction, the species being reduced acts as the cathode couple
and the species being oxidised as the anode couple:
Ecell⊖=Ecathode⊖−Eanode⊖
A positive Ecell⊖ means the reaction is feasible
(spontaneous) under standard conditions; a negative one means the reverse reaction
is the spontaneous direction.
Worked feel: can Fe³⁺ oxidise iodide? E⊖(Fe3+/Fe2+)=+0.77 V is above E⊖(I2/I−)=+0.54 V, so
Ecell⊖=+0.23 V — yes. Can silver metal reduce Fe³⁺?
0.77−0.80=−0.03 V — no.
This is also the logic of the activity series: a metal displaces, from solution,
the ions of any metal whose couple sits above it (less negative / more positive) in
the table — Zn displaces Cu²⁺, Cu displaces Ag⁺, never the reverse.
Common Mistakes
- Flipping the sign when a half reaction is reversed and then double-counting. Use Ecell⊖=Ecathode⊖−Eanode⊖ with BOTH values as tabulated (reduction) potentials — the subtraction already handles the reversal.
- Multiplying E⊖ by stoichiometric coefficients. Potentials are intensive: doubling a half reaction does not double its E⊖.
- Reading "negative" as "impossible". A negative E⊖ only ranks the couple as a stronger reducing agent than H⁺/H₂ — zinc's −0.76 V is exactly why zinc is so good at reducing other ions.
Exam Relevance
Standard-potential questions are staples: pick the strongest oxidising/reducing agent
from given E⊖ values, decide whether a pair reacts (CBSE Class 11 Exercise
7.26; Exemplar Q2–Q4, Q16, Q34), order metals by reducing power, or justify a
displacement series. In Class 12 the same idea grows into full electrochemistry — the
Nernst equation extends E⊖ to non-standard concentrations, and cell EMF
connects to thermodynamics via ΔG=−nFE.
Why this formula?
Galvanic Corrosion: Why the Key Formulas Hold
Galvanic corrosion occurs when two dissimilar metals are electrically connected in the presence of an electrolyte. The key formula that governs this is the mixed potential theory, which leads to the galvanic current and corrosion rate expressions.
Let's build the reasoning step-by-step.
1. The Core Idea: Two Electrodes, One Circuit
When metals M₁ (more active, e.g., zinc) and M₂ (more noble, e.g., copper) are connected:
- M₁ acts as the anode — it oxidizes (corrodes):
M1→M1n++ne−
- M₂ acts as the cathode — it reduces something (e.g., oxygen or H⁺):
O2+2H2O+4e−→4OH−(in neutral/alkaline)
or
2H++2e−→H2(in acidic)
The two metals are electrically connected (via a wire or direct contact), and the electrolyte completes the circuit. Electrons flow from M₁ to M₂.
2. The Mixed Potential: Why It Exists
Each metal, when alone in the electrolyte, has its own open-circuit potential (OCP) — the equilibrium potential for its half-reaction. For M₁, it's Ecorr,1; for M₂, it's Ecorr,2.
When connected, the system cannot stay at two different potentials. The entire metal couple must reach a single potential — the mixed potential Emix.
- Emix lies between Ecorr,1 and Ecorr,2.
- At Emix, the total anodic current from M₁ equals the total cathodic current from M₂ (charge conservation):
Ianode=Icathode
This is the fundamental equation of galvanic corrosion.
3. Deriving the Galvanic Current
Assume each electrode follows Butler-Volmer kinetics (for activation-controlled reactions). For the anode (M₁), the anodic current density ia at potential E is:
ia=i0,1exp(RTαaF(E−E0,1))
For the cathode (M₂), the cathodic current density ic is:
ic=i0,2exp(−RTαcF(E−E0,2))
Where:
- i0,1,i0,2 = exchange current densities
- αa,αc = transfer coefficients (typically ~0.5)
- F = Faraday constant
- R = gas constant
- T = temperature
- E0,1,E0,2 = standard reduction potentials
At the mixed potential Emix:
Igalvanic=A1⋅ia(Emix)=A2⋅ic(Emix)
Where A1 and A2 are the surface areas of the anode and cathode.
Why this holds: The net current from the anode must exactly balance the net current consumed at the cathode — otherwise, charge would accumulate, which is impossible in a steady-state circuit.
