Q.Find the equation of the equipotentials for an infinite cylinder of radius r0, carrying charge of linear density λ.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Electric Potential
Electric Potential
The Idea
When you lift a book onto a shelf you do work against gravity, and the book gains gravitational potential energy that depends on where it sits. Electric charges behave the same way in an electric field. Electric potential is the electrical analogue of "height" in a gravitational field: it tells you the potential energy a unit charge would have at a given point.
Formally, the electric potential at a point is the work done in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to that point, slowly (without giving it kinetic energy), against the electric field.
V=q0W
Here W is the work done to move a small test charge q0 from infinity to the point. Because both W and q0 are scalars, electric potential is a scalar quantity — it has magnitude but no direction. Its SI unit is the volt:
1 V=1 J/C
Potential Due to a Point Charge
For a single point charge q, the potential at a distance r from it is
V=4πε01rq
Notice it falls off as 1/r, whereas the electric field of a point charge falls off as 1/r2. The potential is taken as zero at infinity, our chosen reference. A positive charge makes the potential around it positive; a negative charge makes it negative.
Potential Difference
Usually we care about the potential difference between two points A and B:
VA−VB=q0WB→A
the work per unit charge needed to move a charge from B to A. This is the quantity a voltmeter reads and the "voltage" that drives current in a circuit.
Relation Between Field and Potential
Field and potential are two views of the same thing. The electric field is the negative rate of change of potential with distance:
E=−drdV
The minus sign says the field points from high potential toward low potential — a positive charge, left free, rolls "downhill" in potential. Where the potential changes steeply, the field is strong.
Superposition
Because potential is a scalar, the potential due to several charges is just the algebraic sum of their individual potentials — no vectors, no angles:
V=4πε01(r1q1+r2q2+⋯)
This makes potential far easier to compute than the field, which needs vector addition. Once you have V everywhere, you can get the field by differentiating.
Equipotential Surfaces
An equipotential surface is a surface on which the potential has the same value everywhere.
- No work is done in moving a charge along an equipotential surface (since ΔV=0).
- The electric field is always perpendicular to an equipotential surface. …
Concept: Electric Potential — For an infinite line charge, the potential varies logarithmically with radial distance.
Reasoning:
-
By Gauss’s law, the electric field outside the cylinder (r≥r0) is the same as that of an infinite line charge:
E(r)=2πε0rλ, directed radially outward.
-
The potential difference between a reference point at r=r0 and a point at distance r is:
V(r)−V(r0)=−∫r0rEdr=−2πε0λln(r0r). …
For an infinite line charge, the electric field is radial and falls as 1/r, so the potential varies as lnr. Equipotentials are surfaces of constant r — concentric cylinders around the line charge. For a cylinder of radius r0 with linear density λ, the equipotentials are cylinders of radius r given by V(r)=2πε0λlnrr0+V0, where V0 is the potential at r=r0.
The core idea: symmetry and potential from a line charge
An infinite cylinder with uniform linear charge density λ produces the same electric field outside itself as an infinite line charge along its axis. This is a direct consequence of Gauss's law — the cylindrical symmetry means the field is radial and depends only on the distance r from the axis.
For r≥r0, the field is:
E(r)=2πε0rλ
The direction is radially outward (if λ>0). Inside the cylinder (r<r0), for a conductor the field is zero; for a uniformly charged insulator the field grows linearly with r. The problem likely means a conducting cylinder or a thin cylindrical shell, so we focus on r≥r0.
Step-by-step derivation
- Recall the relation between potential and field. Electric potential difference between two points is the negative line integral of the electric field:
V(b)−V(a)=−∫abE⋅dl
For a radial field, the simplest path is along a radial line, so dl=drr^ and E⋅dl=E(r)dr.
- Set up the integral from a reference point. Choose a reference radius rref where the potential is Vref. Then at any r:
V(r)−Vref=−∫rrefr2πε0r′λdr′
The integral is straightforward:
∫rrefrr′dr′=lnr−lnrref=lnrrefr
So:
V(r)=Vref−2πε0λlnrrefr
- Choose a convenient reference. A natural choice is to set V=V0 at the cylinder's surface r=r0. Then:
V(r)=V0−2πε0λlnr0r
Equivalently:
V(r)=V0+2πε0λlnrr0
A common mistake is to try setting V=0 at infinity. For an infinite line charge, the potential diverges logarithmically as r→∞, so infinity cannot be a reference. Always pick a finite reference radius.
- What defines an equipotential? …
Method: Finding the Equipotential Surfaces of a Symmetric Charge Distribution
Use this method whenever you're asked for the shape/equation of equipotential surfaces around a charge distribution with clear symmetry (spherical, cylindrical, or planar).
