Q.What is the total number of orbitals associated with the principal quantum number n = 3?
Concept understanding — Energy Level Quantization
Energy Level Quantization: From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you're climbing a smooth ramp. You can stop at any height — 1 metre, 1.5 metres, 2.1 metres — anywhere you like. That's how we intuitively think about energy in everyday life: continuous, like a slide.
Now imagine a staircase. You can stand on step 1, step 2, or step 3 — but you cannot stand halfway between step 2 and step 3. There's no such place. The steps are discrete, not continuous.
Energy level quantization is the idea that in the microscopic world of atoms and molecules, energy behaves like a staircase, not a ramp. Electrons in an atom cannot have just any energy — they can only occupy specific, allowed energy levels. Everything else is forbidden.
Why does this happen? The core intuition
In the classical world, an electron orbiting a nucleus would continuously radiate energy, spiral inward, and crash — atoms would be unstable. But atoms are stable. Nature solved this problem by imposing a rule: the electron's angular momentum (and therefore its energy) can only take certain discrete values.
Think of a guitar string. It can only vibrate at specific frequencies — its fundamental and harmonics. You can't pluck it to produce a frequency halfway between two harmonics. The string's vibration is quantized by its boundaries. Similarly, an electron bound to a nucleus is confined in space, and that confinement forces its energy to be quantized.
Quantization is not a mysterious extra rule — it emerges naturally whenever a wave (like an electron's matter wave) is confined. Confinement creates standing waves, and standing waves only exist at specific frequencies.
The precise statement
For a bound system (like an electron in an atom), the total energy E of the system can only take certain discrete values:
E=E1,E2,E3,…
where each En is a specific, fixed number. The integer n (1, 2, 3, …) is called the principal quantum number. The lowest energy level (n=1) is the ground state; higher levels (n>1) are excited states.
For the hydrogen atom, the allowed energies are given by:
En=−n213.6 eV
So:
- n=1: E1=−13.6 eV (ground state)
- n=2: E2=−3.4 eV
- n=3: E3=−1.51 eV
- and so on, approaching 0 eV as n→∞ (the ionization limit)
The negative sign means the electron is bound to the nucleus. Zero energy corresponds to the electron being free (ionized). The more negative the energy, the more tightly bound the electron.
How do we know this is real?
The most direct evidence comes from atomic spectra. When an electron jumps from a higher energy level to a lower one, it emits a photon of light with energy exactly equal to the difference:
ΔE=Ehigher−Elower=hf
where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency of the emitted light.
Since only specific energy differences exist, only specific frequencies of light are emitted — producing a line spectrum (discrete bright lines), not a continuous rainbow. This is exactly what we observe in experiments.
A common mistake is to think quantization means energy is always "chunky" in the macroscopic world. It's not — quantization effects are only noticeable when the energy gaps are comparable to the energies involved. For a moving cricket ball, the allowed energy levels are so close together they appear continuous. Quantization is a microscopic phenomenon.
The key takeaway
Energy level quantization is not an arbitrary assumption — it's a consequence of wave confinement in bound systems. It explains why atoms are stable, why they emit only specific colours of light, and why the microscopic world is fundamentally discrete rather than continuous. The staircase, not the ramp, is how nature works at the smallest scales.
Energy level quantization in the hydrogen atom, expressed as E_n = -13.6 eV / n^2, is one of the most tested formulas in the NCERT Class 12 Physics Atoms chapter, and "energy level quantization formula and derivation" is a frequent search among CBSE board and JEE Main/NEET aspirants. This concept also directly explains atomic line spectra, a connection that appears often in "atoms and molecules important questions" for competitive exams.
Concept: Energy Level Quantization – each principal quantum number n contains subshells characterized by azimuthal quantum number ℓ, and each subshell holds a specific number of orbitals.
For n=3, the allowed values of ℓ range from 0 to n−1, giving ℓ=0,1,2 (corresponding to 3s, 3p, and 3d subshells).
Each subshell with azimuthal quantum number ℓ contains exactly (2ℓ+1) orbitals:
- 3s (ℓ=0): 2(0)+1=1 orbital
- 3p (ℓ=1): 2(1)+1=3 orbitals
- 3d (ℓ=2): 2(2)+1=5 orbitals
Total orbitals = 1+3+5=9, which matches the general formula n2=32=9.