4. The Corrosion Rate Formula
The corrosion rate (mass loss per time) of the anode is given by Faraday's law:
Corrosion rate=n⋅F⋅ρIgalvanic⋅M
Where:
- M = molar mass of the anode metal
- n = number of electrons transferred per atom
- ρ = density of the metal
- F = Faraday constant (96,485 C/mol)
Why this holds: Each mole of metal oxidized releases n moles of electrons. The total charge passed Q=Igalvanic⋅t corresponds to moles of metal lost:
moles lost=nFQ=nFIgalvanic⋅t
Multiply by M/ρ to get volume or thickness loss.
5. The Area Effect: Why It Matters
From the mixed potential equation:
A1⋅ia(Emix)=A2⋅ic(Emix)
If the cathode area A2 is large relative to the anode area A1, then ia(Emix) must be large to balance the current. This means:
- Small anode + large cathode → severe galvanic corrosion (high current density on the anode).
- Large anode + small cathode → mild corrosion.
Why this holds: The current density on the anode is ia=Igalvanic/A1. For a fixed Igalvanic, smaller A1 gives higher ia, which accelerates corrosion.
6. The Driving Force: Potential Difference
The driving force for galvanic corrosion is the difference in open-circuit potentials:
ΔE=Ecorr,2−Ecorr,1
A larger ΔE generally leads to a larger Igalvanic, but the exact relationship depends on the polarization behavior (Tafel slopes) of both electrodes.
Why this holds: The mixed potential Emix is determined by the intersection of the anodic and cathodic polarization curves. A larger separation between the two curves shifts the intersection to a higher current.
Summary of Key Takeaways
| Concept | Formula | Why It Holds |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed potential | Ianode=Icathode | Charge conservation in a closed circuit |
| Galvanic current | A1ia(Emix)=A2ic(Emix) | Butler-Volmer kinetics + area balance |
| Corrosion rate | nFρIgalvanicM | Faraday's law of electrolysis |
| Area effect | Small anode → high ia | Current density inversely proportional to area |
| Driving force | ΔE=Ecorr,2−Ecorr,1 | Larger potential difference → larger current (generally) |
Exam tip: Always start with the mixed potential condition — it's the foundation. Then apply Faraday's law for the rate. Never forget the area ratio — it's the most common trick in exam problems.
Concept: Standard Electrode Potentials and Spontaneity
"Cu will reduce X" means copper metal is oxidised (anode) while X is reduced (cathode);
that is spontaneous only when Ecell∘=EX couple∘−ECu2+/Cu∘>0, i.e. the species being reduced must have a
higher potential than +0.34 V — and it must actually be a reducible (oxidised) form.
Check each option:
- (i) "Cu will reduce Br⁻" — Br⁻ is already the reduced form of the Br₂/Br⁻ couple; it cannot be reduced further. Not possible.
- (ii) "Cu will reduce Ag" — metallic Ag is likewise already reduced. Not possible. (Cu would reduce Ag⁺ ions, but that is not what this option says.)
- (iii) "Cu will reduce I⁻" — same objection as (i). Not possible.
- (iv) "Cu will reduce Br₂" — Br₂ is an oxidised form with E∘=+1.90 V>+0.34 V: Ecell∘=1.90−0.34=+1.56 V>0. Spontaneous.
The correct option is (iv): Cu will reduce Br₂.
A species can reduce another if it has a lower (more negative) standard electrode potential. Copper metal (E⊖=+0.34V) can reduce only those species with higher potentials; among the options, only Br2 (E⊖=+1.90V) qualifies. The correct option is (iv).
The question hinges on understanding spontaneous redox reactions through standard electrode potentials. A redox reaction is spontaneous when the overall cell potential Ecell⊖ is positive. This happens when electrons flow from a species that loses them easily (lower E⊖, better reducing agent) to one that accepts them readily (higher E⊖, better oxidising agent).
When we say "Cu will reduce X," we mean copper metal acts as the reducing agent—it gets oxidised to Cu2+ while X gets reduced. For this to be spontaneous:
Ecell⊖=Ecathode⊖−Eanode⊖>0
Here the cathode is where X gets reduced, and the anode is where Cu gets oxidised. Rearranging, we need:
E⊖(X/reduced form of X)>E⊖(Cu2+/Cu)
In other words, the species being reduced must have a higher standard potential than copper.
Let's examine each option systematically.
1. Option (i): Cu will reduce Br−
The proposed half-reactions would be:
- Oxidation: Cu(s)→Cu2++2e− with E⊖=+0.34V
- Reduction: Br−→?
