Skip to content
Worked Examples · Example 3

Q.Let LL be the set of all lines in a plane and RR be the relation in LL defined as R={(L1,L2):L1 is perpendicular to L2}R = \{(L_1, L_2): L_1 \text{ is perpendicular to } L_2\}. Show that RR is symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive.

Bihar BsebTextbookSubjective· 3mImportance★★★★★
18% · 19/104 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →
Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1

The relation "is perpendicular to" on lines in a plane is symmetric because if L1⊥L2L_1 \perp L_2 then L2⊥L1L_2 \perp L_1, but it is not reflexive (no line is perpendicular to itself) and not transitive (if L1⊥L2L_1 \perp L_2 and L2⊥L3L_2 \perp L_3, then L1L_1 is parallel to L3L_3, not perpendicular).

Why This Approach Works

The question asks us to check three properties of a relation: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Each property has a precise definition, and we test the relation against each one using geometric facts about perpendicular lines.

The key geometric facts you need:

  • A line is never perpendicular to itself (perpendicular means meeting at 90∘90^\circ, which requires two distinct lines).
  • Perpendicularity is mutual: if L1⊥L2L_1 \perp L_2, then L2⊥L1L_2 \perp L_1.
  • If L1⊥L2L_1 \perp L_2 and L2⊥L3L_2 \perp L_3, then L1L_1 and L3L_3 are parallel (or coincident), not perpendicular.

Let's test each property one by one.


1. Checking Reflexivity

Definition: A relation RR on a set LL is reflexive if every element is related to itself. That is, for every line L1∈LL_1 \in L, we must have (L1,L1)∈R(L_1, L_1) \in R.

For our relation, (L1,L1)∈R(L_1, L_1) \in R would mean L1L_1 is perpendicular to itself. But a line cannot be perpendicular to itself — perpendicularity requires two distinct lines intersecting at 90∘90^\circ. A single line does not make an angle with itself.

Watch out

A common mistake is to think a line is perpendicular to itself because "the angle is 0∘0^\circ". No — perpendicular means exactly 90∘90^\circ, and a line with itself has 0∘0^\circ (or 180∘180^\circ), not 90∘90^\circ.

So (L1,L1)∉R(L_1, L_1) \notin R for any line L1L_1. Therefore, RR is not reflexive.


2. Checking Symmetry

Definition: RR is symmetric if whenever (L1,L2)∈R(L_1, L_2) \in R, then (L2,L1)∈R(L_2, L_1) \in R.

Suppose (L1,L2)∈R(L_1, L_2) \in R. This means L1L_1 is perpendicular to L2L_2. But perpendicularity is a mutual relationship: if L1L_1 makes a 90∘90^\circ angle with L2L_2, then L2L_2 also makes a 90∘90^\circ angle with L1L_1. So L2L_2 is perpendicular to L1L_1, which means (L2,L1)∈R(L_2, L_1) \in R.

Tip

Symmetry here is immediate from the definition of perpendicular — it's an "if and only if" relationship. No extra work needed.

Thus, RR is symmetric.


3. Checking Transitivity …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.