The Balmer series for the H-atom can be observed (a) if we measure the frequencies of light emitted when an ex

NCERT Exemplar · Q27

Q. The Balmer series for the H-atom can be observed

(a) if we measure the frequencies of light emitted when an excited atom falls to the ground state.

(b) if we measure the frequencies of light emitted due to transitions between excited states and the first excited state.

(d) as a sequence of frequencies with the higher frequencies getting closely packed.

Assam AhsecMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★

94% · 48/51 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Bohr Model Energy Levels

The Intuition: Why Can't an Electron Just Sit Anywhere?

Imagine you're rolling a marble on a staircase. The marble can rest on any step — step 1, step 2, step 3 — but it can never float halfway between two steps. The staircase forces the marble into specific, fixed positions.

That's the core idea of the Bohr model. Before Bohr, physicists thought electrons orbited the nucleus like planets around the sun — they could be at any distance, any energy. But experiments showed something strange: atoms only emit or absorb light at very specific colours (wavelengths), not a continuous rainbow. That meant electrons could only have certain, fixed energies — like the steps of a staircase.

Bohr's genius was to say: an electron in an atom cannot have any arbitrary energy. It can only occupy certain "allowed" energy levels. When it jumps from one level to another, it either absorbs or emits a photon of light whose energy exactly matches the difference between those levels.

The Precise Statement

In the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom (and hydrogen-like ions with one electron), the electron moves in circular orbits around the nucleus. But only those orbits are allowed where the electron's angular momentum is an integer multiple of $\frac{h}{2\pi}$ (where $h$ is Planck's constant).

This quantisation condition leads to a simple formula for the energy of the electron in the $n$ -th orbit:

E_n = -\frac{13.6 \text{ eV}}{n^2}

Here:

$n$ is the principal quantum number — a positive integer ( $n = 1, 2, 3, \dots$ )
$E_n$ is the energy of the electron in that level (in electronvolts)
The negative sign means the electron is bound to the nucleus — you need to add energy to free it

The lowest energy state ( $n=1$ ) is called the ground state. Its energy is $-13.6 \text{ eV}$ . The higher states ( $n=2, 3, 4, \dots$ ) are excited states — they have less negative (higher) energies.

Note

As $n$ increases, the energy levels get closer together. At $n = \infty$ , the energy becomes $0 \text{ eV}$ — the electron is completely free from the atom (ionisation).

What This Explains

When an electron jumps from a higher level ( $n_i$ ) to a lower level ( $n_f$ ), it emits a photon of energy:

\Delta E = E_{n_f} - E_{n_i} = 13.6 \left( \frac{1}{n_f^2} - \frac{1}{n_i^2} \right) \text{ eV}

This single formula predicts all the spectral lines of hydrogen — the Lyman series (jumps to $n=1$ ), Balmer series (to $n=2$ ), Paschen series (to $n=3$ ), and so on. Each series corresponds to a different "final step" on the staircase. …

Why this formula?

Why the Bohr Model Gives Those Energy Levels

The Bohr model is a beautiful piece of physics because it takes a simple, almost desperate idea — "electrons only exist in certain orbits" — and derives the entire hydrogen spectrum from it. The key is that Bohr didn't just assume the energy levels; he forced them to be consistent with classical physics in one specific way, then broke with it in another.

The Two Non-Negotiable Pieces

First, the electron moves in a circle around the proton. That's pure classical mechanics: the Coulomb attraction provides the centripetal force.

\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{e^2}{r^2} = \frac{mv^2}{r}

This gives you a relation between speed $v$ and radius $r$ :

v^2 = \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 m r}

Second, the total energy of the electron is the sum of its kinetic and potential energies. Potential energy for a Coulomb force is $-\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{e^2}{r}$ (negative because the force is attractive, and we set zero at infinity).

E = \frac12 mv^2 - \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{e^2}{r}

Substitute $v^2$ from above:

E = \frac12 \left( \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} \right) - \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}

So far, nothing is quantised. Any radius $r$ gives a valid classical orbit, and the energy just follows from that radius. The problem is that a classical electron in a curved path radiates energy and spirals into the nucleus — atoms should collapse. Bohr needed a rule to pick out stable orbits.

