Q.If 109 electrons move out of a body to another body every second, how much time is required to get a total charge of 1C on the other body?
Concept understanding — Photoelectric Effect
The Photoelectric Effect: When Light Knocks Electrons Loose
Imagine you're throwing tennis balls at a wall covered in loose pebbles. If you throw hard enough, a pebble might get knocked off. That's the basic picture — but the photoelectric effect is the quantum version of this, and it completely shattered classical physics.
The Intuition
Light is made of tiny packets of energy called photons. Each photon carries a specific amount of energy, determined by its colour (frequency). When a photon hits a metal surface, it can transfer its energy to an electron inside the metal. If that energy is enough, the electron breaks free and flies out.
Think of electrons in a metal like people in a room with a high window. To escape, they need enough energy to reach the window sill. A photon is like a boost — but only if it gives enough energy in one shot. No amount of weak boosts (dim light) will work if each individual boost is too small.
The Precise Statement
Ephoton=hf=ϕ+Kmax
Where:
- Ephoton=hf is the energy of a photon (Planck's constant h=6.63×10−34 J⋅s, f is frequency)
- ϕ is the work function — the minimum energy needed to remove an electron from that metal
- Kmax is the maximum kinetic energy of the ejected electron
What Classical Physics Got Wrong
Before Einstein (1905), physicists thought light was a continuous wave. They expected:
- Brighter light → more energy per electron → faster electrons
- Any colour would eventually eject electrons if you waited long enough
But experiments showed the opposite:
| Observation | Classical Prediction | Actual Result |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of intensity | Brighter light → faster electrons | Brighter light → more electrons, same speed |
| Threshold frequency | None — any light works eventually | Below a certain frequency, no electrons no matter how bright |
| Time delay | Electrons need time to absorb energy | Electrons appear instantly (within 10−9 s) |
The Key Insight
Einstein said: light behaves like a stream of particles (photons), each with energy hf. One photon interacts with one electron. If hf<ϕ, the electron cannot escape — period. If hf>ϕ, the excess energy becomes kinetic energy:
Kmax=hf−ϕ
This is why:
- Increasing intensity (more photons) ejects more electrons, but each electron still gets the same energy per photon — so their speed doesn't change.
- Below threshold frequency, even a trillion photons per second can't help — each one is too weak individually.
The photoelectric effect proved that light is quantized — it comes in discrete packets. This was the birth of quantum mechanics. Einstein won the 1921 Nobel Prize for this, not for relativity.
A Worked Example
Problem: A metal has work function ϕ=2.0 eV. Light of frequency f=6.0×1014 Hz shines on it. Find the maximum kinetic energy of ejected electrons. (h=4.14×10−15 eV⋅s)
Step 1: Photon energy
E=hf=(4.14×10−15)(6.0×1014)=2.48 eV
Step 2: Subtract work function
Kmax=2.48−2.0=0.48 eV
Step 3: Convert to joules if needed
0.48 eV×1.6×10−19=7.68×10−20 J
The electron escapes with this much kinetic energy.
Common Mistake to Avoid
Students often think "more intense light means more energy per electron." Wrong. Intensity = number of photons per second. Each photon still has the same hf. More photons = more electrons, but each electron gets the same energy kick.
The Big Picture
The photoelectric effect is your first encounter with wave-particle duality. Light, which we model as a wave for interference and diffraction, behaves as a particle when transferring energy to matter. This duality is central to all of quantum mechanics.
Final takeaway: Light ejects electrons only if each photon carries enough energy individually. The colour (frequency) determines whether ejection happens; the brightness (intensity) determines how many electrons get ejected.
"Photoelectric effect formula and Einstein equation" is among the most-searched Class 12 physics topics, and it is a core result of the Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter chapter in the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Physics curriculum. Work function and threshold frequency questions built on this concept appear in nearly every JEE Main and NEET physics paper.
Why this formula?
Photoelectric Effect: Why the Key Formulas Hold
The photoelectric effect is a cornerstone of quantum physics. It showed that light behaves as particles (photons) , not just waves. Let's build the reasoning step-by-step.
1. The Core Idea: Energy Conservation
When a photon hits a metal surface, it transfers all its energy to a single electron inside the metal.
- The photon's energy is E=hf, where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency of light.
- The electron needs a minimum energy to escape the metal — this is called the work function, ϕ.
Why only one electron?
