For M2+/M and M3+/M2+ systems the E∘ values for some metals are as follows:
| System | E∘ | System | E∘ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cr2+/Cr | −0.9 V | Cr3+/Cr2+ | −0.4 V |
| Mn2+/Mn | −1.2 V | Mn3+/Mn2+ | +1.5 V |
| Fe2+/Fe | −0.4 V | Fe3+/Fe2+ | +0.8 V |
Use this data to comment upon:
- the stability of Fe3+ in acid solution as compared to that of Cr3+ or Mn3+ and
- the ease with which iron can be oxidised as compared to a similar process for either chromium or manganese metal.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Stability of Oxidation States
Stability of Oxidation States – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you're holding a ball on a hill. If you place it exactly at the top, it's balanced — but the slightest push sends it rolling down. That's an unstable position. If you place it in a small dip on the hillside, it stays put even if nudged — that's stable. Oxidation states work the same way: some are like the hilltop (easily changed), others like the dip (hard to change).
The Core Intuition
An oxidation state is just a number we assign to an atom to track how many electrons it has gained or lost compared to its neutral state. But atoms don't "want" to stay in arbitrary oxidation states — they want to reach a configuration that minimises their energy.
Stability here means: how reluctant is that oxidation state to change under normal conditions? A stable oxidation state resists being oxidised further or reduced further. An unstable one readily changes into something else.
The Precise Statement
Stability of an oxidation state refers to the tendency of an element to maintain that particular oxidation state under given conditions (temperature, pH, presence of other reagents). A stable oxidation state is one that does not easily undergo redox reactions — it is neither easily oxidised nor easily reduced.
This depends on three key factors:
- Electronic configuration – Half-filled and fully-filled d or f subshells confer extra stability (e.g., Fe3+ with d5 is more stable than Fe2+ with d6 in some contexts).
- Inert pair effect – Heavier p-block elements (like Tl, Pb, Bi) show lower oxidation states (e.g., +1 for Tl) as more stable than higher ones (+3 for Tl), because the s-electrons become reluctant to participate.
- Disproportionation tendency – Some oxidation states are unstable because they spontaneously convert into two other states (e.g., Cu+ in aqueous solution gives Cu2+ and Cu).
Stability is relative — it depends on the environment. Mn2+ is stable in acidic solution but easily oxidised in alkaline medium. Always specify conditions when discussing stability.
Examples That Make It Concrete
Transition metals – Cr3+ (d3) and Mn2+ (d5) are exceptionally stable because half-filled/half-filled-like configurations have low energy. Cr2+ (d4) is easily oxidised to Cr3+ — it's unstable.
p-block elements – Pb2+ is stable, Pb4+ is a strong oxidising agent (unstable). Sn2+ is a reducing agent (easily oxidised to Sn4+), so Sn4+ is more stable for tin.
Common pattern – For most elements, the most common oxidation state is the most stable one under standard conditions. But "most common" isn't always "most stable" — e.g., Fe3+ is common but Fe2+ is more stable in acidic solution.
Do not confuse "stability" with "occurrence". Mn7+ (as MnO4−) is common in the lab but is a powerful oxidising agent — it is not stable in the sense of resisting change. It readily accepts electrons.
How to Think About It in Exams …
Why this formula?
Stability of Oxidation States: Why It Works
This concept explains why certain oxidation states of an element are more stable than others — and why some states are never observed at all.
The Core Idea: Energy Minimisation
An oxidation state is stable when the total energy of the system is at a minimum. This depends on three competing factors:
- Ionisation energy (energy needed to remove electrons)
- Lattice energy (for ionic compounds) or bond energy (for covalent compounds)
- Electronic configuration (half-filled / fully-filled subshells)
There is no single formula for stability — instead, we use trends and principles that act as "formulae" for prediction.
Key Principle 1: Inert Pair Effect (for p-block elements)
Why it holds:
For heavier elements (e.g., Tl, Pb, Bi), the 6s² electrons are held very tightly due to poor shielding and relativistic effects. They resist removal.
- Result: Lower oxidation state (e.g., +1 for Tl, +2 for Pb) becomes more stable than the higher state (+3, +4).
- Example: TlX3+ is a strong oxidising agent — it readily gains two electrons to become TlX+.
Derivation logic:
The energy cost to remove the 6s² electrons is greater than the energy gained by forming additional bonds or lattice. So the system stays in the lower state.