The Quantisation Condition

Bohr's revolutionary step was to postulate that the angular momentum of the electron is quantised in units of $\hbar = h/2\pi$ :

m v r = n \hbar, \quad n = 1, 2, 3, \dots

Why this particular rule? Bohr later said it was the simplest way to get the right answer. But there's a deeper physical motivation: if you think of the electron as a wave (de Broglie's idea, which came a decade later), the condition that a standing wave fits exactly around the circumference $2\pi r = n \lambda$ gives $m v r = n \hbar$ directly. So the quantisation condition is really a wave condition imposed on a particle picture.

Note

The angular momentum quantisation is the only non-classical assumption in the Bohr model. Everything else follows from classical mechanics and electromagnetism.

Deriving the Allowed Radii and Energies

From $m v r = n \hbar$ , we get $v = n\hbar / (mr)$ . Substitute this into the centripetal force equation:

\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{e^2}{r^2} = \frac{m}{r} \left( \frac{n\hbar}{mr} \right)^2 = \frac{n^2 \hbar^2}{m r^3}

Solve for $r$ :

r_n = \frac{4\pi\varepsilon_0 \hbar^2}{m e^2} \, n^2

The constant in front is the Bohr radius $a_0 \approx 0.529 \, \text{Å}$ . So the radii are $r_n = a_0 n^2$ .

Now plug $r_n$ back into the energy expression $E = -\frac12 \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}$ :

E_n = -\frac12 \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \cdot \frac{1}{a_0 n^2} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 a_0} \cdot \frac{1}{n^2}

Substitute $a_0 = \frac{4\pi\varepsilon_0 \hbar^2}{m e^2}$ :

E_n = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \cdot \frac{m e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 \hbar^2} \cdot \frac{1}{n^2} = -\frac{m e^4}{8 \varepsilon_0^2 h^2} \cdot \frac{1}{n^2}

E_n = -\frac{13.6 \text{ eV}}{n^2}

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The Balmer series corresponds to transitions where an electron falls to the first excited state ( $n=2$ ), producing visible light with frequencies that converge toward a limit as $n \to \infty$ . The correct option is (B) and the description in (D) is also true for the Balmer series.

The Balmer series is one of the most famous spectral series in atomic physics — it’s the set of lines you actually see when you look at hydrogen’s visible spectrum. But what exactly defines it? Let’s build the concept from the ground up.

1. The core idea: What makes a spectral series?

When an electron in a hydrogen atom jumps from a higher energy level ( $n_{\text{higher}}$ ) to a lower energy level ( $n_{\text{lower}}$ ), it emits a photon of a specific frequency. The series is named after the lower level the electron falls to:

Lyman series: falls to $n=1$ (ground state) — ultraviolet.
Balmer series: falls to $n=2$ (first excited state) — visible and near-UV.
Paschen series: falls to $n=3$ — infrared.
And so on.

So the Balmer series is not about any transition — it’s specifically transitions that end at $n=2$ .

\tilde{\nu} = R_H \left( \frac{1}{2^2} - \frac{1}{n^2} \right), \quad n = 3,4,5,\dots

2. Now evaluate each option

Option (A): “if we measure the frequencies of light emitted when an excited atom falls to the ground state.”

That describes the Lyman series, not Balmer. Falling to the ground state ( $n=1$ ) gives Lyman lines. So (A) is wrong.

Option (B): “if we measure the frequencies of light emitted due to transitions between excited states and the first excited state.”

The first excited state is $n=2$ . Transitions from higher $n$ (3, 4, 5, …) down to $n=2$ are exactly the Balmer series. This is correct.

Option (C): “in any transition in a H-atom.”

No — only those ending at $n=2$ . Transitions like $n=4 \to n=3$ belong to the Paschen series, not Balmer. So (C) is false.

Option (D): “as a sequence of frequencies with the higher frequencies getting closely packed.” …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ26 — The Bohr model for the spectra of a H-atom (a) will not be applicable …→Next questionQ28 — Let Eₙ = -(m e⁴)/(8 n² varepsilon₀² h²) be the energy of the nth level…

Q.The Balmer series for the H-atom can be observed

Concept understanding — Bohr Model Energy Levels

The Intuition: Why Can't an Electron Just Sit Anywhere?

The Precise Statement

What This Explains

Why this formula?

Why the Bohr Model Gives Those Energy Levels

The Two Non-Negotiable Pieces

The Quantisation Condition

Deriving the Allowed Radii and Energies

1. The core idea: What makes a spectral series?

2. Now evaluate each option

Method: Series-Name Lookup Table + the General Convergence Rule

Steps

Q.The Balmer series for the H-atom can be observed

1. The core idea: What makes a spectral series?

2. Now evaluate each option

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days