Q.Arrange the following compounds in increasing order of their acid strength:
Propan-1-ol, 2,4,6-trinitrophenol, 3-nitrophenol, 3,5-dinitrophenol, phenol, 4-methylphenol.
Concept understanding — Boiling Point Trends
Boiling Point Trends (Organic Compounds)
A substance's boiling point is set by how much energy is needed to overcome the attractive forces HOLDING its molecules together in the liquid — the stronger those intermolecular forces, the higher the boiling point.
The Forces, Weakest to Strongest
- Van der Waals (London dispersion) forces — present in every molecule, and they grow stronger as the molecule gets bigger (more electrons, larger surface area of contact between neighbouring molecules) and more polarisable.
- Dipole–dipole forces — present in polar molecules, add an extra attraction on top of dispersion forces.
- Hydrogen bonding — present when H is bonded directly to N, O, or F; much stronger than ordinary dipole–dipole attraction, and it raises the boiling point sharply compared to a similarly-sized molecule without it.
Trend 1: Down a Series of Halogens (Same Alkyl Group)
For a fixed R group, boiling point rises as the halogen gets heavier: R−I>R−Br>R−Cl>R−F. This looks surprising at first, since electronegativity (and so bond polarity/dipole moment) actually DECREASES down the group — but boiling point here is dominated by the growing size and polarisability of the halogen atom (stronger dispersion forces), which outweighs the shrinking dipole contribution.
The measured values for the methyl, ethyl and propyl halides show this rise clearly:
Trend 2: Chain Length and Branching
- Longer chains (more carbons) have more surface area for van der Waals contact between neighbouring molecules, so boiling point rises with chain length within a homologous series.
- Branching LOWERS boiling point compared to a straight-chain isomer of the same molecular formula — a more compact, spherical shape has less surface-to-surface contact with neighbouring molecules, weakening the dispersion forces. (E.g. neopentane boils well below n-pentane.)
Trend 3: Hydrogen Bonding Beats Molecular Mass
An alcohol boils noticeably higher than a haloalkane or ether of similar molecular mass, because the O–H bond can hydrogen-bond to neighbouring alcohol molecules, while a haloalkane or ether (no H directly on the electronegative atom in a donor position) cannot do the same. Comparing purely by molecular mass without checking for H-bonding capability is a common source of wrong predictions.
Don't rank boiling points by dipole moment alone. A haloalkane's dipole moment trend and its boiling-point trend can point in different directions (see the C–X dipole note above) — boiling point is about the total intermolecular attraction (dispersion + dipole + any H-bonding), not any one factor in isolation.
When comparing boiling points, check in this order: (1) is hydrogen bonding possible for one but not the other? — usually decisive if so; (2) if neither/both can H-bond, compare size/branching (more surface area, more contact, higher boiling point); (3) only then consider polarity as a tie-breaker.
Boiling point trends, especially the role of hydrogen bonding, are discussed across the NCERT/CBSE Class 11 and 12 Organic Chemistry chapters, including Alcohols, Phenols and Ethers, and ‘boiling point comparison of isomers’ is a commonly searched important-question topic for board exams, JEE Main and NEET. Applying the hydrogen-bonding-first, then-size-and-branching approach is a strategy tested repeatedly in competitive chemistry MCQs.
Why this formula?
Boiling Point Trends: Why They Happen
Boiling point is the temperature at which a liquid's vapor pressure equals the external atmospheric pressure. To understand why boiling points follow certain trends, we must first understand what determines vapor pressure.
The Core Idea: Intermolecular Forces
A liquid boils when its molecules have enough kinetic energy to overcome the intermolecular forces (IMFs) holding them together in the liquid phase. Stronger IMFs → harder to escape → lower vapor pressure at a given temperature → higher boiling point.
There is no single "formula" for boiling point, but the relationship is captured by the Clausius–Clapeyron equation, which links vapor pressure (P) to temperature (T) and the enthalpy of vaporization (ΔHvap):
lnP=−RΔHvap⋅T1+C
Where:
- P = vapor pressure
- ΔHvap = enthalpy of vaporization (energy needed to vaporize 1 mole)
- R = gas constant
- T = absolute temperature (Kelvin)
- C = constant (depends on substance)
Why this formula makes sense
- ΔHvap is large when IMFs are strong — more energy is needed to separate molecules.
- At boiling point, P=Patm (usually 1 atm). So a substance with larger ΔHvap needs a higher T to reach that pressure.
Thus, boiling point ∝ strength of intermolecular forces.
The Four Key Trends (with Reasoning)
1. Trend across a period (e.g., Period 2: CH₄ → NH₃ → H₂O → HF)
| Molecule | IMFs present | Boiling point (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| CH₄ | London dispersion only | -161 |
| NH₃ | Dispersion + H-bonding | -33 |
| H₂O | Dispersion + H-bonding (2 per molecule) | 100 |
| HF | Dispersion + H-bonding | 19 |
Why?
- CH₄ is nonpolar — only weak London dispersion forces.