Einstein proposed that light is quantized into discrete packets (photons). A single photon cannot split its energy among multiple electrons — it interacts with one electron at a time.
2. The Photoelectric Equation
If the photon's energy is greater than the work function, the excess energy becomes the electron's kinetic energy after escape:
hf=ϕ+Kmax
Where:
- hf = energy of incident photon
- ϕ = work function (minimum energy to remove electron)
- Kmax = maximum kinetic energy of ejected electron
Why "maximum" kinetic energy?
- Electrons inside the metal have different binding energies.
- Some electrons are near the surface (loosely bound) → get maximum K.
- Others are deeper → lose energy in collisions before escaping → lower K.
3. The Stopping Potential Connection
We measure Kmax using a stopping potential Vs:
Kmax=eVs
Where e is the electron charge. This is because:
- An electric field opposing the electron's motion does work eVs to stop it.
- At the stopping potential, the electron's kinetic energy is exactly balanced by the electric potential energy.
Combining:
hf=ϕ+eVs
This is the Einstein photoelectric equation in its most testable form.
4. Why the Threshold Frequency Exists
From the equation:
hf=ϕ+eVs
If f is too low, hf<ϕ. Then:
- The photon cannot supply enough energy to overcome the work function.
- No electron is ejected, regardless of light intensity.
The threshold frequency f0 is when Kmax=0:
hf0=ϕ⇒f0=hϕ
Why intensity doesn't matter for ejection?
- Intensity = number of photons per second.
- Each photon still has energy hf. If hf<ϕ, even a billion photons won't eject an electron — each photon is individually too weak.
5. Why Kinetic Energy Depends on Frequency, Not Intensity
From Kmax=hf−ϕ:
- Frequency f directly determines Kmax.
- Intensity only affects the number of electrons ejected (more photons → more electrons), not their individual energy.
This was the key experimental contradiction with classical wave theory:
- Classical: Higher intensity = bigger wave amplitude = more energy to electrons.
- Reality: Higher frequency = more energy per electron; intensity only changes current.
6. Summary of Key Relationships
| Quantity | Formula | Why it holds |
|---|---|---|
| Photon energy | E=hf | Light is quantized (Planck-Einstein) |
| Work function | ϕ=hf0 | Minimum energy to escape at threshold |
| Max kinetic energy | Kmax=hf−ϕ | Energy conservation per photon-electron |
| Stopping potential | eVs=hf−ϕ | Electric work balances kinetic energy |
| Threshold frequency | f0=ϕ/h | Below this, no ejection possible |
7. The Deeper "Why" — Particle Nature of Light
The photoelectric effect cannot be explained by classical wave theory because:
- Waves spread energy over the whole wavefront — an electron would take time to absorb enough energy.
- But experiments show instantaneous ejection (within 10−9 s).
- Wave theory predicts kinetic energy should increase with intensity — it doesn't.
Einstein's photon model resolves all three:
- Instantaneous — one photon, one interaction.
- Frequency-dependent — photon energy is hf.
- Intensity-independent — more photons = more electrons, not more energy per electron.
Key takeaway: The photoelectric effect is a direct consequence of energy quantization — both light and electron binding energy are quantized. The formulas are simply conservation laws applied to this quantum world.
Concept: Quantization of charge – charge transfer by electron motion.
Each electron carries a fundamental charge e=1.6×10−19C.
Step 1: Find the charge transferred per second.
I=n⋅e=109×1.6×10−19=1.6×10−10C/s
Step 2: To accumulate total charge Q=1C, the time required is
t=IQ=1.6×10−101=1.61010=6.25×109s
Step 3: Convert to years for perspective (optional but useful):
t=365×24×36006.25×109≈3.15×1076.25×109≈198years
The time required is 6.25×109s or approximately 198 years.
Charge accumulates at a rate determined by the number of electrons transferred per second. At 109 electrons/second, it takes approximately 200 years to accumulate 1C.
Understanding charge transfer
When electrons move from one body to another, they carry their elementary charge e=1.6×10−19C with them. The body losing electrons becomes positively charged, while the body gaining electrons becomes negatively charged. The question asks how long it takes for the receiving body to accumulate a total charge of 1C.
The key insight is that charge builds up at a constant rate if electrons transfer at a steady rate. We need to find the charge transferred per second (the current), then determine how many seconds are needed to reach 1C.
