History · Ch 10 — Rebels and the Raj — The Revolt of 1857 and Its Representations
Leaders and followers
Leaders and followers
The revolt of 1857 was not a single, centrally planned event. It erupted in different places at different times, and in each place, the rebels needed someone to lead them. The question of who would lead — and who could lead — was answered differently across the subcontinent.
Turning to Old Rulers
In many cases, the rebels looked to the very figures who had been displaced by the British. The logic was simple: if the British had removed these rulers, then restoring them would symbolise the end of British rule.
The most dramatic example was at Meerut. After killing their officers, the sepoys did not set up their own command. Instead, they rushed to Delhi and appealed to the ageing Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar, to become their leader. This was not an easy decision for the emperor. His first reaction was horror and refusal. He had lived for years as a pensioner of the British, and he knew the risks. It was only when sepoys entered the Mughal court inside the Red Fort, breaking all norms of court etiquette, that he realised he had no real choice. He agreed to become the nominal head of the rebellion.
Similar scenes played out elsewhere, though on a smaller scale.
- Kanpur: The sepoys and townspeople gave Nana Sahib, the adopted son of the exiled Peshwa Baji Rao II, no option but to lead them.
- Jhansi: Rani Lakshmibai was pushed by popular pressure to take command of the uprising.
- Arrah (Bihar): Kunwar Singh, a local zamindar, was forced into the role of leader.
- Awadh: The annexation of the state and the exile of the popular Nawab Wajid Ali Shah were still raw wounds. When British rule collapsed in Lucknow, the populace hailed Birjis Qadr, the young son of the Nawab, as their leader.
In these cases, the leaders did not start the revolt. They were often reluctant figures who were compelled by the rebels and the people to take charge. Their authority came from their symbolic value as the old, legitimate rulers.
Leaders from Outside the Court
Not every leader was a raja, rani, or nawab. The rebellion also threw up leaders from ordinary backgrounds, including religious figures and local strongmen.
- Fakirs and Maulvis: From Meerut, there were reports of a fakir riding an elephant, with sepoys visiting him frequently. In Lucknow, after the annexation of Awadh, many religious leaders and self-styled prophets preached the destruction of British rule.
- Local Leaders: In many areas, local leaders emerged to mobilise peasants, zamindars, and tribals. Shah Mal mobilised the villagers of pargana Barout in Uttar Pradesh. Gonoo, a tribal cultivator from Singhbhum in Chotanagpur, became a rebel leader for the Kol tribals.
Two Rebel Profiles
The textbook provides detailed portraits of two such leaders, showing the different worlds they came from.
Shah Mal
Shah Mal was a Jat cultivator from a large village in pargana Barout, Uttar Pradesh. His clan's kinship ties extended over chaurasee des (eighty-four villages). The region had fertile, irrigated land, and many villagers were prosperous. However, they saw the British land revenue system as deeply oppressive: the demand was high, and collection was inflexible. As a result, cultivators were losing their land to outsiders — traders and moneylenders who were moving into the area.
Shah Mal mobilised the headmen and cultivators of the chaurasee des. He moved at night from village to village, urging people to rebel. The revolt against the British quickly turned into a general rebellion against all signs of oppression.
- Cultivators left their fields and plundered the houses of moneylenders and traders.
- Displaced proprietors took back the lands they had lost.
- Shah Mal's men attacked government buildings, destroyed a bridge over the river, and dug up metalled roads. This was partly to prevent British forces from entering the area, and partly because bridges and roads were seen as symbols of British rule.
- They sent supplies to the sepoys who had mutinied in Delhi and cut off all official communication between the British headquarters and Meerut.
Locally acknowledged as the Raja, Shah Mal took over the bungalow of an English officer and turned it into a "hall of justice," settling disputes and dispensing judgments. He also set up an effective network of intelligence. For a time, the people of the area felt that firangi raj was over and their own rule had begun. Shah Mal was killed in battle in July 1857.
Maulvi Ahmadullah Shah
Maulvi Ahmadullah Shah was one of the many maulvis who played an important part in the revolt. Educated in Hyderabad, he became a preacher when young. In 1856, he was seen moving from village to village, preaching jehad (religious war) against the British and urging people to rebel. …
Shah Mal. Shah Mal lived in a large village in pargana Barout in Uttar Pradesh, and belonged to a clan of Jat cultivators whose kinship ties extended over chaurasee des (eighty-four villages). Many of the villagers were prosperous but saw the British land-revenue system as oppressive — the demand was high and its collection inflexible — and cultivators were losing land to traders and moneylenders. Shah Mal mobilised the headmen and cultivators of the chaurasee des, moving at night from village to village urging people to rebel. His men attacked government buildings, cut the bridge over the river and dug up metalled roads to stop government forces, sent supplies to the sepoys in Delhi, and blocked official communication between Meerut and headquarters. Acknowledged locally as the Raja, he took over an English officer's bungalow, turned it into …
Maulvi Ahmadullah Shah. Maulvi Ahmadullah Shah was one of the many maulvis who played an important part in the revolt of 1857. Educated in Hyderabad, he became a preacher when young. In 1856 he moved from village to village preaching jehad against the British and urging people to rebel, travelling in a palanquin with drumbeaters in front — so that he was popularly called Danka Shah, the maulvi with the drum (danka). British officials grew alarmed as thousands began following him and many Muslims saw him as an inspired prophet. Stopped from preaching in Lucknow in 1856 and jailed in Faizabad in 1857, he was, on his release, elected leader by the mutinous 22nd Native Infantry. He fought at the Battle of Chinhat, where the British forces …
Figure 10.3 is a popular print of Rani Lakshmi Bai of Jhansi. The image shows her as a warrior on horseback, a common visual representation that circulated widely after the revolt. She is depicted in male attire — a turban, a long coat, and holding a sword — riding a horse at full gallop, with a child tied to her back. This child is Damodar Rao, the adopted son of the late Raja Gangadhar Rao, whom the British had refused to recognise as the rightful heir, a key grievance that pushed the Rani into rebellion.
The print is not a photograph but a stylised, heroic portrait. It captures the Rani in action, not as a passive queen but as a military leader actively fighting. The background is usually plain or shows a battlefield, with no specific geographical site or building labelled. The focus is entirely on her figure and her horse, emphasising speed, courage, and defiance. …
Figure 10.4 is a portrait of Nana Sahib, the adopted son of the former Peshwa Baji Rao II. The image shows him as a dignified, princely figure, dressed in fine Mughal-style court attire — a long coat, a turban, and jewellery — seated in a formal pose. He holds a sword, a symbol of both his royal lineage and his role as a military leader during the revolt.
The portrait is not a photograph but a painted representation, typical of the period’s visual culture. It does not show any battle scene, map, or multiple panels. There are no labels, arrows, or relationships depicted within the image itself. The figure is the sole subject, set against a plain background, with no identifiable location or objects beyond the chair and the sword. …