- NH₃, H₂O, HF have hydrogen bonding (strongest IMF).
- H₂O forms two H-bonds per molecule (donor + acceptor), while NH₃ forms one and HF forms one — hence H₂O has the highest boiling point.
Key insight: Hydrogen bonding dominates over molecular mass in small molecules.
2. Trend down a group (e.g., Halogens: F₂ → Cl₂ → Br₂ → I₂)
| Molecule | Molar mass (g/mol) | Boiling point (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| F₂ | 38 | -188 |
| Cl₂ | 71 | -34 |
| Br₂ | 160 | 59 |
| I₂ | 254 | 184 |
Why?
- All are nonpolar — only London dispersion forces.
- Dispersion force strength increases with number of electrons (larger molar mass → more polarizable electron cloud → stronger temporary dipoles).
- So boiling point increases down the group.
Key insight: For nonpolar molecules, molar mass (electron count) is the primary factor.
3. Branching in alkanes (e.g., C₅H₁₂ isomers)
| Isomer | Boiling point (°C) |
|---|---|
| n-pentane (straight chain) | 36 |
| 2-methylbutane (branched) | 28 |
| 2,2-dimethylpropane (highly branched) | 10 |
Why?
- All have same molecular formula — same molar mass.
- Branching reduces surface area → weaker London dispersion forces (less contact between molecules).
- More spherical molecules pack less efficiently → lower boiling point.
Key insight: Shape matters — surface area determines dispersion force strength for same-mass molecules.
4. Polarity vs. nonpolarity (e.g., C₂H₅OH vs. C₂H₆)
| Molecule | IMFs | Boiling point (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| Ethanol (C₂H₅OH) | H-bonding + dispersion | 78 |
| Ethane (C₂H₆) | Dispersion only | -89 |
Why?
- Ethanol has an –OH group → hydrogen bonding.
- Ethane is nonpolar — only weak dispersion.
- Despite similar molar mass (46 vs. 30), ethanol boils 167°C higher.
Key insight: Polarity and hydrogen bonding dominate over mass when present.
Summary: The "Formula" is Conceptual
There is no single equation that gives boiling point directly. Instead, the Clausius–Clapeyron equation is the theoretical backbone:
lnP=−RΔHvap⋅T1+C
And the boiling point is the T at which P=Patm.
To predict trends, ask:
- What IMFs are present? (Dispersion, dipole-dipole, H-bonding)
- How strong are they? (More electrons → stronger dispersion; H-bonding is strongest)
- How does molecular shape affect surface area?
Stronger IMFs → higher ΔHvap → higher boiling point.
Concept: Acid Strength of Phenols vs Alcohols — the effect of substituents on phenol acidity.
Reasoning:
- Propan-1-ol is an aliphatic alcohol; its conjugate base is not resonance-stabilised, so it is the weakest acid.
- Phenol is more acidic than alcohol because the phenoxide ion is stabilised by resonance. Electron-donating groups (like –CH₃ in 4-methylphenol) decrease acidity; electron-withdrawing groups (like –NO₂) increase acidity.
- More nitro groups, and their position (ortho/para > meta), enhance acidity. 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol (picric acid) is the strongest due to three strong –NO₂ groups at ortho and para positions.
Order (weakest to strongest acid):
Propan-1‑ol < 4‑methylphenol < phenol < 3‑nitrophenol < 3,5‑dinitrophenol < 2,4,6‑trinitrophenol
The increasing order of acid strength is: propan-1‑ol < 4‑methylphenol < phenol < 3‑nitrophenol < 3,5‑dinitrophenol < 2,4,6‑trinitrophenol.
Acid strength depends on the stability of the conjugate base after losing H⁺. For phenols, electron-withdrawing groups (like –NO₂) stabilize the phenoxide ion and increase acidity; electron-donating groups (like –CH₃) destabilize it and decrease acidity. Alcohols are far weaker acids than phenols. The increasing order is: Propan-1‑ol < 4‑methylphenol < phenol < 3‑nitrophenol < 3,5‑dinitrophenol < 2,4,6‑trinitrophenol.
Why this approach works
Acid strength is all about the stability of the conjugate base. When a compound loses a proton (H⁺), the remaining anion must be able to spread out (delocalise) the negative charge. The better it does this, the weaker the O–H bond becomes and the stronger the acid.
For phenols, the phenoxide ion can delocalise the negative charge into the aromatic ring via resonance. This makes phenols far more acidic than alcohols (where the alkoxide ion has no such resonance). Now, substituents on the ring either pull electron density away (electron-withdrawing groups, EWGs) or push electron density in (electron-donating groups, EDGs). EWGs stabilise the negative charge further, making the phenol more acidic. EDGs do the opposite — they concentrate the negative charge, making the conjugate base less stable and the phenol less acidic.
The –NO₂ group is a strong EWG (both by inductive and resonance effects). The –CH₃ group is a weak EDG (hyperconjugation/inductive). The more –NO₂ groups, and the closer they are to the –OH, the stronger the acid. 2,4,6‑Trinitrophenol (picric acid) is famously a strong acid — almost as strong as mineral acids — because three –NO₂ groups at the ortho and para positions massively stabilise the phenoxide.
