Q.How would you determine the standard electrode potential of the system Mg2+∣Mg?
Concept understanding — Cell Representation Nernst Equation
Cell Representation and the Nernst Equation: From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you have a Daniell cell — a zinc rod in zinc sulphate solution connected by a salt bridge to a copper rod in copper sulphate solution. You know it produces a voltage. But what happens if you dilute the copper sulphate solution? Or if you change the temperature? The voltage changes. The Nernst equation is the tool that tells you exactly how much it changes.
The Intuition First
A battery works because the two half-cells "want" to react — zinc wants to lose electrons, copper ions want to gain them. This "want" is measured as a tendency, or potential. But the strength of that tendency depends on how crowded the ions are.
Think of it like this: If you have a room full of people who all want to leave (like zinc ions wanting to form), the push to get out is stronger when the room is packed. If the room is nearly empty, the push is weaker. Similarly, for copper ions wanting to enter the metal (gain electrons), the pull is stronger when there are many copper ions around, and weaker when there are few.
The Nernst equation quantifies this: the actual cell potential depends on the concentrations (or activities) of the ions involved.
The Precise Statement
For a general cell reaction:
aA+bB→cC+dD
The cell potential E under non-standard conditions is given by:
E=E∘−nFRTlnQ
Where:
- E = cell potential under the given conditions (in volts)
- E∘ = standard cell potential (when all reactants/products are at 1 M, 1 atm, 25°C)
- R = universal gas constant (8.314 J/mol·K)
- T = temperature in Kelvin
- n = number of moles of electrons transferred in the balanced half-reactions
- F = Faraday constant (96,485 C/mol)
- Q = reaction quotient = [A]a[B]b[C]c[D]d (using concentrations for dilute solutions)
At 25°C (298 K), the equation simplifies to a very practical form:
E=E∘−n0.0591log10Q
The 0.0591 comes from F2.303RT at 298 K. Notice it uses log10 (common log), not natural log.
Cell Representation: How We Write It
In electrochemistry, we represent a cell with a shorthand notation. For the Daniell cell:
Zn(s)∣Zn2+(aq)∥Cu2+(aq)∣Cu(s)
The single vertical line ∣ represents a phase boundary (solid electrode | solution). The double line ∥ represents the salt bridge.
The anode (oxidation) is written on the left, the cathode (reduction) on the right. Electrons flow from left to right in the external circuit.
Applying the Nernst Equation to a Cell Representation
For the Daniell cell, the half-reactions are:
- Anode (oxidation): Zn(s)→Zn2+(aq)+2e−
- Cathode (reduction): Cu2+(aq)+2e−→Cu(s)
Overall: Zn(s)+Cu2+(aq)→Zn2+(aq)+Cu(s)
Here n=2 (two electrons transferred). The reaction quotient is:
Q=[Cu2+][Zn2+]
So the Nernst equation becomes:
E=E∘−20.0591log10[Cu2+][Zn2+]
Solids (Zn, Cu) do not appear in Q because their concentrations are constant (activity = 1).
A Worked Example
Suppose you have a Daniell cell where [Zn2+]=0.1 M and [Cu2+]=1.0 M at 25°C. E∘ for the cell is 1.10 V.
E=1.10−20.0591log101.00.1
E=1.10−20.0591log10(0.1)
log10(0.1)=−1
E=1.10−20.0591(−1)=1.10+0.02955=1.1296 V
The cell voltage is slightly higher than standard because the zinc ion concentration is lower (less "push" from the anode side, so the net driving force is larger).
A common mistake is to forget that n must match the balanced equation. If you write the half-reactions with different numbers of electrons, you'll get the wrong n. Always check that the overall reaction is balanced.
The Key Insight
The Nernst equation is not just a formula — it's a statement that electrochemical potential is a logarithmic function of concentration. This means:
- Diluting the reactant side (lowering [Cu2+]) decreases E
- Diluting the product side (lowering [Zn2+]) increases E
- At equilibrium, E=0 and Q=K (the equilibrium constant), giving lnK=RTnFE∘
This last point connects electrochemistry directly to thermodynamics — the Nernst equation is just the Gibbs free energy equation (ΔG=−nFE) written in terms of concentrations.
Cell representation and the Nernst equation together form a heavily tested pair within the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Chemistry Electrochemistry chapter, and ‘how to write cell representation’ or ‘Nernst equation for cell reaction’ are common important-question searches for board exams, JEE Main and NEET. Being fluent in both the notation and the formula is essential for solving electrochemistry numericals quickly in competitive exams.
Why this formula?
