Q.Obtain the binding energy (in MeV) of a nitrogen nucleus 714N, given m(714N)=14.00307 u.
Concept understanding — Mass Energy Equivalence
Mass Energy Equivalence: From Intuition to the Formula
Imagine you have a lump of coal. You know you can burn it to get heat, and that heat can run a steam engine. The energy you get out seems to come from the chemical bonds in the coal. But what if I told you that the coal itself — just sitting there, not burning — already contains a staggering amount of energy locked inside its very mass? That is the core idea of mass-energy equivalence.
The Intuition: Mass is Frozen Energy
Think of mass as a kind of "frozen" or "stored" energy. When you burn coal, you are only releasing a tiny fraction of this stored energy — the energy in the chemical bonds. The rest of the mass remains as matter. But if you could somehow completely convert that lump of coal into pure energy, you would get an unimaginable amount — enough to power a city for years.
This is not a metaphor. Mass and energy are not two separate things that can be converted into each other like dollars and rupees. They are the same fundamental thing, just in different forms. Mass is a highly concentrated form of energy. Energy, when concentrated enough, behaves like mass.
The Precise Statement
The relationship is given by the most famous equation in physics:
E=mc2
Where:
- E is the energy equivalent of the mass (in joules, J)
- m is the mass (in kilograms, kg)
- c is the speed of light in vacuum (3×108 m/s)
The speed of light is a huge number. Squaring it makes it enormous. This is why a tiny amount of mass corresponds to a colossal amount of energy.
What This Equation Actually Means
The equation tells you exactly how much energy is "stored" inside any object with mass m. If you could annihilate that mass completely, you would get E joules of energy.
Example: A 1 kg mass (like a litre of water) contains:
E=1×(3×108)2=9×1016 J
That is 90 quadrillion joules — roughly the energy released by a 20-megaton nuclear bomb. This is not energy you can normally access; it is locked inside the nucleus of atoms.
Where Does This Show Up in Real Life?
-
Nuclear Reactions: In nuclear fission (splitting atoms) or fusion (joining atoms), a tiny fraction of the mass of the nucleus is converted into energy. The mass of the products is slightly less than the mass of the reactants. The "missing" mass has become energy — exactly as E=mc2 predicts. This is how the Sun works and how nuclear power plants generate electricity.
-
Particle Physics: When a particle and its antiparticle meet, they annihilate completely into pure energy (usually gamma rays). The energy produced equals mc2 for the two particles.
-
Everyday Life: Even when you heat a cup of tea, its mass increases by an immeasurably tiny amount. The added thermal energy has mass. Conversely, a stretched spring has slightly more mass than a relaxed one.
Do not confuse E=mc2 with kinetic energy. E=mc2 is the rest energy — the energy an object has because it has mass, even when it is not moving. Kinetic energy (21mv2) is energy of motion. They are different concepts. The full equation is E2=(pc)2+(mc2)2, where p is momentum. For a stationary object (p=0), this reduces to E=mc2.
The Key Takeaway
Mass and energy are two sides of the same coin. Mass is a measure of how much energy is locked inside an object. The conversion factor is the speed of light squared, which is why even a tiny mass contains an enormous amount of energy. This is not a theory about how to get that energy — it is a statement about the fundamental nature of reality.
Mass-energy equivalence, expressed through Einstein's E = mc^2, is central to the NCERT Class 12 Physics Nuclei chapter and is a frequent subject of "mass energy equivalence formula and examples" and "E=mc2 important questions" searches among CBSE, JEE Main, and NEET aspirants. It also underpins binding-energy and nuclear fission/fusion numericals, making it one of the highest-yield topics for competitive-exam revision in modern physics.
Why this formula?
Why E=mc2 — The Reasoning Behind Mass-Energy Equivalence
The formula E=mc2 is not a random guess. Einstein arrived at it by thinking deeply about what happens to energy when you move an object. The core insight: if an object gains energy, it must behave as if it has gained mass.
The Starting Point: Relativistic Momentum
In special relativity, the momentum of a particle is not simply p=mv. Instead, it is:
p=1−v2/c2m0v
where m0 is the rest mass (mass measured when the object is at rest). This formula already tells us something strange: as speed approaches c, momentum shoots toward infinity — no object with mass can reach the speed of light.