Key Principle 2: Half-Filled / Fully-Filled Subshell Stability
Why it holds:
A half-filled (d5, f7) or fully-filled (d10, f14) subshell has extra exchange energy and symmetry — making it unusually stable.
- Example: MnX2+ (d5) is more stable than MnX3+ (d4). FeX3+ (d5) is more stable than FeX2+ (d6).
Derivation logic:
The exchange energy (Hund's rule) is maximum for half-filled configurations. Removing an electron from a half-filled shell costs extra energy — so the half-filled state is favoured.
Key Principle 3: Lattice Energy / Hydration Energy Compensation
For transition metals, stability of a particular oxidation state in aqueous solution depends on:
ΔG∘=ΔHhydration∘−ΔHionisation∘
Why it holds:
- Higher oxidation states have higher ionisation energy (harder to remove electrons).
- But they also have higher hydration energy (smaller, more charged ions attract water more strongly).
- The balance determines which state is stable.
Example:
- CuX+ is unstable in water because its hydration energy is too low to compensate for the loss of the second electron.
- CuX2+ is stable in water.
Key Principle 4: Disproportionation
Some oxidation states are unstable and spontaneously convert to two other states:
2CuX+Cu+CuX2+
Why it holds: …
Concept: Stability of Oxidation States — a more positive E∘ for M3+/M2+ means M3+ is a stronger oxidising agent (less stable in solution), while a more negative E∘ for M2+/M means the metal is more easily oxidised.
Reasoning:
- Stability of M3+: For Cr3+/Cr2+, E∘=−0.4 V (negative, so Cr3+ is not easily reduced — stable). For Fe3+/Fe2+, E∘=+0.8 V (positive, so Fe3+ readily accepts electrons — less stable). For Mn3+/Mn2+, E∘=+1.5 V (highly positive, so Mn3+ is a very strong oxidiser — least stable). Thus, Fe3+ is less stable than Cr3+ but more stable than Mn3+ in acid. …
The key idea is to use the standard electrode potentials to compare the tendency of M3+ to get reduced (stability in acid) and the ease of oxidation of M to M2+. For (i), Fe3+ is more stable than Mn3+ but less stable than Cr3+ in acid. For (ii), iron is harder to oxidise than chromium but easier than manganese.
Understanding the Concept: What the Potentials Tell Us
The two sets of potentials given — E∘ for M2+/M and E∘ for M3+/M2+ — are like two different thermometers for the same metal. The first tells us how easily the metal loses electrons to become M2+ (oxidation of the metal). The second tells us how easily M2+ loses another electron to become M3+ (oxidation of the +2 ion), or equivalently, how stable the M3+ ion is against being reduced back to M2+.
A more positive E∘ for M3+/M2+ means the half-reaction M3++e−→M2+ is more spontaneous — so M3+ is a stronger oxidising agent and is less stable in solution (it wants to grab an electron and become M2+). Conversely, a more negative E∘ for M3+/M2+ means M3+ is harder to reduce, hence more stable.
For the metal itself, a more negative E∘ for M2+/M means the oxidation M→M2++2e− is more spontaneous (since the reverse reduction is less favourable). So the metal is easier to oxidise.
Let's apply this logic step by step.
(i) Stability of Fe3+ in acid solution compared to Cr3+ and Mn3+
1. Compare the M3+/M2+ potentials.
The relevant values are:
- Cr3+/Cr2+: E∘=−0.4 V
- Fe3+/Fe2+: E∘=+0.8 V
- Mn3+/Mn2+: E∘=+1.5 V
2. Interpret the sign and magnitude.
A more positive E∘ means the reduction M3++e−→M2+ is more favourable. So Mn3+ (with +1.5 V) is the strongest oxidising agent among the three — it is most eager to accept an electron and become Mn2+. That makes Mn3+ the least stable in solution.
Fe3+ (+0.8 V) is less eager than Mn3+ but still quite willing to be reduced.
Cr3+ (−0.4 V) has a negative potential — the reduction is non-spontaneous under standard conditions. So Cr3+ is the most stable; it does not want to become Cr2+.
3. Order of stability.
Stability in acid solution: Cr3+>Fe3+>Mn3+.