Steps
Step 1: Find the field using the distribution's symmetry (Gauss's law)
Identify the symmetry (here, cylindrical) and use Gauss's law with a Gaussian surface matching that symmetry to get E(r) as a function of the single relevant coordinate. For an infinite charged cylinder viewed from outside, the field matches that of an infinite line charge:
E(r)=2πε0rλ,r≥r0
Step 2: Integrate the field to get the potential, relative to a convenient reference
V(r)−Vref=−∫rrefrE(r′)dr′
Choose a FINITE reference point (never infinity, if V diverges there — as it does for an infinite line/cylinder). A natural choice is the distribution's own surface, r=r0.
Step 3: Recognise which coordinate(s) V depends on …
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.A charge 'Q' is distributed on concentric hollow spheres of radii r and R, (R>r) such that their surface charge densities are same. The potential at their centre is (A) 4πε0(R+r)Q(R2+r2) (B) 4πε0(R+r)QR (C) zero (D) 4πε0(R2+r2)Q(R+r)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests potential at the centre of two concentric charged shells with equal surface charge density; the answer is V=4πε0(R2+r2)Q(R+r).
Concept and Intuition
Inside a uniformly charged spherical shell, the potential is constant everywhere inside and equal to the potential at its own surface (even though the field inside is zero). So the potential at the common centre is simply the sum of each shell's own surface potential — there's no need for integration, just superposition of two known constant-inside potentials. The key extra step here is expressing each shell's charge in terms of the common surface density σ, since that's what's actually given as equal (not the charges themselves).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let σ be the common surface charge density. Then q1=σ⋅4πr2 (inner shell), q2=σ⋅4πR2 (outer shell).
- Total charge: Q=q1+q2=σ⋅4π(r2+R2), so σ=4π(R2+r2)Q.
- Potential at centre from inner shell (uniform inside) =rkq1; from outer shell (uniform inside) =Rkq2. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.The figure shows equipotential surfaces in a region [graph: three parallel straight lines cross the X-axis (in cm) at x=10 labelled 10V, at x=20 labelled 20V, and at x=30 labelled 30V; each line makes an angle of 30∘ with the Y-axis]. The electric field in the region is (A) 100 Vm−1 along X-axis (B) 100 Vm−1 along Y-axis (C) 200 Vm−1 at an angle 120∘ with X-axis (D) 50 Vm−1 at an angle 120∘ with X-axis
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is the classic tilted-equipotential-lines problem: the field is perpendicular to the lines, pointing from high to low potential, with magnitude 200 V/m at 120∘ to the x-axis.
Concept and Intuition
The electric field is always perpendicular to equipotential surfaces and points in the direction of decreasing potential. When the equipotential lines are tilted relative to the coordinate axes rather than being simple vertical or horizontal lines, the field has components along both axes, and its true direction must be found by resolving the potential gradient perpendicular to the given lines rather than just reading off the spacing along the x-axis.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Along the x-axis, potential increases linearly from 10 V to 30 V as x goes from 10 to 30 cm — a spacing of 10 V per 10 cm if measured along the x-axis alone.
- Because the lines are tilted (not perpendicular to the x-axis), the true perpendicular spacing between adjacent equipotentials (the direction the field actually acts along) is shorter than the along-axis spacing by a geometric factor set by the tilt angle.
- Resolving this correctly (potential is linear in position, V=mx+ny+c, with the gradient forced perpendicular to the line direction) gives a field magnitude of 200 Vm−1. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.Two point charges −2Q and Q are located at (−3a,0) and (3a,0) in the X - Y plane. The locus of all points in the X - Y plane where electric potential is zero to these charges is (A) Straight line (B) Ellipse (C) Circle (D) Parabola
›Reveal solutionSolution
The zero-potential locus of two unequal point charges is a classic Apollonius circle, since it reduces to the condition "distance to one charge = constant × distance to the other."
Concept and Intuition
Electric potential due to a point charge q at distance r is V=rkq, and potential from multiple charges adds algebraically (as a scalar). Setting the total potential from two unequal-magnitude charges to zero produces a fixed ratio condition between the distances to the two charges — and the geometric locus of points whose distances to two fixed points have a constant ratio =1 is always a circle (the Apollonius circle), not a straight line (a straight line, specifically the perpendicular bisector, only arises when the ratio is exactly 1, i.e. equal-magnitude charges).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let r1 = distance from the field point to −2Q (at (−3a,0)), and r2 = distance to +Q (at (3a,0)).
- Total potential: V=k(r1−2Q+r2Q).
- Setting V=0: r1−2Q+r2Q=0⇒r2Q=r12Q⇒r1=2r2.
- So the locus consists of all points where the distance to (−3a,0) is exactly twice the distance to (3a,0) — a fixed, non-unity ratio between distances to two fixed points.
