Assertion (A): Nitration of benzene with nitric acid requires the use of concentrated sulphuric acid. Reason (

NCERT Exemplar · Q46

Q. Assertion (A): Nitration of benzene with nitric acid requires the use of concentrated sulphuric acid. Reason (R): The mixture of concentrated sulphuric acid and concentrated nitric acid produces the electrophile, NO2^+.

(i) Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A.

(ii) Both A and R are correct but R is not the correct explanation of A.

(iii) Both A and R are not correct.

(iv) A is not correct but R is correct.

Assam AhsecShort· 1mImportance★★★★★

94% · 85/90 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Williamson Ether Synthesis

Williamson Ether Synthesis: From Intuition to Mechanism

Imagine you want to build a simple bridge between two carbon chains — an oxygen atom linking them together. That bridge is an ether ( $R-O-R'$ ). The Williamson ether synthesis is the most reliable way to build that bridge in a lab.

The Core Idea

You have two pieces: an alkoxide ion ( $RO^-$ ) and an alkyl halide ( $R'X$ ). The alkoxide is a strong nucleophile — it loves positive charge. The alkyl halide has a carbon attached to a halogen (like Cl, Br, I) that is slightly positive because the halogen pulls electrons away.

When you mix them, the alkoxide attacks that slightly positive carbon, kicks out the halide ion, and forms a new $C-O$ bond. The result? An ether.

R-O^- + R'-X \longrightarrow R-O-R' + X^-

That's the entire reaction in one line. But the devil is in the details — especially which alkyl halide you choose.

The Mechanism (SN2)

This is a classic SN2 reaction — one step, no intermediates. The alkoxide approaches the carbon from the opposite side of the halogen. As the $C-O$ bond forms, the $C-X$ bond breaks. The halide leaves as a stable anion.

Because it's SN2, the reaction is sensitive to steric hindrance. The carbon being attacked must be accessible.

Watch out

If the alkyl halide is tertiary (3°), the reaction will not work via SN2. The bulky carbon blocks the backside attack. Instead, the alkoxide will act as a base and cause elimination (forming an alkene). You'll get no ether.

The Practical Rule

Alkyl halide	Works?	Why
Methyl ( $CH_3X$ )	Yes	Least hindered, fastest SN2
Primary (1°)	Yes	Clean SN2
Secondary (2°)	Sometimes	Works if not too bulky; elimination competes
Tertiary (3°)	No	Elimination dominates
Aryl (e.g., bromobenzene)	No	SN2 impossible on $sp^2$ carbon

Tip

To make an ether like $R-O-R'$ , always use the less hindered alkyl halide and the more hindered alkoxide. For example, to make $CH_3CH_2-O-CH(CH_3)_2$ , use $CH_3CH_2O^-$ (primary alkoxide) + $(CH_3)_2CHBr$ (secondary halide) — not the other way around.

How to Choose the Alkoxide

You can't just buy alkoxide ions in a bottle. You make them by reacting an alcohol with a strong base like sodium hydride ( $NaH$ ) or sodium metal.

ROH + NaH \longrightarrow RO^-Na^+ + H_2

The alkoxide is then used immediately with the alkyl halide.

A Common Exam Trap …

Why this formula?

Williamson Ether Synthesis: Why the Key Principles Hold

The Williamson Ether Synthesis is a classic method to prepare ethers. The core reaction is:

\text{R-O}^- + \text{R'-X} \rightarrow \text{R-O-R'} + \text{X}^-

Where:

$\text{R-O}^-$ is an alkoxide ion (strong nucleophile)
$\text{R'-X}$ is an alkyl halide (electrophile)
$\text{X}^-$ is a halide ion (leaving group)

Let's break down why this works — the reasoning behind the key principles.

1. Why an Alkoxide (Not an Alcohol) is Needed

The Problem with Alcohols

Alcohols ( $\text{R-OH}$ ) are weak nucleophiles. The oxygen has a partial negative charge, but the O–H bond is strong. If you mix an alcohol with an alkyl halide, the reaction is extremely slow or doesn't happen at all.

The Solution: Deprotonation

By treating the alcohol with a strong base (like $\text{NaH}$ , $\text{Na}$ , or $\text{KOH}$ ), you remove the proton:

\text{R-OH} + \text{NaH} \rightarrow \text{R-O}^- \text{Na}^+ + \text{H}_2

The alkoxide ion ( $\text{R-O}^-$ ) has a full negative charge on oxygen. This makes it:

A much stronger nucleophile (higher electron density)
More reactive toward the electrophilic carbon in the alkyl halide

Key takeaway: The alkoxide's full negative charge is what drives the reaction — it's not just about having oxygen, but about having a charged, electron-rich oxygen.