The Energy-Momentum Relation
Einstein then asked: what is the correct expression for kinetic energy that matches this new momentum? In classical physics, kinetic energy is K=21mv2. But that formula fails at high speeds.
The relativistic kinetic energy turns out to be:
K=1−v2/c2m0c2−m0c2
This looks odd — why subtract m0c2? Because when v=0, the first term becomes m0c2, and we want K=0 at rest. So the subtraction gives zero kinetic energy when the object is stationary.
The term m0c2 appears naturally as a rest energy — energy that an object has simply because it has mass, even when completely at rest.
The Crucial Step: What Happens When You Add Energy?
Now consider a box that emits light (photons) in opposite directions. The light carries away energy. Classical physics says the box loses energy but its mass stays the same. Einstein showed this cannot be true.
The argument (simplified): if the box emits a pulse of light with energy E, the light carries momentum p=E/c. By conservation of momentum, the box recoils. But after the light is absorbed by the opposite wall, the box stops. The net effect: the box has moved slightly. Its center of mass has shifted — unless the energy carried by the light also carried mass.
For the center of mass of the entire system (box + light) to remain stationary, the light must behave as if it has an effective mass m=E/c2. Therefore, energy itself has inertia.
The Full Formula
The total energy of any object — moving or at rest — is:
E=1−v2/c2m0c2
For an object at rest (v=0), this reduces to:
E=m0c2
For a moving object, the total energy is the sum of rest energy and kinetic energy:
E=m0c2+K
E=mc2
where m is the relativistic mass m=1−v2/c2m0, or equivalently:
E2=(pc)2+(m0c2)2
Why It's Not Just a "Conversion"
A common misunderstanding: mass does not "turn into" energy. Rather, mass and energy are the same thing measured in different units. When a nucleus splits (fission) or fuses (fusion), the total mass of the products is less than the original mass — but the missing mass appears as kinetic energy of the fragments. The total E=mc2 of the system is conserved.
Do not think of E=mc2 as a "conversion factor" like 1 kg = 9×1016 J. It is an identity: mass is a form of energy. When you heat a gas, its mass increases (by an incredibly tiny amount). When a spring is compressed, it has more mass than when relaxed.
The Takeaway
The formula holds because:
- Relativity forces momentum to have a new form at high speeds.
- Energy and momentum are linked in a four-dimensional way (the energy-momentum four-vector).
- The invariant length of that four-vector is m0c2, meaning rest mass is just the energy measured in the rest frame.
Final answer: E=mc2 is not derived from a single experiment — it is a logical consequence of the principle of relativity and the conservation of momentum. It tells us that mass is frozen energy, and energy is moving mass.
Concept: Mass Energy Equivalence – the binding energy is the energy equivalent of the mass defect, using 1 u=931.5 MeV/c2.
Step 1 – Find the total mass of constituents.
A 714N nucleus has 7 protons and 7 neutrons.
Mass of 7 protons: 7×1.007825 u=7.054775 u
Mass of 7 neutrons: 7×1.008665 u=7.060655 u
Total mass of nucleons: 7.054775+7.060655=14.11543 u
Step 2 – Compute the mass defect.
Δm=(mass of nucleons)−(actual nuclear mass)
Δm=14.11543−14.00307=0.11236 u
Step 3 – Convert to energy.
Binding energy Eb=Δm×931.5 MeV/u
Eb=0.11236×931.5≈104.66 MeV
The binding energy of 714N is 104.66 MeV.
The binding energy of 714N is about 104.7 MeV.
Nitrogen 714N has Z=7 protons and N=14−7=7 neutrons. First find the mass defect using m(11H)=1.007825 u, mn=1.008665 u and the given m(714N)=14.00307 u:
Δm=[7m(11H)+7mn]−m(714N)
Δm=(7×1.007825+7×1.008665)−14.00307
Δm=14.115430−14.00307=0.112360 u.
The binding energy is the energy equivalent of this mass defect, using 1 u=931.5 MeV/c2:
Eb=Δm×931.5 MeV=0.112360×931.5≈104.7 MeV.
The binding energy of 714N is Eb≈104.7 MeV (mass defect Δm=0.11236 u).
Method: Mass Defect → Binding Energy via Einstein's Mass-Energy Equivalence
The binding energy of a nucleus is the energy equivalent of the mass defect — the difference between the sum of masses of its individual nucleons and the actual nuclear mass. The method uses Einstein's relation E=Δmc2, converting atomic mass units (u) directly to MeV using the standard conversion factor.