Step-by-step solution
1. Calculate the charge transferred per second
Each electron carries charge e=1.6×10−19C. If 109 electrons move every second, the charge transferred per second is:
I=n⋅e=109×1.6×10−19C/s
I=1.6×10−10C/s
This is effectively the current flowing between the two bodies.
2. Find the time required to accumulate 1C
We know that charge Q=I⋅t, where t is time. Rearranging for time:
t=IQ=1.6×10−10C/s1C
t=1.6×10−101s=1.61010s
t=6.25×109s
3. Convert to more meaningful units
This is an enormous amount of time. Let's convert to years:
t=365×24×36006.25×109years
t=3.156×1076.25×109years
t≈198years
A coulomb is a huge amount of charge at the scale of individual electrons. Even though 109 sounds like a large number, the elementary charge is so tiny that the transfer rate is extremely slow. This is why we rarely see static charges of 1C in everyday life!
Remember that 1A=1C/s. The current here is only 1.6×10−10A, which is a billionth of an ampere — far smaller than typical household currents of a few amperes.
The time required is 6.25×109s or approximately 198 years.
Instead of finding the current first, count the total number of electrons needed to make up 1C, then divide by the rate at which electrons are transferred. Same final answer: t≈6.25×109s≈198 years.
Method: Total-Electron-Count Approach
Rather than treating this as a current problem, we can think of it purely as counting: how many electrons in total does it take to reach 1C, and how long does it take to move that many electrons at the given rate?
- Find the total number of electrons needed for 1C. Each electron carries charge e=1.6×10−19C. If N electrons are needed to make up a total charge Q=1C:
N=eQ=1.6×10−191=6.25×1018electrons
-
Note the given transfer rate.
The problem states 109 electrons move across every second — this is simply electrons-per-second, a rate, independent of how we choose to compute the answer.
-
Divide total electrons by the rate to get time.
If N electrons must move at a steady rate of 109 electrons per second, the time taken is:
t=rateN=1096.25×1018s
- Simplify.
t=6.25×109s
- Sanity-check by converting to years.
t=3.15×107s/yr6.25×109≈198years
This matches the current-based method exactly, since dividing "total electrons" by "electrons per second" is algebraically the same as dividing "total charge" by "charge per second" — just counted in a different order.
This way of thinking is useful whenever a rate is given in particles per second rather than current directly — count the particles you need first, then bring in the rate.
The time required is 6.25×109s, approximately 198 years.
Common Mistakes & How to Avoid Them
Mistake 1: Using the wrong sign for charge
The error: Students often forget that electrons are negatively charged. They plug q=1.6×10−19C without considering the sign, then get confused when the time comes out negative or when they try to interpret "charge on the other body."
How to avoid:
- Always write: charge on one electron = −e=−1.6×10−19C
- When electrons leave a body, that body becomes positively charged (loss of negative charge).
- The other body receiving electrons becomes negatively charged.
- For the question: "total charge of 1C on the other body" means the other body has −1C (since it gains electrons). But the magnitude is what matters for time calculation.
Correct approach:
Use magnitude only: ∣q∣=1.6×10−19C per electron. The sign tells you the type of charge, not the amount.
Mistake 2: Confusing number of electrons with charge
The error: Students sometimes think 109 electrons per second means 109 coulombs per second, leading to absurdly short times.
How to avoid:
- Remember: Charge is quantized — every electron carries a fixed tiny charge e.
- The rate of charge transfer = (number of electrons per second) × (charge per electron)
I=(109)×(1.6×10−19)=1.6×10−10C/s
Mistake 3: Forgetting to convert units or misplacing powers of 10
The error: Students write 109×1.6×10−19=1.6×10? and mess up the exponent.
How to avoid:
- Do the exponent arithmetic carefully:
109×10−19=10−10
Then multiply by 1.6: 1.6×10−10
- Double-check: 109 is large, 10−19 is tiny — the product should be a very small number.
Mistake 4: Using the wrong formula for time
The error: Students try to use t=Q/I but plug in Q=1C and I=109 (electrons/second) directly, forgetting to convert current to coulombs/second.
How to avoid:
- Always convert to consistent units:
- Q=1C
- I=1.6×10−10C/s (after conversion)
- Then:
t=IQ=1.6×10−101=6.25×109seconds
Mistake 5: Stopping at seconds without converting to a meaningful unit
The error: Students leave the answer as 6.25×109 seconds, which is correct but not very intuitive.
