Q.Satellites orbiting the earth have finite life and sometimes debris of satellites fall to the earth. This is because,
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Gravitational Potential Energy
Gravitational Potential Energy
The Intuition: Energy Stored by Height
Imagine holding a heavy book above the floor. Your arm feels tired — that's because you're working against gravity. If you let go, the book falls and gains speed. Where did that motion come from? It came from the position of the book. By lifting it, you stored energy in the Earth–book system. That stored energy is gravitational potential energy.
The higher you lift, the more energy you store. The heavier the object, the more energy you store. This is the core idea: Gravitational potential energy is the energy an object has because of its position in a gravitational field.
The Precise Definition
Gravitational potential energy (U) is the work done against gravity to bring an object from a reference point (usually the ground) to its current position.
For objects near the Earth's surface (where gravity is roughly constant), the formula is beautifully simple:
U=mgh
Where:
- U = gravitational potential energy (joules, J)
- m = mass of the object (kg)
- g = acceleration due to gravity (≈ 9.8 m/s² on Earth)
- h = height above the reference point (m)
Why "Potential"?
The word "potential" means "stored and ready to be used." The book at height h has the potential to do work — it can smash a table, compress a spring, or generate sound when it hits the ground. That energy was put in when you lifted it.
The Reference Point is Arbitrary
Here's a crucial point: Only changes in gravitational potential energy matter. You can choose any height as h=0. In most problems, we take the ground as zero, but you could take the floor, the tabletop, or even the ceiling.
If you lift a 2 kg book from the floor (h=0) to a shelf (h=2 m), the change in potential energy is:
ΔU=mgΔh=2×9.8×2=39.2 J
If you instead took the shelf as h=0, the book on the floor would have negative potential energy (−39.2 J). The difference between the two positions is still 39.2 J — that's what matters.
Never say "the object has mgh energy" without specifying the reference level. The value is meaningless without a zero point.
The Bigger Picture: Variable Gravity
The formula U=mgh works only when g is constant — that is, near Earth's surface. For large distances (like a rocket leaving Earth), gravity weakens with distance. The general formula for gravitational potential energy between two masses M and m separated by distance r is:
U=−rGMm
The negative sign means that potential energy is zero at infinite separation and becomes more negative as objects come closer. This is the true definition, and U=mgh is a special case of it (derived by approximating near the surface).
Key Takeaways for Exams
- Gravitational potential energy is always relative — you must state or imply a reference level. …
The key idea is that atmospheric drag, though extremely thin at orbital altitudes, exerts a small but persistent viscous force on low-Earth-orbit satellites.
- A satellite in a circular orbit has total energy E=−2rGMm, where r is the orbital radius.
- Viscous drag from the residual atmosphere does negative work, reducing the satellite's mechanical energy. As E becomes more negative, r decreases — the satellite moves to a lower orbit.
- At lower altitudes, atmospheric density increases, drag grows stronger, and the process accelerates, eventually causing the satellite to re-enter and burn up or fall to Earth. …
The key idea is that even in the near-vacuum of space, a satellite experiences a tiny but persistent drag force from the residual atmosphere. This viscous force reduces its speed, causing it to lose altitude and eventually re-enter the Earth's atmosphere.
The question asks why satellites have finite lives and why their debris eventually falls to Earth. Many students instinctively think of power failure or collisions, but the real culprit is much subtler — and it's a beautiful example of how even negligible forces, given enough time, can produce dramatic effects.
Let's examine each option carefully.
-
Option (A): Solar cells and batteries running out.
This would indeed stop the satellite from functioning — it would become a dead piece of metal. But a dead satellite doesn't automatically fall to Earth. It would continue orbiting just as a rock or any inert object does. Power failure explains why a satellite stops working, not why it descends. So this is incorrect.
-
Option (B): Laws of gravitation predicting a spiralling trajectory.
This is a common misconception. In a pure two-body problem (Earth + satellite), with no other forces, the orbit is a perfect ellipse (or circle) that repeats forever. Gravitation alone never causes an orbit to spiral inward — that would violate conservation of energy and angular momentum. So this is false.
-
Option (C): Viscous forces causing speed and height to gradually decrease.
