Q.How long can an electric lamp of 100 W be kept glowing by fusion of 2.0 kg of deuterium? Take the fusion reaction as
12H+12H→23He+n+3.27 MeV.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Mass Energy Equivalence
Mass Energy Equivalence: From Intuition to the Formula
Imagine you have a lump of coal. You know you can burn it to get heat, and that heat can run a steam engine. The energy you get out seems to come from the chemical bonds in the coal. But what if I told you that the coal itself — just sitting there, not burning — already contains a staggering amount of energy locked inside its very mass? That is the core idea of mass-energy equivalence.
The Intuition: Mass is Frozen Energy
Think of mass as a kind of "frozen" or "stored" energy. When you burn coal, you are only releasing a tiny fraction of this stored energy — the energy in the chemical bonds. The rest of the mass remains as matter. But if you could somehow completely convert that lump of coal into pure energy, you would get an unimaginable amount — enough to power a city for years.
This is not a metaphor. Mass and energy are not two separate things that can be converted into each other like dollars and rupees. They are the same fundamental thing, just in different forms. Mass is a highly concentrated form of energy. Energy, when concentrated enough, behaves like mass.
The Precise Statement
The relationship is given by the most famous equation in physics:
E=mc2
Where:
- E is the energy equivalent of the mass (in joules, J)
- m is the mass (in kilograms, kg)
- c is the speed of light in vacuum (3×108 m/s)
The speed of light is a huge number. Squaring it makes it enormous. This is why a tiny amount of mass corresponds to a colossal amount of energy.
What This Equation Actually Means
The equation tells you exactly how much energy is "stored" inside any object with mass m. If you could annihilate that mass completely, you would get E joules of energy.
Example: A 1 kg mass (like a litre of water) contains:
E=1×(3×108)2=9×1016 J
That is 90 quadrillion joules — roughly the energy released by a 20-megaton nuclear bomb. This is not energy you can normally access; it is locked inside the nucleus of atoms.
Where Does This Show Up in Real Life?
-
Nuclear Reactions: In nuclear fission (splitting atoms) or fusion (joining atoms), a tiny fraction of the mass of the nucleus is converted into energy. The mass of the products is slightly less than the mass of the reactants. The "missing" mass has become energy — exactly as E=mc2 predicts. This is how the Sun works and how nuclear power plants generate electricity.
-
Particle Physics: When a particle and its antiparticle meet, they annihilate completely into pure energy (usually gamma rays). The energy produced equals mc2 for the two particles. …
Why this formula?
Why E=mc2 — The Reasoning Behind Mass-Energy Equivalence
The formula E=mc2 is not a random guess. Einstein arrived at it by thinking deeply about what happens to energy when you move an object. The core insight: if an object gains energy, it must behave as if it has gained mass.
The Starting Point: Relativistic Momentum
In special relativity, the momentum of a particle is not simply p=mv. Instead, it is:
p=1−v2/c2m0v
where m0 is the rest mass (mass measured when the object is at rest). This formula already tells us something strange: as speed approaches c, momentum shoots toward infinity — no object with mass can reach the speed of light.
The Energy-Momentum Relation
Einstein then asked: what is the correct expression for kinetic energy that matches this new momentum? In classical physics, kinetic energy is K=21mv2. But that formula fails at high speeds.
The relativistic kinetic energy turns out to be:
K=1−v2/c2m0c2−m0c2
This looks odd — why subtract m0c2? Because when v=0, the first term becomes m0c2, and we want K=0 at rest. So the subtraction gives zero kinetic energy when the object is stationary.
The term m0c2 appears naturally as a rest energy — energy that an object has simply because it has mass, even when completely at rest.
The Crucial Step: What Happens When You Add Energy?
Now consider a box that emits light (photons) in opposite directions. The light carries away energy. Classical physics says the box loses energy but its mass stays the same. Einstein showed this cannot be true.
The argument (simplified): if the box emits a pulse of light with energy E, the light carries momentum p=E/c. By conservation of momentum, the box recoils. But after the light is absorbed by the opposite wall, the box stops. The net effect: the box has moved slightly. Its center of mass has shifted — unless the energy carried by the light also carried mass.
For the center of mass of the entire system (box + light) to remain stationary, the light must behave as if it has an effective mass m=E/c2. Therefore, energy itself has inertia.
The Full Formula
The total energy of any object — moving or at rest — is:
E=1−v2/c2m0c2
For an object at rest (v=0), this reduces to:
E=m0c2
For a moving object, the total energy is the sum of rest energy and kinetic energy:
E=m0c2+K
E=mc2
where m is the relativistic mass m=1−v2/c2m0, or equivalently:
E2=(pc)2+(m0c2)2
Why It's Not Just a "Conversion" …
Concept: Mass–Energy Equivalence — fusion energy comes from the mass defect, released as 3.27 MeV per D–D reaction.
Step 1: Energy per reaction: 3.27×1.602×10−13=5.24×10−13 J.
Step 2: Atoms of deuterium in 2.0 kg: 22000×6.022×1023=6.022×1026; each reaction uses 2 atoms, so reactions =3.011×1026.
Step 3: Total energy: 3.011×1026×5.24×10−13=1.577×1014 J. …
Converting the mass of deuterium into the number of D–D fusion reactions, then into total energy released, and finally into the time a 100 W lamp can run on it, gives a lamp lifetime of about 5.0×104 years.