How to avoid:
- Convert to years for a sense of scale:
6.25×109s÷(365×24×3600)≈198years
- This also serves as a reality check — it shows how huge 1C really is in terms of electron transfer.
Quick Summary Checklist
| Step | Common Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Charge per electron | Wrong sign | Use magnitude 1.6×10−19C |
| Current calculation | Treat electrons as coulombs | Multiply: n×e |
| Exponent arithmetic | Wrong power of 10 | 109×10−19=10−10 |
| Time formula | Wrong I units | Convert to C/s first |
| Final answer | Leave in seconds | Convert to years for context |
Final correct answer:
t=(109electrons/s)×(1.6×10−19C/electron)1C=6.25×109s≈198years
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQQ.When a metal surface is illuminated with lights of wavelengths λ and 2λ separately, the stopping potentials are V and 3V respectively. Then the threshold wavelength of that metal surface is (A) 34λ (B) 4λ (C) 6λ (D) 38λ
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using Einstein's photoelectric equation at two different wavelengths (and their given stopping potentials) as simultaneous equations lets us solve for the work function, and hence the threshold wavelength. Answer: 4λ.
Concept and Intuition
Einstein's photoelectric equation, eVs=λhc−ϕ, relates the stopping potential to the photon energy and the material's work function ϕ. Since ϕ is a fixed property of the metal, two different (wavelength, stopping potential) pairs give two equations that can be solved simultaneously for ϕ, and then the threshold wavelength follows from ϕ=hc/λ0.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For wavelength λ: eV=λhc−ϕ … (i)
- For wavelength 2λ: e3V=2λhc−ϕ … (ii)
- From (i): ϕ=λhc−eV. Substitute into (ii): 3eV=2λhc−λhc+eV.
- Simplify: 3eV−eV=2λhc−λhc⇒−32eV=−2λhc⇒eV=4λ3hc.
- Then ϕ=λhc−4λ3hc=4λhc.
- Threshold wavelength: λ0=ϕhc=hc/(4λ)hc=4λ.
Common Mistakes
- Sign errors when substituting ϕ back into the second equation.
- Confusing threshold wavelength (ϕ=hc/λ0) with threshold frequency.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 4λ.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.Two identical photo cathodes receive light of frequencies f1 and f2. If the velocity of photo electrons (of mass m) coming out are respectively V1 & V2, then (A) V12−V22=m2h(f1−f2) (B) V1+V2=[m2h(f1+f2)]1/2 (C) V12+V22=m2h(f1+f2) (D) V1−V2=[m2h(f1−f2)]1/2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing Einstein's photoelectric equation for each frequency and subtracting to cancel the common work function directly gives the relation among V1,V2,f1,f2. Answer: (A).
Concept and Intuition
Einstein's photoelectric equation states the maximum kinetic energy of an emitted photoelectron is KEmax=hf−ϕ0, where ϕ0 is the cathode's work function. Since both cathodes are identical, ϕ0 is the same for both — so subtracting the two equations eliminates the unknown work function entirely, leaving a clean relation between the observed velocities and frequencies.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For frequency f1: 21mV12=hf1−ϕ0.
- For frequency f2: 21mV22=hf2−ϕ0.
- Subtract (2) from (1): 21m(V12−V22)=h(f1−f2).
- Multiply both sides by 2/m: V12−V22=m2h(f1−f2).
Common Mistakes
- Trying to eliminate ϕ0 by adding the equations instead of subtracting — that leaves ϕ0 in the result.
- Taking the square root prematurely and writing a relation in V1−V2 (that's not how the algebra works here; V12−V22 is the quantity that cleanly cancels ϕ0).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — V12−V22=m2h(f1−f2).
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.The kinetic energy of released electron in photo electric effect depends on (A) Intensity of incidenting photons (B) Frequency of incidenting photons (C) Area of photocell (D) Time
›Reveal solutionSolution
Einstein's photoelectric equation shows KE of ejected electrons depends on photon frequency, not intensity. Answer: frequency of incident photons.