Cell Representation & the Nernst Equation: Why It Works
The Core Question
Why does a cell's voltage change when concentrations change? The Nernst equation answers this — but the reason lies in the link between chemical free energy and electrical work.
1. The Fundamental Link: Gibbs Free Energy & Cell Potential
A galvanic cell does electrical work. The maximum useful work a cell can do equals the change in Gibbs free energy (ΔG):
ΔG=−nFEcell
Where:
- n = moles of electrons transferred
- F = Faraday constant (96,485C mol−1)
- Ecell = cell potential (volts)
Why negative? A spontaneous reaction has ΔG<0 and Ecell>0 — the negative sign makes this consistent.
2. The Chemical Side: ΔG Depends on Concentration
For a general redox reaction:
aA+bB→cC+dD
The Gibbs free energy under non-standard conditions is:
ΔG=ΔG∘+RTlnQ
Where Q is the reaction quotient:
Q=[A]a[B]b[C]c[D]d
Why this form? It comes from the relationship between chemical potential and concentration — the entropy of mixing drives concentration dependence.
3. Combining Both Sides: The Derivation
Set the electrical work equal to the chemical free energy change:
−nFEcell=−nFEcell∘+RTlnQ
Divide both sides by −nF:
Ecell=Ecell∘−nFRTlnQ
This is the Nernst equation.
4. The "Why" in Plain Terms
| Concept | Physical Meaning |
|---|---|
| Ecell∘ | Voltage when all species are at 1 M (standard state) |
| −nFRTlnQ | Correction factor — adjusts voltage for real concentrations |
| Q | Tells you how far the reaction is from equilibrium |
Key insight: When Q=K (equilibrium), Ecell=0 — the battery is dead because no net reaction occurs.
5. The Common Form (log base 10)
At 25∘C (298K):
FRTln10≈0.0592V
So:
Ecell=Ecell∘−n0.0592log10Q
Why convert to log? Exam convenience — most concentration values are powers of 10.
6. Cell Representation: How to Write Q
For a cell written as:
Zn(s)∣Zn2+(aq)∥Cu2+(aq)∣Cu(s)
The reaction is:
Zn(s)+Cu2+(aq)→Zn2+(aq)+Cu(s)
Solids are omitted from Q (activity = 1):
Q=[Cu2+][Zn2+]
Why omit solids? Their concentration doesn't change — they're pure phases with fixed chemical potential.
7. Exam-Ready Summary
| Step | What to Do | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Write balanced half-reactions | Identify n (electrons transferred) |
| 2 | Write overall reaction | Determine Q form |
| 3 | Plug into Nernst | Corrects E∘ for real conditions |
| 4 | Use log10 at 25∘C | 0.0592/n is exam standard |
Final takeaway: The Nernst equation is thermodynamics in disguise — it's the Gibbs free energy equation rewritten in electrical units. Every time you use it, you're balancing chemical potential against electrical potential.
Concept: Cell Representation & Nernst Equation
To find the standard electrode potential of Mg2+∣Mg, you set up a cell with a reference electrode (e.g., SHE) and measure the cell potential under standard conditions.
Steps
- Construct the cell: Mg(s)∣Mg2+(aq,1M)∣∣H+(aq,1M)∣H2(g,1bar)∣Pt(s).
- Measure the cell potential (Ecell∘) at 298 K with a voltmeter. Since SHE is assigned 0 V, the measured value equals EMg2+∣Mg∘ (with sign determined by the direction of spontaneous reaction).
- For Mg2+∣Mg, the reduction reaction is Mg2++2e−→Mg. The measured Ecell∘ is negative (Mg is more reactive than H₂), so EMg2+∣Mg∘=−2.36 V.
The standard electrode potential of Mg2+∣Mg is −2.36 V (vs. SHE).
The standard electrode potential of Mg2+∣Mg cannot be measured directly because Mg reacts with water. We determine it indirectly by constructing a cell with a known reference electrode (like SHE), measuring the cell potential, and then using the Nernst equation to correct for non-standard conditions — the final value is −2.36 V.
The standard electrode potential of a system like Mg2+∣Mg is defined as the potential of the half-cell Mg2+(aq,1 M)∣Mg(s) measured against the Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE) at 298 K. But here’s the catch: magnesium metal is so reactive that it displaces hydrogen from water even in neutral solutions. If you dip a magnesium rod into a 1 M Mg2+ solution, you’ll see bubbles of hydrogen gas — the Mg is actually reacting with water, not sitting quietly at equilibrium. That makes a direct measurement impossible.