Step 1: Identify the composition of the nucleus
For 714N:
- Atomic number Z=7 → 7 protons
- Mass number A=14 → number of neutrons = A−Z=14−7=7 neutrons
So the nucleus contains 7 protons and 7 neutrons.
Step 2: Write the mass of the individual constituents (in u)
The given nuclear mass 14.00307 u is an atomic mass (it includes the atom's electrons). To make the electron masses cancel automatically, compare against Z hydrogen ATOMS (each carrying its own electron) rather than bare protons:
- Mass of a hydrogen atom, mH=1.007825 u (proton + its electron)
- Mass of a neutron, mn=1.008665 u
Common pitfall: using the bare proton mass (1.007276 u) here instead of the hydrogen ATOM mass (1.007825 u) silently drops Z electron masses from the defect and understates the binding energy — always pair an atomic nuclear mass with atomic (mH) constituent masses, never with bare mp.
Step 3: Calculate the total mass of the separated constituents
Total mass=7mH+7mn=7(1.007825)+7(1.008665)=7.054775+7.060655=14.11543 u
Step 4: Find the mass defect
Mass defect Δm = (mass of constituents) − (actual atomic mass)
Δm=14.11543−14.00307=0.11236 u
Step 5: Convert mass defect to energy
Use the standard conversion: 1 u=931.5 MeV/c2
Binding energy=Δm×931.5 MeV/u=0.11236×931.5≈104.66 MeV
Eb=Δm×931.5 MeV/u
Final answer:
Binding energy of 714N ≈ 104.66 MeV
In exams, always check whether the given mass is the atomic mass or the nuclear mass. Here, m(714N)=14.00307 u is the atomic mass (includes electrons) — so pair it with the hydrogen ATOM mass mH, not the bare proton mass mp, and the electron masses cancel correctly.
Common Mistakes in Binding Energy Problems (Mass-Energy Equivalence)
Students lose marks on this exact type of question in predictable ways. Here are the most frequent errors and how to fix them.
Mistake 1: Forgetting to account for the mass of electrons
The given mass m(714N)=14.00307 u is the atomic mass — it includes the mass of 7 electrons. But when you calculate the mass defect, you need the nuclear mass of nitrogen, not the atomic mass.
What students do wrong: They directly subtract the given mass from the sum of proton and neutron masses, forgetting that the proton mass given in data tables is also the mass of a hydrogen atom (proton + electron).
How to avoid: Always use atomic mass units consistently. The mass of a hydrogen atom m(11H)=1.007825 u already includes one electron. So for a nucleus with Z protons, the total mass of Z hydrogen atoms automatically accounts for Z electrons — matching the Z electrons already included in the atomic mass of the nucleus.
Mass defect Δm=Z⋅m(11H)+(A−Z)⋅mn−m(ZAX)
For 714N:
- Z=7, A=14
- m(11H)=1.007825 u
- mn=1.008665 u
- m(714N)=14.00307 u
So:
Δm=7(1.007825)+7(1.008665)−14.00307
Mistake 2: Using the wrong conversion factor from u to MeV
The standard conversion is 1 u=931.5 MeV/c2. Some students use 931 or 931.5 MeV — both are accepted in most boards, but be consistent with what your textbook uses.
What students do wrong: They forget the c2 and treat the mass defect as if it's already in energy units, or they use the wrong conversion factor entirely.
How to avoid: Write the conversion explicitly:
E=Δm×931.5 MeV/u
Mistake 3: Arithmetic errors in the mass defect calculation
This is the most common — and most frustrating — mistake. The numbers are close together, and a small slip changes the answer completely.
What students do wrong: They mis-add or mis-subtract the 7-digit numbers, or they round too early.
How to avoid: Do the calculation step by step and keep at least 5 decimal places until the final answer.
Let's do it properly:
- 7×1.007825=7.054775
- 7×1.008665=7.060655
- Sum = 7.054775+7.060655=14.115430
- Subtract given mass: 14.115430−14.003070=0.112360 u
The mass defect is Δm=0.11236 u.
Mistake 4: Forgetting to multiply by c2 or misplacing the conversion
Some students compute Δm correctly but then write E=Δm×c2 without converting units, getting a meaningless number.
