Q.Assertion (A) : If A and B are two events such that , then A and B are independent events. Reason (R) : Two events are independent if the occurrence of one does not affect the occurrence of the other. (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The assertion confuses mutually exclusive events () with independent events (); the reason correctly defines independence. The answer is (D).
The heart of this question lies in distinguishing two fundamentally different relationships between events: mutual exclusivity and independence. These concepts are often confused because both involve restrictions on how events relate, but they describe opposite scenarios.
Understanding Independence
The reason (R) gives the correct intuitive definition: two events are independent when the occurrence of one does not affect the probability of the other occurring. Mathematically, events and are independent if and only if:
Equivalently, independence means (when ) and (when ). The events "don't care" about each other.
Why the Assertion Fails
Now let's examine what actually tells us.
1. What does mean?
This condition says that events and cannot occur simultaneously—they are mutually exclusive or disjoint. If one happens, the other cannot.
2. Testing for independence
For and to be independent, we need . If , then independence requires:
This equation holds only if at least one of or equals zero—meaning at least one event is impossible.
3. The typical case
If both and have positive probabilities (both are possible events), then . But we're told . This means:
The events are not independent. In fact, they are maximally dependent: knowing one occurred tells you with certainty that the other did not.
Mutually exclusive events with positive probabilities are always dependent, not independent. If happens, it completely rules out —that's maximum dependence, not independence!
4. A concrete example
Consider rolling a fair die. Let = "rolling a 2" and = "rolling a 5." …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.