But Br− is already in its reduced form. To "reduce" it further is impossible—it would need to accept more electrons, but bromide ion is stable and cannot be reduced under standard conditions. The reverse reaction, oxidising Br− to Br2, would require an oxidising agent stronger than copper. This option makes no chemical sense.
2. Option (ii): Cu will reduce Ag
Again, Ag(s) is already the reduced form of silver. Copper cannot reduce metallic silver further. What can happen is the reverse: Ag+ can oxidise copper, because E⊖(Ag+/Ag)=+0.80V>+0.34V. But that's not what the option states.
3. Option (iii): Cu will reduce I−
Like bromide, iodide ion is already reduced. Copper cannot reduce I− further. (Copper could be oxidised by I2, but that's the opposite process.)
4. Option (iv): Cu will reduce Br2
Now we have a genuine redox pair. The half-reactions are:
- Oxidation: Cu(s)→Cu2++2e− with Eanode⊖=+0.34V
- Reduction: Br2+2e−→2Br− with Ecathode⊖=+1.90V
The cell potential is:
Ecell⊖=1.90−0.34=+1.56V
Since Ecell⊖>0, the reaction is spontaneous. Copper metal will indeed reduce bromine.
A quick mnemonic: Higher potential wins the electrons. The species with the higher E⊖ acts as the oxidising agent (gets reduced), while the one with lower E⊖ acts as the reducing agent (gets oxidised).
Don't confuse the reduced form with the ability to be reduced further. Br−, Ag(s), and I− are already reduced; they cannot accept more electrons. Only their oxidised counterparts (Br2, Ag+, I2) can be reduced.
The correct option is (iv): Cu will reduce Br2.
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.X,Y and Z represent three electrodes Al3+/Al, Cu2+/Cu and Ag+/Ag with E° values −1.66, 0.34 and 0.80 V respectively. The correct order of oxidising power of these three electrodes is (A) X>Y>Z (B) Z>Y>X (C) X=Y=Z (D) Y>Z>X
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests reading standard reduction potentials as a measure of oxidising power; higher (more positive) E° means stronger oxidising power, giving Z>Y>X.
Concept and Intuition
The standard reduction potential E° of an electrode couple Mn+/M measures how readily Mn+ is reduced to M. A more positive E° means the ion has a greater tendency to be reduced — i.e., it is a stronger oxidising agent (it more readily takes electrons from something else, getting reduced itself). So ranking electrodes by oxidising power is the same as ranking them by E° value, from most positive (strongest oxidiser) to most negative (weakest oxidiser / strongest reducing agent in its reduced form).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify the labels: X=Al3+/Al (E°=−1.66 V), Y=Cu2+/Cu (E°=0.34 V), Z=Ag+/Ag (E°=0.80 V).
- Rank by E° value (most positive = strongest oxidising power): Z (0.80)>Y (0.34)>X (−1.66).
- This directly gives the oxidising-power order: Z>Y>X.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing oxidising power with reducing power — a very negative E° (like Al3+/Al) means the metal Al is a strong reducing agent, not that the ion Al3+/Al couple has strong oxidising power.
- Ranking by atomic number or reactivity series intuition instead of directly by the given E° values.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — Z>Y>X.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-FN1 markMCQQ.ΔG∘ (in kJ mol−1) for the cell reaction given below is 2Al(s)+3Cu2+(aq)→2Al3+(aq)+3Cu(s) (Given: EAl3+∣Al∘=−1.66 V ; ECu2+∣Cu∘=+0.34 V ; F = 96500 C mol−1) (A) -1158 (B) -579 (C) -386 (D) -772
›Reveal solutionSolution
Standard electrochemistry problem: find Ecell∘ from the two standard reduction potentials, count the electrons transferred in the balanced equation, then apply ΔG∘=−nFE∘. Result: −1158 kJmol−1.
Concept and Intuition
The standard Gibbs free energy change of a cell reaction is related to its standard cell potential by
ΔG∘=−nFEcell∘
where n is the number of moles of electrons transferred in the balanced overall reaction, and F is the Faraday constant. Here, Al is oxidised (its half-reaction is reversed relative to the reduction potential given, so it becomes the anode), and Cu2+ is reduced (cathode). The cell potential is always cathode potential minus anode potential (both taken as standard reduction potentials, without flipping signs manually):
Ecell∘=Ecathode∘−Eanode∘
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify cathode (reduction): Cu2++2e−→Cu, E∘=+0.34 V.