Propan‑1‑ol is a simple alcohol. Its conjugate base (propan‑1‑oxide) has no resonance stabilisation at all, so it is the weakest acid here by a huge margin.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify the weakest acid
Propan‑1‑ol is an aliphatic alcohol. The alkoxide ion’s negative charge is localised on oxygen — no resonance, no delocalisation. Phenols, even unsubstituted ones, are about 106 times more acidic than alcohols. So propan‑1‑ol is the weakest.
-
Order the phenols by substituent effects
We have five phenols:
- 4‑methylphenol (one –CH₃ at para)
- phenol (no substituent)
- 3‑nitrophenol (one –NO₂ at meta)
- 3,5‑dinitrophenol (two –NO₂ at meta positions)
- 2,4,6‑trinitrophenol (three –NO₂ at ortho and para)
The –CH₃ group is electron-donating. It pushes electron density into the ring, which makes the phenoxide ion less stable (more negative charge concentrated on oxygen). So 4‑methylphenol is a weaker acid than phenol itself.
Phenol is the reference. Its pKa is about 10.
The –NO₂ group is strongly electron-withdrawing. It pulls electron density away from the oxygen, stabilising the phenoxide. A single –NO₂ at the meta position (3‑nitrophenol) increases acidity relative to phenol. Two –NO₂ groups (3,5‑dinitrophenol) increase it further. Three –NO₂ groups at the 2, 4, and 6 positions (2,4,6‑trinitrophenol) give the strongest effect — the ortho and para positions allow direct resonance delocalisation of the negative charge into the nitro groups.
TipThe ortho and para positions are directly conjugated with the -OH group via resonance. A -NO2 at ortho or para can accept the negative charge onto its own oxygen atoms. A -NO2 at meta cannot do this -- it only works by inductive effect. That is why 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (three nitro groups, all ortho/para to the -OH) is so much stronger an acid than 3,5-dinitrophenol (only two nitro groups, both meta): ortho/para placement is far more powerful than meta, so both the extra nitro group and its favourable position push the acidity up.
-
Arrange in increasing order
From weakest to strongest acid:
- Propan‑1‑ol (pKa ~16)
- 4‑methylphenol (pKa ~10.2)
- Phenol (pKa ~10.0)
- 3‑nitrophenol (pKa ~8.4)
- 3,5‑dinitrophenol (pKa ~6.7)
- 2,4,6‑trinitrophenol (pKa ~0.4)
Watch outA common mistake is to think that more nitro groups always means proportionally stronger acid. While true in trend, the position matters enormously. 2,4,6‑trinitrophenol is over a million times more acidic than 3,5‑dinitrophenol because of resonance stabilisation from the ortho and para nitro groups. Don’t just count groups — check where they are.
The increasing order of acid strength is: Propan‑1‑ol < 4‑methylphenol < phenol < 3‑nitrophenol < 3,5‑dinitrophenol < 2,4,6‑trinitrophenol.
Method: Inductive & Resonance Effect Analysis for Acidity of Phenols
This method uses electronic effects (resonance and inductive) to compare the stability of the conjugate base (phenoxide ion) — the more stable the conjugate base, the stronger the acid.
Step 1: Identify the functional group
All compounds are phenols (except propan-1-ol, which is an alcohol).
Phenols are more acidic than alcohols because the phenoxide ion is resonance-stabilised.
Step 2: Understand the key principle
- Electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) like −NO2 stabilise the phenoxide ion (by spreading negative charge), increasing acidity.
- Electron-donating groups (EDG) like −CH3 destabilise the phenoxide ion, decreasing acidity.
- More nitro groups → stronger acid.
- Position matters: ortho/para nitro groups have stronger effect than meta due to resonance.
Step 3: Arrange in increasing order of acid strength
- Propan-1-ol — weakest acid (no resonance stabilisation of conjugate base).
- 4-Methylphenol — −CH3 is EDG, reduces acidity compared to phenol.
- Phenol — reference acid.
- 3-Nitrophenol — one −NO2 group (meta position, only inductive effect).
- 3,5-Dinitrophenol — two −NO2 groups (both meta, stronger inductive withdrawal).
- 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol — three −NO2 groups (ortho & para positions, strong resonance + inductive effect) — strongest acid (picric acid).
Final Answer
Increasing order of acid strength:
Propan-1-ol<4-methylphenol<phenol<3-nitrophenol<3,5-dinitrophenol<2,4,6-trinitrophenol
Here are the most common mistakes students make when ranking acid strength of phenols and alcohols — and exactly how to avoid each.
✗ Mistake 1: Forgetting that alcohols are much weaker acids than phenols
Students often place propan-1-ol somewhere in the middle, thinking the alkyl group donates electrons and weakens acidity — but they miss the fundamental difference:
- Phenols become acidic because the phenoxide ion is stabilised by resonance into the ring.