The total number of orbitals for n=3 is 9.
Each principal quantum number n contains n2 orbitals. For n=3, there are 9 orbitals total (one 3s, three 3p, and five 3d).
Why n2 orbitals?
The principal quantum number n determines the shell, but within each shell electrons occupy different types of orbitals (subshells) with different shapes and orientations. The total number of orbitals isn't arbitrary—it emerges directly from the allowed values of the angular momentum quantum number l and the magnetic quantum number ml.
For a given n, the angular momentum quantum number can take values l=0,1,2,…,(n−1). Each value of l defines a subshell (s, p, d, f, etc.), and within each subshell, the magnetic quantum number ml ranges from −l to +l, giving (2l+1) orbitals.
The total count is the sum over all allowed subshells:
Total orbitals=∑l=0n−1(2l+1)
This sum always equals n2—a beautiful result that connects quantum mechanics to simple arithmetic.
Counting orbitals for n=3
Let's work through the third shell systematically.
1. Identify allowed subshells
For n=3, the angular momentum quantum number l can be 0,1, or 2:
- l=0 → 3s subshell
- l=1 → 3p subshell
- l=2 → 3d subshell
2. Count orbitals in each subshell
Each subshell contains (2l+1) orbitals because ml takes that many values:
| Subshell | l | ml values | Number of orbitals |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3s | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 3p | 1 | −1,0,+1 | 3 |
| 3d | 2 | −2,−1,0,+1,+2 | 5 |
3. Sum across all subshells
Total=1+3+5=9
Alternatively, using the formula directly:
n2=32=9
The pattern 1+3+5+… (sum of the first n odd numbers) always equals n2. This is why the orbital count is so clean.
Don't confuse the number of orbitals with the number of electrons. Each orbital can hold 2 electrons (spin up and spin down), so n=3 can accommodate up to 2n2=18 electrons total.
The total number of orbitals for n=3 is 9.
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.In an atomic spectrum of hydrogen, a series of lines with wavelengths at 656.46, 486.27, x and 410.29 nm was obtained. What is the value of x (in nm)? (RH=1.097×107m−1) (A) 453.15 (B) 449.32 (C) 434.17 (D) 428.37
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the Rydberg formula for the Balmer series of hydrogen to find the missing wavelength (ni=5→nf=2 transition) in a listed sequence of visible spectral lines. Answer: 434.17 nm.
Concept and Intuition
The Balmer series consists of hydrogen emission lines that end on the n=2 level, and these fall in the visible range — they are the most famous hydrogen lines (H-alpha, H-beta, H-gamma, H-delta at 656.3, 486.1, 434.1, 410.2 nm respectively, as commonly tabulated). The listed wavelengths 656.46, 486.27, x, 410.29 nm are exactly this sequence for ni=3,4,5,6, so x corresponds to the ni=5→nf=2 transition (H-gamma).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Rydberg formula: λ1=RH(nf21−ni21).
- Recognize the series: with nf=2, ni=3 gives 656.46 nm, ni=4 gives 486.27 nm, ni=6 gives 410.29 nm — matching the given data confirms nf=2 (Balmer) and that x is the ni=5 line.
- For ni=5: λ1=RH(41−251)=RH(10025−4)=RH×10021=0.21RH.
- λ1=1.097×107×0.21=2.3037×106 m−1.
- λ=2.3037×1061=4.341×10−7 m=434.1 nm≈434.17 nm.
Common Mistakes
- Using the wrong nf (e.g. taking Lyman's nf=1 instead of recognizing this as the visible Balmer series).
- Arithmetic slip computing 41−251 (must use a common denominator of 100).
- Forgetting to invert 1/λ to get λ.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 434.17.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.Wavelength of a photon emitted during electron transition from n=4 state to n=2 state in the hydrogen atom is x nm. Wavelength of a photon emitted during electron transition from n=4 state to n=1 state in the same atom is y nm. xy is equal to (A) 0.4 (B) 0.2 (C) 0.5 (D) 0.3
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the Rydberg/Bohr formula for hydrogen-spectrum wavelengths; the ratio of the two transition wavelengths works out to 0.2.
