Q.Integrate the function x+a+x+b1
Concept understanding — Rationalizing Denominator
Rationalizing the Denominator
Rationalizing the denominator means rewriting a fraction so that no radical (square root, cube root, …) is left on the bottom. It is algebraic housekeeping — the fraction's value never changes, because you only ever multiply by a cleverly disguised form of 1.
Why bother? A quotient like 21 is awkward to estimate (1÷1.414), but the equal form 22 is easy (1.414÷2≈0.707). Cleaner denominators are also easier to add, compare and simplify, and most answer keys expect this final form.
Case 1 — a single square root
Multiply top and bottom by that root:
53×55=535,
because 5×5=5 is rational. In general ba=bab.
Case 2 — a sum or difference with a root
Here multiplying by the root alone fails; use the conjugate, which turns the denominator into a difference of squares:
3+72×3−73−7=32−(7)22(3−7)=22(3−7)=3−7.
For b+ca, multiply by b−cb−c; the denominator becomes b2−c, a rational number.
Multiply both the numerator and the denominator by the same expression. Changing only the bottom changes the value of the fraction.
The single principle behind every case: choose the multiplier that clears the radical from the bottom while keeping the fraction equal to itself. This same trick returns later in limits, complex numbers and integration.
Rationalizing the denominator is taught as early as the NCERT Class 9 Number Systems chapter and remains a useful algebraic tool throughout Class 11 and 12 whenever a surd-based limit, complex number, or integration problem needs a radical cleared from the bottom of a fraction. Students searching 'rationalize the denominator examples class 9' or 'rationalizing denominator with conjugate' will find this multiply-by-a-clever-form-of-1 technique is exactly the method CBSE board solutions use across every grade.
Concept: Rationalizing Denominator — multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate to simplify the integrand.
Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by x+a−x+b:
x+a+x+b1⋅x+a−x+bx+a−x+b=(x+a)−(x+b)x+a−x+b.
Step 2: Simplify the denominator:
(x+a)−(x+b)=a−b.
So the integrand becomes
a−bx+a−x+b.
Step 3: Integrate term by term:
∫a−bx+a−x+bdx=a−b1(∫(x+a)1/2dx−∫(x+b)1/2dx).
Using ∫(x+c)1/2dx=32(x+c)3/2+C, we get
a−b1(32(x+a)3/2−32(x+b)3/2)+C.
The integral is 3(a−b)2[(x+a)3/2−(x+b)3/2]+C.
The key idea is to rationalize the denominator by multiplying numerator and denominator by the conjugate x+a−x+b. This simplifies the integrand to a−bx+a−x+b, which integrates directly to 3(a−b)2[(x+a)3/2−(x+b)3/2]+C.
When you see a sum of square roots in the denominator, your first instinct should be to rationalize. The reason is simple: square roots are messy to integrate directly, but after rationalization, the denominator becomes a simple difference of the terms inside the roots — which is a constant. That turns a complicated-looking fraction into a clean difference of two power functions.
Let’s walk through it.
- Rationalize the denominator. Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate x+a−x+b:
∫x+a+x+b1dx=∫(x+a+x+b)(x+a−x+b)x+a−x+bdx
- Simplify the denominator. The product (x+a+x+b)(x+a−x+b) is of the form (p+q)(p−q)=p2−q2. Here p=x+a and q=x+b, so:
(x+a)2−(x+b)2=(x+a)−(x+b)=a−b
This is a constant — that’s the whole point. The integral becomes:
∫a−bx+a−x+bdx=a−b1∫(x+a−x+b)dx
A common mistake is to forget that a−b is a constant and try to integrate it as a function of x. It’s just a number — pull it out of the integral immediately.
- Integrate each square root. Each term is of the form x+c=(x+c)1/2. The power rule for integration gives:
∫(x+c)1/2dx=3/2(x+c)3/2=32(x+c)3/2
So:
∫x+adx=32(x+a)3/2,∫x+bdx=32(x+b)3/2
- Combine the results. Putting it all together:
a−b1[32(x+a)3/2−32(x+b)3/2]+C=3(a−b)2[(x+a)3/2−(x+b)3/2]+C
Notice that the order matters: we have x+a−x+b in the numerator after rationalization, so the first term in the difference is (x+a)3/2. If you accidentally swap them, you’ll get a sign error.
The integral is 3(a−b)2[(x+a)3/2−(x+b)3/2]+C.
Method: Rationalising a sum of surds in the denominator
Use this whenever the denominator is P±Q: multiply by the conjugate so the denominator collapses to P−Q.
Steps
Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate.
For P+Q1 multiply by P−QP−Q. Using (u+v)(u−v)=u2−v2, the denominator becomes P−Q.
