A rotation in the plane is usually written with trigonometry:
Rθ=(cosθsinθ−sinθcosθ).
The Cayley transform produces the same rotation using only addition, multiplication and division — no sine or cosine at all.
The idea
Start from the skew-symmetric matrix
S=(0t−t0).
Its Cayley transform is
C(S)=(I+S)(I−S)−1=1+t21(1−t22t−2t1−t2).
This C(S) is orthogonal with determinant +1, so it is a genuine rotation matrix. Its angle ϕ satisfies
tan2ϕ=t,ϕ=2arctant.
So the parameter t is not the rotation angle — it is the tangent of the half angle.
Important
The single fact to hold on to: t=tan(ϕ/2), not the angle itself.
Note
Order matters. Here I+S and I−S commute, so (I+S)(I−S)−1 and (I−S)−1(I+S) give the same matrix. Writing the factors the other way round, (I−S)(I+S)−1, would instead produce the clockwise rotation R−ϕ.
This problem uses the Cayley transform to connect a skew-symmetric matrix A (built from tan(α/2)) with a rotation matrix. By computing I+A and I−A, then verifying (I−A)−1(I+A) equals the rotation matrix, we show the given identity holds.
The core idea here is beautiful: any rotation matrix can be expressed as a rational function of a skew-symmetric matrix. This is the Cayley transform for rotations. The matrix A is skew-symmetric (AT=−A), and the matrix [cosαsinα−sinαcosα] is a rotation by angle α. The identity I+A=(I−A)R is equivalent to R=(I−A)−1(I+A), which is exactly the Cayley transform formula.
Let’s work through it step by step.
Write down the given matrices.
We have
A=[0tan2α−tan2α0],I=[1001].
Let t=tan2α for brevity. Then A=[0t−t0].
Compute I+A and I−A.
I+A=[1t−t1],I−A=[1−tt1].
The goal is to show I+A=(I−A)R, where R=[cosαsinα−sinαcosα].
This is equivalent to showing R=(I−A)−1(I+A), provided I−A is invertible. Let’s check: det(I−A)=1⋅1−(t)(−t)=1+t2=0, so it’s invertible.
Find (I−A)−1.
For a 2×2 matrix [acbd], the inverse is ad−bc1[d−c−ba].
Method: Proving a matrix identity involving an inverse
To prove an identity like I+A=(I−A)R, either compute the product on the right directly, or rearrange to R=(I−A)−1(I+A) and evaluate, then simplify entries with the relevant identities.
Steps
Step 1: Write the small matrices explicitly
Form I+A and I−A from the given A, and check det(I−A)=0 so the inverse exists.
Why it's wrong: matrix multiplication is not commutative, so (I−A)R and R(I−A) differ; the identity specifies (I−A)R. Correct approach: keep the exact order stated in the problem.
Mistake 2: Using the wrong half-angle conversions …
AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2019Set ANNUAL6 marks
Q.If A=[0tan2α−tan2α0], then show that I+A=(I−A)[cosαsinα−sinαcosα], where I is the identity matrix of order 2.
OR
If A=12323−3−32−4, then find A−1; and hence solve the system of equations x+2y−3z=−4, 2x+3y+2z=2, 3x−3y−4z=11.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Main: multiply out (I−A)R where R is the given rotation-like matrix, using t=tan2α half-angle formulas for cosα,sinα; every entry matches I+A. OR: compute detA, the adjugate, hence A−1, then solve AX=B via X=A−1B.
Main question.A=[0tan2α−tan2α0]. Let t=tan2α, so A=[0t−t0].
I+A=[1t−t1],I−A=[1−tt1].
Recall the half-angle identities: cosα=1+t21−t2, sinα=1+t22t.
Compute (I−A)[cosαsinα−sinαcosα] entrywise (row of I−A dotted with column of the rotation matrix):