This is the correct physical explanation. Even at orbital altitudes (say 200–1000 km), there is a very thin atmosphere — not a perfect vacuum. The satellite experiences a tiny drag force (a viscous force) from collisions with air molecules. …
Step 1: Rule out power failure (option a): a dead satellite with no electronics still obeys the same orbital mechanics — losing power doesn't change its trajectory.
Step 2: Rule out gravitation alone predicting an inward spiral (option b): in a pure two-body gravitational system with no other forces, orbits are closed ellipses that repeat forever — gravity alone never causes decay.
Step 3: Rule out collisions as the general cause (option d): they happen, but rarely — not why the vast majority of satellites eventually re-enter. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.A 1200 kg artificial satellite is in an orbit of radius 2RE about the earth. The energy required to transfer it to an orbit of radius 3RE is (g=10 ms−2, RE=6400 km) (A) 1.2×109 J (B) 6.4×109 J (C) 6400×103 J (D) 3.2×109 J
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests total orbital energy and the energy needed to move a satellite to a higher orbit. Answer: 6.4×109 J.
Concept and Intuition
A satellite in a circular orbit has total mechanical energy E=−2rGMm (negative, bound orbit), which becomes less negative (i.e. increases) as r increases — moving to a higher orbit requires adding energy, even though the satellite ends up moving slower there, because potential energy increases faster than kinetic energy decreases.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Energy in orbit of radius r: E(r)=−2rGMm.
- Required energy: ΔE=E(3RE)−E(2RE)=−6REGMm+4REGMm=GMm(41−61)RE1=12REGMm.
- Use GM=gRE2 (from g=GM/RE2 at the surface): GM=10×(6.4×106)2=10×4.096×1013=4.096×1014 m3s−2. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-FN1 markMCQQ.Work required to shift an artificial satellite from an orbit of radius 'r' to an orbit of radius '2r' is (A) 2rGMm (B) 4rGMm (C) 8rGMm (D) zero
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the total energy formula for a satellite in circular orbit, and that the work needed to change orbits equals the difference in total orbital energies. The answer is 4rGMm.
Concept and Intuition
For a satellite of mass m orbiting a planet of mass M in a circular orbit of radius r, the total mechanical energy (kinetic + potential) is E=−2rGMm — negative because the satellite is gravitationally bound. Moving to a larger orbit radius means a less negative (higher) total energy, so external work must be done on the satellite. This work equals the difference between the final and initial total energies (by the work-energy theorem applied to the whole orbit-raising process).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Total energy in orbit of radius r: Ei=−2rGMm.
- Total energy in orbit of radius 2r: Ef=−2(2r)GMm=−4rGMm. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.If a body is thrown vertically upwards from the surface of the earth with a speed equal to 75% of the escape speed from the surface of the earth, then the ratio of the maximum height reached by the body and the radius of the earth is (A) 5 : 7 (B) 9 : 7 (C) 3 : 7 (D) 11 : 7
›Reveal solutionSolution
Because the launch speed (75% of escape speed) is a large fraction of ve, the height reached is comparable to Earth's radius, so we must use the exact (varying-g) gravitational PE, not mgh. Energy conservation gives h/R=9/7.
Concept and Intuition
The familiar H=u2/2g formula assumes gravity is constant over the rise — valid only for heights much smaller than the Earth's radius. Here the speed is a substantial fraction of the escape speed, so the body could rise to a height comparable to R itself, where g noticeably weakens. We must instead use the full gravitational potential energy U(r)=−GM/r and conserve total mechanical energy between the surface and the highest point (where the radial velocity is momentarily zero).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Escape speed: ve2=R2GM.
- Launch speed: v=0.75ve⇒v2=0.5625ve2=0.5625×R2GM=1.125RGM.
- Energy conservation from the surface (radius R, speed v) to the highest point (radius R+h, speed 0): 21v2−RGM=0−R+hGM …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.A rocket is fired vertically from the surface of the earth with quarter the escape speed. If R is radius of the earth, the maximum altitude reached by the rocket is (A) 5R (B) 3R (C) 15R (D) 14R
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests energy conservation for a projectile launched at a fraction of escape speed to find the maximum height reached (using the exact 1/r potential, not mgh).