A common mistake is to think a more positive E∘ for M3+/M2+ means M3+ is more stable. Actually, it means the opposite — it is more easily reduced, hence less stable.
4. Conclusion for (i).
Fe3+ is more stable than Mn3+ but less stable than Cr3+ in acid solution.
--- …
Method: Standard Electrode Potential Comparison for Redox Stability
This method uses the sign and magnitude of E∘ values to determine:
- Stability of a higher oxidation state (from M3+/M2+ data)
- Ease of oxidation of the metal (from M2+/M data)
Steps
Step 1: Understand what each E∘ tells you
| System | Meaning | More positive E∘ → |
|---|---|---|
| M2+/M | Tendency of M2+ to get reduced to M | M2+ is easier to reduce (less stable as ion) |
| M3+/M2+ | Tendency of M3+ to get reduced to M2+ | M3+ is easier to reduce (less stable as M3+) |
Step 2: Analyse stability of M3+ (part i)
-
Cr3+/Cr2+: E∘=−0.4 V
→ Negative E∘ means Cr3+ is not easily reduced to Cr2+
→ Cr3+ is stable in acid
-
Mn3+/Mn2+: E∘=+1.5 V
→ Large positive E∘ means Mn3+ is very easily reduced to Mn2+
→ Mn3+ is unstable (it will readily accept electrons)
-
Fe3+/Fe2+: E∘=+0.8 V
→ Positive E∘, but smaller than +1.5 V
→ Fe3+ is moderately stable — less stable than Cr3+, but more stable than Mn3+
Conclusion for (i):
Stability order in acid: Cr3+>Fe3+>Mn3+
Fe3+ is less stable than Cr3+ but much more stable than Mn3+.
Step 3: Analyse ease of oxidation of the metal (part ii)
Oxidation of metal: M→M2++2e−
This is the reverse of the given M2+/M reduction. …
Common Mistakes & How to Avoid Them
Mistake 1: Confusing "Stability" with "Reducing Power"
The error: Students often think a more negative E∘ for M3+/M2+ means the ion is more stable. They see Cr3+/Cr2+=−0.4 V and think Cr3+ is "unstable" because the value is negative.
Why it's wrong: Stability of a higher oxidation state (like +3) in acid solution depends on how easily it gets reduced to the +2 state. A more positive E∘ for M3+/M2+ means the M3+ ion is a stronger oxidising agent — it readily accepts electrons and gets reduced. This makes the +3 state less stable in solution.
How to avoid: Remember the rule:
- More positive E∘ for M3+/M2+ → M3+ is easily reduced → less stable
- More negative E∘ for M3+/M2+ → M3+ is hard to reduce → more stable
For the given data:
- Cr3+/Cr2+=−0.4 V → Cr3+ is most stable
- Fe3+/Fe2+=+0.8 V → Fe3+ is moderately stable
- Mn3+/Mn2+=+1.5 V → Mn3+ is least stable (strongest oxidiser)
Mistake 2: Misinterpreting "Ease of Oxidation" for Metals
The error: Students look at M2+/M values and think a more positive value means easier oxidation. They see Fe2+/Fe=−0.4 V and Cr2+/Cr=−0.9 V and conclude iron oxidises more easily.
Why it's wrong: Oxidation of a metal M to M2+ is the reverse of the reduction reaction M2++2e−→M. A more negative E∘ for M2+/M means the reduction is less favourable — so the reverse (oxidation) is more favourable.
How to avoid: Flip your thinking:
- More negative E∘ for M2+/M → metal is easier to oxidise (stronger reducing agent)
- Less negative E∘ for M2+/M → metal is harder to oxidise
For the given data:
- Mn2+/Mn=−1.2 V → easiest to oxidise
- Cr2+/Cr=−0.9 V → moderate
- Fe2+/Fe=−0.4 V → hardest to oxidise among the three
Mistake 3: Forgetting to Compare Both Systems Together
The error: Students answer part (i) using only M3+/M2+ data and part (ii) using only M2+/M data, without linking the two.
Why it's wrong: The question asks for comparative statements. For part (ii), "ease with which iron can be oxidised" refers to Fe→Fe2+, which uses Fe2+/Fe data. But the comparison with Cr and Mn must use their respective M2+/M values.