How to avoid: Remember that 1 u=931.5 MeV/c2, so:
E=0.11236×931.5=104.66 MeV
Mistake 5: Reporting the wrong number of significant figures
The given mass is 14.00307 u (6 significant figures). The proton and neutron masses are typically given to 6 or 7 figures. Your final answer should reflect this precision.
What students do wrong: They round to 2 or 3 significant figures, or they report 104.66 MeV when the data only justifies 104.7 MeV.
How to avoid: Keep intermediate calculations to 5-6 decimal places, then round the final energy to match the least precise input. Here, 104.7 MeV is appropriate.
Mistake 6: Confusing binding energy per nucleon with total binding energy
The question asks for binding energy — that's the total. Some students divide by 14 and report the per-nucleon value instead.
How to avoid: Read the question carefully. If it says "binding energy" without "per nucleon," give the total. If you want to be safe, you can state both, but clearly label which is which.
Total binding energy =104.7 MeV
Binding energy per nucleon =14104.7=7.48 MeV/nucleon
Quick Checklist to Avoid All These Mistakes
- Use hydrogen atom mass (not proton mass) for the protons
- Subtract the atomic mass of the nucleus (which includes electrons)
- Keep 5-6 decimal places in Δm
- Multiply by 931.5 to get MeV
- Round final answer appropriately
- Check if the question wants total or per-nucleon binding energy
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.What is the energy released in the following fission reaction? z236U→a117X+(z−a)117Y+2(01n) Given that the binding energy per nucleon of X and Y is 8.8 MeV and that of z236U is 7.5 MeV (A) 256.4 MeV (B) 248.6 MeV (C) 274.2 MeV (D) 289.2 MeV
›Reveal solutionSolution
Energy released in fission equals the increase in total nuclear binding energy from reactant to products; computing this gives 289.2 MeV.
Concept and Intuition
Nuclear fission releases energy because the fragment nuclei are, per nucleon, more tightly bound than the original heavy nucleus (binding energy per nucleon peaks around mass number ~56 and is higher for the mid-mass fragments than for very heavy nuclei like uranium). The energy released is exactly the difference between the total binding energy of the products and that of the reactant — free neutrons contribute zero binding energy since they are not bound in any nucleus.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Total binding energy of the reactant, Z236U: BEreactant=236×7.5=1770 MeV.
- The two product nuclei X and Y together have 117+117=234 nucleons, each bound at 8.8 MeV/nucleon: BEproducts=234×8.8=2059.2 MeV.
- The 2 free neutrons emitted carry no binding energy (they are not part of a nucleus).
- Energy released =BEproducts−BEreactant=2059.2−1770=289.2 MeV.
Common Mistakes
- Including the 2 free neutrons' mass number (238 total) in the binding-energy-per-nucleon multiplication for the products, instead of only the 234 nucleons that are actually bound in X and Y.
- Subtracting in the wrong order (reactant − products) and getting a negative/wrong-magnitude answer.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 289.2 MeV.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-AN1 markMCQQ.Energy released in the fission of a single 92U235 nucleus is 200 MeV. The fission rate of 92U235 fueled reactor operating at a power level of 5W is (A) 1.56×1010 s−1 (B) 1.56×1011 s−1 (C) 1.56×1016 s−1 (D) 1.56×10−17 s−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Divide reactor power by energy released per fission event to get the fission rate: ≈1.56×1011 fissions per second.
Concept and Intuition
A nuclear reactor's power output is the total energy released per second, which equals (energy released per fission) × (number of fissions per second). So the fission rate is just power divided by per-fission energy, after converting MeV to joules using 1 MeV=1.6×10−13 J.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Convert energy per fission to SI: E=200 MeV=200×1.6×10−13 J=3.2×10−11 J.
- Reactor power P=5 W=5 J/s.
- Fission rate R=EP=3.2×10−115=1.5625×1011 fissions per second.
Common Mistakes
- Using 1 MeV=1.6×10−19 J (that's the eV-to-J conversion, not MeV) — this is off by a factor of 106 and lands on a wrong-magnitude option like (D).
- Arithmetic slip when dividing by a number in scientific notation, landing on 1010 or 1016 instead of 1011.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 1.56×1011 s−1.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.Each nuclear fission of 235U releases 200 MeV of energy. If a reactor generates 1 MW power, then the rate of fission in the reactor is (A) 3.125×106 (B) 3.125×108 (C) 3.125×1010 (D) 3.125×1016
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests converting a reactor's power output into a fission rate using the known energy released per fission event. The rate comes out to 3.125×1016 fissions/second.
