Q.Evaluate: ∫e4logx−e3logxe6logx−e5logxdx
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Exponential Logarithmic Simplification
Exponential Logarithmic Simplification
You've probably seen expressions like elogx or log(ex) and wondered whether they just cancel out. The short answer is yes — but only under the right conditions. This is what we call exponential logarithmic simplification.
The Intuition
Think of the exponential function ex and the natural logarithm logx as inverse operations — they "undo" each other.
- Start with a number, take its natural log, then exponentiate the result: you get back where you started, elogx=x.
- Start with a number, exponentiate it, then take the natural log: you also get back, log(ex)=x.
This is exactly like how adding 5 and subtracting 5 cancel out, or how squaring and taking the square root undo each other (for non-negative numbers).
The functions ex and logx are inverses — they reverse each other's effect, just like x and x2 are inverses for x≥0.
The Precise Statement
elogx=xfor all x>0
log(ex)=xfor all real x
The first formula works only when x>0 because logx is only defined for positive inputs. The second works for any real x because ex is always positive.
A common mistake is to write elogx=x for x≤0. This is wrong — logx is undefined for x≤0 in the reals. Always check the domain.
Why This Matters
This simplification lets you solve equations that mix exponentials and logs:
- To solve log(x)=5, exponentiate both sides: elogx=e5⟹x=e5.
- To solve ex=7, take the natural log: log(ex)=log7⟹x=log7.
Without this rule you'd be stuck; with it, you can "peel away" the exponential or the log to isolate the variable.
A Quick Example
Simplify elog(3x+1). The expression is defined only when 3x+1>0; if that holds, then: …
The key idea is to simplify the exponentials using enlogx=xn, then reduce the rational expression.
First, rewrite each term:
e6logx=x6,e5logx=x5,e4logx=x4,e3logx=x3.
So the integral becomes:
∫x4−x3x6−x5dx=∫x3(x−1)x5(x−1)dx. …
Since eklogx=xk, the integrand simplifies to x2, so the integral is 3x3+C.
Rewrite the exponentials. Using eklogx=xk:
∫e4logx−e3logxe6logx−e5logxdx=∫x4−x3x6−x5dx.
Simplify the rational function. Factor numerator and denominator: …
Method: Simplify enlogx before integrating
Use this whenever an integrand hides powers of x inside exponentials of logarithms. The integral looks intimidating but collapses to an elementary one after one simplification.
Steps
Step 1: Apply enlogx=xn.
Because log and exp are inverses, enlogx=(elogx)n=xn. Rewrite every such term.
Step 2: Factor numerator and denominator.
After converting, you get a rational function in x. Factor out common powers, e.g. x4−x3x6−x5=x3(x−1)x5(x−1).
Step 3: Cancel common factors. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Not converting enlogx to xn.
Why it's wrong: leaving the exponentials in place makes the integral look non-elementary, and students give up or misuse exponential rules. Correct approach: apply enlogx=xn first.
Mistake 2: Cancelling incorrectly across the fraction. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.If sinhx=2−1, coshy=2, and x+y=logp, then p= (A) 5+14+23 (B) 43+25−1 (C) (5−1)(2+3) (D) 5+14−23
›Reveal solutionSolution
Solve each hyperbolic equation for ex and ey as quadratics in t=e(⋅), then multiply to get p=ex+y.
Concept and Intuition
sinhx and coshy are defined purely in terms of ex,ey, so each condition is really a quadratic in t=ex (or ey) once you clear denominators. Taking the positive root (since e(⋅)>0 always) pins down each exponential uniquely (using the principal/positive value of y), and then p=ex+y=exey is just a product.
Step-by-Step Solution
- sinhx=2ex−e−x=−21⇒ex−e−x=−1.
- Let t=ex: t−t1=−1⇒t2+t−1=0⇒t=2−1±5. Since t>0, t=25−1.
- coshy=2ey+e−y=2⇒ey+e−y=4.
- Let s=ey: s+s1=4⇒s2−4s+1=0⇒s=2±3. Taking the principal (positive) y=cosh−12, s=ey=2+3.
- p=ex+y=ex⋅ey=25−1⋅(2+3). …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-27-FN1 markMCQQ.The equation x43(log2x)2+log2x−45=2 has (A) no real roots (B) only one real solution (C) exactly two real solutions (D) exactly three real solutions
›Reveal solutionSolution
Substituting t=log2x turns the equation into a cubic 3t3+4t2−5t−2=0, which factors into three distinct real roots — each corresponding to one valid positive x. So the equation has exactly three real solutions.
Concept and Intuition
Whenever the variable appears both as the base and inside the exponent (here x appears as the base and log2x appears inside the exponent), substituting t=log2x is the natural move: it converts everything into a polynomial equation in t, and since x=2t is a strictly increasing bijection from R to (0,∞), every real solution t corresponds to exactly one valid positive x (no solutions are lost or spuriously created).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Domain: x>0 (so log2x is defined). Let t=log2x.
- The given equation is x43t2+t−45=2. Take log2 of both sides (valid since both sides are positive):
(43t2+t−45)⋅log2x=log22=21.
