Q.How would you account for the following:
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Stability of Oxidation States
Stability of Oxidation States – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you're holding a ball on a hill. If you place it exactly at the top, it's balanced — but the slightest push sends it rolling down. That's an unstable position. If you place it in a small dip on the hillside, it stays put even if nudged — that's stable. Oxidation states work the same way: some are like the hilltop (easily changed), others like the dip (hard to change).
The Core Intuition
An oxidation state is just a number we assign to an atom to track how many electrons it has gained or lost compared to its neutral state. But atoms don't "want" to stay in arbitrary oxidation states — they want to reach a configuration that minimises their energy.
Stability here means: how reluctant is that oxidation state to change under normal conditions? A stable oxidation state resists being oxidised further or reduced further. An unstable one readily changes into something else.
The Precise Statement
Stability of an oxidation state refers to the tendency of an element to maintain that particular oxidation state under given conditions (temperature, pH, presence of other reagents). A stable oxidation state is one that does not easily undergo redox reactions — it is neither easily oxidised nor easily reduced.
This depends on three key factors:
- Electronic configuration – Half-filled and fully-filled d or f subshells confer extra stability (e.g., Fe3+ with d5 is more stable than Fe2+ with d6 in some contexts).
- Inert pair effect – Heavier p-block elements (like Tl, Pb, Bi) show lower oxidation states (e.g., +1 for Tl) as more stable than higher ones (+3 for Tl), because the s-electrons become reluctant to participate.
- Disproportionation tendency – Some oxidation states are unstable because they spontaneously convert into two other states (e.g., Cu+ in aqueous solution gives Cu2+ and Cu).
Stability is relative — it depends on the environment. Mn2+ is stable in acidic solution but easily oxidised in alkaline medium. Always specify conditions when discussing stability.
Examples That Make It Concrete
Transition metals – Cr3+ (d3) and Mn2+ (d5) are exceptionally stable because half-filled/half-filled-like configurations have low energy. Cr2+ (d4) is easily oxidised to Cr3+ — it's unstable.
p-block elements – Pb2+ is stable, Pb4+ is a strong oxidising agent (unstable). Sn2+ is a reducing agent (easily oxidised to Sn4+), so Sn4+ is more stable for tin.
Common pattern – For most elements, the most common oxidation state is the most stable one under standard conditions. But "most common" isn't always "most stable" — e.g., Fe3+ is common but Fe2+ is more stable in acidic solution.
Do not confuse "stability" with "occurrence". Mn7+ (as MnO4−) is common in the lab but is a powerful oxidising agent — it is not stable in the sense of resisting change. It readily accepts electrons.
How to Think About It in Exams …
Why this formula?
Stability of Oxidation States: Why It Works
This concept explains why certain oxidation states of an element are more stable than others — and why some states are never observed at all.
The Core Idea: Energy Minimisation
An oxidation state is stable when the total energy of the system is at a minimum. This depends on three competing factors:
- Ionisation energy (energy needed to remove electrons)
- Lattice energy (for ionic compounds) or bond energy (for covalent compounds)
- Electronic configuration (half-filled / fully-filled subshells)
There is no single formula for stability — instead, we use trends and principles that act as "formulae" for prediction.
Key Principle 1: Inert Pair Effect (for p-block elements)
Why it holds:
For heavier elements (e.g., Tl, Pb, Bi), the 6s² electrons are held very tightly due to poor shielding and relativistic effects. They resist removal.
- Result: Lower oxidation state (e.g., +1 for Tl, +2 for Pb) becomes more stable than the higher state (+3, +4).
- Example: TlX3+ is a strong oxidising agent — it readily gains two electrons to become TlX+.
Derivation logic:
The energy cost to remove the 6s² electrons is greater than the energy gained by forming additional bonds or lattice. So the system stays in the lower state.
Key Principle 2: Half-Filled / Fully-Filled Subshell Stability
Why it holds:
A half-filled (d5, f7) or fully-filled (d10, f14) subshell has extra exchange energy and symmetry — making it unusually stable.
- Example: MnX2+ (d5) is more stable than MnX3+ (d4). FeX3+ (d5) is more stable than FeX2+ (d6).
Derivation logic:
The exchange energy (Hund's rule) is maximum for half-filled configurations. Removing an electron from a half-filled shell costs extra energy — so the half-filled state is favoured.