Concept and Intuition
Power is energy delivered per unit time. If each fission event reliably releases a fixed amount of energy, then the number of fission events needed per second to sustain a given power output is simply that power divided by the energy released per event — exactly like asking how many coins of a given value you need per second to make up a certain rate of payment.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Energy released per fission: 200 MeV. Convert to joules using 1 eV=1.6×10−19 J:
Efission=200×106×1.6×10−19 J=3.2×10−11 J
- Reactor power: P=1 MW=106 W=106 J/s.
- Rate of fission (fissions per second):
n=EfissionP=3.2×10−11106=3.125×1016 s−1
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to convert MeV to joules (leaving the huge unit mismatch uncorrected).
- Arithmetic slip in the division — it helps to write 106/3.2×10−11=(1/3.2)×1017=0.3125×1017=3.125×1016.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 3.125×1016.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-17-AN1 markMCQQ.The energy released in the fission of one 92U235 nucleus is 200 MeV. The energy released in the fission of 235 g mass of 92U235 is nearly (A) 15.84×1012 J (B) 19.27×1012 J (C) 13.59×1012 J (D) 17.73×1012 J
›Reveal solutionSolution
235 g of U-235 is exactly one mole of nuclei; multiplying the per-nucleus fission energy by Avogadro's number gives 19.27×1012 J.
Concept and Intuition
The atomic mass of U-235 in grams equals one mole of that isotope (this is precisely why 235 g is chosen in the problem — it's a clean way to get exactly NA nuclei). So the total fission energy from 235 g is just the per-nucleus energy times Avogadro's number.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Convert per-nucleus energy to joules: 200 MeV=200×106×1.6×10−19 J=3.2×10−11 J.
- Number of nuclei in 235 g: N=NA=6.022×1023.
- Total energy: E=3.2×10−11×6.022×1023.
- 3.2×6.022=19.27, and the powers of ten give 10−11+23=1012, so E≈19.27×1012 J.
Common Mistakes
- Using the wrong conversion for MeV to Joules (should be 1.6×10−13 J per MeV, i.e. 1.6×10−19×106).
- Forgetting that 235 g corresponds to exactly one mole (i.e., NA atoms), and instead trying to use some other mass-to-number conversion.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 19.27×1012 J.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The decrease in each day in the Uranium mass of the material in a Uranium reactor operating at a power of 12 MW is (Energy released in one 92U235 fission is about 200 MeV) (A) 12.64×10−2 kg (B) 11.50×10−2 g (C) 12.64 kg (D) 12.64 g
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests converting reactor power output into a mass of fissile fuel consumed per day, via the energy released per fission event.
Concept and Intuition
A nuclear reactor's power output comes from a huge number of individual fission events, each releasing a fixed amount of energy (~200 MeV for U-235). Knowing the total energy needed per day and the energy per fission tells us how many nuclei fission per day; multiplying by the mass per nucleus (via Avogadro's number) gives the mass consumed.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Total energy released per day: E=P×t=12×106 W×(24×3600 s)=12×106×86400=1.0368×1012 J.
- Energy released per fission: 200 MeV=200×106×1.6×10−19 J=3.2×10−11 J.
- Number of fissions per day: N=EfissionE=3.2×10−111.0368×1012≈3.24×1022.
- Mass of one mole of U-235 is 235 g, containing NA=6.022×1023 atoms; mass consumed =NAN×235=6.022×10233.24×1022×235≈0.0538×235≈12.64 g.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to convert the day into seconds (86400 s) before computing total energy.
- Mixing up grams and kilograms in the final answer.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 12.64 g.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.If the energy released per fission of a 92235U nucleus is 200 MeV, the energy released in the fission of 0.1 kg of 92235U in kilowatt-hour is. (A) 22.8×105 (B) 22.8×107 (C) 11.4×105 (D) 820×1010
›Reveal solutionSolution
Count the U-235 atoms in the given mass, multiply by the per-fission energy, then convert joules to kilowatt-hours.
Concept and Intuition
Each fission event releases a fixed amount of energy (given as 200 MeV). To get the total energy from a macroscopic mass, we need the number of atoms/nuclei present, found via moles and Avogadro's number. The final conversion from joules to kWh uses the standard 1kWh=3.6×106 J.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Moles in 0.1 kg = 100 g: n=235100=0.4255 mol.