How to avoid: Write your answer in clear comparative sentences:
Part (i):
- Cr3+ is most stable (most negative E∘ for Cr3+/Cr2+)
- Fe3+ is moderately stable
- Mn3+ is least stable (most positive E∘)
Part (ii):
- Mn is easiest to oxidise (most negative E∘ for Mn2+/Mn)
- Cr is next …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.Identify the pair of ions which act as good reducing agents (A) Ce4+,Yb2+ (B) Ce4+,Tb4+ (C) Ce3+,Tb2+ (D) Eu2+,Yb2+
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests which unusual lanthanide oxidation states behave as reducing vs oxidising agents; Eu2+ and Yb2+ are the textbook pair of reducing agents, so the answer is (D).
Concept and Intuition
Lanthanides normally exist as Ln3+. A few elements also show +2 or +4 states when that unusual state happens to correspond to an especially stable f0, f7 (half-filled) or f14 (fully-filled) configuration. But "isolable" is not the same as "thermodynamically preferred" — the normal +3 state is still the most stable overall for the element, so:
- An unusual +4 ion (higher than normal +3) tends to gain an electron and fall back to +3 — it therefore acts as an oxidising agent (itself gets reduced). Examples: Ce4+ (4f0→4f1), Tb4+ (4f7→4f8).
- An unusual +2 ion (lower than normal +3) tends to lose an electron and rise back to +3 — it therefore acts as a reducing agent (itself gets oxidised). Examples: Eu2+ (4f7→4f6), Yb2+ (4f14→4f13), and (more weakly) Sm2+.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify each ion's usual/unusual character: Ce4+ (unusual +4, oxidiser), Tb4+ (unusual +4, oxidiser), Eu2+ (unusual +2, reducer), Yb2+ (unusual +2, reducer).
- Option (A) Ce4+,Yb2+ — mixes an oxidiser with a reducer, not a matching pair.
- Option (B) Ce4+,Tb4+ — both are oxidising agents, not reducing. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.Which pair of ions act as strong reducing agents? (A) Ce4+,Tb4+ (B) Eu2+,Yb2+ (C) Gd3+,Lu3+ (D) La3+,Pm3+
›Reveal solutionSolution
Eu2+ and Yb2+ are strong reducing agents because oxidising to the common +3 lanthanide state gives them extra electronic stability.
Concept and Intuition
Lanthanides are overwhelmingly found in the +3 oxidation state. Ions that deviate from +3 tend to revert to it if doing so gives a specially stable electron configuration (empty, half-filled, or fully-filled f subshell). Eu2+ (4f7, half-filled — already quite stable) still readily loses an electron to Eu3+ (4f6) — actually, more precisely, the drive is that +2 ions with configurations one electron short of a stable count are pushed to lose an electron toward +3, or +4 ions are pulled to gain one toward +3. The exam-relevant memorised fact: Eu2+ and Sm2+ (and here, Yb2+, which is 4f14, fully filled) act as reducing agents by oxidising to +3, while Ce4+ and Tb4+ act as oxidising agents by being reduced to the stable +3 state (Ce3+ is 4f0; Tb3+ is 4f8/near half-filled +1 pattern that's more stable than Tb4+).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Recall the standard exceptions to +3 among lanthanides: Ce4+,Pr4+,Tb4+ (oxidising agents, reduce to +3) and Eu2+,Sm2+,Yb2+ (reducing agents, oxidise to +3).
- Option (A) Ce4+,Tb4+ — both oxidising agents, not reducing. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.How many of the following lanthanide elements exhibit +4 oxidation state ? Ce,Pr,Nd,Pm,Sm,Eu,Gd,Tb,Dy (A) 5 (B) 4 (C) 3 (D) 6
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests which lanthanides depart from the dominant +3 state to also show +4, based on electronic-configuration stability.
Concept and Intuition
Lanthanides are overwhelmingly +3 because that oxidation state matches a filled 6s/5d loss while leaving a reasonably stable 4f configuration. A few members show +4 (or +2) only when losing (or gaining) one more electron gets them to, or close to, an empty (f0), half-filled (f7), or fully-filled (f14) 4f sub-shell — extra stability that offsets the higher ionisation energy.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Ce (4f¹5d¹6s²): losing one more electron beyond +3 gives Ce⁴⁺ with f0 — very stable, +4 is in fact its best-known state (e.g., CeO2).