- Identify anode (oxidation, but use its reduction potential in the formula): Al3++3e−→Al, E∘=−1.66 V.
- Ecell∘=0.34−(−1.66)=2.00 V.
- Balance the overall reaction: 2Al→2Al3++6e− and 3Cu2++6e−→3Cu, so total electrons transferred n=6.
- ΔG∘=−nFE∘=−(6)(96500 Cmol−1)(2.00 V)=−1,158,000 Jmol−1=−1158 kJmol−1.
Common Mistakes
- Using n=2 or n=3 (the individual half-reaction electron counts) instead of n=6, the electrons transferred in the fully balanced overall equation.
- Sign errors: forgetting that Ecell∘ is cathode minus anode (both as reduction potentials), not adding the two potentials or flipping the wrong sign.
- Forgetting to convert the final answer from joules to kilojoules.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — -1158.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.Which of the following reactions is non-spontaneous? (A) 2F2+2H2O→4HF+O2 (B) Cl2+H2O→HCl+HOCl (C) Br2+H2O→HBr+HOBr (D) 2I2+2H2O→4HI+O2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Comparing the standard reduction potentials of the halogens with that of O2/H2O shows only F2 (and, via ordinary hydrolysis, Cl2/Br2) can act spontaneously on water; iodine cannot oxidise water to O2. The answer is (D).
Concept and Intuition
Whether a halogen reacts with water depends on its oxidising power (standard reduction potential) relative to the species it must oxidise. Fluorine has such an exceptionally high reduction potential that it can directly oxidise water all the way to O2 gas, releasing HF — a highly spontaneous, even violent reaction. Chlorine and bromine are weaker oxidants and instead undergo a milder disproportionation-type hydrolysis, forming the hydrohalic acid and the hypohalous acid (HOX), which is also spontaneous (though the equilibrium lies less and less to the product side going down the group). Iodine is the weakest oxidant of these halogens; its reduction potential is too low to drive the oxidation of water to O2, so a reaction analogous to fluorine's (2I2+2H2O→4HI+O2) does not occur spontaneously.
Step-by-Step Solution
- (A) 2F2+2H2O→4HF+O2: fluorine's reduction potential (E°≈2.87 V) vastly exceeds that of O2/H2O (E°≈1.23 V), so this reaction is strongly spontaneous — not the answer.
- (B) Cl2+H2O→HCl+HOCl: this simple hydrolysis (disproportionation) reaction is spontaneous and is the actual observed reaction of chlorine with water — not the answer.
- (C) Br2+H2O→HBr+HOBr: similarly a spontaneous hydrolysis reaction (to a smaller extent than chlorine, but still spontaneous) — not the answer.
- (D) 2I2+2H2O→4HI+O2: this requires iodine to oxidise water to O2, exactly like fluorine does — but iodine's reduction potential (E°≈0.54 V) is far below that of O2/H2O (1.23 V), so iodine simply cannot drive this reaction; it is thermodynamically non-spontaneous.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming all halogens behave identically toward water just because they're in the same group.
- Not distinguishing between the "ordinary hydrolysis" reaction (X2+H2O→HX+HOX, spontaneous down to Br) and the "water-oxidation-to-O₂" reaction (spontaneous only for F).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 2I2+2H2O→4HI+O2.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.Identify the sets in which both the metals react with water? I. Be, Mg II. Li, Mg III. Na, K IV. K, Ca Correct answer is (A) II, IV only (B) II, III, IV only (C) III, IV only (D) I, II only
›Reveal solutionSolution
Only Be fails to react with water; sets II, III and IV have both metals reacting → (B).
Concept and Intuition
Among the light s-block metals, reactivity with water rises down and across the alkali/alkaline-earth series. Beryllium is anomalous — it does not react with water even as steam (protective oxide, high hydration/ionisation energy). Magnesium reacts slowly with hot water/steam; alkali metals (Li, Na, K) react with water, and Ca reacts readily with cold water.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Set I (Be, Mg): Be does not react with water → invalid.
- Set II (Li, Mg): Li reacts with water, Mg reacts with hot water/steam → valid.
- Set III (Na, K): both react vigorously with water → valid.
- Set IV (K, Ca): both react with water → valid.