- Since log2x=t: (43t2+t−45)t=21.
- Expand: 43t3+t2−45t−21=0. Multiply through by 4: 3t3+4t2−5t−2=0.
- Test t=1: 3(1)+4(1)−5(1)−2=3+4−5−2=0. ✓ So (t−1) is a factor.
- Divide: 3t3+4t2−5t−2=(t−1)(3t2+7t+2).
- Solve 3t2+7t+2=0 via the quadratic formula: t=2(3)−7±72−4(3)(2)=6−7±49−24=6−7±5.
- This gives t=6−7+5=−31 and t=6−7−5=−2.
- So the three roots are t=1, −31, −2 — all distinct real numbers. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.x→∞lim[(1+n31)n31(1+n38)n34(1+n327)n39…(2)n1]= (A) log2−21 (B) e(log2−21) (C) e(32log2−1) (D) 31(2log2−1)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Taking the log converts the product into a Riemann sum that becomes ∫01x2log(1+x3)dx=31(2log2−1); exponentiating gives option (C).
Concept and Intuition
A product of the form ∏k(1+n3k3)k2/n3 is a classic "log turns product into Riemann sum" limit: taking log converts the exponents into a sum that, in the limit n→∞, becomes a definite integral in x=k/n.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Identify the general factor: for k=1,2,…,n, the term is (1+n3k3)k2/n3; at k=n this is (1+1)n2/n3=21/n, matching the last given factor.
- Let L=log(product)=k=1∑nn3k2log(1+n3k3)=n1k=1∑n(nk)2log(1+(nk)3).
- As n→∞ this Riemann sum →∫01x2log(1+x3)dx. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.cosh(log4)= (A) 178 (B) 817 (C) 0 (D) 89
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct application of the hyperbolic cosine definition; cosh(log4)=817.
Concept and Intuition
coshu is defined purely in terms of the exponential function, so as soon as eu is known (here u=log4 means natural log, so eu=4 exactly), the value follows immediately — no trig or hyperbolic identities beyond the definition are needed.
Step-by-Step Solution
- coshu=2eu+e−u.
- With u=log4 (natural log), eu=elog4=4.
- e−u=eu1=41.
- cosh(log4)=24+41=2416+41=2417=817.
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.If α=loge(2+3), then 1−tanhαcoshα+1−cothαsinhα= (A) 4+23 (B) 7+43 (C) 23+1 (D) 2+3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The given expression simplifies to eα using cosh2α−sinh2α=1 and coshα−sinhα=e−α; with α=log(2+3), this is just 2+3.
Concept and Intuition
Expressions combining tanh,coth with cosh,sinh often simplify dramatically by writing everything over a common denominator involving coshα−sinhα or coshα+sinhα — these combinations are exactly e∓α, which is the whole point of hyperbolic functions being defined via exponentials.
Step-by-Step Solution
- 1−tanhαcoshα=1−coshαsinhαcoshα=coshα−sinhαcosh2α.
- 1−cothαsinhα=1−sinhαcoshαsinhα=sinhα−coshαsinh2α=coshα−sinhα−sinh2α.
- Adding: coshα−sinhαcosh2α−sinh2α=coshα−sinhα1 (using the identity cosh2α−sinh2α=1). …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-16-AN1 markMCQQ.If 2sinhx=coshx, then x= (A) 31log2 (B) 2log3 (C) 21log3 (D) log9
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing sinhx,coshx in exponential form and solving the resulting linear equation in ex gives e2x=3, so x=21ln3.
Concept and Intuition
sinhx and coshx are defined directly via ex: sinhx=2ex−e−x, coshx=2ex+e−x. Substituting these definitions converts a hyperbolic equation into ordinary exponential algebra.
Step-by-Step Solution
- 2sinhx=coshx⇒2⋅2ex−e−x=2ex+e−x.
- Simplify left side: ex−e−x=2ex+e−x.
- Multiply both sides by 2: 2ex−2e−x=ex+e−x.
- Rearranging: 2ex−ex=e−x+2e−x⇒ex=3e−x.
- Multiply both sides by ex: e2x=3. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-AN1 markMCQQ.If α and β are the roots of the equation 26x−3(23x+2)+32=0 with β<1, then 2α+3β= (A) −3 (B) −4 (C) 3 (D) 4
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests solving an exponential equation via substitution, then correctly assigning roots based on the given size constraint. Answer: 2α+3β=4 (option D).
Concept and Intuition
Equations with repeated exponential terms like 26x and 23x+2 can be reduced to a quadratic by substituting t=23x (noting 26x=t2 and 23x+2=4⋅23x=4t). After solving for t, convert back to x using logarithms (or by recognizing powers of 2), then use the given ordering constraint to correctly assign which root is α and which is β.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Equation: 26x−3(23x+2)+32=0. Let t=23x, so 26x=t2 and 23x+2=4t.
- Substitute: t2−12t+32=0.
- Solve: t=212±144−128=212±4, giving t=8 or t=4.
- t=8=23⇒23x=23⇒3x=3⇒x=1.