Concept and Intuition
The photoelectric effect was the key evidence for the particle (photon) nature of light. Each photon interacts with one electron, transferring its full energy hν; some of that energy overcomes the work function ϕ of the metal, and the rest becomes the electron's kinetic energy: KEmax=hν−ϕ. Since this equation has no dependence on how many photons arrive per second (intensity), increasing intensity only increases the number of ejected electrons (photocurrent), not their individual kinetic energy. Only increasing the frequency increases each photon's energy and hence the ejected electron's energy.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Einstein's photoelectric equation: KEmax=hν−ϕ, where ϕ is the material's work function (fixed for a given metal).
- KEmax depends explicitly and only on ν (and the fixed ϕ) — no intensity, area, or time term appears.
- Intensity affects the number of photons per second, which affects photocurrent (number of electrons/sec), not the energy per electron.
- Hence the correct dependence is on frequency.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming brighter (more intense) light means 'more energetic' electrons — intensity only means more photons, not higher-energy photons.
- Confusing this with photocurrent magnitude, which does depend on intensity.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — Frequency of incidenting photons.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.Sodium and Copper have work functions 2.3 eV and 4.5 eV respectively. Then the ratio of their threshold wavelengths is nearly (A) 1:2 (B) 4:1 (C) 2:1 (D) 1:4
›Reveal solutionSolution
Threshold wavelength ∝1/ϕ, so the ratio of Na's to Cu's threshold wavelength is ϕCu/ϕNa=4.5/2.3≈2:1.
Concept and Intuition
The photoelectric threshold condition is hνth=ϕ, i.e. λthhc=ϕ, giving λth=ϕhc. A metal with a smaller work function has a longer threshold wavelength (easier to eject electrons, so even lower-energy/longer-wavelength photons suffice). Sodium has the smaller work function of the two, so it should have the longer threshold wavelength.
Step-by-Step Solution
- λth,Na=ϕNahc, λth,Cu=ϕCuhc.
- Ratio: λth,Cuλth,Na=ϕNaϕCu=2.34.5=1.956.
- This rounds to nearly 2:1 — sodium's threshold wavelength is about twice copper's, consistent with sodium being much easier to photo-ionize (smaller work function).
Common Mistakes
- Taking the ratio the wrong way round (ϕNa/ϕCu instead of the reciprocal), which would wrongly suggest Cu has the longer threshold wavelength.
- Forgetting that λth and ϕ are inversely, not directly, proportional.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 2:1.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.In photo electric experiment, if the wavelength of incident light on the metal changes from 200 nm to 300 nm. The decrease in stopping potential is about (ehc=1240 eV-nm) (A) 2.1 V (B) 4.2 V (C) 3.1 V (D) 6.2 V
›Reveal solutionSolution
Since work function cancels when comparing two stopping potentials for the same metal, the drop in stopping potential is just ehc(λ11−λ21)≈2.1 V.
Concept and Intuition
Einstein's photoelectric equation: eVs=λhc−ϕ0, where ϕ0 is the (fixed) work function of the metal. Since the same metal is used for both wavelengths, ϕ0 is common and cancels out when we take the difference of stopping potentials at two wavelengths — leaving only the photon energy difference.
Step-by-Step Solution
- At λ1=200 nm: eVs1=λ1hc−ϕ0.
- At λ2=300 nm: eVs2=λ2hc−ϕ0.
- Decrease in stopping potential: e(Vs1−Vs2)=hc(λ11−λ21).
- Using ehc=1240 eV·nm: ΔVs=1240(2001−3001)=1240×6003−2=1240/600≈2.07 V.
- Rounding, ΔVs≈2.1 V.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to compute the work function separately (not given, and not needed since it cancels).
- Arithmetic slip in combining 1/200−1/300 as a single fraction.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 2.1 V.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.If the threshold wavelength of light for photoelectric emission to take place from a metal surface is 6250 Å, then the work function of the metal is (Planck's constant = 6.6×10−34 Js) (A) 3.98 eV (B) 1.98 eV (C) 2.98 eV (D) 4.98 eV
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the relation between threshold wavelength and work function in the photoelectric effect. The work function comes out to 1.98 eV.
Concept and Intuition
The threshold wavelength is the longest wavelength (lowest photon energy) that can just barely eject an electron from the metal, with zero kinetic energy left over. At exactly this wavelength, the entire photon energy hc/λ0 equals the work function ϕ — the minimum energy needed to free an electron from the metal surface.
Step-by-Step Solution
- At threshold: ϕ=λ0hc.