Concept and Intuition
Escape speed is the speed needed to just reach infinity with zero leftover kinetic energy. A rocket launched slower than escape speed will rise, decelerate under gravity, and momentarily stop at some finite maximum altitude — found by conserving total mechanical energy between the surface and that highest point (where KE=0). Because the altitude is not small compared to R, we must use the exact gravitational PE −GMm/r, not the uniform-field approximation mgh.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Escape speed: ve=R2GM. Launch speed v=4ve, so v2=16ve2=16R2GM=8RGM.
- Energy conservation from surface (radius R) to maximum altitude (radius R+h, velocity =0):
21mv2−RGMm=0−R+hGMm
- Divide by m and substitute v2:
16RGM−RGM=−R+hGM
- Simplify the left side: 16RGM−16R16GM=−16R15GM. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.A satellite of mass 1000 kg is revolving around the earth at height equal to 4R. Then the energy to be given to the satellite to revolve around the earth at height 2R is (Acceleration due to gravity 10 m s−2, Radius of the earth R=6400 km) (A) 64×109 J (B) 32×109 J (C) 96×109 J (D) 16×109 J
›Reveal solutionSolution
The energy needed to move a satellite between two orbits is the difference of total orbital energies E=−GMm/2r; plugging in the given radii and GM=gR2 gives 64×109 J. Answer: (A).
Concept and Intuition
A satellite in a bound circular orbit has total mechanical energy E=−2rGMm (negative, since it's bound). Moving it to a larger orbital radius requires supplying energy — even though its kinetic energy actually decreases at the larger radius (it orbits slower), the potential energy increases by more than enough to cover both the KE decrease and the net energy that must be added. The clean way to find "energy to be given" is simply the difference of the total energies at the two radii.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Total orbital energy at radius r: E(r)=−2rGMm.
- Energy required ΔE=E(r2)−E(r1)=2GMm(r11−r21).
- With r1=R/4 and r2=R/2: r11=R4, r21=R2, difference =R2.
- ΔE=2GMm×R2=RGMm. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.An infinite number of objects each 1 kg mass are placed on the x-axis on both sides of x = 0 at ±1 m,±2 m,±4 m,±8 m… and so on. The magnitude of the resultant gravitational potential (in SI units) at x = 0 is (G - Universal gravitational constant) (A) −G (B) −2G (C) −3G (D) −4G
›Reveal solutionSolution
Superposition of gravitational potential from an infinite geometric arrangement of point masses; the geometric series sums to give V=−4G.
Concept and Intuition
Gravitational potential is a scalar, so contributions from every mass simply add (with sign). Potential due to a point mass m at distance r is V=−rGm. Here masses of 1 kg are placed at distances 1,2,4,8,… m on both sides of the origin — a geometric progression with common ratio 21 (in terms of 1/r), which sums to a finite value even though there are infinitely many masses.
Step-by-Step Solution
- On the positive x-axis, masses of 1 kg sit at r=1,2,4,8,…=2n m for n=0,1,2,….
- Contribution from positive side: −G∑n=0∞2n1=−G(1−211)=−2G. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.A mass of 6×1024 kg is to be compressed in the form of a solid sphere such that the escape velocity from its surface is 3×104 ms−1. The radius of the sphere is (Universal gravitational constant =6.66×10−11 Nm2kg−2) (A) 483 km (B) 575 km (C) 789 km (D) 888 km
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests the escape-velocity formula ve=2GM/R rearranged to find the radius a given mass must be compressed to. Answer: 888 km.
Concept and Intuition
Escape velocity is the minimum speed needed for an object to leave a gravitating body's surface without further propulsion, found by equating kinetic energy to the magnitude of gravitational potential energy: 21mve2=RGMm, giving ve=R2GM. If a fixed mass is compressed into a smaller sphere, R decreases and ve increases — this is the physical idea behind black holes (compress enough mass into a small enough radius and even light cannot escape).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Start from ve=R2GM.
- Square both sides: ve2=R2GM.
- Solve for R: R=ve22GM.
- Substitute values: 2GM=2×6.66×10−11×6×1024=7.992×1014. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.If an object of mass 1 kg is taken to a height which is equal to three times the radius of the earth, then the change in its potential energy is (Radius of the earth = 6400 km, acceleration due to gravity on the surface of the earth = 10 m s−2) (A) 48×106 J (B) 24×106 J (C) 36×106 J (D) 12×106 J
›Reveal solutionSolution
Since the height (3R) is comparable to Earth's radius, the exact gravitational PE formula −GMm/r must be used instead of mgh; the change works out to 48×106 J.