Step 2: Recognise the new denominator is a constant (or simpler).
When P−Q is a constant (as with (x+a)−(x+b)=a−b), pull it straight out of the integral — it does not depend on x.
Step 3: Integrate the leftover power functions.
You are left with a difference of terms like x+c=(x+c)1/2; apply the power rule
∫(x+c)1/2dx=32(x+c)3/2.
Preserve the order of the two terms from the numerator so the final signs stay correct.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Treating a−b as a function of x.
Why it's wrong: after rationalising, the denominator is the constant (x+a)−(x+b)=a−b; trying to "integrate" it is meaningless. Correct approach: pull the constant a−b1 outside the integral.
Mistake 2: Wrong power-rule antiderivative for x+c.
Why it's wrong: ∫(x+c)1/2dx=32(x+c)3/2, but students often write (x+c)3/2 without the 32. Correct approach: divide by the new exponent 23, i.e. multiply by 32.
Mistake 3: Swapping the order of the two roots.
Why it's wrong: the numerator after rationalising is x+a−x+b, so the first term must be (x+a)3/2; reversing them flips the sign. Correct approach: keep the conjugate's order.
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.x→2limx3−81+4x−3+3x= (A) 721 (B) 361 (C) 241 (D) 121
›Reveal solutionSolution
A 0/0 indeterminate form at x=2; L'Hôpital's rule (differentiate top and bottom) gives the limit directly.
Concept and Intuition
At x=2: 1+8=3 and 3+6=3, so the numerator is 0; also x3−8=0. This is a genuine 0/0 form, so L'Hôpital's rule (or equivalently rationalising) applies.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let g(x)=1+4x−3+3x, h(x)=x3−8. Both g(2)=0, h(2)=0.
- g′(x)=21+4x4−23+3x3=1+4x2−3+3x1.5.
- At x=2: g′(2)=32−31.5=30.5=61.
- h′(x)=3x2, so h′(2)=12.
- By L'Hôpital, x→2limh(x)g(x)=h′(2)g′(2)=121/6=721.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the factor of 2 in the denominator when differentiating each square root.
- Not checking it's truly 0/0 before applying L'Hôpital.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 721.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-AN1 markMCQQ.x→0limx2+2sinx+tanx+3−sin2x−2tanx−x+3x+2sinx+3tanx−tan3x= (A) 23 (B) 10 (C) 25 (D) 17
›Reveal solutionSolution
A 0/0 limit resolved by small-x series expansion of numerator and denominator to first order. Answer: 23.
Concept and Intuition
When both numerator and denominator vanish at the limit point, replace sinx,tanx by their Maclaurin series and keep terms up to the lowest surviving order — everything else washes out in the limit. For a difference of square roots like f(x)−g(x), it helps to write f,g as 3(1+u), 3(1+v) and expand 1+u≈1+2u.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Numerator: using sinx=x−6x3+⋯, tanx=x+3x3+⋯, tan3x=x3+⋯:
x+2sinx+3tanx−tan3x=x+(2x−3x3)+(3x+x3)−x3+O(x5)=6x−3x3+O(x5).
As x→0 this behaves like 6x.
2. Denominator terms: f(x)=x2+2sinx+tanx+3=3+(2x+x)+x2+O(x3)=3+3x+x2+O(x3).
g(x)=sin2x−2tanx−x+3=3+(−2x−x)+x2+O(x3)=3−3x+x2+O(x3).
3. Write f=3(1+x+3x2), so f≈3(1+2x+⋯); similarly g=3(1−x+3x2), so g≈3(1−2x+⋯).
4. f−g≈3[(1+2x)−(1−2x)]=3x.
5. Limit =3x6x=36=23.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to apply L'Hôpital directly to the messy square-root expression rather than expanding in series (much more error-prone here).
- Dropping the x3 terms too early and missing that they don't actually affect the leading-order limit anyway.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 23.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.x→1lim3x2+2x−5(9x−1)(x−1)= (A) 21 (B) 53 (C) 2 (D) −21
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both numerator and denominator vanish at x=1; rationalizing x−1 and factoring the denominator cancels the common (x−1) factor, leaving a limit of 1/2.
Concept and Intuition
A 0/0 indeterminate form involving a square root is almost always resolved by rationalizing (multiplying by the conjugate, or equivalently recognizing x−1=x+1x−1) so that the offending (x−1) factor becomes explicit and cancels with the same factor in the denominator.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Check the form at x=1: numerator (9−1)(1−1)=0; denominator 3+2−5=0 — indeed 0/0.
- Factor the denominator: 3x2+2x−5=(3x+5)(x−1) (verify: 3x2−3x+5x−5=3x2+2x−5 ✓).
- Rewrite x−1=x+1(x−1)(x+1)=x+1x−1.