- Substitute values: h=6.6×10−34 Js, c=3×108 m/s, λ0=6250 A˚=6250×10−10 m=6.25×10−7 m.
ϕ=6.25×10−7(6.6×10−34)(3×108)=6.25×10−71.98×10−25=3.168×10−19 J
- Convert to eV (divide by 1.6×10−19 J/eV):
ϕ=1.6×10−193.168×10−19≈1.98 eV
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to convert the wavelength from Å to metres before using it (a factor-of-1010 error).
- Forgetting the final J-to-eV conversion, leaving the answer in joules.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 1.98 eV.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.In a photoelectric experiment, when the wavelength of light incident on a metal is λ, the maximum kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectron is E. When the wavelength of incident light is 3λ, the maximum kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectron becomes 4E. The work function of the metal is (A) λhc (B) λ3hc (C) 2λhc (D) 3λhc
›Reveal solutionSolution
Setting up Einstein's photoelectric equation for two different wavelengths and solving the resulting pair of linear equations gives the work function as 3λhc.
Concept and Intuition
Einstein's photoelectric equation, KEmax=λhc−ϕ, is linear in λ1 and ϕ. Given two (wavelength, KE) pairs, we get two equations in two unknowns (E appears as a scale, ϕ is what we want) which we can solve algebraically.
Step-by-Step Solution
- First case: λhc−ϕ=E → so λhc=E+ϕ.
- Second case (wavelength λ/3): λ/3hc−ϕ=4E⇒λ3hc−ϕ=4E.
- Substitute λhc=E+ϕ into the second equation: 3(E+ϕ)−ϕ=4E⇒3E+2ϕ=4E⇒ϕ=2E.
- From step 1: λhc=E+2E=23E⇒E=32⋅λhc.
- So ϕ=2E=31⋅λhc=3λhc.
Common Mistakes
- Treating E as a known numeric constant rather than eliminating it algebraically.
- Sign errors when substituting the two equations.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 3λhc.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-FN1 markMCQQ.When photons of energy 8×10−19 J incident on a photosensitive material, the de Broglie wavelength of the photoelectrons emitted with maximum kinetic energy is 10 Å. The work function of the photosensitive material is nearly (A) 3.5 eV (B) 2.5 eV (C) 2.0 eV (D) 1.5 eV
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests Einstein's photoelectric equation combined with the de Broglie relation; the photon energy is 5 eV, the photoelectron's kinetic energy (from its de Broglie wavelength) is about 1.5 eV, so the work function is 3.5 eV.
Concept and Intuition
Einstein's photoelectric equation, Ephoton=ϕ+KEmax, says the absorbed photon's energy splits between freeing the electron (the work function ϕ) and giving it kinetic energy. Here the electron's maximum kinetic energy isn't given directly — instead its de Broglie wavelength is, so we must first recover KEmax from λ=h/p and KE=p2/2m, then use the photoelectric equation to isolate ϕ.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Photon energy in eV: E=1.6×10−198×10−19=5eV.
- Momentum of the photoelectron from its de Broglie wavelength: p=λh=10×10−106.63×10−34=6.63×10−25kgm/s.
- Kinetic energy: KEmax=2mep2=2×9.11×10−31(6.63×10−25)2≈2.41×10−19J≈1.5eV.
- Work function: ϕ=Ephoton−KEmax=5−1.5=3.5eV.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to use λ=h/p with the photon's energy instead of computing the electron's momentum from its own de Broglie wavelength — the two are different particles here.
- Forgetting to convert the final kinetic energy from joules to eV before subtracting from the photon energy (also in eV).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 3.5 eV.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-16-FN1 markMCQQ.When a metal surface is illuminated by a light of wavelength λ, the stopping potential is V. If the same surface is illuminated by light of wavelength 2λ, the stopping potential is 4V, the threshold wavelength is (A) λ (B) 2λ (C) 3λ (D) 2λ
›Reveal solutionSolution
Applying Einstein's photoelectric equation at two wavelengths and eliminating the work function gives threshold wavelength λ0=3λ.
Concept and Intuition
The stopping potential V measures the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons: eV=λhc−ϕ, where ϕ=λ0hc is the work function expressed via the threshold wavelength λ0. Given the stopping potential at two different wavelengths, we get two linear equations in the two unknowns eV and λ0hc (treating λhc as known), which can be solved simultaneously.