Concept and Intuition
mgh only applies near the surface where g is essentially constant. Here the object is lifted by 3R — far too large a distance for that approximation — so we must use the exact potential energy U(r)=−rGMm, measured from the center of the Earth.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Initial distance from Earth's center: R. Final distance: R+3R=4R.
- ΔPE=U(4R)−U(R)=−4RGMm−(−RGMm)=GMm(R1−4R1)=4R3GMm.
- Using g=R2GM, we get RGM=gR, so ΔPE=43mgR. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.If a body is projected from the surface of the earth with a velocity of 5VE, then the velocity of the body when it escapes from the gravitational influence of the earth is (Escape velocity of a body from the surface of the earth, VE=11.2 kms−1) (A) 22.4 kms−1 (B) 11.2 kms−1 (C) 11.25 kms−1 (D) 5.6 kms−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Applying energy conservation with the definition of escape velocity, the residual speed at infinity works out to exactly 2VE=22.4 km/s.
Concept and Intuition
Escape velocity VE is defined as the minimum launch speed for which a body just barely escapes Earth's gravity, arriving at infinity with zero residual speed: 21VE2=RGM (all its kinetic energy is used up climbing out of the potential well). If a body is launched faster than VE, it will still have some leftover kinetic energy (hence leftover speed) once it's escaped to infinity, found by simply subtracting the potential-well "toll" (RGM=21VE2) from its initial kinetic energy per unit mass.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Energy conservation per unit mass (ignoring rotation, launched radially): 21v02−RGM=21v∞2.
- Substitute RGM=21VE2: 21v02−21VE2=21v∞2. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.If the escape velocity of a body from the surface of the earth is 11.2 km s−1, then the orbital velocity of a satellite in an orbit which is at a height equal to the radius of the earth is (A) 11.2 km s−1 (B) 2.8 km s−1 (C) 22.4 km s−1 (D) 5.6 km s−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the relationship between escape velocity and orbital velocity at a given altitude; the answer is (D) 5.6 kms−1.
Concept and Intuition
Escape velocity from the surface is ve=2gR, derived from energy conservation. Orbital velocity at height h (orbit radius R+h) comes from equating gravitational force to the centripetal requirement: vo=R+hgR2. Both expressions share the combination gR, which lets us eliminate g and R separately and express vo purely in terms of ve.
Step-by-Step Solution
- ve=2gR⇒gR=2ve2.
- At height h=R, orbit radius is 2R: vo=2RgR2=2gR. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-AN1 markMCQQ.The potential energy of a satellite of mass 'm' revolving around the earth at a height of Re from the surface of the earth is (Re - radius of earth; g - acceleration due to gravity) (A) −0.5mgRe (B) −mgRe (C) −2mgRe (D) −4mgRe
›Reveal solutionSolution
Substituting GM=gRe2 into the gravitational PE formula at orbital radius 2Re gives −0.5mgRe.
Concept and Intuition
Gravitational potential energy of a satellite at distance r from Earth's centre is U=−rGMm. Since g=Re2GM at the surface, we can re-express GM in terms of g and Re to avoid needing G and M separately.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Height above surface =Re, so distance from Earth's centre r=Re+Re=2Re.
- Gravitational PE: U=−rGMm=−2ReGMm. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-27-FN1 markMCQQ.The escape velocity of a body from a planet of mass M and radius R is 14 kms−1. The escape velocity of the body from another planet having same mass and diameter 8R (in kms−1) is (A) 7 (B) 10.5 (C) 14 (D) 28
›Reveal solutionSolution
With the same mass but 4 times the radius, escape velocity (which scales as 1/R) is halved: 7 km/s.
Concept and Intuition
Escape velocity depends on both the mass and the radius of the body being escaped from: vesc=R2GM. Same mass but a larger radius means the surface is farther from the centre, so gravity there is weaker and less speed is needed to escape.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Given vesc=2GM/R=14km/s for radius R.
- New planet: same mass M, diameter 8R ⇒ radius =4R. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.