- Alcohols (like propan-1-ol) have no such resonance — the alkoxide ion is localised and unstable.
✓ How to avoid:
Always place any alcohol at the weakest end of the list.
Propan-1-ol is the least acidic here, regardless of substituents on the ring.
Correct order start:
Propan-1-ol < 4-methylphenol < phenol < …
✗ Mistake 2: Ignoring the number and position of nitro groups
Students often rank 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (picric acid) as strongest — correct — but then misorder 3-nitrophenol and 3,5-dinitrophenol.
Common error:
- Placing 3-nitrophenol after 3,5-dinitrophenol (wrong direction).
- Forgetting that more nitro groups → more electron withdrawal → stronger acid.
✓ How to avoid:
Count the nitro groups first:
- 3,5-dinitrophenol (2 groups) is stronger than 3-nitrophenol (1 group).
- 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (3 groups) is strongest of all.
Correct sub-order:
… < 3-nitrophenol < 3,5-dinitrophenol < 2,4,6-trinitrophenol
✗ Mistake 3: Forgetting that position matters — ortho/para vs meta
Students sometimes treat all nitro groups equally, but ortho and para positions allow direct resonance withdrawal, while meta does not.
Example error:
- Thinking 2-nitrophenol and 3-nitrophenol have similar acid strength.
✓ How to avoid:
Remember:
- Ortho/para nitro groups withdraw by both inductive and resonance effects → stronger acid.
- Meta nitro groups withdraw only by inductive effect → weaker than ortho/para.
In this question, 2,4,6-trinitrophenol has all three positions (ortho and para) occupied — maximum effect.
✗ Mistake 4: Misplacing 4-methylphenol (p-cresol)
Students often put 4-methylphenol after phenol, thinking the methyl group donates electrons and increases acidity — but they forget the +I effect of methyl actually decreases acidity.
✓ How to avoid:
Electron-donating groups (like –CH₃) destabilise the phenoxide ion → weaker acid.
So 4-methylphenol is less acidic than phenol.
Correct order:
… < 4-methylphenol < phenol < …
✓ Final Correct Order (Increasing Acid Strength)
Propan-1-ol<4-methylphenol<phenol<3-nitrophenol<3,5-dinitrophenol<2,4,6-trinitrophenol
Quick Revision Checklist
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Placing alcohol anywhere but last | Alcohols are weakest — always start with them |
| Ignoring number of nitro groups | More nitro groups → stronger acid |
| Ignoring position of nitro groups | Ortho/para > meta for acid strength |
| Misplacing methylphenol | Methyl is electron-donating → weaker acid than phenol |
Key takeaway:
Acid strength in phenols depends on resonance stabilisation of the conjugate base.
Electron-withdrawing groups (like –NO₂) increase it; electron-donating groups (like –CH₃) decrease it. Alcohols lack this resonance entirely.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQQ.Match the following List – I (Compound) / List – II (b.p / K) A. n−C4H9OH / I. 310.5 B. (C2H5)2NH / II. 350.8 C. n−C4H9NH2 / III. 390.3 D. C2H5N(CH3)2 / IV. 329.3 The correct answer is (A) A-IV, B-II, C-I, D-III (B) A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II (C) A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I (D) A-II, B-III, C-IV, D-I
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the classic boiling-point trend among an alcohol, a 1° amine, a 2° amine, and a 3° amine of comparable molecular weight, driven by hydrogen-bonding capacity. The match is A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I.
Concept and Intuition
For molecules of similar size, boiling point tracks how strongly molecules can hydrogen-bond to each other:
- Alcohols (O–H) hydrogen-bond most strongly (O is more electronegative than N, and the O–H bond is highly polarized), so they have the highest boiling points among comparably-sized compounds.
- Primary amines have two N–H bonds per molecule available for intermolecular hydrogen bonding — next highest.
- Secondary amines have only one N–H bond — weaker hydrogen bonding, lower boiling point than primary amines.
- Tertiary amines have no N–H bond at all (nitrogen's lone pair can still accept a hydrogen bond from something else, but the molecule itself cannot donate one), so they rely mainly on weaker dipole–dipole and dispersion forces — lowest boiling point of the four.
Step-by-Step Solution
- A. n-C4H9OH (n-butanol): a primary alcohol — strongest H-bonding → highest boiling point among the four, 390.3 K → list item III. A-III.
- C. n-C4H9NH2 (n-butylamine): a primary amine, two N–H bonds → next highest, 350.8 K → list item II. C-II.
- B. (C2H5)2NH (diethylamine): a secondary amine, one N–H bond → lower still, 329.3 K → list item IV. B-IV.
- D. C2H5N(CH3)2 (N,N-dimethylethylamine): a tertiary amine, no N–H bond → lowest boiling point, 310.5 K → list item I. D-I.
- Ranking confirms: 390.3>350.8>329.3>310.5, i.e. alcohol > 1° amine > 2° amine > 3° amine, exactly as the hydrogen-bonding argument predicts.