- Pr and Nd: Pr⁴⁺ (f1) and Nd⁴⁺ (f2) are known, though less stable than Ce⁴⁺ (e.g., PrO2, and Nd⁴⁺ in a few solid oxides).
- Pm: radioactive, poorly characterised; +4 not established.
- Sm, Eu: these instead favour +2 (f6 close to half-filled for Sm²⁺, and f7 half-filled exactly for Eu²⁺) — the opposite direction, not +4. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.Identify the correct statement (A) Yb2+ is an oxidant (B) Lu3+ is paramagnetic (C) CrO is basic (D) Brass is an alloy of Cu, Sn
›Reveal solutionSolution
Of the four statements, only "CrO is basic" is correct — the others misstate Yb2+'s redox role, Lu3+'s magnetism, and brass's composition.
Concept and Intuition
This question tests several standard d- and f-block facts together: (i) lanthanide ions in unusual oxidation states tend to revert to the characteristic, most stable +3 state, so Eu2+/Yb2+ act as reducing agents (they get oxidized to +3) while Ce4+/Tb4+ act as oxidizing agents (they get reduced to +3);
(ii) magnetism of lanthanide ions follows from unpaired 4f electrons — a fully-filled or fully-empty 4f subshell is diamagnetic;
(iii) the acid-base character of transition-metal oxides follows their oxidation state — low oxidation states give basic oxides, high oxidation states give acidic oxides, with intermediate ones amphoteric;
(iv) common alloy compositions (brass vs bronze) are a factual recall point.
Step-by-Step Solution
- (A) Yb2+: has configuration 4f14 (fully filled, stable), so it readily loses an electron to attain the general lanthanide-favoured Yb3+ state — meaning Yb2+ itself gets oxidized, i.e. it is a reducing agent, not an oxidant. Statement false.
- (B) Lu3+: Lu (Z=71) is [Xe]4f145d16s2; removing 3 electrons (5d1,6s2) gives Lu3+=[Xe]4f14 — completely filled 4f, hence diamagnetic, not paramagnetic. Statement false. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-08-AN1 markMCQQ.For which of the following +3 oxidation state is highly oxidizing in character? (A) Al (B) Ga (C) In (D) Tl
›Reveal solutionSolution
The inert pair effect is strongest for the heaviest Group 13 element, thallium, making its +3 oxidation state a strong oxidizer that is readily reduced to the more stable +1 state.
Concept and Intuition
Going down Group 13 (B, Al, Ga, In, Tl), the ns² electron pair becomes increasingly reluctant to participate in bonding due to poor shielding by intervening d/f electrons and relativistic contraction of the ns orbital — this is the "inert pair effect". Consequently, the +1 oxidation state (where the ns² pair stays un-ionized) becomes progressively more stable relative to +3 as we move down the group. For Al and Ga, the +3 state is the dominant, stable state. For Tl, the inert pair effect is so pronounced that +1 is actually the more stable oxidation state, which means Tl(III) compounds are strong oxidizing agents — they are readily reduced to Tl(I), releasing energy in the process.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Rank the inert pair effect across Al, Ga, In, Tl — it strengthens down the group, being negligible for Al and dominant for Tl.
- For Al, +3 is essentially the only common, stable oxidation state (Al³⁺ is not oxidizing).
- For Ga and In, +3 is still the more stable state, with +1 being a minor, less common state. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set ap-2021-10-05-FN1 markMCQQ.Which among the following is the strongest oxidizing agent? (A) SnO2 (B) SiO2 (C) GeO2 (D) PbO2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The inert-pair effect destabilises Pb(IV) relative to Pb(II), making PbO2 a strong oxidising agent — the strongest among SnO2, SiO2, GeO2, PbO2.
Concept and Intuition
Down group 14, the ns² electron pair becomes increasingly reluctant to participate in bonding (the inert-pair effect), so the lower oxidation state (+2) becomes progressively more stable relative to the group oxidation state (+4) as you go from C to Pb. This means Pb4+ compounds readily oxidise other species while being reduced to the more stable Pb2+.
Step-by-Step Solution
- SiO2, GeO2: silicon and germanium show little inert-pair effect; +4 is their stable, common state, so these oxides are not strong oxidisers.