Key Principle 3: Lattice Energy / Hydration Energy Compensation
For transition metals, stability of a particular oxidation state in aqueous solution depends on:
ΔG∘=ΔHhydration∘−ΔHionisation∘
Why it holds:
- Higher oxidation states have higher ionisation energy (harder to remove electrons).
- But they also have higher hydration energy (smaller, more charged ions attract water more strongly).
- The balance determines which state is stable.
Example:
- CuX+ is unstable in water because its hydration energy is too low to compensate for the loss of the second electron.
- CuX2+ is stable in water.
Key Principle 4: Disproportionation
Some oxidation states are unstable and spontaneously convert to two other states:
2CuX+Cu+CuX2+
Why it holds: …
The key idea is stability of oxidation states in transition metals, governed by the electronic configuration and the tendency to achieve half-filled or fully-filled d subshells.
(i) Cr2+ has a d4 configuration. It is strongly reducing because losing one electron gives Cr3+ (d3), which has a stable half-filled t2g level. Conversely, Mn3+ (d4) is strongly oxidising because gaining one electron gives Mn2+ (d5), a stable half-filled d subshell.
(ii) Co2+ (d7) is stable in water because the hydration energy is sufficient. However, in the presence of strong-field ligands (like NH3), the pairing energy is overcome, and Co2+ is easily oxidised to Co3+ (d6), which gains extra crystal field stabilisation energy (CFSE) in a low-spin octahedral complex. …
The stability of oxidation states in transition metals is governed by the electronic configuration of the ion and its tendency to achieve a half-filled (d5) or fully-filled (d10) d-subshell. Cr2+ (d4) is strongly reducing because losing an electron gives Cr3+ (d3, a half-filled t2g level); Mn3+ (d4) is strongly oxidising because gaining an electron gives Mn2+ (d5); Co2+ (d7) is stable in water but oxidises to d6 in complexes; and d1 ions are unstable because they easily lose their single d-electron to reach the stable d0 state.
The Core Idea: Stability and the d-Subshell
The key to understanding these observations lies in the stability associated with half-filled and fully-filled d-orbitals. A d5 configuration (half-filled) has all five electrons unpaired, one in each orbital — this gives maximum exchange energy and extra stability. A d10 configuration (fully-filled) is also exceptionally stable. Ions that are one electron away from these configurations tend to be either strongly reducing (if they can lose an electron to reach d5 or d10) or strongly oxidising (if they can gain an electron to reach d5 or d10).
Let’s apply this to each case.
(i) Cr2+ is strongly reducing; Mn3+ is strongly oxidising
Both Cr2+ and Mn3+ have a d4 configuration. But their chemical behaviour is opposite. Why?
Step 1: Identify the electronic configurations.
- Cr (atomic number 24): [Ar]3d54s1. Cr2+ loses the 4s1 and one 3d electron → [Ar]3d4.
- Mn (atomic number 25): [Ar]3d54s2. Mn3+ loses both 4s electrons and one 3d electron → [Ar]3d4.
So both are d4 ions. But look at what they want to become.
Step 2: The driving force — reaching d3 or d5.
- Cr2+ (d4) readily loses one electron to become Cr3+ (d3). In an octahedral field, d3 means the t2g set is exactly half-filled (t2g3), which carries extra stability from exchange energy. This matches NCERT's own reasoning (Example 4.4): Cr2+ is reducing because its configuration changes from d4 to the extra-stable half-filled-t2g d3.
E∘(Cr3+/Cr2+)=−0.41 V
A negative potential confirms Cr2+ is a good reducing agent — it wants to give away an electron to reach that stable d3 state.
- Mn3+ (d4) readily gains one electron to become Mn2+ (d5). Here d5 is the half-filled whole d-subshell (not just t2g) — the single most stable dn configuration there is. So Mn3+ readily accepts an electron, acting as a strong oxidising agent.
A common mistake is to think both d4 ions behave the same. The difference is which neighbouring configuration is more stable: Cr2+ oxidises to the half-filled-t2g d3, while Mn3+ reduces to the fully half-filled d5. Both moves are driven by reaching a more stable configuration, just in opposite directions.
Step 3: The numbers confirm it.
E∘(Mn3+/Mn2+)=+1.57 V
A large positive potential means Mn3+ is a strong oxidising agent — it pulls electrons from others.
The d4 configuration is inherently unstable because it is one electron short of d5 (half-filled) or one electron away from d3 (which is also relatively stable in some cases). The actual behaviour depends on which neighbour (d3 or d5) is more stable in that element’s context.
