Q.If matrix AB=O, then A=O or B=O or both A and B are null matrices.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Matrix Multiplication Compatibility
Matrix Multiplication Compatibility: The Inner-Dimensions Rule
You cannot multiply just any two matrices. Multiplication is defined only when their sizes line up in a specific way, and this compatibility check is always the very first step of any product.
The Idea: A Row Meets a Column
When you multiply A by B, you take each row of A and pair it against each column of B, multiply corresponding entries, and add. For that pairing to work, a row of A must have exactly as many entries as a column of B.
Think of a handshake: each finger of one hand must meet a finger of the other. If one hand has 4 fingers and the other has 3, the handshake fails.
The Precise Statement
Let A be m×n and B be p×q.
A×B is defined if and only if n=p — the number of columns of A equals the number of rows of B. The product C=AB then has order m×q.
Writing the sizes side by side, (m×n)(p×q), the inner numbers (n,p) must match; the outer numbers (m,q) give the result's shape.
Why the Rule Exists
Each entry of the product is
cij=∑k=1naikbkj.
Here k runs over the columns of A (up to n) and the rows of B (up to p). If n=p, the sum runs out of matching terms and is meaningless — that is exactly why compatibility demands n=p.
Even when both AB and BA are defined, they usually differ. For A of order 2×3 and B of order 3×2, AB is 2×2 but BA is 3×3 — different sizes entirely. Matrix multiplication is not commutative.
Quick Check
| A | B | Defined? | Result | …
Concept: Matrix Multiplication Compatibility — The product of two non-zero matrices can be the zero matrix, unlike real numbers.
Reasoning:
- For matrices, AB=O does not imply A=O or B=O. A non-zero matrix can act as a "zero divisor."
- Example: Let A=[1000] and B=[0100]. Then AB=[0000], but neither A nor B is the zero matrix. …
The statement is false. Matrix multiplication being zero does not force either factor to be a zero matrix — non‑zero matrices can multiply to the zero matrix when their rows and columns are structured in a specific way.
The intuition here is simple but easy to miss: matrix multiplication is not like multiplying real numbers. For numbers, if ab=0, then at least one of a or b must be zero. But matrices are different — they represent linear transformations, and a product can be zero even when neither transformation is zero, as long as the image of the first lies entirely in the nullspace of the second.
Let’s see why with a concrete example.
-
Pick a simple non‑zero matrix A.
Take A=(1000). This is clearly not the zero matrix — it has a 1 in the top‑left corner.
-
Pick a non‑zero matrix B that “cancels” A.
We want AB=O. Notice that A only keeps the first row of whatever it multiplies (because its second row is all zeros). So if we choose B so that its first row is zero, the product will vanish.
Let B=(0100). This is also not the zero matrix — it has a 1 in the bottom‑left.
-
Multiply them.
AB=(1000)(0100)=(1⋅0+0⋅10⋅0+0⋅11⋅0+0⋅00⋅0+0⋅0)=(0000).
Indeed, AB=O, but neither A nor B is the zero matrix.
A common mistake is to treat matrix multiplication like scalar multiplication and conclude “if product is zero, one factor must be zero.” That rule only holds in an integral domain (like real numbers). The set of n×n matrices is not an integral domain — it has zero divisors.
- Why does this happen? …
Method: Testing the "Zero-Product" Property for Matrices
Use this whenever a claim assumes that a product being zero forces a factor to be zero — a rule that holds for real numbers but fails for matrices, which have zero divisors.
Steps
Step 1: Recall the number-algebra rule the claim borrows.
For real numbers, ab=0⇒a=0 or b=0 (they form an integral domain). Matrices do not form an integral domain, so this rule is exactly the kind that needs re-checking.
Step 2: Reframe AB=O geometrically. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Treating matrices as an integral domain.
Why it's wrong: unlike real numbers, matrices have zero divisors — non-zero A,B with AB=O. Correct approach: never conclude A=O or B=O from AB=O; look for a counterexample instead.
Mistake 2: Believing AB=O says nothing at all.
Why it's wrong: for square matrices it does force at least one factor to be singular (det=0). Correct approach: state the correct weaker consequence (singular), not the false strong one (zero). …
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 on this concept.
- CBSE 20241 markMCQQ.If for two non-zero square matrices A and B of the same order, (A+B)2=A2+B2, then : (A) AB=O (B) AB=−BA (C) BA=O (D) AB=BA Questions number 19 and 20 are Assertion and Reason based questions. Two statements are given, one labelled Assertion (A) and the other labelled Reason (R). Select the correct answer to these questions from the codes (A), (B), (C) and (D) as given below. (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The given equation (A+B)2=A2+B2 forces the cross terms to cancel, which means AB=−BA. The correct option is (B).
