Mathematics · Ch 13 — Limits and Derivatives
Limits of Polynomials and Rational Functions
Limits of Polynomials and Rational Functions
Limits of Polynomial Functions
A polynomial function of degree is written as
where each is a real number and for some natural number .
We already know the fundamental limit . From this, we can build up to powers of . For :
A simple induction on tells us that for any natural number :
Now consider a general polynomial . Treat each term as a separate function. Using the limit laws (the limit of a sum is the sum of the limits, and the limit of a constant times a function is the constant times the limit of the function):
For any polynomial function , . The limit of a polynomial at a point is simply the value of the polynomial at that point.
Make sure you understand the justification for each step: the first equality uses the sum law for limits, the second uses the constant multiple law, the third uses , and the last is just the definition of .
Limits of Rational Functions
A rational function is a function of the form , where and are polynomials and (at least near the point of interest).
Using the quotient law for limits:
This works perfectly when . But what happens when ? There are two cases to consider.
Case 1: and
In this case, the denominator approaches zero while the numerator approaches a non-zero number. The limit does not exist (it tends to , depending on the signs).
Case 2: and
This is the interesting case — the indeterminate form. Since both polynomials vanish at , both and must have as a factor.
Let be the highest power of that divides , and let be the highest power of that divides . Then we can write:
where and .
Now:
If : The factor approaches , and approaches , a finite non-zero number. So:
If : The factor blows up (tends to ), so the limit is not defined.
If : The factor , so:
When you get for a rational function, factor both numerator and denominator, cancel the common factor(s) of , and then re-evaluate. The cancellation is valid because in the limit process.
Theorem 2: Limit of
For any positive integer ,
This theorem is true even if is any rational number and is positive (a remark that will be useful later).
›Proof
We use the algebraic identity for the difference of th powers:
Therefore, for :
Now take the limit as . The right-hand side is a polynomial in (for fixed ), so its limit is its value at :
There are exactly terms in this sum (one for each power from to ), each equal to . Hence:
Example 3: Applying Theorem 2
(i)
We can rewrite this as:
Therefore: …
Theorem 2 (Limit of )
Hypotheses: is any positive integer, and is any real number. The theorem also holds when is any rational number and , but the proof given here is for positive integer .
This theorem gives us a direct formula for a limit that would otherwise be an indeterminate form when we substitute .
The Complete Proof
›Proof
The key idea is to factor using the algebraic identity for the difference of th powers.
Step 1: Factorisation
For any positive integer , we have the factorisation:
This identity can be verified by multiplying out the right-hand side — all intermediate terms cancel, leaving only .
Step 2: Rewrite the limit
Using this factorisation, we can rewrite the limit as:
Since when taking the limit (we only care about values arbitrarily close to , not equal to ), we can cancel the factor :
Step 3: Evaluate the limit of the polynomial
The expression inside the limit is now a polynomial in (with treated as a constant). By the limit of a polynomial function, we can simply substitute :
Step 4: Simplify the sum
Each term simplifies: , , and so on. So every term in the sum is .
How many terms are there? The sum has terms: from down to , which gives terms in total.
Therefore:
Conclusion:
A common mistake is to forget that the sum has exactly terms. Count them: the exponents on go from down to , which is terms. Each term evaluates to , so the sum is , not .
--- …