- Number of atoms: N=0.4255×6.022×1023=2.562×1023.
- Energy per fission in joules: 200 MeV=200×1.6×10−13 J=3.2×10−11 J.
- Total energy: E=2.562×1023×3.2×10−11=8.20×1012 J.
- Convert to kWh: 3.6×1068.20×1012≈2.278×106 kWh=22.8×105 kWh.
Common Mistakes
- Using 0.1 kg as if it's grams directly in the mole calculation (must convert to 100 g first, using molar mass 235 g/mol).
- Forgetting to convert MeV to joules before totaling, or mixing unit conversions when going to kWh.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 22.8×105.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.In a nuclear reactor, the fuel is consumed at the rate of 1×10−3 gs−1. The power generated in kW is (A) 9×1014 (B) 9×107 (C) 9×108 (D) 9×1012
›Reveal solutionSolution
Converting the mass-consumption rate to a power via E=mc2 gives 9×107 kW.
Concept and Intuition
In a nuclear reactor, mass is converted into energy according to Einstein's mass-energy equivalence, E=mc2. If a certain mass of fuel is "consumed" (i.e., converted to energy) every second, then the energy released per second — which is exactly the power output — follows directly by plugging the mass rate into this formula.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Given mass consumption rate: dtdm=1×10−3 g/s=1×10−6 kg/s.
- Power (energy released per second): P=dtdmc2.
- c2=(3×108)2=9×1016 m2/s2.
- P=1×10−6×9×1016=9×1010 W.
- Convert to kW: P=10009×1010=9×107 kW.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to convert grams to kilograms before applying E=mc2 (an error of 103).
- Forgetting to convert the final answer from watts to kilowatts (another error of 103), which would land on a different power-of-ten option.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 9×107.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2023Set ap-2023-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.If the speed of the light was half the present value, the energy released in a nuclear reaction decreases by (A) 100% (B) 75% (C) 50% (D) 25%
›Reveal solutionSolution
Since nuclear energy release follows E=mc2, halving c reduces c2 (and hence E) to one-quarter of its original value — a 75% decrease.
Concept and Intuition
The mass–energy equivalence relation E=mc2 shows energy scales with the square of the speed of light, not linearly with it. So even a modest change in c produces an amplified (squared) change in the energy released for the same mass defect.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original energy: E=mc2.
- New speed: c′=c/2, so new energy E′=m(c′)2=m4c2=4E.
- Decrease =E−E′=E−4E=43E.
- Percentage decrease =E3E/4×100%=75%.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the square in E=mc2 and assuming a 50% decrease (linear scaling) instead of 75% (quadratic scaling).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 75%.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-16-AN1 markMCQQ.The nucleus having highest binding energy per nucleon is (A) 816O (B) 2656Fe (C) 84208Pb (D) 24He
›Reveal solutionSolution
The binding-energy-per-nucleon curve peaks around iron (A ≈ 56); among the given nuclei, Fe-56 sits closest to that peak.
Concept and Intuition
The famous binding energy per nucleon vs. mass number curve rises steeply for light nuclei, peaks around A=56 (iron group), then falls slowly for heavier nuclei. This is why fusion releases energy for light elements and fission releases energy for heavy elements — both processes move nuclei toward the iron peak.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Recall approximate binding energy per nucleon values: 24He≈7.1 MeV, 816O≈8.0 MeV, 2656Fe≈8.8 MeV, 82208Pb≈7.9 MeV.
- Comparing these, Fe-56 has the maximum value among the choices.
- This matches the known peak of the BE/nucleon curve at mass number ~56.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming binding energy per nucleon keeps increasing with mass number — it actually peaks and then decreases.
- Confusing total binding energy (which does increase with A) with binding energy per nucleon (which peaks at iron).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 2656Fe.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.The process that mainly takes place in stars to produce energy (A) nuclear fission (B) nuclear fusion (C) ionization (D) annihilation
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests basic astrophysics: the source of a star's energy. Answer: nuclear fusion.