Common Mistakes
- Ranking amines purely by molecular weight/size rather than by how many N–H bonds are available for hydrogen bonding.
- Assuming a secondary amine boils higher than a primary amine of similar formula weight — it's actually lower, because a 2° amine has only one N–H donor versus two for a 1° amine.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.Among the hydrides of group 15 elements, the hydride with highest boiling point is A and the hydride with lowest boiling point is B. What are A and B respectively? (A) BiH3, NH3 (B) BiH3, PH3 (C) NH3, PH3 (D) NH3, SbH3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling points of group 15 hydrides dip after ammonia (loss of H-bonding) then rise with increasing molar mass; highest is BiH3, lowest is PH3.
Concept and Intuition
NH3 has strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding (N is small and highly electronegative), giving it an unusually high boiling point for its size. Once H-bonding is lost going to PH3, boiling point drops sharply because only weak van der Waals (London dispersion) forces operate. As you continue down the group (AsH3→SbH3→BiH3), molecular size and mass increase steadily, so van der Waals forces strengthen again and boiling point rises — eventually exceeding even NH3.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Approximate boiling points: NH3≈−33°C, PH3≈−87.7°C, AsH3≈−55°C, SbH3≈−17°C, BiH3≈+17°C.
- Lowest of these is PH3 (the H-bonding of NH3 is gone, and molecular mass is still small).
- Highest of these is BiH3 (largest, heaviest molecule with strongest dispersion forces).
- So A (highest) = BiH3, B (lowest) = PH3.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming NH3 must be the highest-bp hydride of the whole series just because of H-bonding — BiH3 actually surpasses it due to its much greater size.
- Picking NH3 as the lowest by mistakenly thinking H-bonding lowers boiling point.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — BiH3,PH3.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.The correct order of boiling points of the compounds given below is A) Methoxy ethane B) Propan-1-ol C) Propanal D) Propanone (A) C > B > A > D (B) B > D > C > A (C) B > C > D > A (D) C > A > B > D
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests ranking boiling points by intermolecular forces: H-bonding alcohol > dipolar ketone > dipolar aldehyde > weakly-polar ether.
Concept and Intuition
For molecules of similar molar mass, boiling point is set by the strength of intermolecular forces. An –OH group enables strong hydrogen bonding (raising b.p. sharply above similarly-sized non-alcohols). A C=O group gives a fairly strong permanent dipole (ketones/aldehydes), but weaker than H-bonding. An ether has a weaker net dipole (bond dipoles partly oppose) and no H-bond donor, so it boils at the lowest temperature of the four functional classes here.
Step-by-Step Solution
- B) Propan-1-ol, CH3CH2CH2OH: extensive intermolecular H-bonding via −OH gives it the highest boiling point of the four.
- D) Propanone (acetone), CH3COCH3: a symmetric ketone with a strong dipole from C=O but no H-bond donor — boils next highest.
- C) Propanal, CH3CH2CHO: also has a polar C=O, but the aldehyde's dipole/packing gives it a slightly lower boiling point than the ketone of the same carbon count.
- A) Methoxyethane, CH3−O−C2H5: an ether — only weak dipole-dipole/van der Waals forces, no H-bonding — has by far the lowest boiling point.
- Order (highest to lowest): B > D > C > A.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming aldehydes always boil higher than ketones of the same size — in this size range the ketone (acetone) actually boils a little higher than the aldehyde (propanal).
- Forgetting that ethers, despite having an oxygen atom, cannot hydrogen-bond with each other and so boil much lower than alcohols of similar mass.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — B > D > C > A.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.Observe the following substances. Ethanol, acetic acid, ethylamine, trimethylamine, salicylic acid, ethanal. In the above list, the number of substances with H-bonding is (A) 4 (B) 3 (C) 5 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests recognizing which functional groups (O–H, N–H) enable hydrogen bonding; 4 of the 6 substances qualify.
Concept and Intuition
Hydrogen bonding needs a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a small, highly electronegative atom — O, N, or F — so that the H carries a strong partial positive charge able to interact with a lone pair on a neighbouring electronegative atom. A carbonyl oxygen (as in an aldehyde) or a nitrogen with no attached H (as in a fully substituted tertiary amine) cannot act as an H-bond donor themselves.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Ethanol (C2H5OH): has an O–H group → capable of H-bonding.
- Acetic acid (CH3COOH): has a carboxylic O–H group → capable of H-bonding.
- Ethylamine (C2H5NH2): a primary amine with N–H bonds → capable of H-bonding.
- Trimethylamine (N(CH3)3): a tertiary amine — nitrogen has no attached H, so it cannot donate a hydrogen bond → excluded.
- Salicylic acid: has both a carboxylic O–H and a phenolic O–H → capable of H-bonding.
- Ethanal (CH3CHO): an aldehyde with no O–H or N–H bond → excluded.
- Total qualifying substances: ethanol, acetic acid, ethylamine, salicylic acid = 4.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming any amine can hydrogen-bond, without checking whether it actually has an N–H bond (tertiary amines don't).