Why This Works: The Core Idea
Matrix multiplication is not commutative — AB is generally not equal to BA. When you expand (A+B)2, you get A2+AB+BA+B2. The given condition says this equals A2+B2, so the middle terms AB+BA must vanish. That gives AB=−BA, a condition called anti-commutativity.
Watch outA common mistake is to assume AB=O (zero matrix) from AB+BA=O. But that’s only one possibility — the matrices could be non-zero and still satisfy AB=−BA. For example, take A=(0010) and B=(0100); then AB=(1000) and BA=(0001), so AB=−BA holds but neither product is zero.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Expand the square Since A and B are square matrices of the same order, we can multiply them. The distributive law holds for matrices, so:
(A+B)2=(A+B)(A+B)=A2+AB+BA+B2
- Apply the given condition The problem states:
(A+B)2=A2+B2
Substituting the expansion:
A2+AB+BA+B2=A2+B2
- Cancel the common terms Subtract A2+B2 from both sides:
AB+BA=O
where O is the zero matrix of the same order.
- Interpret the result The equation AB+BA=O is equivalent to:
AB=−BA
This is the definition of anti-commuting matrices. It does not force AB or BA to be zero individually — only that they are negatives of each other. …
- CBSE 2025Set 65/1/11 markMCQQ.Let A=10−3−242−1−11, B=−2−5−7, C=[9 8 7], which of the following is defined ? (A) Only AB (B) Only AC (C) Only BA (D) All AB, AC and BA
›Reveal solutionSolution
Matrix multiplication is defined only when the number of columns in the first matrix equals the number of rows in the second. Here, A is 3×3, B is 3×1, and C is 1×3. So AB (3×3 times 3×1) is defined, AC (3×3 times 1×3) is defined, but BA (3×1 times 3×3) is not defined. The correct option is (B) Only AC.
The key idea is simple: you can multiply two matrices only if the inner dimensions match. That is, if the first matrix has size m×n and the second has size p×q, the product is defined iff n=p. The resulting matrix then has size m×q.
Let’s check each product one by one.
1. Check AB
A is 3×3 (3 rows, 3 columns).
B is 3×1 (3 rows, 1 column).
The inner dimensions: 3 (columns of A) and 3 (rows of B) are equal. So AB is defined. The result will be a 3×1 matrix.
2. Check AC
A is 3×3.
C is 1×3 (1 row, 3 columns).
Inner dimensions: 3 (columns of A) and 1 (rows of C) — these are not equal. So AC is not defined. …
- CBSE 2026Set 65/2/11 markMCQQ.If A and B are square matrices of same order, then which of the following statements is/are always true?(i) (A+B)(A−B)=A2−B2(ii) AB=BA(iii) (A+B)2=A2+AB+BA+B2(iv) AB=0⇒A=0 or B=0 (A) Only(i) and(iii) (B) Only(ii) and(iii) (C) Only(iii) (D) Only(iii) and (iv)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Matrix multiplication is generally not commutative (AB=BA), which means many algebraic identities from scalar arithmetic do not hold for matrices. Only statement (iii) is always true, making (C) the correct option.
Concept and Intuition
When we work with numbers (scalars), we are used to properties like ab=ba (commutativity) and ab=0⇒a=0 or b=0. However, matrices behave differently. The most crucial distinction is that matrix multiplication is generally not commutative. This means that for two matrices A and B, AB is usually not equal to BA. This single property is the root cause for why many familiar algebraic identities, which rely on terms like AB and BA cancelling or combining, do not hold true for matrices.
Let's examine each statement with this fundamental understanding in mind.
Step-by-step Evaluation
- Evaluate statement (i): (A+B)(A−B)=A2−B2 To check if this is always true, we expand the left-hand side using the distributive property of matrix multiplication over addition, which does hold for matrices:
(A+B)(A−B)=A(A−B)+B(A−B)
=A⋅A−A⋅B+B⋅A−B⋅B
=A2−AB+BA−B2
For this expression to be equal to $A^2 - B^2$, we would need the terms $-AB + BA$ to be zero. This implies $BA = AB$. However, as discussed, matrix multiplication is generally not commutative, meaning $AB \neq BA$ in most cases. > [!WARNING] > This is a classic pitfall! The identity $(x+y)(x-y) = x^2 - y^2$ is true for scalars because $xy = yx$. For matrices, this is only true if $A$ and $B$ commute. Therefore, statement (i) is not always true.2. Evaluate statement (ii): AB=BA
This statement claims that matrix multiplication is always commutative. This is false. Matrix multiplication is generally not commutative. We can easily find counterexamples.