2. Why the Alkyl Halide Must Be Primary (or Methyl)

The Mechanism: $\text{S}_\text{N}2$ is the Only Path

The Williamson synthesis proceeds exclusively via an $\text{S}_\text{N}2$ mechanism (bimolecular nucleophilic substitution). This means:

The nucleophile attacks the carbon from the backside
The leaving group departs from the opposite side
The reaction is concerted (one step, no intermediates)

Why Primary Halides Work Best

In $\text{S}_\text{N}2$ reactions, the rate depends on steric hindrance:

Alkyl Halide Type	Steric Hindrance	$\text{S}_\text{N}2$ Reactivity
Methyl ( $\text{CH}_3\text{X}$ )	Minimal	Very fast
Primary ( $\text{RCH}_2\text{X}$ )	Low	Fast
Secondary ( $\text{R}_2\text{CHX}$ )	Moderate	Slow
Tertiary ( $\text{R}_3\text{CX}$ )	High	Does not occur

Why Tertiary Halides Fail

With a tertiary halide, the bulky alkyl groups block the backside attack. Instead, the alkoxide (a strong base) will eliminate a proton from the halide, forming an alkene:

\text{R-O}^- + \text{R'}_3\text{C-X} \rightarrow \text{R-OH} + \text{alkene} + \text{X}^-

This is an E2 elimination — not the desired ether formation.

Key takeaway: The Williamson synthesis works only when the alkyl halide is primary or methyl because $\text{S}_\text{N}2$ requires an unhindered backside.

3. Why the Leaving Group Must Be Good

The Role of the Halide

The halide ( $\text{X}^-$ ) must be a good leaving group — meaning it can stabilize the negative charge after departure.

Halide	Leaving Group Ability	Reason
$\text{I}^-$	Excellent	Large, polarizable, weak base
$\text{Br}^-$	Good	Moderate size, weak base
$\text{Cl}^-$	Fair	Smaller, stronger base
$\text{F}^-$	Poor	Small, strong base, holds tightly

Why Fluoride Fails

Fluoride is a strong base and a poor leaving group. The C–F bond is very strong, and $\text{F}^-$ does not depart easily. So alkyl fluorides are unreactive in Williamson synthesis.

Key takeaway: The leaving group must be weakly basic and polarizable — iodide and bromide are ideal.

--- …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The key idea is that nitration of benzene requires a strong electrophile, $\text{NO}_2^+$ , which is generated in situ by the reaction of concentrated $\text{HNO}_3$ with concentrated $\text{H}_2\text{SO}_4$ . Both the assertion and reason are correct, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

The nitration of benzene is a classic example of electrophilic aromatic substitution. Benzene’s $\pi$ -electron cloud is rich, but it is not reactive enough to be attacked by a weak electrophile like nitric acid alone. The role of concentrated sulphuric acid is to protonate nitric acid, leading to the formation of the nitronium ion ( $\text{NO}_2^+$ ), which is a powerful electrophile. Without this activation, the reaction would not proceed at a practical rate.

Why nitric acid alone is insufficient

Nitric acid ( $\text{HNO}_3$ ) can, in principle, act as a source of $\text{NO}_2^+$ via self-protonation, but the equilibrium lies far to the left. The concentration of $\text{NO}_2^+$ is too low to attack benzene effectively. Concentrated sulphuric acid is a much stronger acid and a better proton donor.
The role of concentrated sulphuric acid

When concentrated $\text{H}_2\text{SO}_4$ is mixed with concentrated $\text{HNO}_3$ , the following reaction occurs:

\text{HNO}_3 + 2\text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 \rightleftharpoons \text{NO}_2^+ + \text{H}_3\text{O}^+ + 2\text{HSO}_4^-

The sulphuric acid protonates nitric acid, which then loses water to form the nitronium ion. This is the key step that generates the electrophile.

The electrophile attacks benzene

The $\text{NO}_2^+$ ion is linear and positively charged, making it highly electrophilic. It attacks the benzene ring to form a sigma complex (arenium ion), which then loses a proton to regenerate aromaticity, yielding nitrobenzene.
Evaluating the assertion and reason …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ45 — Assertion (A): Toluene on Friedal Crafts methylation gives o- and p-xy…→Next questionQ47 — Assertion (A): Among isomeric pentanes, 2, 2-dimethylpentane has highe…

Q.Assertion (A): Nitration of benzene with nitric acid requires the use of concentrated sulphuric acid. Reason (R): The mixture of concentrated sulphuric acid and concentrated nitric acid produces the electrophile, NO2^+.

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.Assertion (A): Nitration of benzene with nitric acid requires the use of concentrated sulphuric acid.
Reason (R): The mixture of concentrated sulphuric acid and concentrated nitric acid produces the electrophile, NO2^+.

Unlock everything free for 14 days