- Assuming a carbonyl compound like an aldehyde can hydrogen-bond just because it contains oxygen.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 4.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.What is the correct boiling point order of the following haloalkanes? i) 2-chloro 2-methylpropane ii) 1-Cholobutane iii) 2-Chlorobutane (A) i > ii > iii (B) ii > iii > i (C) i < ii < iii (D) i > iii > ii
›Reveal solutionSolution
Among isomeric C₄H₉Cl haloalkanes, the straight-chain isomer boils highest and the most branched (tertiary) isomer boils lowest, giving the order ii > iii > i.
Concept and Intuition
For a set of structural isomers with the same molecular formula, boiling point is governed mainly by the strength of intermolecular van der Waals (London dispersion) forces, which depend on the surface area available for molecules to contact each other. A straight (unbranched) chain packs closely and has more surface contact, giving stronger dispersion forces and a higher boiling point. Branching makes the molecule more compact/spherical, reducing surface area and intermolecular contact, and hence lowering the boiling point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify the three isomers, all of formula C4H9Cl: (i) 2-chloro-2-methylpropane (tert-butyl chloride) — most branched, chlorine on a tertiary carbon; (ii) 1-chlorobutane — straight (unbranched) chain, chlorine on a primary carbon; (iii) 2-chlorobutane — chlorine on a secondary carbon, slightly branched.
- Rank by branching (least to most): (ii) unbranched < (iii) one branch point < (i) most branched (quaternary-like carbon skeleton around the C–Cl carbon).
- Since boiling point decreases with increasing branching for isomers, the order (highest bp to lowest) is: (ii) > (iii) > (i).
- This matches known experimental values: 1-chlorobutane (~78.5°C) > 2-chlorobutane (~68°C) > tert-butyl chloride (~51°C).
Common Mistakes
- Assuming a more "substituted" (tertiary) halide would have a higher boiling point by analogy with stability of carbocations — boiling point trends for branching go the opposite way from carbocation stability trends.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — ii > iii > i.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.Para-nitro phenol has higher boiling point than ortho-nitrophenol. This is due to (A) The presence of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between Para-nitro phenol molecules (B) The presence of intramolecular hydrogen bonding in Para-nitro phenol molecules (C) The presence of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between ortho-nitro phenol molecules (D) The absence of intramolecular hydrogen bonding between ortho-nitro phenol molecules
›Reveal solutionSolution
Para-nitrophenol boils higher than ortho because ortho forms intramolecular H-bonding (chelation) while para is forced into intermolecular H-bonding, which needs more energy to break.
Concept and Intuition
Boiling point depends on the strength of the forces holding molecules together in the liquid. Ortho-nitrophenol's −OH and −NO2 are adjacent, so they hydrogen-bond to each other within the same molecule (a six-membered ring "chelate"). This uses up the −OH's hydrogen-bonding capacity internally, so ortho-nitrophenol molecules interact with each other only weakly (via van der Waals forces) — it boils low and is even steam-volatile. In para-nitrophenol the groups are on opposite ends of the ring and cannot reach each other, so the −OH of one molecule instead hydrogen-bonds to the −NO2/−OH of a neighbouring molecule — building an extended, harder-to-break intermolecular network, hence a higher boiling point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify the substitution pattern: ortho places −OH and −NO2 next to each other; para places them across the ring.
- Ortho: intramolecular H-bond forms a stable ring — no need for the molecule to H-bond with neighbours.
- Para: no intramolecular H-bond is geometrically possible, so −OH groups H-bond between different molecules.
- Intermolecular H-bonds must all be broken simultaneously to vaporise the liquid → higher boiling point for para.
- Hence para-nitrophenol has the higher boiling point due to intermolecular H-bonding among its own molecules.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming intramolecular H-bonding always raises boiling point — it's the opposite; it lowers it by removing the drive to associate with other molecules.
- Mixing up which isomer has which type of bonding.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — The presence of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between para-nitrophenol molecules.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.Arrange the following in increasing order of their boiling points N-Ethylethanamine - I Butanamine - II N,N-dimethylethanamine - III (A) III > II > I (B) III > I > II (C) II > III > I (D) II > I > III
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling point of amines of the same formula falls as 1° > 2° > 3°, because more N–H bonds mean stronger intermolecular hydrogen bonding.
Concept and Intuition
All three compounds share the molecular formula C4H11N, so molecular weight/dispersion forces are essentially comparable; the boiling-point differences are governed by hydrogen bonding capacity. A primary amine (−NH2) has two N–H bonds and can form the most extensive intermolecular hydrogen-bond network, giving it the highest boiling point among the three classes for a given carbon count. A secondary amine (−NH−) has only one N–H bond, so it hydrogen-bonds less extensively (lower bp than the primary isomer). A tertiary amine has no N–H bond at all, so it cannot hydrogen-bond with itself, relying only on weaker dipole–dipole and dispersion forces, giving it the lowest boiling point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Classify each compound: Butanamine (II) = CH3CH2CH2CH2NH2, a primary amine (2 N–H bonds).