Step-by-Step Solution
- At wavelength λ: eV=λhc−λ0hc ... (1)
- At wavelength 2λ: e⋅4V=2λhc−λ0hc ... (2)
- Subtract (2) from (1): eV−4eV=λhc−2λhc, i.e. 43eV=2λhc, so eV=32⋅λhc.
- Substitute into (1): 32⋅λhc=λhc−λ0hc, so λ0hc=31⋅λhc.
- Therefore λ0=3λ.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting that stopping potential scales with V, not eV directly when substituting the fraction V/4 — must multiply through by e consistently.
- Sign errors when subtracting the two photoelectric equations.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 3λ.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-17-AN1 markMCQQ.The work function of a photosensitive metal surface is 6.4×10−19 J. The maximum kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectrons when electromagnetic radiation of wavelength 1240 Å incidents on the metal surface is nearly (A) 5 eV (B) 6 eV (C) 3 eV (D) 4 eV
›Reveal solutionSolution
Converting the work function to eV and the photon energy via E=1240/λ(nm) gives a maximum photoelectron kinetic energy of 6 eV.
Concept and Intuition
Einstein's photoelectric equation states KEmax=Ephoton−ϕ, where ϕ is the work function (minimum energy needed to free an electron) and Ephoton=λhc is the incident photon's energy. A handy shortcut is Ephoton(eV)=λ(nm)1240, since hc≈1240 eV·nm.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Convert work function to eV: ϕ=1.6×10−196.4×10−19=4 eV.
- Convert wavelength to nm: 1240 A˚=124 nm.
- Photon energy: E=1241240=10 eV.
- Maximum kinetic energy: KEmax=E−ϕ=10−4=6 eV.
Common Mistakes
- Mixing up units (Å vs nm) when applying the 1240/λ(nm) shortcut — 1240 Å must first become 124 nm.
- Forgetting to convert the work function from joules to eV before subtracting.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 6 eV.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The longest wavelength of light that can initiate photo electric effect in the metal of work function 9 eV is (A) 1.37×10−7 m (B) 1.5×10−7 m (C) 3.7×10−7 m (D) 4×10−7 m
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the threshold-wavelength relation in the photoelectric effect: the longest wavelength that can still eject an electron corresponds exactly to a photon energy equal to the work function.
Concept and Intuition
Below the threshold frequency (equivalently, above the threshold/longest wavelength), photons don't carry enough energy to overcome the metal's work function, so no photoelectrons are emitted regardless of intensity. At exactly the threshold, the photon energy just equals the work function, with zero kinetic energy left over for the electron.
Step-by-Step Solution
- At the threshold, Ephoton=λmaxhc=W (work function), since KE of the emitted electron is zero here.
- So λmax=Whc.
- Using hc=1240 eV·nm and W=9 eV: λmax=9 eV1240 eV⋅nm≈137.8 nm.
- Converting to metres: 137.8 nm=1.378×10−7 m≈1.37×10−7 m.
Common Mistakes
- Using hc=1240 eV·nm but forgetting to convert nm to metres at the end.
- Confusing threshold wavelength (maximum wavelength that still works) with a minimum wavelength condition.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 1.37×10−7 m.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.Light of wavelength 4000A˚ is incident on a sodium surface for which the threshold wavelength of photo electrons is 5420A˚. The work function of sodium is (A) 4.58 eV (B) 2.29 eV (C) 1.14 eV (D) 0.57 eV
›Reveal solutionSolution
The work function equals the photon energy corresponding to the threshold wavelength, computed using hc≈12400 eV⋅A˚.
Concept and Intuition
In the photoelectric effect, the threshold wavelength λ0 is the longest wavelength (lowest photon energy) that can still just eject an electron from the metal surface — at this wavelength the photon energy exactly equals the work function, with zero kinetic energy left over for the electron. The incident wavelength of 4000 Å given in the problem is a distractor for this particular sub-question, since the work function depends only on the threshold wavelength.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Work function: W=λ0hc.
- Using the convenient constant hc≈12400 eV⋅A˚ and λ0=5420 Å:
- W=542012400≈2.288 eV≈2.29 eV.
Common Mistakes
- Using the incident wavelength (4000 Å) instead of the threshold wavelength (5420 Å) to compute the work function.
- Using an imprecise value of hc leading to a different rounding than the intended answer.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 2.29 eV.
ANSWER: B
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.