(ii) Cobalt(II) is stable in water but easily oxidised in presence of complexing reagents
Step 1: The aqueous ion.
Co2+ has a d7 configuration. In water, it forms the hexaaqua complex [Co(H2O)6]2+. Water is a weak field ligand, so the electrons occupy orbitals according to Hund’s rule — high spin configuration: t2g5eg2. This is reasonably stable.
Step 2: Why is it stable in water?
The standard reduction potential for Co3+/Co2+ in water is:
E∘(Co3+/Co2+)=+1.82 V(literature value; NCERT’s own Table 4.2 prints +1.97 V for this couple)
This is highly positive, meaning Co3+ is a very strong oxidising agent in water — it would oxidise water itself. So Co2+ is the stable form in aqueous solution because Co3+ is too reactive.
Step 3: What changes with complexing reagents?
When you add strong field ligands (like NH3, CN−, en), the crystal field splitting Δo increases. For Co3+ (d6), a strong field forces a low spin configuration: t2g6 — all electrons paired in the lower set. This gives huge extra stabilisation (CFSE). For Co2+ (d7), even with strong field, you get t2g6eg1 — still one electron in the higher eg level, less stable.
So the complex of Co3+ becomes much more stable than that of Co2+ under strong field ligands. The equilibrium shifts:
[Co(H2O)6]2+ligand[CoL6]3+ (easily oxidised)
The CFSE for d6 low spin (octahedral) is −2.4Δo+2P (where P is pairing energy), while for d7 high spin it is −0.8Δo. The difference favours d6 when Δo is large.
Step 4: Real example. …
Here is a clear, concept-first solution for each part, using the Standard Electrode Potential (E°) and Electronic Configuration method.
Core Concept: Stability & E° Values
The stability of an oxidation state in aqueous solution is determined by its standard reduction potential (E∘).
- A high positive E∘ (e.g., M3+→M2+) means the higher state is strongly oxidising (it wants to gain electrons).
- A high negative E∘ means the lower state is strongly reducing (it wants to lose electrons).
- Stability is also linked to achieving half-filled (d5) or fully-filled (d10) configurations.
(i) Cr2+ (reducing) vs Mn3+ (oxidising)
Method: Electronic Configuration & E° Comparison
Steps:
-
Write the configurations:
- Cr2+: [Ar]3d4
- Mn3+: [Ar]3d4
- Both are d4 species.
-
Identify the stable target:
- Cr2+ wants to lose one electron to become Cr3+ (d3). This is not a half-filled shell, but it is a stable configuration.
- Mn3+ wants to gain one electron to become Mn2+ (d5). d5 is a half-filled, highly stable configuration.
-
Apply the E° logic:
- Cr2+ is reducing: The reaction Cr3++e−→Cr2+ has E∘=−0.41V. The negative value means the reverse reaction (Cr2+→Cr3++e−) is spontaneous. Thus, Cr2+ loses electrons easily (acts as a reducing agent).
- Mn3+ is oxidising: The reaction Mn3++e−→Mn2+ has E∘=+1.57V. The large positive value means Mn3+ gains electrons very easily (acts as a strong oxidising agent) to achieve the stable d5 state.
Result: Cr2+ is reducing because it tends to lose an electron. Mn3+ is strongly oxidising because gaining an electron gives it the stable half-filled d5 configuration.
(ii) Cobalt(II) stability with complexing reagents
Method: Crystal Field Theory & Ligand Field Stabilisation Energy (LFSE)
Steps:
-
Identify the species:
- Co2+: d7 configuration.
- Co3+: d6 configuration.
-
Analyse the aqueous state (weak field ligand - H2O):
- In water, Co2+ exists as [Co(H2O)6]2+ (high spin, t2g5eg2).
- Water is a comparatively weak field ligand: it does not stabilise the +3 state enough to offset cobalt's high third ionisation enthalpy.
- The E∘ for Co3+/Co2+ is +1.82V (literature value; NCERT's Table 4.2 prints +1.97V), meaning aqueous Co3+ is strongly oxidising and readily reduces to Co2+. Hence, Co2+ is stable in water.
-
Analyse with strong field ligands (e.g., NH3, CN−):
- Strong ligands cause large crystal field splitting (Δ0).
- Co3+ (d6): Pairs up completely to become low spin (t2g6eg0). This gives a huge LFSE (very stable).