So how do we get the value? We use a clever indirect method: construct a cell where the Mg half-cell is combined with a reference electrode whose potential is known, measure the cell potential under carefully controlled conditions, and then back-calculate the Mg potential.
Let’s walk through the actual experimental procedure step by step.
-
Choose a reference electrode that doesn’t interfere. The Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE) is the universal reference, but it’s impractical for routine lab work. Instead, we often use a calomel electrode (saturated calomel electrode, SCE) or a silver-silver chloride electrode — these have stable, well-known potentials. For this explanation, let’s assume we use the SHE as the reference, since that’s the definition.
-
Set up the cell carefully. We cannot simply put Mg metal in a 1 M Mg2+ solution and connect it to the SHE, because the Mg will react with water. Instead, we use a non-aqueous solvent or a very carefully deoxygenated aqueous solution, and we work quickly. In practice, the measurement is done in a solution of MgSO4 or MgCl2 at exactly 1 M concentration, with the Mg electrode freshly polished and the solution thoroughly purged of dissolved oxygen. The cell is:
Pt, H2(g,1 atm)∣H+(aq,1 M)∣∣Mg2+(aq,1 M)∣Mg(s)
-
Measure the cell potential. A voltmeter (or potentiometer) connected between the two electrodes gives the electromotive force (emf) of the cell. Because the Mg electrode is more negative than the SHE, the measured cell potential will be positive if we connect the SHE as the cathode and Mg as the anode. Let’s say we measure Ecell=2.36 V at 298 K.
-
Apply the cell potential equation. For a cell written as:
Anode (oxidation): Mg(s)→Mg2+(aq)+2e−
Cathode (reduction): 2H+(aq)+2e−→H2(g)
The overall cell reaction is:
Mg(s)+2H+(aq)→Mg2+(aq)+H2(g)
The cell potential is the difference between the cathode and anode potentials:
Ecell=Ecathode−Eanode
Here, Ecathode=EH+/H2∘=0 V (by definition), and Eanode=EMg2+/Mg∘ (the value we want). So:
2.36 V=0 V−EMg2+/Mg∘
Therefore:
EMg2+/Mg∘=−2.36 V
A common mistake is to forget the sign convention. The measured cell potential is positive when the SHE is the cathode, meaning the Mg electrode is the anode (oxidation occurs there). The standard reduction potential of Mg is therefore negative. If you reverse the cell, you’d get a negative reading — but the standard reduction potential is always defined for the reduction reaction Mg2++2e−→Mg.
- Is it really that simple? In practice, the measurement isn’t done at exactly 1 M concentrations because of the reactivity issue. Instead, we measure the cell potential at a known, lower concentration of Mg2+ (say 10−3 M) and then use the Nernst equation to extrapolate to standard conditions. The Nernst equation for the Mg half-cell is:
EMg2+/Mg=EMg2+/Mg∘+20.059log[Mg2+]
(at 298 K, using base-10 log). If we measure the cell potential at [Mg2+]=10−3 M, we get a different Ecell, and we solve for EMg2+/Mg∘.
The factor n0.059 comes from F2.303RT. At 298 K, 2.303RT/F≈0.05916 V. For Mg, n=2, so the slope is about 0.0296 V per decade of concentration change.
- Confirm with multiple concentrations. To be rigorous, we measure Ecell at several different Mg2+ concentrations, plot Ecell vs. log[Mg2+], and extrapolate to log[Mg2+]=0 (i.e., 1 M). The intercept gives EMg2+/Mg∘ directly. This also checks that the system obeys the Nernst equation (the slope should be 0.0296 V), confirming that the electrode is behaving reversibly.
Ecell=Ecathode∘−(EMg2+/Mg∘+20.059log[Mg2+])
At 298 K, with SHE as cathode (E∘=0), this simplifies to:
Ecell=−EMg2+/Mg∘−20.059log[Mg2+]
- The accepted value. Through such careful experiments, the standard electrode potential of the Mg2+∣Mg system is determined to be −2.36 V (vs. SHE). This large negative value reflects magnesium’s strong tendency to lose electrons — it’s a powerful reducing agent.
The standard electrode potential is an intensive property: it doesn’t depend on how much Mg or Mg2+ you have. It’s a measure of the thermodynamic tendency for the reduction reaction Mg2++2e−→Mg to occur. The more negative the value, the stronger the reducing agent.
The standard electrode potential of Mg2+∣Mg is determined indirectly by measuring the cell potential against a reference electrode (like SHE) and applying the Nernst equation, yielding −2.36 V.
