Many problems reduce to a system of linear equations, for example
2x+3yx−y=8=−1.
The inverse matrix method solves such a system by writing it as a single matrix equation and then undoing the coefficient matrix with its inverse — the matrix analogue of dividing.
Writing the system as AX=B
Collect the coefficients, the unknowns and the constants:
A=(213−1),X=(xy),B=(8−1),
so the whole system becomes AX=B.
The idea
For numbers, ax=b gives x=a−1b provided a=0. The same works for matrices: if A is invertible, multiply AX=B on the left by A−1:
A−1(AX)=A−1B⇒IX=A−1B⇒X=A−1B.
X=A−1B
Multiplying on the left matters — matrix products do not commute, so BA−1 would be wrong.
When it works
The inverse A−1 exists only when detA=0, so:
detA=0: the system is consistent with the unique solution X=A−1B.
detA=0: no inverse; the system is either inconsistent (no solution) or has infinitely many — handle it by another method.
Worked steps
For the system above, detA=(2)(−1)−(3)(1)=−5=0, and
Whenever a question asks for the inverse of a 3×3 matrix, the standard route is: determinant → cofactors → adjoint → divide.
Steps
Step 1: Find detA first, before anything else
Expand along the row or column with the most zeros to keep the arithmetic light. If detA=0, stop — the matrix has no inverse, and the question is really testing that you recognise this, not that you complete the adjoint calculation.
detA=0⟹A−1 exists
Step 2: Compute the nine cofactors Cij=(−1)i+jMij
Each Mij is the 2×2 determinant left after crossing out row i and column j. Compute all nine methodically — row 1, then row 2, then row 3 — applying the alternating sign as you go, rather than trying to remember signs at the end.
Step 3: Transpose the cofactor matrix to get the adjoint
Mistake 1: Mixing up signs when several matrix entries are negative
Why it's wrong: with negative entries like −1 or −3 in the matrix, it's easy to drop a sign while writing out a 2×2 minor determinant (e.g. writing 2×4−(−3)×(−2) as 8+6 instead of 8−6). Correct approach: write each minor's 2×2 determinant out fully in brackets before simplifying, rather than combining the subtraction mentally.
Mistake 2: Dividing by detA incorrectly when detA is negative …
Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.
AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2020Set ANNUAL6 marks
Q.Using matrix method solve the following system of linear equations: x−y+z=4, 2x+y−3z=0, x+y+z=2.
OR
Using elementary transformation find the inverse of the following matrix: A=1−32305−2−50.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Solve AX=B via X=A−1B using the adjoint method; for the OR, row-reduce [A∣I] to [I∣A−1].
Matrix method: x−y+z=4,2x+y−3z=0,x+y+z=2
A=121−1111−31,X=xyz,B=402
detA=1(1+3)−(−1)(2+3)+1(2−1)=4+5+1=10=0, so a unique solution exists.
Since ∣A∣=−17e0, A−1 exists and X=A−1B gives a unique solution. Solving (by X=A−1B, or by elimination): from the second equation y=1−2x+z; substituting into the first gives 7x+z=10, and into the third gives 17x=17.