- This is precisely the defining property of an Apollonius circle: for two fixed points and a constant ratio k=1, the locus of points P with PA/PB=k is a circle (whose centre lies on the line joining the two points, but is not at either charge, and is generally off-centre from their midpoint since k=1). …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.A conducting sphere of radius 4cm is charged such that it has a potential of 5V on its surface. Then the potential at a point which is at a depth of 1cm from its surface is (A) 2 V (B) 3 V (C) 4 V (D) 5 V
›Reveal solutionSolution
Inside a charged conductor E=0, so the potential is constant throughout the interior and equal to the surface value — the point 1 cm below the surface (still inside the sphere) is at the same 5 V.
Concept and Intuition
For a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, all excess charge resides on the outer surface, and the electric field inside the conducting material is exactly zero. Since E=−drdV, a zero field over some region means the potential is constant throughout that region — it doesn't vary from the surface all the way to the centre. So every interior point of a charged conducting sphere is at the same potential as the surface itself.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Sphere radius R=4 cm, surface potential Vsurface=5 V.
- A point at depth 1 cm from the surface is at radial distance r=R−1=3 cm from the centre — this is inside the conducting sphere (since r<R).
- Inside a conductor, E=0⇒V(r)=Vsurface for all r≤R. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-FN1 markMCQQ.A circle of radius r is drawn in a uniform electric field E as shown in figure (diagram: horizontal field lines point from left to right through the circle; A is the topmost point of the circle, B is the bottommost point, so AB is the vertical diameter; D is the leftmost point and C is the rightmost point of the circle, so DC is the horizontal diameter aligned with the field direction). If VA, VB, VC & VD are the potentials at A, B, C & D respectively. Then (A) VA=VB, VC=VD (B) VA=VB, VC>VD (C) VA=VB, VC<VD (D) VA>VB, VC=VD
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the relation between a uniform field's direction and equipotential surfaces (planes perpendicular to E). Answer: VA=VB, VC<VD.
Concept and Intuition
In a uniform field, equipotential surfaces are planes perpendicular to the field. Two points on the same perpendicular plane (through the centre of the circle here) are at the same potential; the field always points from higher to lower potential, so any displacement along the field direction moves from high potential to low potential.
Step-by-Step Solution
- A (top) and B (bottom) lie on the vertical diameter, which is perpendicular to the horizontal field lines — both are at the same horizontal position as the centre, hence on the same equipotential surface: VA=VB.
- D (left) and C (right) lie on the horizontal diameter, which is along the field direction; the field points from D toward C (left to right). …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-AN1 markMCQQ.The electrical potential at a point 'A' in an electric field 300 NC−1 is 900 V. Now find the work done in moving 1 μC charge from point 'A' to 10m is (A) 500×10−6 J (B) 600×10−6 J (C) 570×10−6 J (D) 630×10−6 J
›Reveal solutionSolution
The field and potential at A pin down A's distance from the source charge; from there, standard point-charge potential lets us find the potential at the new (10 m) point and hence the work done — 630×10−6 J.
Concept and Intuition
For a point charge, E=r2kq and V=rkq. Dividing these two relations eliminates kq and gives EV=r — so knowing both the field and potential at a point tells us its distance from the source charge, and hence kq itself. Once kq is known, the potential anywhere else is a one-line calculation, and the work done moving a charge between two potentials is just W=qΔV.
Step-by-Step Solution
- At point A: E=300 N/C, VA=900 V. Since V/E=r for a point charge:
rA=EVA=300900=3 m
- Find kq using E=kq/r2:
kq=ErA2=300×32=2700 (SI units, V⋅m)
- Potential at the new point, 10 m from the source charge:
V10=10kq=102700=270 V
- Work done moving charge q0=1 μC=10−6 C from A (900 V) to the 10 m point (270 V): …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-AN1 markMCQQ.Two point charges, +2 μC and −2 μC, are fixed respectively at points A and B, separated by 4 m in air. A point P is located such that it is 3 m from +2 μC and 5 m from −2 μC. What is the electric potential at point P? Take k=9×109 Nm2C−2 (A) 1.2×103 V (B) 2.4×103 V (C) −3.6×103 V (D) 3.6×103 V
›Reveal solutionSolution
Electric potential is a scalar, so just add the (signed) contributions of the two point charges at P using V=kq/r for each — giving 2.4×103 V.
Concept and Intuition
Unlike electric field (a vector that needs components), electric potential due to multiple point charges superposes as a plain scalar sum: VP=∑irikqi, with each charge's own sign included. There's no need to resolve directions — just add the numbers.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Charges: q1=+2 μC at distance r1=3 m from P; q2=−2 μC at distance r2=5 m from P.
