What is the effect of temperature on the rate constant of a reaction? How can this effect of temperature on ra

Exercises · 3.7

Q. What is the effect of temperature on the rate constant of a reaction? How can this effect of temperature on rate constant be represented quantitatively?

Arunachal CbseNCERTSubjective· 2mImportance★★★★★

22% · 26/117 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Arrhenius Equation

The Arrhenius Equation Plot: Why Temperature Changes Reaction Speed

You already know that heating things up makes reactions go faster. A cold chai takes forever to dissolve sugar; hot chai does it in seconds. But how much faster? And is there a pattern that holds for every reaction?

That pattern is the Arrhenius equation, and plotting it in a clever way reveals something fundamental about how molecules need to collide to react.

The core idea: an energy barrier

Imagine a ball sitting in a valley. To get to the next valley, it must first be pushed up over a hill. That hill is the activation energy ( $E_a$ ) — the minimum energy two molecules need to have when they collide, for the reaction to happen.

At a low temperature, most molecules move slowly. Only a tiny fraction have enough energy to climb that hill. Raise the temperature, and suddenly many more molecules have the required energy. The fraction of molecules with energy $\ge E_a$ is given by the Boltzmann distribution:

\text{fraction} = e^{-E_a / RT}

where $R$ is the gas constant and $T$ is the absolute temperature (in Kelvin). This exponential is the heart of the story.

The Arrhenius equation (precise statement)

The rate constant $k$ of a reaction depends on temperature as:

k = A \, e^{-E_a / RT}

$k$ = rate constant (how fast the reaction proceeds)
$A$ = pre-exponential factor (frequency of collisions, times a steric factor — how often molecules hit in the right orientation)
$E_a$ = activation energy (J/mol or kJ/mol)
$R$ = 8.314 J/(mol·K)
$T$ = temperature in Kelvin

Important

$k$ is not the reaction rate itself — it's the proportionality constant in the rate law. But for a fixed concentration, a larger $k$ means a faster reaction.

Why plot it? The linear trick

The equation $k = A e^{-E_a / RT}$ is exponential in $1/T$ . That's hard to eyeball. But take the natural logarithm of both sides:

\ln k = \ln A - \frac{E_a}{R} \cdot \frac{1}{T}

This is the equation of a straight line:

y = c + m x

where:

$y = \ln k$
$x = 1/T$
slope $m = -E_a / R$
intercept $c = \ln A$

So if you measure $k$ at several temperatures and plot $\ln k$ versus $1/T$ , you get a straight line — provided the reaction follows Arrhenius behaviour (most do, over moderate temperature ranges).

Tip

Always use Kelvin for $T$ . Celsius will give you a curved mess because $1/T$ is not linear in Celsius.

What the plot tells you

From the slope, you get $E_a$ :

E_a = - (\text{slope}) \times R

A steep negative slope means a large $E_a$ — the reaction is very sensitive to temperature. A shallow slope means a small $E_a$ — temperature doesn't affect it much.

From the intercept, you get $A$ :

A = e^{\text{intercept}}

This tells you about the collision frequency and orientation factor. A high $A$ means molecules are colliding often and in the right geometry.

A typical Arrhenius plot looks like this

$T$ (K)	$k$ (s⁻¹)	$1/T$ (K⁻¹)	$\ln k$
300	0.0012	0.00333	-6.72
310	0.0028	0.00323	-5.88
320	0.0061	0.00313	-5.10
330	0.0125	0.00303	-4.38

Plot $\ln k$ (y-axis) vs $1/T$ (x-axis). The points fall on a straight line. Draw the best-fit line, measure its slope, and compute $E_a$ . …

Why this formula?

Arrhenius Equation: Why It Holds

The Arrhenius equation is not a guess — it emerges from a deep physical picture of how molecules react. Let's build that picture step by step.

1. The Core Question

Why does reaction rate increase dramatically with temperature?

For many reactions, a 10 °C rise can double or triple the rate. This cannot be explained by simple kinetic energy arguments alone — the relationship is exponential.

2. The Key Insight: An Energy Barrier

Before molecules can react, they must collide — but not all collisions lead to products.

There is a minimum energy threshold called activation energy ( $E_a$ ). Only collisions with energy ≥  $E_a$ can break old bonds and form new ones.

Think of it like pushing a boulder over a hill:

The hilltop is the transition state (activated complex).
$E_a$ is the height of that hill from the reactant valley.

3. The Boltzmann Factor — The "Why" of Exponential Dependence

At temperature $T$ , the fraction of molecules with energy ≥  $E_a$ is given by the Boltzmann distribution:

\text{Fraction} = e^{-E_a / (RT)}

where:

$R$ = universal gas constant (8.314 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹)
$T$ = absolute temperature (Kelvin)

Why this form?