Method: Using the Nernst Equation with a Known Reference Electrode
This is a standard method for determining the standard electrode potential of a half-cell that cannot be measured directly (like Mg²⁺|Mg, which reacts with water).
Why can't we measure it directly?
If you dip Mg metal into Mg²⁺ solution, the system is not at equilibrium under standard conditions — Mg reacts with water. So we use an indirect electrochemical cell method.
Steps
- Set up a galvanic cell Combine the Mg²⁺|Mg half-cell with a standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) as the reference. Cell notation:
Mg∣Mg2+(1M)∥H+(1M)∣H2(1atm)∣Pt
-
Measure the cell potential (Ecell)
Using a voltmeter (high impedance), measure the emf of this cell under standard conditions (298 K, 1 M, 1 atm).
For Mg²⁺|Mg, the measured value is approximately +2.36 V (Mg acts as the anode).
-
Write the half-reactions
- Anode (oxidation):
Mg→Mg2++2e−
- Cathode (reduction):
2H++2e−→H2
- Apply the cell potential equation
Ecell∘=Ecathode∘−Eanode∘
Here, Ecathode∘=0.00V (SHE).
So:
+2.36=0.00−EMg2+∣Mg∘
- Solve for the unknown
EMg2+∣Mg∘=−2.36V
Key Result
Standard electrode potential of Mg²⁺|Mg is −2.36V (at 298 K).
Why this works
The Nernst equation isn't directly used here for calculation — it's the principle that allows us to relate measured cell potential to standard potentials. The method relies on:
- The SHE having a defined E∘=0.00V
- The cell potential being the difference between two half-cell potentials
- Standard conditions ensuring Q=1, so Ecell=Ecell∘
Common Mistakes: Determining the Standard Electrode Potential of Mg²⁺|Mg
✗ Mistake 1: Thinking You Can Measure It by Simply Dipping Mg in 1 M Mg²⁺ Solution
The error: Students assume the standard electrode potential can be measured the same way as a less-reactive metal — just immerse the metal in its 1 M salt solution and read a voltmeter against the SHE.
Why it's wrong: Magnesium is extremely reactive. In an aqueous Mg²⁺ solution, metallic Mg spontaneously reacts with water (or dissolved oxygen), evolving hydrogen gas. This side reaction disturbs the electrode equilibrium, so a stable, meaningful potential cannot be read directly under true standard conditions.
How to avoid: Always ask, "Is this electrode reactive enough to react with the solvent itself?" For very electropositive metals (Mg, Na, K, Ca), direct aqueous measurement is unreliable — an indirect method is required.
✗ Mistake 2: Forgetting That a Reference Electrode (SHE) Is Required
The error: Students try to quote "the potential of Mg" as if it is an absolute number measured in isolation.
Why it's wrong: Electrode potentials are always defined RELATIVE to a reference — the Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE), assigned E∘=0 V by convention. You cannot measure a single electrode's potential without pairing it with a reference half-cell to complete a circuit.
How to avoid: Always set up a full cell: Mg(s)∣Mg2+(aq)∥H+(aq)∣H2(g)∣Pt(s), then use Ecell∘=Ecathode∘−Eanode∘ with the SHE's potential fixed at 0 V.
✗ Mistake 3: Mixing Up the Sign of the Measured emf
The error: Students read a positive cell emf and then also write EMg2+/Mg∘ as positive.
Why it's wrong: Since Mg is the anode (it is oxidised) in the cell against SHE, a positive cell emf actually means EMg2+/Mg∘ (a reduction potential) is negative: Ecell∘=Ecathode∘(SHE,0 V)−Eanode∘(Mg), so EMg∘=−Ecell∘.
How to avoid: Always write out which electrode is the cathode and which is the anode before assigning a sign to the unknown reduction potential.
✗ Mistake 4: Ignoring the Need to Extrapolate to True Standard Conditions
The error: Students assume any single measurement, at any concentration, directly gives the standard potential.
Why it's wrong: Because a literal 1 M Mg²⁺/Mg half-cell is hard to maintain cleanly (Mistake 1), the practical measurement is often done at a lower, more controlled concentration, then the Nernst equation is used to extrapolate the result to 1 M (i.e. log[Mg2+]=0).
How to avoid: Remember the two-part method: (1) measure Ecell at a convenient, known concentration; (2) use the Nernst equation E=E∘+20.059log[Mg2+] to solve for E∘, or better, measure at several concentrations and extrapolate the E vs. log[Mg2+] plot to zero.