- t=4=22⇒23x=22⇒3x=2⇒x=32. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-04-AN1 markMCQQ.If 4+6(e2x+1)tanhx=11coshx+11sinhx, then x= (A) log10 (B) log4 (C) log5 (D) log2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Rewriting the hyperbolic expression in terms of y=ex reduces the equation to a solvable quadratic 6y2−11y−2=0, giving x=log2.
Concept and Intuition
Hyperbolic-function equations usually collapse into ordinary algebraic (often quadratic) equations once everything is expressed via ex, since coshx,sinhx,tanhx are all built from ex and e−x.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Note e2x+1=ex(ex+e−x)=2excoshx.
- So 6(e2x+1)tanhx=6⋅2excoshx⋅coshxsinhx=12exsinhx.
- The equation becomes 4+12exsinhx=11(coshx+sinhx)=11ex (since coshx+sinhx=ex).
- Since exsinhx=ex⋅2ex−e−x=2e2x−1, we get 4+6(e2x−1)=11ex, i.e. 6e2x−2=11ex. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-04-FN1 markMCQQ.If 4x−3x−1/2=3x+1/2−22x−1 then the value of x is (A) 7/2 (B) 5/2 (C) 1/2 (D) 3/2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Grouping powers of 2 on one side and powers of 3 on the other reduces the equation to (4/3)x=8/(33), solved by x=3/2.
Concept and Intuition
Exponential equations mixing two different bases (here 2 and 3, disguised as 4 and 3) can often be solved by collecting all terms of each base onto one side, factoring out the common power, and then comparing/solving the resulting single-base-ratio equation.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Rewrite 4x=22x and rearrange the given equation 4x−3x−1/2=3x+1/2−22x−1 as 22x+22x−1=3x+1/2+3x−1/2.
- LHS: 22x+22x−1=22x(1+21)=22x⋅23.
- RHS: 3x+1/2+3x−1/2=3x(3+31)=3x⋅34.
- So 22x⋅23=3x⋅34⇒3x22x=338⇒(34)x=338. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-04-FN1 markMCQQ.If limn→∞xnlogex=0, then logx12= (A) Negative (B) Positive (C) Zero (D) any value between -1 and 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit condition forces 0<x<1; with a base strictly between 0 and 1, logx is decreasing, so logx12 (evaluated at an argument bigger than 1) must be negative.
Concept and Intuition
xn→0 as n→∞ only when ∣x∣<1; combined with the domain of log requiring x>0, this pins down 0<x<1. For such a base, the logarithm function is decreasing (unlike bases >1, where it's increasing), which flips the usual intuition about signs.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For the limit limn→∞xnlnx=0 to hold with lnx a fixed (nonzero, for x=1) real number, we need xn→0.
- xn→0 as n→∞ precisely when 0<x<1 (for x>1, xn→∞; for x=1, xn=1 always, and the whole expression is identically 0 trivially but x=1 is excluded from any logarithm base anyway).
- So the condition effectively forces 0<x<1. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-FN1 markMCQQ.4x−3x−21=3x+21−22x−1⇒x= (A) 25 (B) 21 (C) 23 (D) 27
›Reveal solutionSolution
Regrouping all the base-2 terms on one side and all the base-3 terms on the other turns the equation into a single balance that is exactly satisfied at x=23.
Concept and Intuition
Exponential equations mixing two different bases (2 and 3 here, via 4=22) usually can't be solved by taking a single logarithm cleanly; instead, collect all terms of one base together (using ap+aq=amin(a∣p−q∣+1)-type factoring) and all terms of the other base together, then look for the value of x that balances both sides — often it's a "nice" number found by testing, then confirmed algebraically.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Rewrite every term with base 2 or base 3: 4x=22x, 22x−1=222x.
- The equation 4x−3x−1/2=3x+1/2−22x−1 becomes 22x−3x−1/2=3x+1/2−222x.
- Move all base-2 terms to the left, all base-3 terms to the right: 22x+222x=3x+1/2+3x−1/2, i.e. 23⋅22x=3x+1/2+3x−1/2.
- Factor the right side: 3x+1/2+3x−1/2=3x−1/2(31+30)=3x−1/2⋅4. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-FN1 markMCQQ.If 2cosh2x+10sinh2x=5, then x= (A) 21log34 (B) 21log32 (C) 21log23 (D) 21log43
›Reveal solutionSolution
Rewrite the hyperbolic equation in terms of e2x, reducing it to a quadratic.
Concept and Intuition
cosh and sinh are combinations of e2x and e−2x; substituting these turns the transcendental equation into an algebraic (quadratic) one in u=e2x.
Step-by-Step Solution
- cosh2x=2e2x+e−2x, sinh2x=2e2x−e−2x.
- 2cosh2x=e2x+e−2x; 10sinh2x=5(e2x−e−2x).
- Sum: e2x+e−2x+5e2x−5e−2x=5⇒6e2x−4e−2x=5.
- Let u=e2x (so e−2x=1/u): 6u−u4=5⇒6u2−5u−4=0.
- Solve: u=125±25+96=125±11, giving u=1216=34 or u=−21 (rejected, since u=e2x>0). …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.