The Boltzmann distribution tells us that the probability of a molecule having energy $E$ is proportional to $e^{-E/(k_B T)}$ .
For 1 mole of molecules, $k_B$ (Boltzmann constant) becomes $R$ via $R = N_A k_B$ .
So the fraction with energy ≥ $E_a$ is the integral of that distribution from $E_a$ to ∞, which yields $e^{-E_a/(RT)}$ .

Key takeaway: This exponential factor is not arbitrary — it comes directly from statistical mechanics.

4. The Pre-Exponential Factor ( $A$ )

Even if a collision has enough energy, it must also:

Have the correct orientation (steric factor)
Occur with sufficient collision frequency

These are bundled into the pre-exponential factor $A$ (also called the frequency factor):

A = \text{(collision frequency)} \times \text{(orientation factor)}

For simple gas-phase reactions, collision frequency can be calculated from kinetic molecular theory — it's on the order of $10^{10}$  L mol⁻¹ s⁻¹.

5. Putting It Together: The Arrhenius Equation

The rate constant $k$ is proportional to:

The number of effective collisions per second (given by $A$ )
The fraction of collisions with sufficient energy (given by $e^{-E_a/(RT)}$ )

Thus:

\boxed{k = A \, e^{-E_a / (RT)}}

This is the Arrhenius equation.

6. Why It Works — The Physical Logic

Component	Physical meaning	Why it's there
$A$	Maximum possible rate if every collision worked	Accounts for collision frequency & geometry

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The rate constant $k$ increases exponentially with temperature, as described quantitatively by the Arrhenius equation: $k = A e^{-E_a / RT}$ , where $A$ is the pre-exponential factor, $E_a$ is the activation energy, $R$ is the gas constant, and $T$ is the absolute temperature.

The effect of temperature on the rate constant is one of the most fundamental ideas in chemical kinetics. It’s not just that reactions speed up when you heat them — the relationship is precise, exponential, and rooted in the energy barrier that molecules must overcome to react.

Why temperature matters: the collision and energy picture

Think about what happens when you raise the temperature. Molecules move faster, so they collide more often. But that alone doesn’t explain the dramatic increase in reaction rate — typically, a 10 °C rise doubles or triples the rate. The real reason is that a much larger fraction of molecules now have enough energy to overcome the activation energy barrier $E_a$ . This fraction is given by the Boltzmann distribution: it’s proportional to $e^{-E_a / RT}$ . So even a small increase in $T$ makes this exponential factor shoot up.

k = A e^{-E_a / RT}

This is the Arrhenius equation, proposed by Svante Arrhenius in 1889. It gives the quantitative relationship between temperature and the rate constant.

Step-by-step breakdown

Identify the variables.

$k$ is the rate constant (units depend on reaction order). $T$ is the absolute temperature in kelvin (K). $R$ is the universal gas constant, $8.314\ \text{J mol}^{-1}\text{K}^{-1}$ . $E_a$ is the activation energy in J/mol (or kJ/mol — be consistent with $R$ ). $A$ is the pre-exponential factor, which accounts for the frequency of collisions and the orientation factor.
Understand the exponential dependence.

The term $e^{-E_a / RT}$ is the fraction of molecules with energy at least $E_a$ . As $T$ increases, the exponent becomes less negative, so $e^{-E_a / RT}$ increases. This is not linear — it’s exponential. For example, if $E_a = 50\ \text{kJ/mol}$ , raising $T$ from 300 K to 310 K increases $k$ by a factor of about 2.
Quantify the effect using the two-point form.

Often you need to compare rate constants at two temperatures. Take the natural log of the Arrhenius equation:

\ln k = \ln A - \frac{E_a}{R} \cdot \frac{1}{T}

This is a straight line: $\ln k$ vs. $1/T$ gives slope $= -E_a/R$ and intercept $= \ln A$ . For two temperatures $T_1$ and $T_2$ :

\ln \frac{k_2}{k_1} = -\frac{E_a}{R} \left( \frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1} \right)

This lets you calculate $E_a$ from experimental data, or predict $k$ at a new temperature.

Interpret the physical meaning. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Here is a breakdown of the common mistakes students make with the Arrhenius Equation, along with how to avoid them.

The Core Concept (The "Why")

First, let's establish the correct understanding. The effect of temperature on the rate constant ( $k$ ) is exponential and positive. As temperature increases, $k$ increases sharply.