Consider:
A=(1011),B=(1101)
Then:AB=(1011)(1101)=(1⋅1+1⋅10⋅1+1⋅11⋅0+1⋅10⋅0+1⋅1)=(2111)
And:BA=(1101)(1011)=(1⋅1+0⋅01⋅1+1⋅01⋅1+0⋅11⋅1+1⋅1)=(1112)
Since $AB \neq BA$, statement (ii) is not always true.3. Evaluate statement (iii): (A+B)2=A2+AB+BA+B2
Let's expand the left-hand side:
(A+B)2=(A+B)(A+B)
Again, using the distributive property:=A(A+B)+B(A+B)
=A⋅A+A⋅B+B⋅A+B⋅B
$$= A^2 + AB + BA + B^2$$ … - CBSE 2026Set A1 markMCQQ.If A=[1 2 3 4] and B=1234 then AB=(a) [30](b) [10](c) [20](d) [40]
›Reveal solutionSolution
A 1×4 row times a 4×1 column is the dot product =30.
…
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.If A=[1−4−2235] and B=242351, then find AB.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Multiply the 2×3 matrix A by the 3×2 matrix B row-by-column.
AB11=1(2)+(−2)(4)+3(2)=2−8+6=0
AB12=1(3)+(−2)(5)+3(1)=3−10+3=−4
AB21=−4(2)+2(4)+5(2)=−8+8+10=10
AB22=−4(3)+2(5)+5(1)=−12+10+5=3 …
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.If A=[2143] then A2=(a) [49161](b) [26122](c) [1691312](d) None of these
›Reveal solutionSolution
Multiply A by itself using row-by-column matrix multiplication; the result matches none of the printed options.
Given A=[2143].
A2=A⋅A=[2143][2143]
Entry (1,1): 2(2)+4(1)=4+4=8
Entry (1,2): 2(4)+4(3)=8+12=20
Entry (2,1): 1(2)+3(1)=2+3=5
Entry (2,2): 1(4)+3(3)=4+9=13
…
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Find AB, if A=[00−12] and B=[3050].
›Reveal solutionSolution
Multiply the two 2×2 matrices row-by-column; every entry of the product turns out to be 0.
Given A=[00−12] and B=[3050].
AB=[00−12][3050]
Entry (1,1): 0(3)+(−1)(0)=0
Entry (1,2): 0(5)+(−1)(0)=0
Entry (2,1): 0(3)+2(0)=0
Entry (2,2): 0(5)+2(0)=0
…
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.If A=[1 2 5 7] and B=6248, write the orders of AB and BA.
›Reveal solutionSolution
A1×4B4×1→1×1; B4×1A1×4→4×4.
A=[1 2 5 7] has order 1×4. B=6248 has order 4×1.
- AB: (1×4)(4×1) — inner dimensions (4) agree, result order 1×1. …
- CBSE 2025Set E1 markMCQQ.[56−17]⋅[2314]=(a) [7331134](b) [733134](c) [734133](d) [1639525]
›Reveal solutionSolution
Row-by-column multiplication gives [733134].
Multiply [56−17][2314] entry by entry:
- (1,1):5⋅2+(−1)⋅3=10−3=7
- (1,2):5⋅1+(−1)⋅4=5−4=1
- (2,1):6⋅2+7⋅3=12+21=33 …
- CBSE 2025Set E1 markMCQQ.[1324][1001]=(a) [1004](b) [1324](c) [1024](d) [1320]
›Reveal solutionSolution
AI=A, so the product is the original matrix.
The second matrix [1001] is the 2×2 identity I. For any matrix A, AI=A. Hence …
- CBSE 2025Set E1 markMCQQ.[65][−11]=(a) [−65](b) [−65](c) [−1](d) [1]
›Reveal solutionSolution
[6 5][−11]=6(−1)+5(1)=−1, a 1×1 matrix.
A 1×2 matrix times a 2×1 matrix gives a 1×1 matrix: …
- CBSE 2025Set E1 markMCQQ.[1324][4004]=(a) [40816](b) [5328](c) [412816](d) [481216]
›Reveal solutionSolution
[4004]=4I, so the product is 4[1324].
Since [4004]=4I,
[1324](4I)=4[1324]=[412816]. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.