- N-Ethylethanamine (I) = diethylamine, (C2H5)2NH, a secondary amine (1 N–H bond).
- N,N-Dimethylethanamine (III) = CH3CH2N(CH3)2, a tertiary amine (0 N–H bonds).
- Ranking by H-bonding strength (and hence boiling point): primary > secondary > tertiary, i.e. II > I > III.
- Checking each option against this true relative ranking (II's bp highest, then I, then III lowest), only option (D) has both pairwise relations (II > I and I > III) correctly stated.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming more substitution (like more alkyl branching) always raises boiling point — for amines, hydrogen-bonding capacity (number of N–H bonds) dominates over simple branching/molecular-weight effects.
- Mixing up which Roman numeral corresponds to which amine class.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — II > I > III.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.The correct order of boiling points of following molecules is(i) n – Hexane(ii) 2-methylpentane(iii) 2,3 – dimethylbutane (A) i > ii > iii (B) iii > ii > i (C) iii > i > ii (D) i > iii > ii
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling point falls as branching increases among isomeric alkanes, so n-hexane > 2-methylpentane > 2,3-dimethylbutane.
Concept and Intuition
All three compounds are isomers of hexane (C6H14), so they have identical molecular formula and hence similar total van der Waals attraction potential — but the shape of the molecule matters. A straight, extended chain (n-hexane) has more surface-to-surface contact with neighbouring molecules, maximizing van der Waals (London dispersion) forces. Branching makes the molecule more compact and spherical, reducing effective surface contact and hence the strength of intermolecular attractions, which lowers the boiling point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- n-Hexane: a straight, unbranched 6-carbon chain — largest surface area for intermolecular contact — highest boiling point among the three.
- 2-Methylpentane: one methyl branch — somewhat more compact than n-hexane — intermediate boiling point.
- 2,3-Dimethylbutane: two methyl branches, the most compact/spherical of the three — smallest surface area for contact — lowest boiling point.
- Order (decreasing boiling point): n-hexane (i) > 2-methylpentane (ii) > 2,3-dimethylbutane (iii).
Common Mistakes
- Assuming boiling point depends only on molecular weight (all three isomers have the same molecular weight, so shape/branching is the deciding factor here).
- Reversing the trend and thinking more branching increases boiling point (branching actually decreases it, unlike its effect on some other properties like octane number).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — i > ii > iii.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.At 298 K, if the vapour pressure of pure liquids toluene, benzene, chloroform and dichloromethane are 60, 160, 200 and 415 torr respectively. Then which liquid is having high boiling point? (A) Toluene (B) Benzene (C) Chloroform (D) Dichloromethane
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling point and vapour pressure (at fixed T) are inversely related; toluene's lowest vapour pressure (60 torr) means it has the highest boiling point.
Concept and Intuition
Vapour pressure measures how readily a liquid's molecules escape into the gas phase at a given temperature — it is a direct measure of volatility. Boiling point is the temperature at which vapour pressure equals atmospheric pressure. A liquid that already has a low vapour pressure at a reference temperature needs to be heated more to reach atmospheric pressure, so lower vapour pressure at a fixed T corresponds to a higher boiling point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- List the vapour pressures at 298 K: toluene 60 torr, benzene 160 torr, chloroform 200 torr, dichloromethane 415 torr.
- Rank from lowest to highest vapour pressure: toluene < benzene < chloroform < dichloromethane.
- Since boiling point ranks inversely to vapour pressure (at the same reference temperature), the ranking of boiling points (highest to lowest) is: toluene > benzene > chloroform > dichloromethane.
- The liquid with the highest boiling point is therefore toluene.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming higher vapour pressure means higher boiling point (it's the opposite — high vapour pressure means the substance evaporates easily, i.e., low boiling point).
- Not recognizing that this comparison is valid because all values are given at the same temperature (298 K).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — Toluene.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.Arrange the hydrides NH3, HF, H2O, HCl in the increasing order of their boiling points (A) HF<NH3<HCl<H2O (B) H2O<HF<HCl<NH3 (C) NH3<HCl<H2O<HF (D) HCl<NH3<HF<H2O
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling points of these hydrides are governed mainly by hydrogen bonding strength/extent, giving the increasing order HCl<NH3<HF<H2O.
Concept and Intuition
Among simple hydrides, boiling point is strongly influenced by hydrogen bonding, which occurs when H is bonded to a small, highly electronegative atom (N, O, F). HCl's Cl is not electronegative/small enough to hydrogen bond significantly, so it relies only on weaker dipole-dipole/dispersion forces and has the lowest boiling point among these four. Among the hydrogen-bonded species, H2O forms an extensive 3-D hydrogen-bonded network (2 lone pairs and 2 H atoms per molecule, ideal for a 3-D network) giving it the highest boiling point, while HF and NH3 form more limited (chain-like or less networked) hydrogen bonding.
Step-by-Step Solution
- HCl: negligible hydrogen bonding (Cl is not electronegative/small enough) — lowest boiling point among the four (≈−85∘C).
