Sociology · Ch 9 — Change and Development in Rural Society
Transformations in Rural Society after Independence
Transformations in Rural Society after Independence
Transformations in Rural Society after Independence
The post-Independence period, especially in regions that experienced the Green Revolution, brought profound changes to social relations in rural India. These transformations reshaped how people worked, how they were paid, and the very nature of ties between landowners and labourers.
Key Changes in Rural Social Relations
Several interconnected shifts occurred, particularly in areas where cultivation became more intensive:
- Increased use of agricultural labour — as farming methods grew more intensive, the demand for hired workers rose sharply.
- Shift from payment in kind to payment in cash — instead of receiving grain or other produce as wages, agricultural workers began to be paid in money.
- Loosening of traditional bonds — hereditary relationships between farmers or landowners and agricultural workers, known as bonded labour, weakened significantly.
- Rise of a class of 'free' wage labourers — workers who were no longer tied to particular landowners through debt or custom, and could sell their labour on the open market.
From Patronage to Exploitation
Sociologist Jan Breman described this change in the relationship between landlords (who usually belonged to dominant castes) and agricultural workers (usually from low castes) as a shift from 'patronage to exploitation' (Breman, 1974). Under the older system, landlords had certain customary obligations toward their workers — providing grain, loans, and some measure of security in exchange for labour and loyalty. With commercialisation, these obligations dissolved, and workers were treated purely as hired hands with no reciprocal claims on their employers.
The Transition to Capitalist Agriculture
Some scholars see these changes in labour relations as evidence of a transition to capitalist agriculture. The capitalist mode of production rests on two key features:
- Separation of workers from the means of production — in this case, land. Workers no longer own or have customary access to land; they must work for wages.
- Use of 'free' wage labour — workers are legally free to enter and leave employment contracts, unlike bonded labourers who were tied to a particular master.
In general, farmers in more developed regions became increasingly oriented to the market. As cultivation grew more commercialised, rural areas became integrated into the wider economy. This integration brought more money into villages and expanded opportunities for business and employment.
Colonial Roots and Post-Independence Acceleration
It is important to remember that this transformation of the rural economy actually began during the Colonial period. In many regions during the 19th century, large tracts of land in Maharashtra, for example, were given over to cotton cultivation, and cotton farmers became directly linked to the world market.
However, the pace and spread of change increased rapidly after Independence. The government actively promoted modern methods of cultivation and attempted to modernise the rural economy through various strategies:
- Investment in rural infrastructure — irrigation facilities, roads, and electricity.
- Provision of agricultural inputs — including credit through banks and cooperatives.
- The Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana, launched in 2014, is a notable government effort to ensure uninterrupted power supply to rural India, which is essential for regular agricultural growth.
Impact on Rural Social Structure
The overall outcome of these 'rural development' efforts was not limited to transforming the rural economy and agriculture. It also altered the agrarian structure and rural society itself.
One major way in which rural social structure changed since the 1960s was through the enrichment of medium and large farmers who adopted the new technologies of the Green Revolution. In several agriculturally rich regions — such as coastal Andhra Pradesh, western Uttar Pradesh, and central Gujarat — well-to-do farmers belonging to dominant castes began to invest their agricultural profits in other types of business ventures.
This process of diversification gave rise to new entrepreneurial groups that moved out of rural areas and into the growing towns of these developing regions. These groups formed new regional elites that became economically as well as politically dominant (Rutten, 1995).
Alongside this change in class structure, the spread of higher education — especially private professional colleges — in rural and semi-urban areas allowed the new rural elites to educate their children. Many of these children then joined professional or white-collar occupations or started businesses, feeding into the expansion of the urban middle classes.
Regional Variations
The pattern of transformation was not uniform across India:
| Region | Outcome |
|--------|---------| …