- Co2+ (d7): Becomes low spin (t2g6eg1), but the LFSE gain is less than for Co3+.
-
Conclusion: …
Here are the common mistakes students make on this topic, broken down by each sub-part, along with the correct conceptual approach to avoid them.
General Mistake: Memorizing without understanding the why
Students often try to memorize that "Cr²⁺ is reducing" and "Mn³⁺ is oxidizing" without linking it to the electronic configuration and the stability of the half-filled or fully-filled d-subshell. This leads to confusion when a similar question is asked for a different element.
How to avoid: Always connect stability to the exchange energy and symmetry of the d-orbital configuration. The most stable configurations are d0, d5 (half-filled), and d10 (fully-filled).
(i) Cr2+ is reducing, Mn3+ is oxidizing
Common Mistake 1: Confusing the direction of electron transfer.
Students often say "Cr²⁺ is reducing because it wants to lose electrons" but fail to specify what it reduces (it reduces other species by getting oxidized itself). Similarly, they say "Mn³⁺ is oxidizing because it wants to gain electrons" without linking it to the stable product.
How to avoid: Be precise. A reducing agent gets oxidized (loses electrons). A oxidizing agent gets reduced (gains electrons).
- Cr²⁺ (d4) loses one electron to become Cr³⁺ (d3). The d3 configuration has a half-filled t2g level in an octahedral field, which is extra stable due to high exchange energy. So Cr²⁺ readily gives up an electron.
- Mn³⁺ (d4) gains one electron to become Mn²⁺ (d5). The d5 configuration is a half-filled d-subshell, which is exceptionally stable. So Mn³⁺ readily accepts an electron.
Common Mistake 2: Forgetting the standard electrode potentials.
Students might not realize that the tendency is quantified by E∘ values.
- E∘(Cr3+/Cr2+)=−0.41 V (negative, so Cr²⁺ is a good reducing agent).
- E∘(Mn3+/Mn2+)=+1.57 V (highly positive, so Mn³⁺ is a strong oxidizing agent).
How to avoid: Memorize the trend: For d4 ions, the M3+/M2+ potential is very negative for Cr (easy to oxidize) and very positive for Mn (easy to reduce).
(ii) Cobalt(II) stability in water vs. easy oxidation with ligands
Common Mistake 1: Thinking "stable in water" means it never oxidizes.
Students often assume Co²⁺ is inert. The key is comparison: Co²⁺ is stable in water relative to Co³⁺, but in the presence of strong ligands, the stability order reverses.
How to avoid: Understand the role of crystal field stabilization energy (CFSE) and ligand field strength.
- In water (weak field ligand):
- Co²⁺ (d7): High spin, CFSE is moderate.
- Co³⁺ (d6): High spin, CFSE is lower than expected. The standard potential E∘(Co3+/Co2+) is about +1.82 V in water, meaning Co³⁺ is a very strong oxidizing agent and readily gets reduced to Co²⁺. So Co²⁺ is stable.
- With strong ligands (e.g., NH₃, CN⁻):
- Co³⁺ (d6): Low spin (t2g6). This gives a huge CFSE (pairing energy is overcome by the large splitting). The t2g6 configuration is very stable.
- Co²⁺ (d7): Low spin (t2g6eg1). The extra electron in the eg level reduces stability.
- Result: Co²⁺ is now easily oxidized to the very stable Co³⁺ complex.
Common Mistake 2: Ignoring the spin-state change.
Students forget that the same ion can have different spin states depending on the ligand. They assume Co³⁺ is always unstable.
How to avoid: Always check the ligand. Strong field ligands (like CN⁻, NH₃, en) cause low spin configurations, which can dramatically stabilize a higher oxidation state.
(iii) The d1 configuration is very unstable in ions
Common Mistake 1: Thinking "unstable" means it doesn't exist. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 on this concept.
- CBSE 2026Set 56/3/11 markMCQQ.In aqueous solution, Cr2O72− ion converts to which of the following in alkaline medium ? (A) Cr3+ (B) CrO42− (C) CrO (D) CrO3
›Reveal solutionSolution
In alkaline medium, dichromate (Cr2O72−) converts to chromate (CrO42−) without any change in oxidation state — it’s a simple acid-base equilibrium, not a redox reaction. The correct option is (B).