- Valid sets = II, III, IV → option (B).
Common Mistakes
- Assuming Be behaves like other alkaline-earth metals — Be is the exception that does not react with water.
- Overlooking that Mg does react, but only with hot water/steam.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — II, III, IV only.
ANSWER: B
NoteThis solution was worked out by our team and cross-checked by a second independent solve. The official answer key for this question could not be confirmed, so please cross-verify with the official paper where possible.
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.For which of the following the E⊖(M3+/M2+) is negative? (A) Mn (B) Co (C) Fe (D) Cr
›Reveal solutionSolution
Cr3+/Cr2+ has a negative standard reduction potential because Cr2+ is unstable/strongly reducing (readily loses an electron to reach the stable d3 Cr3+), unlike Mn, Fe, Co which favour +2. The answer is (D) Cr.
Concept and Intuition
The sign and magnitude of E⊖(M3+/M2+) tells us the relative thermodynamic stability of the +2 vs +3 oxidation state for a transition metal:
- A large positive E⊖ means M3+ is a strong oxidising agent — i.e., M2+ is the thermodynamically favoured/stable state (electron gain is favourable).
- A negative E⊖ means the reverse: M2+ readily loses an electron to become M3+ — i.e., M3+ is the stable state and M2+ is a strong reducing agent.
Extra stability of a particular dn configuration (half-filled d5, or in this case the stability trend of d3 for Cr3+) strongly influences these potentials. Known standard values (approx.): Mn3+/Mn2+=+1.57 V, Co3+/Co2+=+1.82 V, Fe3+/Fe2+=+0.77 V, Cr3+/Cr2+=−0.41 V.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Recall/estimate the sign of E⊖(M3+/M2+) for each metal in the options.
- Mn: Mn2+ (d5, half-filled, extra stable) is strongly favoured over Mn3+ (d4) — so E⊖ is a large positive value (+1.57 V). Not the answer.
- Co: Co2+ (d7) is far more stable than Co3+ (d6, in aqueous simple ions) — E⊖ is strongly positive (+1.82 V). Not the answer.
- Fe: Fe2+ (d6) to Fe3+ (d5, half-filled and stable) is only mildly favourable to oxidise — E⊖ is positive but modest (+0.77 V). Not the answer.
- Cr: Cr2+ (d4) readily loses an electron to reach the more stable Cr3+ (d3, particularly stable half-filled t2g3 subshell in an octahedral field) — so Cr2+ is a strong reducing agent and E⊖(Cr3+/Cr2+) is negative (≈ −0.41 V).
- Only Cr gives a negative value, matching option D.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming all M3+/M2+ potentials are positive by default — the Cr case is the well-known textbook exception because Cr3+'s d3 configuration is unusually stable.
- Confusing this with Mn3+/Mn2+, which is a large positive value (opposite sign) due to Mn2+'s d5 stability.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — Cr.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.If EFe2+/Fe∘=−0.441 V and EFe3+/Fe2+∘=0.771 V, the standard emf of the cell reaction Fe(s)+2Fe3+(aq)⟶3Fe2+(aq) is (A) −1.212 V (B) +1.212 V (C) −2.424 V (D) +2.424 V
›Reveal solutionSolution
Combining the Fe2+/Fe and Fe3+/Fe2+ half-cells for the disproportionation-type reaction Fe + 2Fe3+ → 3Fe2+ gives a standard cell potential of +1.212 V.
Concept and Intuition
Standard cell potential is computed as Ecell∘=Ecathode(reduction)∘−Eanode(reduction)∘, regardless of how many electrons each half-reaction involves — E∘ is an intensive quantity and is NOT multiplied when a half-reaction is scaled to balance electrons.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify the two half reactions inside the overall reaction Fe(s) + 2Fe3+(aq) → 3Fe2+(aq):
- Oxidation (anode): Fe→Fe2++2e−, using EFe2+/Fe∘=−0.441 V (as a reduction potential).
- Reduction (cathode): Fe3++e−→Fe2+ (doubled to 2Fe3++2e−→2Fe2+ for electron balance), using EFe3+/Fe2+∘=0.771 V — this value does NOT change when the equation is doubled.
- Apply Ecell∘=Ecathode∘−Eanode∘=0.771−(−0.441)=1.212 V.
- Since this is positive, the reaction as written is spontaneous, consistent with iron metal reducing Fe3+ to Fe2+.