Concept and Intuition
For the hydrogen atom, the energy released (and hence the wavenumber 1/λ of the emitted photon) during a transition from a higher level n2 to a lower level n1 is given by the Rydberg formula. A bigger energy jump means a shorter wavelength, so a transition all the way down to n=1 releases more energy (and gives a shorter wavelength) than one landing at n=2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Rydberg formula: λ1=R(n121−n221), with n1<n2.
- For n=4→n=2 (wavelength x): x1=R(221−421)=R(41−161)=R⋅163.
- For n=4→n=1 (wavelength y): y1=R(121−421)=R(1−161)=R⋅1615.
- Divide the two wavenumber expressions: 1/x1/y=yx=315=5, so xy=51=0.2.
Common Mistakes
- Inverting the ratio (computing x/y instead of y/x).
- Using n12−n22 instead of n121−n221.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 0.2.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.The energy of spectral line of lowest frequency in Lyman series of Li2+ spectrum is x J. The energy of second spectral line in Balmer series of He+ spectrum is y J. The ratio of x and y is (A) 3:1 (B) 1:3 (C) 1:9 (D) 9:1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both are hydrogen-like ions, so the Rydberg-type energy formula with Z2 scaling applies; identifying the correct transitions (lowest-frequency Lyman line, second Balmer line) and computing gives x:y=9:1.
Concept and Intuition
For any hydrogen-like species (single electron, nuclear charge Ze), the energy released in a transition from level n2 to n1 (n2>n1) is
E=13.6Z2(n121−n221) eV.
Within a series (fixed lower level n1), the lowest-frequency (least energetic) line corresponds to the smallest jump, i.e. the transition from the level immediately above n1. The Lyman series has n1=1, so its lowest-frequency line is 2→1. The Balmer series has n1=2; its lines in increasing energy (and frequency) order are 3→2 (first/weakest), 4→2 (second), 5→2 (third), etc. — so the second Balmer line is 4→2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Lyman, lowest-frequency line of Li2+ (Z=3): transition 2→1.
x=13.6×32(121−221)=13.6×9×43=13.6×6.75=91.8 eV (in energy units, up to a common constant)
- Balmer, second line of He+ (Z=2): second line means 4→2 (first is 3→2).
y=13.6×22(221−421)=13.6×4×163=13.6×0.75=10.2
- Ratio:
yx=10.291.8=9
So x:y=9:1.
Common Mistakes
- Taking the Lyman "lowest frequency" line as ∞→1 (that's actually the highest-energy/series-limit line; the lowest-frequency line is the smallest jump, 2→1).
- Miscounting "second spectral line" of Balmer as 3→2 (that is the first line; second is 4→2).
- Forgetting the Z2 scaling difference between Li2+ (Z=3) and He+ (Z=2).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 9:1.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.Quantum number sets of four electrons I, II, III, IV are given below. The correct order of the energy of these electrons is I. n=3, l=1, ml=−1, ms=+21 II. n=4, l=1, ml=0, ms=+21 III. n=4, l=2, ml=−2, ms=+21 IV. n=3, l=2, ml=−1, ms=−21 The correct answer is (A) I > IV > II > III (B) III > II > I > IV (C) III > IV > II > I (D) III > II > IV > I
›Reveal solutionSolution
Applying the (n+l) (Aufbau) rule with the n+l tie-breaker gives the energy order III > II > IV > I — testing whether the tie-break (lower n wins for equal n+l) is applied correctly.
Concept and Intuition
In multi-electron atoms, orbital energy is not determined by n alone (as in hydrogen) but follows the empirical (n+l) rule: orbitals with a lower value of n+l have lower energy. When two orbitals share the same n+l value, the one with the smaller n (and hence larger l) has lower energy — because a larger l means the electron is, on average, farther from the nucleus in angular terms but the radial penetration effects work out so that lower-n/higher-l combinations of equal n+l sit lower in energy (e.g. 3d fills before 4p... more precisely 4s before 3d, but the classic comparison here is between 4p (n+l=5) and 3d (n+l=5), where 3d is lower).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Compute n+l for each electron (the ml,ms values don't affect orbital energy, only n,l do):
- I: n=3,l=1 (3p) ⇒n+l=4
- II: n=4,l=1 (4p) ⇒n+l=5
- III: n=4,l=2 (4d) ⇒n+l=6
- IV: n=3,l=2 (3d) ⇒n+l=5
- Order by n+l ascending (lower = lower energy): I(4) < {II, IV}(5) < III(6).