The quantitative representation is the Arrhenius Equation:

k = A e^{-E_a / RT}

Where:

$k$ = rate constant
$A$ = Arrhenius constant (frequency factor)
$E_a$ = activation energy (J/mol)
$R$ = gas constant (8.314 J/mol·K)
$T$ = absolute temperature (Kelvin)

The logarithmic form (used for calculations) is:

\ln k = \ln A - \frac{E_a}{RT}

Common Mistake #1: Forgetting the Exponential Nature

The Mistake: Students often think the effect is linear (e.g., "doubling temperature doubles $k$ "). They treat the Arrhenius equation like a simple proportion.

Why it's wrong: The equation is $k = A e^{-E_a/RT}$ . The temperature $T$ is in the denominator of the exponent. A small change in $T$ causes a large, non-linear change in $k$ . For many reactions, a 10°C rise can double or triple $k$ .

How to Avoid: Always visualize the graph. Plot $\ln k$ vs. $1/T$ — it gives a straight line with slope $= -E_a/R$ . This proves the relationship is exponential, not linear.

Common Mistake #2: Using Celsius Instead of Kelvin

The Mistake: Plugging temperature in °C directly into $T$ in the equation.

Why it's wrong: The Arrhenius equation is derived from thermodynamics, which requires absolute temperature. Using Celsius will give a completely wrong value for $k$ because $T$ appears in the denominator of the exponent.

How to Avoid: Always convert to Kelvin before any calculation.

T(K) = T(°C) + 273

Common Mistake #3: Confusing $E_a$ with $\Delta H$

The Mistake: Thinking activation energy ( $E_a$ ) is the same as enthalpy change ( $\Delta H$ ) of the reaction.

Why it's wrong: $E_a$ is the energy barrier that reactants must overcome to form products. $\Delta H$ is the net energy difference between reactants and products. They are completely different quantities. A reaction can have a high $E_a$ (slow) but a small $\Delta H$ (slightly exothermic).

How to Avoid: Remember the "mountain pass" analogy:

$E_a$ = height of the pass (how hard to climb)
$\Delta H$ = difference in altitude between start and end (net energy change)

Common Mistake #4: Misapplying the Two-Point Form

The Mistake: Using the two-point form incorrectly, especially when solving for $E_a$ or $T_2$ .

The Correct Formula:

\ln \frac{k_2}{k_1} = \frac{E_a}{R} \left( \frac{1}{T_1} - \frac{1}{T_2} \right)

Common errors:

Swapping $k_1$ and $k_2$ in the log
Writing $\frac{1}{T_2} - \frac{1}{T_1}$ instead of $\frac{1}{T_1} - \frac{1}{T_2}$
Forgetting to convert $E_a$ to J/mol (if given in kJ/mol)

How to Avoid: Write the formula clearly, label $k_1, T_1$ and $k_2, T_2$ , and always check units — $E_a$ must be in J/mol to match $R = 8.314$ J/mol·K.

Common Mistake #5: Ignoring the Pre-Exponential Factor $A$ …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous question3.6 — A reaction is second order with respect to a reactant. How is the rate…→Next question3.8 — In a pseudo first order reaction in water, the following results were …

Q.What is the effect of temperature on the rate constant of a reaction? How can this effect of temperature on rate constant be represented quantitatively?

Concept understanding — Arrhenius Equation

The Arrhenius Equation Plot: Why Temperature Changes Reaction Speed

The core idea: an energy barrier

The Arrhenius equation (precise statement)

Why plot it? The linear trick

What the plot tells you

A typical Arrhenius plot looks like this

Why this formula?

Arrhenius Equation: Why It Holds

1. The Core Question

2. The Key Insight: An Energy Barrier

3. The Boltzmann Factor — The "Why" of Exponential Dependence

4. The Pre-Exponential Factor ( $A$ )

5. Putting It Together: The Arrhenius Equation

6. Why It Works — The Physical Logic

Why temperature matters: the collision and energy picture

Step-by-step breakdown

Method: The Arrhenius Equation

Step 1 – State the Arrhenius Equation

Step 2 – Understand the qualitative effect

Step 3 – Use the logarithmic form for calculations

The Core Concept (The "Why")

Common Mistake #1: Forgetting the Exponential Nature

Common Mistake #2: Using Celsius Instead of Kelvin

Common Mistake #3: Confusing $E_a$ with $\Delta H$

Common Mistake #4: Misapplying the Two-Point Form

Common Mistake #5: Ignoring the Pre-Exponential Factor $A$ …

Q.What is the effect of temperature on the rate constant of a reaction? How can this effect of temperature on rate constant be represented quantitatively?

Why temperature matters: the collision and energy picture

Step-by-step breakdown

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days