Common Mistakes
- Doubling EFe3+/Fe2+∘ to "balance" the 2 electrons — standard potentials are never scaled with stoichiometric coefficients.
- Sign errors when subtracting a negative anode potential (must become +0.441, not −0.441, in the addition).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — +1.212 V.
ANSWER: B
- Identify the two half reactions inside the overall reaction Fe(s) + 2Fe3+(aq) → 3Fe2+(aq):
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.Which one of the following reactions is not feasible ? (g = gas, l = liquid, s = solid, aq = aqueous) (A) Cl2(g)+2KBr(aq)⟶2KCl(g)+Br2(l) (B) Cl2(g)+2KI(aq)⟶2KCl(aq)+I2(s) (C) Br2(l)+2KI(aq)⟶2KBr(aq)+I2(s) (D) I2(s)+2KBr(aq)⟶2KI(aq)+Br2(l)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the halogen displacement (reactivity) series; the infeasible reaction is I₂ + 2KBr → 2KI + Br₂, option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Among halogens, oxidizing power (and hence the ability to displace a halide from its salt) decreases down the group: F2>Cl2>Br2>I2. A more powerful oxidizing halogen can displace a less powerful one from its halide salt, but the reverse cannot happen spontaneously.
Step-by-Step Solution
- (A) Cl2+2KBr→2KCl+Br2: Cl₂ is a stronger oxidizer than Br₂, so it displaces bromide — feasible.
- (B) Cl2+2KI→2KCl+I2: Cl₂ is stronger than I₂, displaces iodide — feasible.
- (C) Br2+2KI→2KBr+I2: Br₂ is stronger than I₂, displaces iodide — feasible.
- (D) I2+2KBr→2KI+Br2: I₂ is WEAKER than Br₂ as an oxidizer, so it cannot displace bromide from KBr — NOT feasible.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the direction of the reactivity trend and assuming any halogen can displace any other.
- Mixing up oxidizing power with reducing power of the halide ions.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — I2(s)+2KBr(aq)⟶2KI(aq)+Br2(l) is not feasible.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.The EM+(aq)∣M(s)⊖ is highest with negative sign for the alkali metal 'x' and lowest with negative sign for the alkali metal 'y'. In flame test, the characteristic colours of x and y are respectively (A) Blue, Yellow (B) Yellow, Violet (C) Yellow, Crimson red (D) Crimson red, Yellow
›Reveal solutionSolution
Li has the most negative EM+/M⊖ among alkali metals (anomalously, due to huge hydration enthalpy) and Na has the least negative. Their flame colours are crimson red (Li) and yellow (Na) respectively.
Concept and Intuition
Standard reduction potentials of alkali metals in water do not follow the simple ionisation-energy trend because hydration enthalpy also matters heavily. Lithium's very small ionic size gives it an unusually large hydration enthalpy, which overcompensates for its lower ionisation energy and makes ELi+/Li⊖ the most negative among the alkali metals — Li is thus the strongest reducing agent in aqueous solution, contrary to what its higher ionisation energy alone might suggest. Sodium, further down this thermodynamic cycle, ends up with the least negative potential among the common alkali metals.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Typical standard reduction potentials (aqueous, 298 K): Li+/Li≈−3.05 V, Na+/Na≈−2.71 V, K+/K≈−2.93 V, Rb+/Rb≈−2.93 V, Cs+/Cs≈−2.92 V.
- "Highest with negative sign" = most negative value = Li (x=Li).
- "Lowest with negative sign" = least negative (closest to zero) = Na (y=Na).
- Flame test colours (characteristic emission on excitation): Li → crimson red; Na → yellow (the well-known intense sodium D-line emission).
- So x,y colours are crimson red, yellow — matching option (D).
Common Mistakes
- Assuming ionisation energy alone determines E⊖ trend and picking K (highest IE trend anomaly) instead of correctly identifying Li as most negative due to hydration enthalpy.
- Swapping Li's and Na's flame colours (Li = crimson red, not Na; Na = yellow, not Li).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — Crimson red, Yellow.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.Match the following List-I (Transition metal, M): A) Ni B) Mn C) Fe D) Cr List-II (EM2+/M⊖): I) −1.18 II) −0.91 III) −0.25 IV) −0.44 The correct answer is (A) A-III, B-II, C-IV, D-I (B) A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II (C) A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II (D) A-I, B-IV, C-II, D-III
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests recall of standard reduction potentials EM2+/M⊖ for first-row transition metals. The answer is A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II.