The key to this question lies in understanding that the conversion of dichromate to chromate is not a redox reaction — the oxidation state of chromium remains +6 throughout. Many students instinctively think of reduction to Cr3+ because they associate dichromate with strong oxidizing behaviour, but that only happens in acidic medium. In alkaline conditions, the chemistry is entirely different.
Let’s walk through the reasoning step by step.
-
Recall the oxidation state of chromium in dichromate.
In Cr2O72−, each oxygen is -2, so total from seven oxygens is -14. The ion has a -2 charge, so the sum of oxidation states of the two chromium atoms must be +12. Hence each Cr is in the +6 state.
-
Now consider the alkaline medium.
When you add a base (like NaOH) to a solution of K2Cr2O7, the dichromate ion reacts with hydroxide ions. The reaction is:
Cr2O72−+2OH−→2CrO42−+H2O
Notice that the oxidation state of Cr in CrO42− is also +6 (four oxygens at -2 give -8, charge -2, so Cr = +6). No electrons are transferred — this is an acid-base equilibrium, not a redox change.
- Why does this happen? Dichromate exists in equilibrium with chromate, and the position depends on pH. In acidic solution, the equilibrium shifts toward dichromate; in alkaline solution, it shifts toward chromate. The reaction is:
2CrO42−+2H+⇌Cr2O72−+H2O
Adding OH− removes H+, pulling the equilibrium to the left — producing chromate. …
-
- CBSE 2026Set 56/1/11 markMCQQ.Assertion (A) : Actinoids show wide range of oxidation states. Reason (R) : Actinoids are radioactive in nature. (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The assertion that actinoids show a wide range of oxidation states is true, but the reason given — that they are radioactive — is not the correct explanation. The correct explanation lies in the small energy gap between 5f, 6d, and 7s orbitals, which allows many electrons to participate in bonding. So the answer is option (B).
The question tests your understanding of why actinoids (elements 90–103, from thorium to lawrencium) exhibit so many different oxidation states. Many students memorise that “actinoids show variable oxidation states” and also know they are radioactive, so they assume the second explains the first. That’s a trap.
Let’s break it down properly.
-
Is Assertion (A) true?
Yes. Actinoids display a remarkably wide range of oxidation states. For example, uranium shows +3, +4, +5, and +6; neptunium and plutonium go from +3 to +7. This is far more varied than most d-block elements. The reason is that the 5f, 6d, and 7s orbitals are very close in energy. Electrons from all three can be lost with relatively little energy cost, so many different oxidation numbers become accessible.
-
Is Reason (R) true?
Yes, actinoids are indeed radioactive. All actinoid nuclei are unstable and decay over time. So the reason statement is factually correct.
-
Does the radioactivity explain the wide range of oxidation states?
No. Radioactivity is a nuclear property — it depends on the instability of the nucleus (proton/neutron ratio, nuclear binding energy). Oxidation states are an electronic property — they depend on how easily electrons are lost from the outer orbitals. These two phenomena are completely independent.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that because both statements are true, the reason must be the explanation. But correlation is not causation. Radioactivity does not cause variable oxidation states; the orbital energy structure does.
-
What actually causes the wide range of oxidation states in actinoids? …
-
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which of the following oxidation states is common for all lanthanoids?(a) +2(b) +3(c) +4(d) +5
›Reveal solutionSolution
All lanthanoids show a characteristic +3 oxidation state because it corresponds to a stable, similar electronic configuration achieved after losing the two 6s and one 4f (or 5d) electron.
Lanthanoids have the general electronic configuration [Xe] 4f^(1-14) 5d^(0-1) 6s2. Removal of the two 6s electrons and one more electron (from 4f or 5d) gives the Ln3+ ion, which is the most stable and commonly observed oxidation state across the entire series, from Ce to Lu.
…
- CBSE 2025Set 56/4/11 markMCQQ.The product of the oxidation of I− with MnO4− in alkaline medium is : (A) IO4− (B) I2 (C) IO− (D) IO3−
›Reveal solutionSolution
In alkaline medium, permanganate (MnO4−) oxidises iodide (I−) to iodate (IO3−), not to iodine or periodate. The balanced reaction shows I− loses 6 electrons to form IO3−, while MnO4− gains 3 electrons to form MnO2. The correct product is IO3−, option (D).
