Q.Differentiate the following w.r.t. :
- ;
- ;
- for , and for (not differentiable at ).
Each part simplifies the inverse-trig argument with an identity first, then differentiates the simplified form — the efficient route, rather than differentiating the inverse-trig composition directly.
(i)
Using the complementary-angle identity :
on the principal range. Differentiating,
(ii)
Using half-angle identities and :
So the function is on the principal range, and
(iii)
Put (so for every real ); then and , so the argument becomes .
This is where care is needed. Write with (possible since ). Then , so the expression is — but only when lies in ; otherwise it equals .
Since , , which is not always inside 's principal range — so the simplification genuinely splits into two cases depending on the sign of (which controls whether , i.e. whether ):
- If : , so and , which IS inside the principal range. Then
Differentiating (using ):
- If : , so and , OUTSIDE the principal range. Then
Differentiating:
So the derivative is genuinely piecewise, flipping sign at — a well-known trap in this exercise. (The function value itself is continuous at , but the two one-sided derivatives there are and , so is not differentiable at .)
A very common mistake is to quote only the branch, , as if it held unconditionally for all — but for the correct value is the negative of that expression.
- ;
- ;
- for , and for (not differentiable at ).
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.