A mercury lamp is a convenient source for studying frequency dependence of photoelectric emission, since it gives a number of spectral lines ranging from the UV to the red end of the visible spectrum. In our experiment with rubidium photo-cell, the following lines from a mercury source were used: $\lambda_1 = 3650\ \text{Å}, \lambda_2 = 4047\ \text{Å}, \lambda_3 = 4358\ \text{Å}, \lambda_4 = 5461\ \text{Å}, \lambda_5 = 6907\ \text{Å}$, The stopping voltages, respectively, were measured to be: $V_{01} = 1.28\ \text{V}, V_{02} = 0.95\ \text{V}, V_{03} = 0.74\ \text{V}, V_{04} = 0.16\ \text{V}, V_{05} = 0\ \text{V}$. Determine the value of Planck's constant $h$, the threshold frequency and work function for the material.

A mercury lamp is a convenient source for studying frequency dependence of photoelectric emission, since it gi

Additional Exercises · 11.28

\lambda_1 = 3650\ \text{Å}, \lambda_2 = 4047\ \text{Å}, \lambda_3 = 4358\ \text{Å}, \lambda_4 = 5461\ \text{Å}, \lambda_5 = 6907\ \text{Å}

Assam AhsecTextbookSubjective· 3mImportance★★★★★

37% · 31/83 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Photon Energy

Photon Energy: The Energy Carried by Light

Light does not carry its energy in a continuous stream. It comes in discrete packets — like individual drops instead of a steady hose. Each packet is called a photon: the smallest possible unit of light of a given frequency. You cannot have half a photon; it is all or nothing.

The Intuition: Colour Determines Energy

Red light and blue light are both light, but they behave differently — blue light causes sunburn and drives chemical reactions more readily than red. The reason is that the colour (frequency) of light directly fixes how much energy each photon carries, and blue photons carry more energy than red photons.

The Planck–Einstein Relation

The energy $E$ of a single photon is directly proportional to its frequency $f$ , and inversely proportional to its wavelength $\lambda$ :

E = h f = \frac{h c}{\lambda}

Where:

$E$ = energy of one photon (joules, J)
$f$ = frequency (hertz, Hz)
$\lambda$ = wavelength (metres, m)
$c$ = speed of light in vacuum ( $3.00 \times 10^8$ m/s)
$h$ = Planck's constant ( $6.626 \times 10^{-34}$ J·s)

Important

Planck's constant $h$ is extremely tiny, so an individual photon carries a very small amount of energy — which is why we never feel single photons striking our skin.

What This Tells You

Higher frequency = higher energy. Gamma rays have extremely energetic photons; radio waves have very low-energy photons.
Shorter wavelength = higher energy. Ultraviolet photons are more energetic than visible-light photons; infrared photons are less.
Energy is quantised. Light energy comes in fixed packets — you can have 1, 2, or 1000 photons, but never 0.5. This was Max Planck's revolutionary idea of 1900.

This is why UV light causes sunburn (UV photons carry enough energy to damage DNA, while visible photons do not), why X-ray photons are energetic enough to pass through soft tissue but get absorbed by bone, and why a photon needs enough energy to actually break a bond or drive a photochemical/biological reaction, rather than merely wavelength-dependent intensity.

A Concrete Example

Note

Question: Which has more energy — a photon of red light ( $\lambda = 700$ nm) or a photon of blue light ( $\lambda = 450$ nm)?

Since $E = \dfrac{hc}{\lambda}$ , energy is inversely proportional to wavelength, so the shorter-wavelength blue photon carries more energy:

Red: $E_{\text{red}} = \dfrac{(6.626 \times 10^{-34})(3.00 \times 10^8)}{700 \times 10^{-9}} \approx 2.84 \times 10^{-19}$ J …

Why this formula?

Why Photon Energy is $E = hf$ — The Reasoning Behind the Formula

The formula $E = hf$ is not something you memorise and plug numbers into. It comes from a deep shift in how physicists understood light.

The problem that forced the formula

By the late 1800s, classical physics said light was a wave — continuous, carrying energy in proportion to its intensity (brightness). But blackbody radiation and the photoelectric effect showed something bizarre: when you shine light on a metal, electrons are ejected only if the light's frequency is above a certain threshold, no matter how bright the light is. Below that frequency, even the brightest lamp won't kick out a single electron. Classically this made no sense — a wave's energy depends on amplitude, not frequency.

Einstein's radical idea (1905)

Einstein proposed that light comes in discrete packets — photons — each carrying a fixed energy that depends only on its frequency, with Planck's constant $h$ as the proportionality:

A single photon's energy is $E = hf$ , where $f$ is the frequency of the light.

This directly explains the photoelectric effect: an electron needs a minimum energy (the work function $\phi$ ) to escape. If a photon's energy $hf < \phi$ , no electron is ejected — regardless of how many photons you send, because each photon interacts with one electron individually.

Important

$E = hf$ is not derived from deeper principles — it is a postulate justified by the experiments it explains, and it unified optics with quantum mechanics.

The equivalent forms

Since $c = f\lambda$ for light in vacuum, the same idea in terms of wavelength is:

E = \frac{hc}{\lambda}

Use this when you're given $\lambda$ instead of $f$ . A photon also carries momentum (despite having no mass): …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Einstein's equation $eV_0=h\nu-\phi$ is a straight line when $V_0$ is plotted against $\nu$ : slope $=h/e$ , and the frequency-axis intercept is the threshold frequency $\nu_0=\phi/h$ . Using two well-separated data points gives $h\approx6.57\times10^{-34}$ J s, $\nu_0\approx5.1\times10^{14}$ Hz, and $\phi\approx2.1$ eV.

Step 1 — Convert each wavelength to frequency ( $\nu=c/\lambda$ ).

\nu_1 = \frac{3\times10^8}{3650\times10^{-10}} \approx 8.219\times10^{14}\ \text{Hz}, \qquad \nu_4 = \frac{3\times10^8}{5461\times10^{-10}} \approx 5.493\times10^{14}\ \text{Hz}

(similarly $\nu_2\approx7.413\times10^{14}$ , $\nu_3\approx6.884\times10^{14}$ , $\nu_5\approx4.343\times10^{14}$ Hz)

Step 2 — Find the slope using two well-separated points ( $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_4$ ).

Einstein's equation $eV_0=h\nu-\phi$ means $V_0$ vs $\nu$ is a straight line of slope $h/e$ :

\text{slope} = \frac{V_{01}-V_{04}}{\nu_1-\nu_4} = \frac{1.28-0.16}{8.219\times10^{14}-5.493\times10^{14}} = \frac{1.12}{2.726\times10^{14}} \approx 4.11\times10^{-15}\ \text{V s}

Step 3 — Planck's constant.

h = e\times\text{slope} = (1.6\times10^{-19})(4.11\times10^{-15}) \approx 6.57\times10^{-34}\ \text{J s}

(within a couple of percent of the accepted value, consistent with this being real, rounded experimental data)

Step 4 — Threshold frequency and work function.

Using the line equation $V_0 = (\text{slope})\nu + c$ through point 1: $1.28 = (4.11\times10^{-15})(8.219\times10^{14}) + c \Rightarrow c \approx -2.10\ \text{V}$ . …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous question11.27 — Monochromatic radiation of wavelength 640.2nm (1nm = 10⁻⁹m) from a neo…→Next question11.29 — The work function for the following metals is given: Na: 2.75eV; K: 2.…

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days