- Break the tie between II (4p) and IV (3d), both n+l=5: lower n has lower energy, so IV (n=3) < II (n=4).
- Full ascending energy order: I < IV < II < III.
- The question asks for the order of energy from the given options, listed highest-to-lowest: III > II > IV > I.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the tie-break rule and assuming equal n+l orbitals have identical energy or the wrong precedence.
- Confusing (n+l) with n alone (would wrongly rank II and III, both n=4, ahead of IV incorrectly, or order I above IV since n=3 for both — but their l differs, changing n+l).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — III > II > IV > I.
ANSWER: D
- Compute n+l for each electron (the ml,ms values don't affect orbital energy, only n,l do):
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.The wavelength of spectral line (X) of hydrogen spectrum is same as that of spectral line of He+ spectrum corresponding to n=4→n=2 electron transition. The correct electron transition corresponding to X is (A) n=2→n=1 (B) n=3→n=2 (C) n=4→n=2 (D) n=3→n=1
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the Rydberg formula scaled by Z2 and matching two different hydrogenic spectra to the same photon energy/wavelength. The transition is n=2→n=1.
Concept and Intuition
Every hydrogen-like ion (H, He+, Li2+, …) has energy levels En=−n213.6Z2 eV. Two hydrogenic transitions emit the same wavelength exactly when their Z2(n121−n221) values are equal — the Z2 scaling is what lets a lower-Z atom's low-lying transition mimic a higher-Z ion's higher-lying one.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For He+ (Z=2), transition n=4→n=2:
λHe+1=R(2)2(221−421)=4R(41−161)=4R⋅163=0.75R
- For hydrogen (Z=1), we need a transition n1→n2 with
λH1=R(1)2(n121−n221)=0.75R
- Test n=2→n=1: R(1−41)=0.75R. This matches exactly.
- Checking the other options confirms none give 0.75R: n=3→2 gives R(1/4−1/9)=0.139R; n=3→1 gives R(1−1/9)=0.889R; n=4→2 (same as He+'s own, but for H with Z=1) gives R(1/4−1/16)=0.1875R.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the Z2 factor for He+ and directly equating n values between the two species.
- Not checking all four options systematically — the match is exact only for one transition.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — n=2→n=1.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.If the energy required to remove an electron from the ground state of He+ is x J, the energy (in J) required to remove an electron from the ground state of Li2+ is (A) 23x (B) 32x (C) 49x (D) 94x
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both He+ and Li2+ are hydrogen-like (one electron); their ground-state ionization energies scale purely as Z2, giving a factor of 9/4. Answer: (C).
Concept and Intuition
He+ (Z=2) and Li2+ (Z=3) are both single-electron (hydrogen-like) species, so the Bohr-model ionization energy formula En=13.6n2Z2 eV applies directly to each. For the ground state (n=1), the energy is simply proportional to Z2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Ionization energy of He+ (Z=2, n=1): EHe+=13.6×22=13.6×4=x (given).
- Ionization energy of Li2+ (Z=3, n=1): ELi2+=13.6×32=13.6×9.
- Ratio: EHe+ELi2+=13.6×413.6×9=49.
- So ELi2+=49x.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting these are hydrogen-like (single-electron) ions, so the simple Z2-scaling formula applies exactly — no shielding/multi-electron corrections needed.
- Inverting the ratio (using He+'s Z in the numerator) and getting 4/9 instead of 9/4.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 49x.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.Which of the following set of quantum numbers represent the electron with highest energy? (A) n=3, l=0, m=0, s=+21 (B) n=3, l=1, m=1, s=−21 (C) n=3, l=2, m=1, s=+21 (D) n=4, l=0, m=0, s=−21
›Reveal solutionSolution
Comparing orbital energies from quantum numbers uses the (n+l) rule (Aufbau/Madelung ordering): the set with the largest (n+l) sum (and, on a tie, the larger n) is highest in energy.