- SnO2: tin shows a mild inert-pair effect; Sn4+ is reasonably stable, only a weak oxidiser. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The incorrect statement among the following is /are ________ (A) NCl5 does not exist while PCl5 does (B) Pb prefers to form tetravalent compounds (C) The three C−O bonds are equal in the CO32− ion (D) Both O2+ and NO are paramagnetic
›Reveal solutionSolution
The inert-pair effect makes lead prefer the +2 (divalent) oxidation state, not +4 (tetravalent) — so the claim that "Pb prefers to form tetravalent compounds" is the incorrect statement.
Concept and Intuition
Going down Group 14, the heavier elements' ns2 electron pair becomes increasingly reluctant to participate in bonding (the inert-pair effect, due to poor shielding by intervening d/f electrons and relativistic contraction of the ns orbital). This makes the lower oxidation state progressively more stable for heavier members: Sn shows both +2 and +4 fairly readily, but Pb strongly favours +2 (PbO, PbCl2, Pb(NO3)2 are common; Pb4+ compounds like PbO2 are comparatively strong oxidizers/less stable).
Step-by-Step Solution
- (A) NCl5 does not exist (N has no accessible d orbitals to expand its octet beyond 4 bonds) while PCl5 does (P can use 3d orbitals) — this is a correct/true statement.
- (B) "Pb prefers to form tetravalent compounds" — false; due to the inert-pair effect Pb actually prefers divalent compounds. This is the incorrect statement. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-FN1 markMCQQ.The stability of +1 oxidation state increases in the sequence ________ (A) Ga<In<Al<Tl (B) Al<Ga<In<Tl (C) Tl<In<Ga<Al (D) In<Tl<Ga<Al
›Reveal solutionSolution
The inert-pair effect grows down group 13, making the +1 oxidation state progressively more stable: least for Al, most for Tl.
Concept and Intuition
The inert-pair effect describes the reluctance of the outermost ns2 electron pair to participate in bonding as atomic number increases down a group, due to poor shielding by intervening d/f electrons and relativistic effects for heavier elements. In group 13, this makes the +1 oxidation state (retaining the ns2 pair, only losing the single p electron) increasingly favoured relative to +3 as you go down the group.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Al: +3 is overwhelmingly the stable/common oxidation state; +1 compounds are rare and unstable.
- Ga: +1 exists but is less stable than +3; +3 still dominant.
- In: +1 and +3 are both reasonably common, with +1 gaining stability. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-FN1 markMCQQ.Among the following options, identify the one which exhibits the greatest number of oxidation states. (A) Fe (B) Mn (C) Cr (D) V
›Reveal solutionSolution
Manganese exhibits the broadest range of oxidation states among first-row transition metals. Answer: Mn.
Concept and Intuition
The number of oxidation states a transition metal can adopt tends to be maximised near the middle of the 3d series, where there are enough d-electrons to support both low and (through loss of many/all valence electrons) very high oxidation states, while still having partially-filled d-orbitals available for a range of intermediate states. Manganese, with configuration 3d54s2, is the textbook example, spanning +2 (as Mn2+) all the way to +7 (as MnO4−).
Step-by-Step Solution
- V (Z=23): common oxidation states +2,+3,+4,+5 — 4 common states.
- Cr (Z=24): common oxidation states +2,+3,+6 (and +4,+5 less commonly) — fewer well-established states than Mn. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-10-05-FN1 markMCQQ.The most common oxidation state among lanthanoids is ______ (A) +4 (B) +3 (C) +2 (D) +1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Almost all lanthanoids show a dominant +3 oxidation state because losing the 6s2 (and 5d1 where present) electrons is comparatively easy, while removing a 4th electron from the deeply shielded 4f subshell requires a very high ionisation energy.
Concept and Intuition
The chemistry of lanthanoids is governed by the filling of the inner 4f subshell, which is well shielded from the surrounding chemical environment by the outer 5s25p6 shells. Because the 4f electrons are so shielded, they don't participate readily in bonding, and it is always the outermost 6s2 electrons (plus the occasional 5d1) that ionise first.
Step-by-Step Solution
- General configuration: [Xe]4f1−145d0,16s2.
- First two ionisations remove 6s2 readily; where a 5d1 electron is present it is the third to go — giving the Ln3+ ion with configuration [Xe]4fn.
- The 4th ionisation energy (removing an electron from 4fn) is very large, because the 4f subshell is already at a comparatively stable, contracted low-energy configuration once the outer electrons are gone. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.