✓ Correct Answer (for reference)
Construct the cell Mg(s)∣Mg2+(aq, 1 M)∥H+(aq, 1 M)∣H2(g, 1 atm)∣Pt(s), measure its emf (correcting for non-ideal concentrations via the Nernst equation if needed), and use Ecell∘=ESHE∘−EMg2+/Mg∘=0−EMg2+/Mg∘ to obtain EMg2+/Mg∘=−2.36 V.
Quick Checklist
| Step | Common Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Setup | Assuming direct aqueous measurement works | Recognise Mg reacts with water; use an indirect method |
| Reference | Forgetting SHE is needed | Always pair with a reference electrode |
| Sign | Wrong sign for the reduction potential | Identify anode vs. cathode first |
| Conditions | Skipping extrapolation to 1 M | Use the Nernst equation to correct to standard conditions |
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.Observe the following galvanic cell. Two statements are given about this cell Statement I: Electrons flow from Cu electrode to Zn electrode. Statement II: With increase in time, the weight of Zn electrode decreases and weight of Cu electrode increases [FIGURE] (galvanic cell diagram: a Zn anode dipped in a Zn2+ solution beaker connected via a salt bridge to a Cu cathode dipped in a Cu2+ solution beaker; the external circuit connecting the electrodes has a resistor and an ammeter, with an opposing external source marked Eext<1.1) Correct answer is (A) Both Statements I and II are correct (B) Both Statements I and II are not correct (C) Statement I is correct but statement II is not correct (D) Statement I is not correct but statement II is correct
›Reveal solutionSolution
The cell is a Daniell cell (Zn|Zn²⁺||Cu²⁺|Cu) with an external opposing voltage Eext<1.1 V. Since the opposing voltage is less than the cell’s standard emf (1.1 V), the cell still drives electrons from Zn (anode) to Cu (cathode) — so Statement I is correct. As the cell operates, Zn dissolves (weight decreases) and Cu deposits (weight increases) — so Statement II is also correct. Hence the correct option is (A).
Concept and Intuition
This is a Daniell cell — the classic Zn–Cu galvanic cell. Normally, without any external source, electrons flow spontaneously from the Zn electrode (anode, oxidation) to the Cu electrode (cathode, reduction). The standard cell potential is about 1.1 V.
Here, an external voltage source Eext is inserted in the external circuit, but it is less than 1.1 V. That means the external source is trying to oppose the cell’s natural electron flow, but it is too weak to reverse it. The cell still operates as a galvanic cell (not an electrolytic cell), because the net driving force remains from Zn to Cu.
The Nernst equation helps us understand that even if concentrations change slightly, the cell potential remains positive as long as the reaction quotient Q is less than the equilibrium constant K. Since Eext<Ecell, the cell continues to discharge.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Identify the spontaneous direction In a Zn–Cu cell, the standard reduction potentials are:
Cu2++2e−Zn2++2e−→CuE∘=+0.34 V→ZnE∘=−0.76 V
The cell reaction is:
Zn+Cu2+→Zn2++Cu
with Ecell∘=0.34−(−0.76)=1.10 V.
Electrons flow from Zn (anode) to Cu (cathode) in the external circuit.
-
Effect of the external source Eext<1.1 V
The external source is connected opposing the cell’s natural polarity. However, because its voltage is less than the cell’s emf, the net potential difference still drives electrons from Zn to Cu.
TipThink of it like two batteries in series opposing: the larger one (the cell) wins, so current flows in its direction. Here the cell is the “larger” battery.
-
Evaluate Statement I: “Electrons flow from Cu electrode to Zn electrode.”
The statement claims the opposite of the spontaneous direction. But as argued, the external source is too weak to reverse the flow. Therefore electrons still flow from Zn to Cu, not from Cu to Zn.
Statement I is false as written — wait, careful: The statement says “from Cu electrode to Zn electrode”. That is the reverse of the actual direction. So Statement I is incorrect.
Watch outA common mistake is to assume that any external voltage reverses the cell. But reversal only happens if Eext>Ecell. Here Eext<1.1, so the cell still discharges normally.
-
Evaluate Statement II: “With increase in time, the weight of Zn electrode decreases and weight of Cu electrode increases.”
In the spontaneous reaction:
- Zn anode: Zn→Zn2++2e− (Zn dissolves, so its mass decreases).
- Cu cathode: Cu2++2e−→Cu (Cu deposits, so its mass increases). This happens regardless of the external source as long as the cell is discharging. Since Eext<Ecell, the cell continues to discharge, so Zn loses mass and Cu gains mass. Statement II is correct.
-
Combine the two statements
- Statement I: Incorrect (electrons flow Zn → Cu, not Cu → Zn).