Concept and Intuition
For multi-electron atoms, orbital energy isn't decided by n alone — the (n+l) rule says orbitals with a lower (n+l) sum fill first (are lower in energy); when two orbitals share the same (n+l), the one with smaller n is lower. This is why 4s (n+l=4) fills before 3d (n+l=5), even though 3d has a smaller n.
Step-by-Step Solution
- (A) n=3,l=0 (3s): n+l=3.
- (B) n=3,l=1 (3p): n+l=4.
- (C) n=3,l=2 (3d): n+l=5.
- (D) n=4,l=0 (4s): n+l=4.
- Largest (n+l) is 5, belonging to option (C) — so the 3d electron has the highest energy among these four.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming higher n alone means higher energy (would incorrectly pick 4s over 3d).
- Ignoring that the spin quantum number is irrelevant to energy ranking — it doesn't affect orbital energy.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — n=3,l=2 (3d electron).
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.Wavelength of a particular line in Balmer series of atomic spectrum of hydrogen is 656.4 nm. What is the wavelength (in nm) of corresponding line in the spectrum of He+? (A) 328.2 (B) 164.1 (C) 492.3 (D) 246.1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The same Balmer transition in the hydrogen-like He+ ion has wavelength scaled down by Z2=4 from hydrogen's, giving 164.1 nm.
Concept and Intuition
The Rydberg formula for any hydrogen-like (single-electron) species is λ1=RZ2(n121−n221). For the same pair of energy levels n1,n2 (the "corresponding line"), everything is identical between hydrogen and He+ except the nuclear charge Z. Since λ1∝Z2, the wavelength itself is inversely proportional to Z2: a higher-charge nucleus pulls electrons in more tightly, so transition energies are larger and wavelengths shorter.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For H (Z=1): λH1=R(n121−n221).
- For He+ (Z=2): λHe+1=R(2)2(n121−n221)=4×λH1.
- So λHe+=4λH=4656.4=164.1 nm.
Common Mistakes
- Multiplying by Z2 instead of dividing (i.e., thinking wavelength increases with Z), which would give 2625.6 nm — not even among the options, a red flag that the scaling direction was inverted.
- Using Z=4 (confusing charge with the scaling factor Z2) directly on the wavelength.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 164.1.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-20-FN1 markMCQQ.The difference between the radii of M and N shells of He+ is ΔR1(nm). The difference between the radii of L and N shells of Li2+ is ΔR2(nm). The ratio of ΔR1 to ΔR2 is (A) 8 : 7 (B) 7 : 8 (C) 3 : 4 (D) 4 : 5
›Reveal solutionSolution
This uses the Bohr-model radius formula for hydrogen-like ions to compute two shell-radius differences and compare them.
Concept and Intuition
For any hydrogen-like species, the radius of the n-th Bohr orbit is rn=Za0n2, where a0 is the Bohr radius and Z is the atomic number. Shell letters map to principal quantum numbers: K=1, L=2, M=3, N=4.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For He+ (Z=2): rM=2a0⋅32=4.5a0; rN=2a0⋅42=8a0. ΔR1=rN−rM=8a0−4.5a0=3.5a0.
- For Li2+ (Z=3): rL=3a0⋅22=34a0; rN=3a0⋅42=316a0. ΔR2=rN−rL=316a0−34a0=4a0.
- Ratio: ΔR2ΔR1=4a03.5a0=43.5=87.
Common Mistakes
- Mislabelling shells (e.g. treating L as n=1) — remember K=1, L=2, M=3, N=4.
- Forgetting the 1/Z dependence and using the same effective charge for both ions.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 7 : 8.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-20-FN1 markMCQQ.If the velocity of electron in first Bohr's orbit of H-atom is x ms−1, then the velocity (in ms−1) of electron in fourth Bohr's orbit of same atom is (me=9×10−31 kg) (A) x/2 (B) x/4 (C) x/6 (D) x/5
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct application of the Bohr-model scaling law that orbital electron speed is inversely proportional to the orbit number.
