Q.“Extrinsic motivation sometimes may kill intrinsic motivation.” Justify.
When external rewards or pressures are introduced for an activity someone already enjoys, the person may begin to see the activity as a means to an end rather than something valuable in itself, thereby undermining their original internal drive.
Motivation is the force that energizes and directs our behavior. Psychologists distinguish between two fundamental types: intrinsic motivation, where we engage in an activity for the sheer pleasure, interest, or satisfaction it brings, and extrinsic motivation, where we act to obtain external rewards or avoid punishment. A child who paints because she loves the colors and the creative process is intrinsically motivated. If her parents start paying her money for every painting, they introduce extrinsic motivation.
The relationship between these two forms of motivation is not simply additive. Research has shown that introducing external rewards for an activity that someone already finds inherently enjoyable can paradoxically reduce their intrinsic interest. This phenomenon is known as the "overjustification effect." When people receive tangible rewards for doing something they already love, they begin to attribute their behavior to the reward rather than to their own interest. The activity shifts from being an end in itself to becoming a means to earn the reward.
Consider a student who reads books voraciously because she finds stories fascinating and enjoys losing herself in different worlds. If a school program suddenly starts giving prizes or money for every book read, her perception of reading may change. She might begin to ask herself, "Am I reading because I love it, or because I want the prize?" The external reward provides an alternative explanation for her behavior, and over time, her original love of reading may diminish. If the rewards are later removed, she may read less than she did before the program started, because the intrinsic motivation has been eroded.
This effect is particularly strong when rewards are expected, tangible, and contingent on simply doing the activity rather than on the quality of performance. Unexpected rewards or verbal praise tend to have less damaging effects on intrinsic motivation.
Several factors determine whether extrinsic motivation will undermine intrinsic motivation:
- Type of reward: Tangible rewards like money or prizes are more likely to reduce intrinsic motivation than intangible ones like praise or recognition.
- Expectation: When people expect a reward before engaging in the activity, the undermining effect is stronger than when rewards come as a surprise.
- Perceived control: If the external reward makes people feel controlled or manipulated, intrinsic motivation suffers. If it provides information about competence without being controlling, the effect is less harmful.
- Initial level of interest: The overjustification effect primarily affects activities that were already intrinsically interesting. You cannot kill intrinsic motivation that never existed.
In educational settings, this has important implications. Teachers who rely heavily on grades, gold stars, or other external incentives may inadvertently reduce students' natural curiosity and love of learning. A child who enjoys mathematics for the puzzle-solving aspect may come to see it merely as a way to earn good marks or parental approval. When learning becomes a transaction, the joy of discovery can fade.
The key issue is not that all external rewards are harmful, but that they can shift the perceived locus of causality from internal to external. When people feel they are acting for external reasons, their sense of autonomy and self-determination decreases, and with it, their intrinsic motivation.
Workplaces face similar challenges. An employee who is passionate about creative problem-solving may find that passion diminished if the organization introduces rigid performance bonuses tied to every task. The work becomes about hitting targets rather than about the inherent satisfaction of solving interesting problems. This is why some organizations are careful about how they structure incentives, trying to support autonomy and competence rather than simply dangling rewards.
The solution is not to eliminate all external motivators, which would be impractical, but to use them thoughtfully. Rewards that acknowledge competence without controlling behavior, that come unexpectedly, or that are tied to genuine achievement rather than mere participation tend to be less harmful. Fostering environments where people feel autonomous, competent, and connected to others helps preserve intrinsic motivation even when some external structures are necessary.
In short, extrinsic motivation can kill intrinsic motivation because external rewards shift a person's perception of why they are doing an activity—from internal enjoyment to external gain—thereby undermining their original interest and sense of autonomy. The activity becomes a means to an end rather than an end in itself.
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.