Concept and Intuition
The standard electrode potentials of M2+/M couples for 3d transition metals are largely governed by a combination of enthalpy of atomisation, ionisation enthalpy, and hydration enthalpy, and do not follow a simple monotonic trend across the series. These values are typically memorised from the standard NCERT table.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Recall standard EM2+/M⊖ values (in volts): Cr2+/Cr=−0.91, Mn2+/Mn=−1.18, Fe2+/Fe=−0.44, Ni2+/Ni=−0.25.
- Match List-I to List-II: A) Ni =−0.25= III; B) Mn =−1.18= I; C) Fe =−0.44= IV; D) Cr =−0.91= II.
- This gives A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II, which is option (C).
Common Mistakes
- Mixing up Mn (most negative, −1.18) with Cr (next most negative, −0.91) since both are strongly negative.
- Confusing Fe and Ni values, which are numerically closer to zero.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-17-FN1 markMCQQ.The cell reaction of a cell is given below 2Cu+→Cu+Cu2+ What is Ecell0 (in V)? (Given: ECu2+/Cu+0=x V; ECu+/Cu0=y V) (A) x−y (B) y−x (C) x+y (D) −x−y
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to treat the given cell reaction as the sum of two half‑reactions, each with its own standard potential, and then combine them correctly — the result is Ecell0=y−x, so the correct option is (B).
Why this approach works
Standard electrode potentials are intensive properties: they do not depend on how many electrons are transferred. When we combine half‑reactions to get a full cell reaction, we never multiply the potentials by coefficients — we simply add them (with the appropriate sign for the direction we use). The trick here is that the reaction 2Cu+→Cu+Cu2+ is a disproportionation: one Cu+ is reduced to Cu and the other is oxidised to Cu2+. So we need to identify which half‑reaction runs as reduction and which as oxidation, then combine their potentials.
Step‑by‑step reasoning
- Identify the two half‑reactions hidden in the overall reaction The overall reaction is:
2Cu+→Cu+Cu2+
This can be split into:
- Reduction half: Cu++e−→Cu Its standard potential is given as ECu+/Cu0=y V.
- Oxidation half: Cu+→Cu2++e− This is the reverse of Cu2++e−→Cu+, whose potential is x V. For the reverse reaction, the potential changes sign: Eox0=−x V.
- Combine the half‑reaction potentials The standard cell potential is the sum of the reduction potential of the cathode and the oxidation potential of the anode:
Ecell0=Ered0+Eox0
Here:
- Cathode (reduction): Cu++e−→Cu, Ered0=y
- Anode (oxidation): Cu+→Cu2++e−, Eox0=−x
Therefore:
Ecell0=y+(−x)=y−x
- Check the sign convention A positive Ecell0 would mean the reaction is spontaneous as written. Since y is typically more positive than x for copper (because Cu+ is unstable in water and tends to disproportionate), y−x is indeed positive — consistent with the known spontaneous disproportionation of Cu+.
Watch outA common mistake is to treat the reaction as two identical Cu+ ions and try to average or double the potentials. Remember: potentials are not multiplied by stoichiometric coefficients. The number of electrons cancels out when you add the half‑reactions, but the potentials themselves are simply added with the correct sign.
TipIf you ever forget the sign rule: write the two half‑reactions as reductions with their given potentials, then reverse the one that must be oxidation and flip its sign. Then add. That always works.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B).
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.The standard reduction potentials of 2H+/H2, Cu2+/Cu, Zn2+/Zn and NO3−,H+/NO are 0.0, +0.34, -0.76 and 0.97 V respectively. Observe the following reactions I. Zn+HCl→ II. Cu+HCl→ III. Cu+HNO3→ Which reactions does not liberate H2(g)? (A) II, III only (B) I, II only (C) I, III only (D) I, II, III
›Reveal solutionSolution
H2 is liberated only when the metal's reduction potential is below 0 V (more easily oxidized than H2); Zn (−0.76 V) liberates H2 with HCl, but Cu (+0.34 V) cannot liberate H2 with either HCl or HNO3.