- So the limit becomes
limx→1(3x+5)(x−1)(9x−1)⋅x+1x−1=limx→1(x+1)(3x+5)9x−1.
- Substitute x=1: (1+1)(3(1)+5)9(1)−1=2⋅88=168=21.
Common Mistakes
- Trying L'Hôpital's rule without simplifying first and making a sign/derivative error on x.
- Forgetting to cancel (x−1) from the denominator's factored form, leaving a spurious 0/0.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 21.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.y→0limy41+1+y4−2= (A) 421 (B) 22(1+2)1 (C) 221 (D) 42(1+2)1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Use the binomial/Taylor approximation 1+t≈1+t/2 twice (nested), to first order in y4. Answer: 421.
Concept and Intuition
For a 00-type limit built from nested square roots, the cleanest approach is the small-t approximation 1+t≈1+2t (from the binomial series, valid to first order as t→0), applied from the inside out. Since we only need the coefficient of y4 in the numerator, first-order expansions suffice — no need for full Taylor series or L'Hôpital's rule (which would require four differentiations here).
Step-by-Step Solution
- As y→0, 1+y4≈1+2y4 (first-order binomial expansion, t=y4→0).
- So 1+1+y4≈2+2y4.
- Factor out 2: 2+2y4=21+4y4.
- Expand again: 1+4y4≈1+8y4, so 21+4y4≈2+82y4.
- Numerator: 1+1+y4−2≈82y4.
- Divide by y4: limit =82=421 (rationalising: 82=82⋅11=421 since 82=822=421).
Common Mistakes
- Expanding only the outer square root and treating the inner 1+y4 as exactly 1 (dropping its own y4/2 contribution) — this loses a term that matters at this order.
- Sign or factor errors when pulling 2 out of the outer square root.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 421.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.If 2+cosθ+isinθ3=x+iy, then (x−1)(x−3)= (A) y2 (B) −y2 (C) 0 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to rationalize the complex denominator by multiplying by its conjugate, which reveals that the real part x and the imaginary part y satisfy a simple quadratic relation. The final result is (x−1)(x−3)=−y2, so the correct option is (B).
We start with
2+cosθ+isinθ3=x+iy.
The denominator is a complex number of the form 2+eiθ. Our goal is to find a relation between x and y that doesn’t involve θ.
Why rationalize?
When a complex number appears in the denominator, we can multiply numerator and denominator by its conjugate to separate real and imaginary parts. This is the same trick used for expressions like a+ib1. Here, the conjugate of 2+cosθ+isinθ is 2+cosθ−isinθ.
Step-by-step
- Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate
2+cosθ+isinθ3⋅2+cosθ−isinθ2+cosθ−isinθ=(2+cosθ)2+sin2θ3(2+cosθ−isinθ).
- Simplify the denominator
(2+cosθ)2+sin2θ=4+4cosθ+cos2θ+sin2θ=4+4cosθ+1=5+4cosθ.
(We used cos2θ+sin2θ=1.)
- Separate real and imaginary parts
x+iy=5+4cosθ3(2+cosθ)+i⋅5+4cosθ−3sinθ.
So
x=5+4cosθ3(2+cosθ),y=5+4cosθ−3sinθ.
- Eliminate θ We want (x−1)(x−3). Let’s express x in a more convenient form.
x=5+4cosθ6+3cosθ.
Compute x−1 and x−3:
x−1=5+4cosθ6+3cosθ−1=5+4cosθ6+3cosθ−(5+4cosθ)=5+4cosθ1−cosθ.
x−3=5+4cosθ6+3cosθ−3=5+4cosθ6+3cosθ−3(5+4cosθ)=5+4cosθ6+3cosθ−15−12cosθ=5+4cosθ−9−9cosθ.
Factor:
x−3=5+4cosθ−9(1+cosθ).
- Multiply them
(x−1)(x−3)=5+4cosθ1−cosθ⋅5+4cosθ−9(1+cosθ)=(5+4cosθ)2−9(1−cosθ)(1+cosθ).
But (1−cosθ)(1+cosθ)=1−cos2θ=sin2θ. So
(x−1)(x−3)=(5+4cosθ)2−9sin2θ.
- Relate to y2 Recall
y=5+4cosθ−3sinθ⇒y2=(5+4cosθ)29sin2θ.
Therefore
(x−1)(x−3)=−y2.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget the negative sign when squaring y: since y itself is negative for some θ, y2 is always positive, but the product (x−1)(x−3) is negative of that positive quantity.
TipNotice that the expression (x−1)(x−3) is symmetric in a way that cancels the dependence on θ completely — a sign that the relation is purely algebraic, not trigonometric.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B).
ANSWER: B
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.