- Statement II: Correct. Therefore the correct choice is (D).
For a galvanic cell with an opposing external voltage Eext:
- If Eext<Ecell: cell discharges normally (anode dissolves, cathode gains mass).
- If Eext>Ecell: cell is forced into electrolytic mode (reverse reaction).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.Two statements are given about the galvanic cell shown below Statement I: Current flows from Cu electrode to Zn electrode Statement II: With increase in time the mass of Zn electrode increases and mass of Cu electrode decreases Correct answer is [FIGURE] (galvanic cell apparatus diagram: a Zn anode dipped in Zn2+ solution and a Cu cathode dipped in Cu2+ solution, the two beakers connected by a salt bridge; the electrodes are connected via an external circuit containing an ammeter/galvanometer and a variable opposing voltage source labelled Eext<1.1 V) (A) Both statements I and II are correct (B) Both statements I and II are not correct (C) Statement I is correct and statement II is not correct (D) Statement I is not correct and statement II is correct
›Reveal solutionSolution
In a standard Zn–Cu galvanic cell, electrons flow from the Zn anode (oxidation) to the Cu cathode (reduction), so conventional current flows from Cu to Zn. The Zn electrode loses mass (Zn → Zn²⁺) and the Cu electrode gains mass (Cu²⁺ → Cu). Therefore Statement I is correct, Statement II is incorrect, and the answer is (C).
Concept and Intuition: The Cell Representation and the Nernst Equation
This question tests your understanding of the direction of current and the mass changes at the electrodes in a working galvanic cell. The key is to remember that in a galvanic (voltaic) cell, the spontaneous redox reaction drives electrons through the external circuit. By convention, current flows opposite to electron flow (from positive to negative). The electrode where oxidation occurs (anode) loses mass; the electrode where reduction occurs (cathode) gains mass. The external opposing voltage Eext<1.1 V tells us the cell is still operating spontaneously (the cell’s emf is about 1.1 V for Zn–Cu under standard conditions).
Step-by-step reasoning
- Identify the spontaneous reaction In a Zn–Cu cell, zinc is more reactive (higher reduction potential for Zn²⁺/Zn is –0.76 V, for Cu²⁺/Cu is +0.34 V). The spontaneous reaction is:
Zn(s)+Cu2+(aq)→Zn2+(aq)+Cu(s)
Zinc is oxidized (loses electrons), copper ions are reduced (gain electrons).
-
Determine electron flow and conventional current
- Oxidation at the Zn electrode (anode): Zn→Zn2++2e− Electrons leave the Zn electrode and travel through the external circuit toward the Cu electrode.
- Reduction at the Cu electrode (cathode): Cu2++2e−→Cu Electrons arrive at the Cu electrode.
- Conventional current is defined as the flow of positive charge, opposite to electron flow. So electrons flow from Zn → Cu, meaning conventional current flows from Cu → Zn.
- Statement I says: “Current flows from Cu electrode to Zn electrode.” This matches the conventional current direction. Statement I is correct.
-
Analyze mass changes at the electrodes
- At the Zn anode: Zn metal is converted to Zn²⁺ ions, which go into solution. The solid Zn electrode loses mass.
- At the Cu cathode: Cu²⁺ ions from solution gain electrons and deposit as solid Cu on the electrode. The Cu electrode gains mass.
- Statement II says: “With increase in time the mass of Zn electrode increases and mass of Cu electrode decreases.” This is the exact opposite of what happens. Statement II is incorrect.
-
Check the role of the external voltage source
The diagram shows Eext<1.1 V. This is an opposing voltage, but because it is less than the cell’s emf, the cell still operates spontaneously (just with a reduced net voltage). The direction of electron flow and the mass changes remain the same as in an unopposed cell. So the presence of this small opposing voltage does not alter the correctness of the statements.
Watch outA common mistake is to confuse electron flow with conventional current. Remember: electrons flow from anode to cathode (negative to positive inside the cell), but conventional current flows from cathode to anode (positive to negative). Also, do not assume that the external voltage source reverses the cell — it only opposes it, and since Eext<1.1 V, the cell still runs spontaneously.
TipA quick memory aid: Anode = Oxidation = Loss of mass (think “An Ox” — Anode Oxidation). Cathode = Reduction = Gain of mass (think “Red Cat” — Reduction at Cathode). For a Zn–Cu cell, Zn is the anode, so it loses mass; Cu is the cathode, so it gains mass.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.The standard free energy change (ΔG∘) for the following reaction (in kJ) at 25°C is 3Ca(s)+2Au3+(aq,1M)→3Ca2+(aq,1M)+2Au(s) (given: EAu3+/Au∘=+1.50 V, ECa2+/Ca∘=−2.87 V, 1F=96500 C mol−1) (A) −2.53×103 (B) +2.53×103 (C) −2.53×104 (D) +2.53×104
›Reveal solutionSolution
This applies ΔG∘=−nFEcell∘ to the Ca/Au3+ redox couple; the standard free energy change works out to −2.53×103 kJ.
