Two arrows that meet at a right angle — one east, one north — are perpendicular (or orthogonal) vectors. How do you check this without a protractor, especially in 3D where the angle is hard to draw?
The Idea: Zero Overlap
When two vectors are perpendicular, neither "borrows" any length from the other: walking along one makes zero progress in the direction of the other. The tool that measures this overlap is the dot product.
a⊥b⟺a⋅b=0
Why? Using a⋅b=∥a∥∥b∥cosθ, a right angle gives cos90∘=0, so the dot product vanishes. In coordinates, for a=(a1,a2,a3) and b=(b1,b2,b3),
a⋅b=a1b1+a2b2+a3b3,
and you simply check whether this sum is 0.
Examples
2D:a=(3,4), b=(4,−3): 3(4)+4(−3)=12−12=0 — perpendicular. (In general (x,y) and (y,−x) are always perpendicular.)
Method: Finding an Unknown Parameter from a Perpendicularity Condition
Use this when two lines contain an unknown (like k) in their direction ratios and you are told the lines are perpendicular; the condition turns into a single equation for the unknown.
Steps
Step 1: Extract each direction vector, keeping the unknown symbolic.
From the symmetric form ax−x0=by−y0=cz−z0, the denominators are the direction ratios. Write both as b1 and b2 with the unknown left in place.
Step 2: Impose perpendicularity as dot product =0.
b1⋅b2=a1a2+b1b2+c1c2=0
This is the one condition perpendicular lines must satisfy. …
Mistake 1: Using the proportionality (parallel) condition instead of the dot-product (perpendicular) condition.
Why it's wrong: for perpendicular lines you need b1⋅b2=0, not a2a1=b2b1=c2c1. Setting up proportions here gives a wrong equation for k. Correct approach: because the lines are perpendicular, write (−3)(3k)+(2k)(1)+(2)(−5)=0. …