Why the medium matters
The oxidation state of iodine in its products depends heavily on the pH of the solution. Permanganate is a powerful oxidising agent, but its reduction product changes with medium:
- In acidic medium: MnO4−→Mn2+ (gains 5 electrons)
- In neutral/alkaline medium: MnO4−→MnO2 (gains 3 electrons)
This difference in electron gain per mole of permanganate directly affects how far it can oxidise iodide. In alkaline medium, permanganate is a milder oxidising agent (gains only 3 electrons) compared to acidic medium (gains 5 electrons). Yet it still oxidises I− all the way to IO3−, not stopping at I2.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Identify the half-reactions
Iodide (I−) has oxidation state −1. The possible products given are:
- IO4−: iodine in +7 state
- I2: iodine in 0 state
- IO−: iodine in +1 state (hypoiodite)
- IO3−: iodine in +5 state (iodate)
In alkaline medium, permanganate reduces to MnO2 (manganese in +4 state, from +7 in MnO4−).
-
Balance the oxidation half-reaction
Iodide going to iodate:
I−→IO3−
Balance oxygen with water (alkaline medium):
I−+3H2O→IO3−+6H+
Balance charge: left side has −1, right side has −1+6=+5. Add 6 electrons to right:
I−+3H2O→IO3−+6H++6e−
In alkaline medium, add OH− to neutralise H+:
I−+6OH−→IO3−+3H2O+6e−
So each I− loses 6 electrons to become IO3−.
-
Balance the reduction half-reaction
Permanganate to manganese dioxide in alkaline medium:
MnO4−→MnO2
Balance oxygen with water:
MnO4−+2H2O→MnO2+4OH−
Balance charge: left −1, right −4. Add 3 electrons to left:
MnO4−+2H2O+3e−→MnO2+4OH−
So each MnO4− gains 3 electrons.
-
Combine the half-reactions
To equalise electrons: multiply reduction half by 2 (gives 6 electrons gained) and oxidation half by 1 (gives 6 electrons lost):
2MnO4−+4H2O+6e−→2MnO2+8OH−
I−+6OH−→IO3−+3H2O+6e−
Adding:
2MnO4−+I−+4H2O+6OH−→2MnO2+IO3−+3H2O+8OH−
Cancel 3H2O from both sides and 6OH− from both sides: …
- CBSE 2025Set 56/6/11 markMCQQ.For the following question, two statements are given — one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Select the correct answer from the codes (A), (B), (C) and (D) as given below. (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true. Assertion (A) : Actinoids show wide range of oxidation states. Reason (R) : Actinoids are radioactive in nature.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The assertion that actinoids show a wide range of oxidation states is true, but the reason given — that they are radioactive — does not explain this property. The correct answer is (B).
The question tests your understanding of why actinoids exhibit variable oxidation states. The key is to separate two distinct facts: actinoids are radioactive, and they do show many oxidation states — but the radioactivity is not the cause of the oxidation state variability.
Let’s break this down.
-
Why do actinoids show a wide range of oxidation states?
The 5f, 6d, and 7s orbitals in actinoids are very close in energy. This means electrons can be removed from any of these orbitals with relatively little energy cost. As you move across the actinoid series, the 5f orbitals gradually become more stable, but early actinoids (like Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu) can lose anywhere from 3 to 7 electrons. For example, uranium shows +3, +4, +5, and +6; plutonium shows +3, +4, +5, +6, and +7. This is the real reason for the wide range — it’s an electronic structure effect, not a nuclear one.
-
What about radioactivity?
Yes, all actinoids are radioactive — their nuclei are unstable and decay over time. But radioactivity is a nuclear property, while oxidation states depend on electron configuration. A nucleus decaying does not directly change how many electrons an atom can lose or gain in a chemical reaction. So while both statements are factually true, the reason does not explain the assertion. …
-
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markQ.What is the common oxidation state of Lanthanoids?
›Reveal solutionSolution
All lanthanoids overwhelmingly favour the +3 oxidation state, since their poorly-bonding 4f electrons are not readily involved, leaving the same outer 5d/6s electrons available across the series.
Across the entire lanthanide series, the +3 oxidation state is by far the most common and stable one, shown by essentially every lanthanoid. This is because the 4f electrons are deeply buried and well-shielded, taking little part in bonding, while the outer 5d0−16s2 electrons are readily lost to give the stable Ln3+ ion. Occasional +2 or +4 states occur only for a few elements whe …
- CBSE 2024Set A11 markMCQQ.Which of the following pair of metal oxides are amphoteric?(a) V2O5, Cr2O3(b) Mn2O7, CrO3(c) V2O5, V2O4(d) CrO, V2O5
›Reveal solutionSolution
V2O5 and Cr2O3 are the amphoteric pair — option (a).