- NH3: hydrogen bonds via N, but only one lone pair per molecule to hydrogen bond with ⇒ boiling point ≈−33∘C.
- HF: strong hydrogen bonding via a highly electronegative F, but limited to one H and three lone pairs (only one bond forms per molecule in the chain) ⇒ boiling point ≈19.5∘C.
- H2O: two H atoms and two lone pairs allow each molecule to participate in up to 4 hydrogen bonds, forming an extensive 3-D network ⇒ highest boiling point, 100∘C.
- Increasing order of boiling point: HCl<NH3<HF<H2O.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming HF, having the strongest single hydrogen bond, must have the highest boiling point overall — but the extent of hydrogen-bond networking (as in water) matters more than single-bond strength.
- Forgetting HCl essentially lacks hydrogen bonding altogether and placing it above NH3.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — HCl<NH3<HF<H2O.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2022Set ap-2022-07-11-AN1 markMCQQ.Which among the following will have the highest boiling point ? (A) Butan-2-ol (CH3CH(OH)CH2CH3) (B) Butan-2-one (CH3COCH2CH3) (C) n-Butane (CH3CH2CH2CH3) (D) Ethyl propyl ether (CH3CH2−O−CH2CH2CH3)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Among an alcohol, a ketone, an alkane, and an ether of comparable size, the alcohol has the highest boiling point because only it can hydrogen-bond between its own molecules.
Concept and Intuition
Boiling point depends on the strength of intermolecular forces that must be overcome to vaporise the liquid. Alcohols (-OH group) can form hydrogen bonds with each other, a strong, directional intermolecular force. Ketones and ethers only have permanent dipole-dipole interactions (no O-H or N-H to hydrogen-bond with each other), which are weaker than hydrogen bonding. Alkanes have only weak, non-polar van der Waals (London dispersion) forces, the weakest of all.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Butan-2-ol: contains -OH, capable of strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding ⇒ highest boiling point among these four.
- Butan-2-one: a ketone, polar C=O but no H-bond donor ⇒ moderate boiling point (dipole-dipole), lower than the alcohol.
- Ethyl propyl ether: polar C-O-C but no H-bond donor either ⇒ boiling point similar to or slightly below the ketone.
- n-Butane: non-polar, only weak dispersion forces ⇒ lowest boiling point (in fact a gas near room temperature).
- Hence Butan-2-ol has the highest boiling point.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming molecular weight alone determines boiling point, ignoring the type of intermolecular force present.
- Forgetting that ethers, despite having an oxygen, cannot hydrogen-bond with themselves (no O-H bond) the way alcohols can.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — Butan-2-ol.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-FN1 markMCQQ.Arrange the following in decreasing order of their boiling points(a) CH3CH2CH2CH2OH (butan-1-ol)(b) CH3CH2CH2CH2NH2 (butan-1-amine, a primary amine)(c) a tertiary amine, (CH2CH3) chain with an N bearing two other alkyl branches (drawn as a small N with two branches, i.e. a trialkylamine)(d) a secondary amine with an N-H, drawn as two ethyl-type chains joined through an N-H (a secondary amine) (A) a > b > d > c (B) a > c > d > b (C) b > c > d > a (D) c > a > b > d
›Reveal solutionSolution
Boiling point here tracks hydrogen-bonding ability: the alcohol (strongest H-bonding) is highest, then primary amine (two N–H), then secondary amine (one N–H), then tertiary amine (no N–H, weakest): a > b > d > c.
Concept and Intuition
For molecules of comparable molecular weight, boiling point is governed largely by the strength and extent of intermolecular hydrogen bonding. Oxygen is more electronegative than nitrogen, so O–H···O hydrogen bonds are stronger than N–H···N hydrogen bonds — alcohols therefore boil higher than amines of similar size. Among amines themselves, hydrogen bonding requires an N–H bond to donate; a primary amine has two N–H bonds (most extensive hydrogen-bonded network), a secondary amine has only one N–H bond (less association), and a tertiary amine has none (cannot hydrogen-bond to itself at all, only weaker dipole-dipole/van der Waals forces), giving it the lowest boiling point of the three.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Butan-1-ol (a): −OH group, strongest hydrogen bonding of the four compounds → highest boiling point.
- Butan-1-amine (b), a primary amine: two N–H bonds, extensive intermolecular hydrogen bonding → next highest.
- The secondary amine (d): only one N–H bond, weaker/less extensive hydrogen bonding than a primary amine → next.
- The tertiary amine (c): no N–H bond at all, cannot hydrogen bond with itself, relies only on weaker dipole-dipole and dispersion forces → lowest boiling point.
- Overall order: a > b > d > c.
Common Mistakes
- Ranking by molecular weight alone instead of hydrogen-bonding capacity.
- Assuming all amines hydrogen-bond equally regardless of how many N–H bonds are present.
- Placing the tertiary amine above the secondary amine by mistake.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — a > b > d > c.
ANSWER: A
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.