Concept and Intuition
Stars like our Sun are powered by thermonuclear fusion reactions in their cores, where
extreme temperature and pressure force light nuclei (mainly hydrogen) to fuse into
heavier nuclei (helium), converting a tiny fraction of mass into a huge amount of
energy (E=mc2) that is radiated as heat and light.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Compare the options: nuclear fission is the splitting of heavy nuclei (used in reactors on Earth, not the dominant stellar process); ionization and annihilation don't release nearly enough sustained energy to power a star for billions of years.
- In stars, hydrogen nuclei fuse (proton-proton chain, or CNO cycle in heavier stars) to form helium, releasing energy continuously over the star's lifetime.
- This is nuclear fusion — the correct answer.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing fusion (combining light nuclei, powers stars) with fission (splitting heavy nuclei, powers nuclear reactors on Earth).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — nuclear fusion.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2022Set ap-2022-07-12-AN1 markMCQQ.An experimental train uses 1 g of nuclear material to run. 90 % of the produced energy is wasted to overcome the frictional force between the wheels and the track. If the weight of each coach is 18 ton (18000 kg) and it runs at a speed of 100 m s−1, the number of coaches the engine can drag at a time is (Speed of light in vacuum is =3×108 m s−1) (A) 100 (B) 1000 (C) 10000 (D) 100000
›Reveal solutionSolution
Mass-energy from the fuel splits 90%-wasted / 10%-useful; the useful 10% supplies the kinetic energy of the coaches at their running speed, from which the number of coaches follows.
Concept and Intuition
By E=mc2, even a tiny mass of nuclear fuel releases enormous energy. Here, 90% of that energy is dissipated as heat overcoming friction between wheels and track (this is the "wasted" part), leaving 10% as the useful energy that actually goes into moving the train — i.e. giving the coaches their kinetic energy at running speed.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Total energy released: E=mc2=(10−3 kg)×(3×108 m/s)2=9×1013 J.
- Useful (non-wasted) energy: 10% of E = 9×1012 J.
- This equals the total kinetic energy of n coaches, each of mass M=18000 kg, moving at v=100 m/s:
9×1012=21nMv2=21n×18000×(100)2.
- Solve: 21×18000×104=9×107, so n=9×1079×1012=105=100000.
Common Mistakes
- Using the 90% "wasted" energy instead of the 10% useful energy in the kinetic-energy equation.
- Forgetting to convert grams to kilograms in E=mc2.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 100000.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.Which of the following statement is correct? (A) The rest mass of the stable nucleus is less than the sum of the rest masses of its separated nucleons (B) The rest mass of the stable nucleus is greater than the sum of the rest masses of its separated nucleons (C) In nuclear fission, energy is released by fusion is of two nuclei of medium mass (approximate 100amu) (D) In nuclear fission, energy is released by fragmentation is very low atomic mass nucleus
›Reveal solutionSolution
A stable nucleus's rest mass is less than the sum of its free nucleons' rest masses — the mass defect that accounts for its binding energy — making option (A) correct.
Concept and Intuition
Binding a set of nucleons together into a nucleus releases energy (the binding energy), and by mass-energy equivalence, that released energy corresponds to a loss of rest mass. So a bound (stable) nucleus always weighs less than its separated, free constituent nucleons — this "mass defect" is a foundational nuclear-physics fact, and it is precisely why nuclear reactions that increase binding energy per nucleon (fission of heavy nuclei, or fusion of light nuclei) release energy.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Binding energy: BE=(sum of rest masses of free nucleons−rest mass of nucleus)c2>0 for any stable, bound nucleus.
- This directly means: rest mass of nucleus < sum of rest masses of separated nucleons — confirming option (A) and ruling out (B).
- Nuclear fission is the splitting of a heavy nucleus (like U-235) into medium-mass fragments (~100 amu each), releasing energy because the fragments are more tightly bound per nucleon than the parent — this is fission, not "fusion of two nuclei of medium mass" as option (C) mislabels it.
- Nuclear fusion is the combining of very light nuclei (like hydrogen isotopes), releasing energy — option (D) mislabels this process as "fission... of very low atomic mass nucleus," swapping the terminology.
Common Mistakes
- Swapping "fission" and "fusion" in describing which process combines light nuclei versus splits heavy ones (options C and D deliberately test this common confusion).
- Thinking binding makes a nucleus heavier than its parts, rather than lighter (the mass defect is easy to get backwards).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — The rest mass of the stable nucleus is less than the sum of the rest masses of its separated nucleons.
ANSWER: A
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.