For transition-metal oxides, the character changes from basic (low oxidation state) through amphoteric to acidic (high oxidation state). Cr2O3 (Cr in +3) is amphoteric — it dissolves in acids to give Cr3+ salts and in alkali to give chromite. V2O5 (V in +5) is chiefly acidic but is genuinely amphoteric, dissolving in both acids and alka …
- CBSE 2024Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which of the following oxidation state is common for all lanthanoids ?(a) +2(b) +3(c) +4(d) +5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Every lanthanoid shows the +3 oxidation state as its characteristic and most stable state, even though a few also show +2 or +4 in special cases.
Lanthanoids (Ce to Lu) have the general electronic configuration [Xe]4f1−145d0−16s2. Losing the two 6s electrons and one 4f/5d electron gives the stable, half-filled/fully-filled-favouring Ln3+ ion, which is why +3 is the predominant and universally shown oxidation state across the whole series. A handful of lanthanoids additi …
- CBSE 2023Set 56/1/11 markMCQQ.The most common and stable oxidation state of a Lanthanoid is : (A) + 2 (B) + 3 (C) + 4 (D) + 6
›Reveal solutionSolution
Lanthanoids overwhelmingly prefer the +3 oxidation state due to the stability gained from losing the two 6s and one 5d/4f electron, achieving a configuration analogous to noble gases or half-filled/filled f-subshells. The answer is (B) +3.
Why Lanthanoids Love +3: Electronic Configuration and Stability
The lanthanoid series (elements 57–71: La through Lu) sits in the f-block, where the 4f orbitals are being progressively filled. To understand their oxidation state preference, we need to look at what electrons are available and what configurations become stable upon ionization.
A typical lanthanoid has the general electronic configuration:
[Xe]4f0−145d0−16s2
The 6s electrons are outermost and easiest to remove. The 5d and 4f orbitals are close in energy, so sometimes one electron occupies 5d instead of 4f. When a lanthanoid forms a cation, it loses electrons in a specific order: 6s electrons go first, then 5d, then 4f (because 4f is more tightly held, being an inner orbital).
Step-by-Step Reasoning
-
First ionization removes 6s electrons
All lanthanoids have two 6s electrons. Removing both gives a +2 state, but this is rarely the stopping point because the resulting ion still has relatively accessible 5d or 4f electrons.
-
Third electron removal: the key to +3 stability
After losing the two 6s electrons, removing one more electron (from 5d if occupied, otherwise from 4f) produces the +3 oxidation state. This configuration turns out to be remarkably stable across the entire series.
Why? The resulting Ln3+ ion achieves one of several favorable electronic arrangements:
- For La (4f0): [Xe] — a noble gas configuration.
- For Gd (4f7): half-filled f-subshell with all spins parallel (exchange energy stabilization).
- For Lu (4f14): completely filled f-subshell.
- For others: partially filled 4f with reasonable stability.
-
Why not +2?
The +2 state does exist for a few lanthanoids (Eu, Yb) where it leads to half-filled or filled f-subshells (4f7 for Eu²⁺, 4f14 for Yb²⁺), but these are exceptions, not the rule. Most lanthanoids find +2 too reducing and unstable in aqueous solution.
-
Why not +4 or higher?
Removing a fourth electron means breaking into the tightly held 4f subshell (which is shielded and contracted). The ionization energy jumps dramatically. Only Ce commonly shows +4 (because Ce⁴⁺ achieves 4f0=[Xe]), and even that is a strong oxidizing agent. Higher states like +6 are virtually unknown in lanthanoids—the 4f electrons are too stable to remove. …
-
- CBSE 2023Set 56/2/11 markMCQQ.The oxidation state of Fe in [Fe(CO)5] is (A) +2 (B) 0 (C) +3 (D) +5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Carbonyl (CO) is a neutral ligand that does not contribute any charge. With five neutral CO ligands, the overall complex is neutral, so Fe must be in the 0 oxidation state. The correct option is (B).
Why this is a trick question — and how to see through it
Most students memorise that transition metals in coordination compounds usually show positive oxidation states like +2 or +3. Iron especially is famous for Fe(II) and Fe(III). So when you see
[Fe(CO)5], the instinct is to guess +2 or +3. That instinct is wrong here — and the reason is beautiful.The key is to ask: What charge does each ligand bring?