Concept and Intuition
The standard free energy change of a redox reaction is related to the cell's standard EMF by ΔG∘=−nFEcell∘, where n is the total number of electrons transferred as balanced by the overall equation, and F is Faraday's constant. A positive Ecell∘ (spontaneous reaction) corresponds to a negative ΔG∘.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify the half-reactions: reduction at cathode, Au3++3e−→Au, E∘=+1.50 V; oxidation at anode, Ca→Ca2++2e−, ECa2+/Ca∘=−2.87 V.
- Balance electrons: multiply the Au half-reaction by 2 and the Ca half-reaction by 3, giving n=6 electrons transferred overall, matching the given equation 3Ca+2Au3+→3Ca2++2Au.
- Compute Ecell∘=Ecathode∘−Eanode∘=1.50−(−2.87)=4.37 V.
- Compute ΔG∘=−nFEcell∘=−(6)(96500 C/mol)(4.37 V).
- Calculate: 6×96500=579000; 579000×4.37=2,530,230 J =2530.23 kJ. So ΔG∘=−2530.23 kJ ≈−2.53×103 kJ.
Common Mistakes
- Using n=3 or n=2 (from the individual half-reactions) instead of the correctly balanced n=6 for the overall reaction.
- Sign errors — forgetting the negative sign in ΔG∘=−nFE∘, or mishandling the negative anode potential when computing Ecell∘.
- Misplacing the decimal/power of ten when converting J to kJ (giving 104 instead of 103).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — −2.53×103.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2022Set ap-2022-07-11-FN1 markMCQQ.The standard Gibbs energy ΔG0 for the following electrochemical cell is P(s)∣P3+(aq,0.01M)∥Q2+(aq,0.02M)∣Q(s) (Ecell0=0.2 V) (A) 115.8 kJ (B) 100.2 kJ (C) 200.5 kJ (D) 300 kJ
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the relation ΔG∘=−nFEcell∘, with the key subtlety of finding the correct n (total electrons transferred, found via LCM of the two half-cell electron counts).
Concept and Intuition
The standard Gibbs energy change of a cell reaction is directly proportional to the number of moles of electrons transferred in the balanced overall reaction and the cell potential. Since the anode gives 3 electrons per P atom and the cathode needs 2 electrons per Q2+ ion, the reaction must be balanced so both half-reactions transfer the same total number of electrons — found via the LCM of 3 and 2, which is 6.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Anode (oxidation): P→P3++3e−; Cathode (reduction): Q2++2e−→Q.
- Balance electrons: multiply the anode reaction by 2 and the cathode reaction by 3, so n=6 electrons flow in the overall balanced cell reaction (2P+3Q2+→2P3++3Q).
- Apply ΔG∘=−nFEcell∘=−6×96500C/mol×0.2V.
- Compute: −6×96500×0.2=−115800J=−115.8kJ.
Common Mistakes
- Using n=1, 2, or 3 instead of the correctly balanced n=6.
- Forgetting to convert Joules to kilojoules.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 115.8 kJ.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-07-FN1 markMCQQ.The energy conversion involved in a galvanic cell is (A) Chemical energy to mechanical energy (B) Chemical energy to electrical energy (C) Electrical energy to chemical energy (D) Electrical energy to thermal energy
›Reveal solutionSolution
A galvanic cell is the device that turns a spontaneous chemical (redox) reaction into usable electrical energy — the opposite of electrolysis.
Concept and Intuition
In a galvanic cell, a spontaneous (ΔG<0) redox reaction is split into separate oxidation (anode) and reduction (cathode) half-reactions connected by an external circuit, so the electron transfer that would otherwise happen directly (releasing energy as heat) instead flows through a wire and does electrical work. This is the reverse energy conversion of an electrolytic cell, which consumes electrical energy to drive a non-spontaneous chemical reaction.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify the device: a galvanic/voltaic cell (e.g. Daniell cell) generates electricity from a spontaneous redox reaction.
- The reaction proceeds because it is thermodynamically favourable (releases chemical energy).
- That released energy is captured as an electric current through the external circuit rather than dissipated as heat.