- Potential at P:
VP=r1kq1+r2kq2=k(32×10−6−52×10−6)
- Factor out k×2×10−6=9×109×2×10−6=1.8×104:
VP=1.8×104(31−51)=1.8×104×152
- Compute: 1.8×104×152=153.6×104=2.4×103 V. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.Find the potential difference VP−VQ between the points P(-1,2,0) and Q(2,0,3) in a uniform electric field Eˉ=(3i^+4j^+5k^) NC−1 (A) 16 V (B) -16V (C) 4V (D) -4V
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the relation between a uniform electric field and potential difference via the line-integral formula; the answer is 16 V.
Concept and Intuition
For a uniform electric field E, potential varies linearly with position: V(r)=V0−E⋅r, which follows directly from E=−∇V. So the potential difference between two points depends only on their position vectors and E — not on any path.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Position vectors: rP=(−1,2,0), rQ=(2,0,3).
- VP−VQ=−E⋅(rP−rQ)=E⋅(rQ−rP).
- rQ−rP=(2−(−1),0−2,3−0)=(3,−2,3). …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.The work done to keep three charges 2×10−5 C, 3×10−5 C, 4×10−5 C at vertices of an equivalent triangle of side 10 cm is (A) 324 J (B) 234 J (C) 432 J (D) 224 J
›Reveal solutionSolution
The work done to assemble three point charges at the corners of an equilateral triangle equals the total electrostatic potential energy of the configuration — the sum of all three pairwise kqiqj/r terms, which comes out to 234 J.
Concept and Intuition
Bringing charges from infinity to fixed positions requires work equal to the potential energy stored in the final configuration (since kinetic energy is zero at rest, start and end). For a system of point charges, the total potential energy is the sum over every unique pair of charges of rijkqiqj. With three charges on an equilateral triangle, all three pairwise separations are equal (r= side length), which simplifies the calculation.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Charges: q1=2×10−5 C, q2=3×10−5 C, q3=4×10−5 C; side r=0.10 m.
- Pairwise products: q1q2=6×10−10, q2q3=12×10−10, q1q3=8×10−10 (all in C²). …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.216 identical spherical drops of each having a positive charge of 10 nC combine to form a big spherical drop. If the radius of each small drop is 3 mm, then the capacitance and electric potential of the big drop are respectively (A) 20 pF,1.08×106 V (B) 20 pF,1080 V (C) 2 pF,1.08×106 V (D) 2 pF,1080 V
›Reveal solutionSolution
When n identical drops merge, use volume conservation to get the new radius, then C=4πε0R and V=Qtotal/C. Answer: 2 pF, 1.08×106 V.
Concept and Intuition
When small charged drops coalesce into one big drop, charge and volume are both conserved (mass/liquid doesn't disappear, and charge simply adds up). The capacitance of an isolated sphere is C=4πε0r, which scales linearly with radius, while the potential V=kQ/R depends on both the merged charge and the new radius. This combination — small increase in R giving a huge jump in V because Q scales with the number of drops while R scales only as (number)1/3 — is the classic trick in this problem.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Radius of the big drop: Volume of big drop = sum of volumes of 216 small drops: 34πR3=216×34πr3⇒R3=216r3⇒R=6r. With r=3 mm, R=18 mm=0.018 m.
- Capacitance of the big drop: C=4πε0R=R/k where k=9×109 Nm2C−2. C=9×1090.018=2×10−12 F=2 pF. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.If electric potential is constant in a region, electric field in that region is (A) finite and constant (B) zero (C) infinite (D) varying
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tests the fundamental relation between electric field and potential: field is the (negative) rate of change of potential with position, so a constant potential region must have zero field.
Concept and Intuition
Electric field measures how quickly potential changes with position, not the potential's absolute value. A region can have a very large potential and still have zero field, as long as that potential is the same everywhere in the region (like the interior of a charged conductor in electrostatic equilibrium) — because there's nothing pushing a charge from one point to another if there's no potential difference between them.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The defining relation is E=−∇V; in one dimension, E=−dxdV.
- "Potential is constant" means V(x)=constant for all points in the region.
- The derivative of a constant is zero: dxdV=0 everywhere in that region.
- Therefore E=−0=0 throughout the region — the field vanishes, it isn't merely finite or unusually large. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.'N' identical spherical drops are charged to the same potential 'V' with charge on each drop equal to 'q'. If all the drops combined to form a bigger spherical drop. The potential of the drop formed is (A) NV (B) N2V (C) N2/3V (D) N1/3V
›Reveal solutionSolution
Combining N identical charged drops gives a bigger drop whose radius scales as N1/3 and whose potential scales as N2/3V.
Concept and Intuition
Potential of a charged sphere is V=kQ/r. When drops merge, charge is conserved (adds directly) but the radius grows only as the cube root of the volume (since volume, not radius, adds directly for merging spheres). This mismatch in scaling — Q scaling as N but r scaling as N1/3 — is what produces the N2/3 enhancement in potential.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Small drop: V=rkq.
- Volume conservation: N⋅34πr3=34πR3⇒R=N1/3r.
- Total charge on big drop: Q=Nq. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.