Why this approach works
Deuterium nuclei fuse in pairs, each pair releasing 3.27 MeV. The lamp consumes 100 J every second. So the question reduces to: how many fusion events can 2.0 kg of deuterium supply, and how long will that energy last at 100 W? The only subtlety: each fusion event consumes two deuterium nuclei, so the number of reactions is half the number of atoms.
Step-by-step solution
1. Number of deuterium atoms in 2.0 kg
Deuterium (12H) has a molar mass of about 2.0 g/mol (mass number 2). So:
Moles=2.0 g/mol2000 g=1000 mol
Natoms=1000×NA=1000×6.022×1023=6.022×1026 atoms
2. Number of fusion reactions
Each reaction uses two deuterium nuclei:
Nreactions=26.022×1026=3.011×1026
3. Total energy released
Each reaction releases 3.27 MeV; using 1 MeV=1.602×10−13 J:
Ereaction=3.27×1.602×10−13=5.238×10−13 J
Etotal=(3.011×1026)×(5.238×10−13)=1.577×1014 J …
Method: Energy conservation via mass-energy equivalence (Einstein’s relation E=Δmc2).
Step 1 – Find the number of deuterium nuclei in 2.0 kg.
Deuterium (12H) has a molar mass of approximately 2.0 g/mol.
Number of moles in 2.0 kg:
n=2.0 g/mol2000 g=1000 mol
Number of nuclei:
N=n×NA=1000×6.022×1023=6.022×1026
Step 2 – Determine the energy released per fusion event.
Each fusion reaction involves two deuterium nuclei and releases 3.27 MeV.
So the number of fusion events possible from N nuclei is N/2 (since two nuclei are consumed per event).
Step 3 – Calculate total energy released.
Total energy in MeV:
Etotal=2N×3.27 MeV=26.022×1026×3.27
=3.011×1026×3.27≈9.846×1026 MeV
Convert to joules (1 MeV=1.602×10−13 J):
Etotal=9.846×1026×1.602×10−13≈1.577×1014 J
Step 4 – Relate energy to lamp power. …
Common Mistakes & How to Avoid Them
1. Forgetting to convert MeV to joules
The energy released per fusion event is given in MeV, but power is in watts (J/s). Many students plug 3.27 MeV directly into the calculation without converting to joules.
How to avoid: Always write the conversion factor explicitly before starting:
1 MeV=1.6×10−13 J.
So 3.27 MeV=3.27×1.6×10−13 J.
Never mix MeV and J in the same equation — convert everything to SI units first.
2. Using the wrong number of nuclei in 2 kg of deuterium
Deuterium is 12H, so its molar mass is 2 g/mol, not 1 g/mol. A common error is to treat it as ordinary hydrogen.
How to avoid:
Number of moles = molar massmass=2 g/mol2000 g=1000 mol.
Number of nuclei = 1000×NA=1000×6.02×1023=6.02×1026.
Each fusion reaction consumes two deuterium nuclei. So the number of reactions possible is half the number of deuterium nuclei.
3. Forgetting that each reaction uses two deuterium atoms
Students sometimes take the total number of deuterium nuclei as the number of reactions. But the reaction 12H+12H needs two per event.
How to avoid:
Number of reactions = 2total deuterium nuclei=26.02×1026=3.01×1026.
4. Confusing power with energy
Power is energy per second. The lamp consumes 100 J every second. The total energy from fusion gives the total time directly as t=PEtotal.
How to avoid:
Write the relation clearly:
P=tE⇒t=PE.
Do not multiply power and time — that gives energy, not time.
5. Arithmetic errors in powers of ten …
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2023Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.Calculate the energy equivalent of 1 kg of a substance. OR Discuss conductor and insulator in terms of energy gap.
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Einstein's mass-energy relation, 1 kg of matter is equivalent to an enormous 9×10¹⁶ J of energy.
Einstein's mass-energy equivalence relation states that mass and energy are interconvertible: E = mc², where c is the speed of light in vacuum (c ≈ 3×10⁸ m/s).
For m = 1 kg:
E = 1 × (3×10⁸)² = 1 × 9×10¹⁶ = 9×10¹⁶ J.
This illustrates how much energy is 'locked' in even a small amount of mass — comparable to the energy released by tens of megatons of TNT — which is why nuclear reactions, which convert only a tiny fraction of mass into energy, release such enormous amounts of energy compared with ordinary chemical reactions.
…
- AHSEC Higher Secondary (HS) Final Examination 2018Set ANNUAL2 marksQ.Some scientists have predicted that global nuclear war on the earth would be followed a severe "Nuclear Winter". What might be the basis of this prediction? (2)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Nuclear winter: dust/smoke from nuclear war blocks sunlight, cooling the earth drastically. OR: B₀ = E₀/c = 1.6 × 10⁻⁷ T.
Main — basis of nuclear winter. A global nuclear war would release vast amounts of energy, igniting widespread fires and vaporising material. The resulting dust, smoke and soot would be thrown high into the atmosphere and spread around the globe. This thick layer would absorb and scatter incoming solar radiation, so far less sunlight reaches the earth's surface. With sunlight cut off, surface temperatures would fall sharply for a long period — a 'nuclear winter' — devastating plant life and the food chain. The basis of the prediction is therefore the blocking of sunlight by atmospheric dust and smoke produced in the war.
…
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.