Concept and Intuition
In the Bohr model, the electron's orbital speed in the n-th orbit of a hydrogen-like atom is vn=2ϵ0nhZe2∝n1 for fixed Z. So as the orbit number increases, the electron moves proportionally slower.
Step-by-Step Solution
- vn∝n1, so v1v4=n4n1=41.
- Given v1=x: v4=4x.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing the 1/n scaling of velocity with the n2 scaling of radius or the 1/n2 scaling of energy.
- Bringing in the given electron mass value, which is irrelevant here since it cancels out in the ratio.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — x/4.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.In hydrogen spectrum, the frequency of the spectral line corresponding to electron transition n2=3 to n1=2 is x Hz. What is the frequency (in Hz) of the spectral line corresponding to electron transition n2=4 to n1=3 of He+ spectrum? (A) 75x (B) 57x (C) 720x (D) 207x
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both frequencies come from the same Rydberg formula (with Z2 scaling for He+); dividing the two expressions gives νHe+=57x.
Concept and Intuition
The Rydberg formula for the frequency of a spectral line in a hydrogen-like ion of nuclear charge Z is ν=RcZ2(n121−n221). For He+ (Z=2), every transition frequency is scaled up by a factor of Z2=4 compared to the equivalent transition in hydrogen (same n1,n2), on top of whatever the specific n-dependence contributes.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Hydrogen, n2=3→n1=2: νH=Rc(1)2(221−321)=Rc(41−91)=Rc⋅369−4=Rc⋅365=x.
- He+, n2=4→n1=3: νHe+=Rc(2)2(321−421)=4Rc(91−161)=4Rc⋅14416−9=4Rc⋅1447=Rc⋅367.
- Divide: xνHe+=Rc⋅5/36Rc⋅7/36=57.
- So νHe+=57x.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the Z2=4 factor for He+.
- Mixing up which n is n1 (lower) and which is n2 (upper) inside the parentheses.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 57x.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.Which of the following statements are correct? I) The energy of hydrogen atom in its ground state is −13.6 eV II) On the basis of Bohr's model, the radius of the 3rd orbit of hydrogen atom is 158.7 pm III) The order of radius of the first orbit of H, He+, Li2+ and Be3+ is H>He+>Li2+>Be3+ (A) II & III only (B) I & III only (C) I & II only (D) I, II, III
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the Bohr model formulas for orbit energy and radius, and their Z-dependence across isoelectronic hydrogen-like species. Statements I and III are correct; II misapplies the radius formula.
Concept and Intuition
In the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom (and hydrogen-like ions), the electron's energy in the nth orbit is En=−n213.6Z2 eV, and its radius is rn=0.529Zn2 Å. For hydrogen (Z=1), the ground state (n=1) has E1=−13.6 eV — this is a foundational number worth memorizing. The radius grows as n2 (not linearly with n), which is a common trap. For isoelectronic one-electron species (H, He+, Li2+, Be3+), all have one electron but increasing nuclear charge Z=1,2,3,4; since radius ∝1/Z, a larger nuclear pull contracts the orbit.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Statement I: For hydrogen, ground state (n=1), E1=−13.6×12/12=−13.6 eV. True.
- Statement II: For hydrogen, n=3: r3=0.529×32/1 A˚=0.529×9=4.761 A˚=476.1 pm. The claimed value of 158.7 pm is actually 0.529×3×100 pm — that is, someone used n instead of n2. So Statement II is False.
- Statement III: Using r1=0.529/Z Å for each species: r1(H)=0.529 Å (Z=1), r1(He+)=0.2645 Å (Z=2), r1(Li2+)=0.1763 Å (Z=3), r1(Be3+)=0.1323 Å (Z=4). These are in decreasing order: H>He+>Li2+>Be3+. True.
- So I and III are correct, II is not.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the n2 dependence in the Bohr radius formula and using n instead, which produces exactly the wrong 158.7 pm trap value.
- Confusing Z-dependence direction: some students think a higher Z ion has a LARGER orbit; in fact greater nuclear charge pulls the electron in, shrinking the radius.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — I & III only.
ANSWER: B
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.