- Hence: chemical energy → electrical energy.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing a galvanic cell (chemical → electrical) with an electrolytic cell (electrical → chemical), which is the reverse process.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — Chemical energy to electrical energy.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set ap-2021-09-07-FN1 markMCQQ.For a galvanic cell Cr/Cr3+ // Cd2+/Cd, calculated ΔG0 for its cell reaction will be ________ [ECr3+/Cr0=−0.74 V, ECd2+/Cd0=−0.40 V] (A) −28.95 kJ/mol (B) −125.4 kJ/mol (C) −196.8 kJ/mol (D) −87.6 kJ/mol
›Reveal solutionSolution
Compute Ecell∘ from the given half-cell potentials, balance electrons for the overall cell reaction to get n, then use ΔG∘=−nFEcell∘.
Concept and Intuition
In the cell notation Cr/Cr3+//Cd2+/Cd, the left electrode (written first) is the anode (oxidation), and the right electrode is the cathode (reduction). The cell potential is always cathode minus anode: Ecell∘=Ecathode∘−Eanode∘. Once Ecell∘ is known, ΔG∘ follows from the fundamental relation between electrical work and free energy, ΔG∘=−nFEcell∘, where n is the total number of electrons transferred in the balanced overall cell reaction (found by matching the electron counts of the two half-reactions via their LCM).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify electrodes: anode = Cr3+/Cr (E∘=−0.74 V, oxidation: Cr→Cr3++3e−), cathode = Cd2+/Cd (E∘=−0.40 V, reduction: Cd2++2e−→Cd).
- Compute cell potential: Ecell∘=Ecathode∘−Eanode∘=(−0.40)−(−0.74)=0.34 V (positive, confirming the reaction is spontaneous as written -- consistent with it being a genuine galvanic cell).
- Balance the overall reaction by matching electrons: the anode releases 3 electrons per Cr, the cathode consumes 2 electrons per Cd2+; the LCM of 3 and 2 is 6, so multiply the anode reaction by 2 and the cathode reaction by 3: 2Cr→2Cr3++6e− and 3Cd2++6e−→3Cd, giving overall 2Cr+3Cd2+→2Cr3++3Cd with n=6.
- Apply ΔG∘=−nFEcell∘=−6×96,500×0.34.
- Compute: 6×96,500=579,000; 579,000×0.34=196,860 J/mol≈−196.8 kJ/mol (negative, consistent with a spontaneous cell reaction).
Common Mistakes
- Reversing anode and cathode (using Eanode∘−Ecathode∘), which flips the sign of Ecell∘ and hence of ΔG∘.
- Using n=1 or n=2 (from an unbalanced half-reaction) instead of the correctly balanced n=6 for the overall reaction, which would give a ΔG∘ several times too small in magnitude.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) -- −196.8 kJ/mol.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-10-05-FN1 markMCQQ.An electrochemical cell is represented as X∣X+(x M)∣∣Y+(y M)∣Y. The e.m.f measured is +0.5 V. Identify the corresponding cell reaction. (A) X++Y⟶X+Y+ (B) X+Y⟶XY (C) X+Y+⟶X++Y (D) X++Y−⟶X−+Y+
›Reveal solutionSolution
By the standard cell-notation convention (anode | ... || ... | cathode) and a positive measured emf, the spontaneous cell reaction is X+Y+→X++Y.
Concept and Intuition
Electrochemical cell notation has a fixed convention: the electrode written on the left is the anode, where oxidation occurs, and the electrode on the right is the cathode, where reduction occurs — the double vertical line "||" represents the salt bridge separating the two half-cells. A positive emf value for the cell as written confirms the reaction is indeed spontaneous in the direction implied by this left-to-right convention (anode oxidation feeding electrons to cathode reduction).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Left half-cell, X∣X+(xM): this is the anode — oxidation occurs here, X→X++e−.
- Right half-cell, Y+(yM)∣Y: this is the cathode — reduction occurs here, Y++e−→Y.
- Combine the two half-reactions (balancing the single electron transferred in each): X+Y+→X++Y.
- The given emf is +0.5V (positive), which confirms this reaction as written is indeed the spontaneous direction (a negative emf would instead indicate the reverse reaction is spontaneous).
Common Mistakes
- Reversing which side is the anode/cathode — cell notation is standardized with anode always on the left, cathode on the right.
- Writing the overall reaction with charges/species that don't correspond to the actual redox half-reactions implied by the cell diagram (e.g. inventing an X− or Y− species, as in option D, which isn't consistent with the X+/Y+ notation given).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — X+Y+⟶X++Y.
ANSWER: C
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.