Concept and Intuition
A metal displaces H2 from a dilute acid only if it is a stronger reducing agent than hydrogen, i.e., its standard reduction potential is more negative than that of 2H⁺/H2 (0.0 V). Cu, with a positive reduction potential, cannot reduce H⁺ to H2 under any of these acids — with HNO3 specifically, the acid itself acts as an oxidizer (reduced to NO) rather than being a source of H2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Zn²⁺/Zn = −0.76 V is more negative than 2H⁺/H2 = 0.0 V, so Zn CAN reduce H⁺ to H2 — reaction I liberates H2.
- Cu²⁺/Cu = +0.34 V is more positive than 0.0 V, so Cu CANNOT reduce H⁺ to H2 with HCl — reaction II does NOT liberate H2.
- With HNO3, the oxidizing species is NO3⁻/H⁺ → NO (E° = 0.97 V), which is even more strongly oxidizing than H⁺; Cu reacts with HNO3 by reducing NO3⁻ to NO (or NO2), not by liberating H2 — reaction III does NOT liberate H2.
- So the reactions that do NOT liberate H2 are II and III, matching option (A).
Common Mistakes
- Assuming any metal + acid automatically gives H2 — this fails whenever the metal's reduction potential is positive (less reactive than H2).
- Forgetting that HNO3 is a special oxidizing acid: it reacts with metals via redox to give nitrogen oxides, not H2, even with reactive metals in most cases.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — reactions II (Cu+HCl) and III (Cu+HNO3) do not liberate H2.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.Consider the following standard electrode potentials (E0 in volts) in aqueous solution:
Element M3+/M M+/M ; Al −1.66 +0.55 ; Tl +1.26 −0.34. Based on this data, which of the following statements is correct? (A) Tl3+ is more stable than Al3+ (B) Tl+ is more stable than Al3+ (C) Al+ is more stable than Al3+ (D) Tl+ is more stable than Al+ ›Reveal solutionSolution
Combining the two given electrode potentials for each metal (via ΔG=−nFE0) shows Al's +1 state is unstable (disproportionates to Al3+) while Tl's +1 state is the stable one — the classic inert-pair-effect result, so Tl+ is more stable than Al+.
Concept and Intuition
Whether an intermediate oxidation state (M+) is stable or disproportionates depends on the relative reducing/oxidizing strength of the two half-reactions that flank it. We can combine E0(M3+/M) and E0(M+/M) using free energies (which are additive, unlike potentials) to get E0(M3+/M+), and that tells us directly whether M+ wants to disproportionate into M and M3+.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For Al: E0(Al3+/Al)=−1.66 V (n=3), E0(Al+/Al)=+0.55 V (n=1).
- ΔG0(Al3+→Al)=−3F(−1.66)=+4.98F; ΔG0(Al+→Al)=−1F(0.55)=−0.55F.
- ΔG0(Al3+→Al+)=ΔG0(Al3+→Al)−ΔG0(Al+→Al)=4.98F−(−0.55F)=5.53F (for a 2-electron step), so E0(Al3+/Al+)=−5.53F/2F≈−2.77 V — very negative, meaning Al3+ strongly resists being reduced to Al+; equivalently, Al+ is a strong enough reducing agent to be oxidized to Al3+ spontaneously (disproportionates, i.e. Al+ is unstable).
- For Tl: E0(Tl3+/Tl)=+1.26 V, E0(Tl+/Tl)=−0.34 V.
- ΔG0(Tl3+→Tl)=−3F(1.26)=−3.78F; ΔG0(Tl+→Tl)=−1F(−0.34)=+0.34F.
- ΔG0(Tl3+→Tl+)=−3.78F−0.34F=−4.12F (2-electron step), so E0(Tl3+/Tl+)=+4.12F/2F≈+2.06 V — strongly positive, meaning Tl3+ is readily reduced to Tl+: Tl+ is the thermodynamically favoured, stable state and does not disproportionate.
- Conclusion: Al+ is unstable (it disproportionates to Al+Al3+), while Tl+ is stable. Comparing the two +1 ions directly, Tl+ is therefore more stable than Al+ — the textbook inert-pair-effect result (heavier p-block elements like Tl prefer the lower oxidation state).
Common Mistakes
- Trying to compare Tl+ directly against Al3+ (different oxidation states of different elements) without a valid thermodynamic link — the data only lets us rigorously compare same-oxidation-state ions (i.e. M+ vs M+, or the disproportionation tendency within each element).
- Forgetting that potentials are NOT additive — only free energies (nFE0) can be combined via Hess's law.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — Tl+ is more stable than Al+.
ANSWER: D
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.