CO (carbonyl) is a neutral ligand. It donates a lone pair to the metal but carries no net charge. If every ligand is neutral, and the overall complex is neutral (no square brackets with a superscript charge), then the metal must be in the zero oxidation state.
This is not a rare exception — it is a whole class of compounds called metal carbonyls, where metals often exist in low or zero oxidation states. CO is a strong field ligand that stabilises these low states through back-bonding.
Step-by-step reasoning
1. Identify the charge on each ligand.
CO is carbon monoxide — a neutral molecule. In coordination chemistry, neutral ligands contribute 0 to the oxidation state calculation. Other examples: NH₃, H₂O, PPh₃.
2. Identify the overall charge on the complex.
The formula is written as
[Fe(CO)5]— no superscript charge. That means the complex is neutral: overall charge = 0.3. Set up the oxidation state equation.
Let the oxidation state of Fe be x.
Each CO contributes 0. There are 5 CO ligands.
So:
x+5(0)=0
4. Solve for x.
x=0
That is the entire calculation — it takes one line once you know the rule.
Watch outA common mistake is to treat CO as if it were a charged ligand like CN⁻ or Cl⁻. CO is not cyanide — it is neutral. Do not assign it a −1 charge. Also, do not confuse this with ferrocene or other organometallics where the ligand (like cyclopentadienyl) is anionic. …
- CBSE 2023Set 56/2/11 markMCQQ.Which of the following characteristics of transition metals is associated with their catalytic activity ? (A) Paramagnetic nature (B) Colour of hydrated ions (C) High enthalpy of atomisation (D) Variable oxidation states
›Reveal solutionSolution
The catalytic activity of transition metals arises primarily from their ability to adopt variable oxidation states, which allows them to form intermediate complexes and lower activation energy. The correct option is (D).
Why this question tests a core idea
Catalysis is about providing an alternative reaction pathway with a lower activation energy. For a substance to be a good catalyst, it must be able to temporarily bind to reactants, change its own electronic state, and then release the products. Transition metals excel at this because they can change their oxidation state easily — often by ±1 — without breaking down. This flexibility lets them shuttle electrons to and from reactants, stabilising transition states that would otherwise be too high in energy.
The other options — paramagnetism, colour, and high enthalpy of atomisation — are important properties of transition metals, but they don't directly explain catalytic activity. Let's see why.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Paramagnetic nature (A)
Paramagnetism arises from unpaired electrons. While many transition metal ions are paramagnetic, this property has no direct role in catalysis. A catalyst doesn't need unpaired electrons to speed up a reaction — it needs to form bonds with reactants and then break them. Paramagnetism is a consequence of electronic configuration, not a cause of catalytic behaviour.
-
Colour of hydrated ions (B)
The colour of transition metal complexes comes from d–d transitions — electrons jumping between split d orbitals when they absorb visible light. This is fascinating, but it's a spectroscopic property. Colour tells us about the electronic structure of the ion, but it doesn't help the ion catalyse a reaction. A colourless catalyst can be just as effective.
-
High enthalpy of atomisation (C)
This refers to the energy required to convert a solid metal into isolated gaseous atoms. Transition metals have high enthalpies of atomisation because of strong metallic bonding (due to unpaired d electrons contributing to bonding). This property is related to the strength of the metal lattice, not to its ability to change oxidation states during a catalytic cycle. In fact, a very high enthalpy of atomisation might make it harder for the metal to leave the lattice and participate in solution-phase catalysis.
-
Variable oxidation states (D) …
-
- CBSE 2023Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which of the following lanthanoid ions in solution is a good oxidizing agent ?(a) Eu2+(b) Yb2+(c) Sm2+(d) Tb4+
›Reveal solutionSolution
+3 is the overwhelmingly preferred oxidation state across the whole lanthanide series, so an unusual +4 ion like Tb⁴⁺ tends to gain an electron and revert to +3 — making it a good oxidising agent.
Across the lanthanide series, +3 is by far the most stable and common oxidation state (arising from the overall energetics of the whole series, not just an individual ion's own f-subshell configuration). Ions that deviate from +3 — whether to +2 or +4 — tend to revert back to +3, and in doing so they act as either reducing or oxidising agents:
- +2 lanthanide ions (Eu²⁺, Sm²⁺, Yb²⁺) tend to lose an electron to revert to +3 — they act as reducing agents. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.