Skip to content
Question

Q.Assertion (A) : If A and B are two events such that P(A∩B)=0P(A \cap B) = 0, then A and B are independent events. Reason (R) : Two events are independent if the occurrence of one does not affect the occurrence of the other. (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2025MCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The assertion confuses mutually exclusive events (P(A∩B)=0P(A \cap B) = 0) with independent events (P(A∩B)=P(A)⋅P(B)P(A \cap B) = P(A) \cdot P(B)); the reason correctly defines independence. The answer is (D).

The heart of this question lies in distinguishing two fundamentally different relationships between events: mutual exclusivity and independence. These concepts are often confused because both involve restrictions on how events relate, but they describe opposite scenarios.

Understanding Independence

The reason (R) gives the correct intuitive definition: two events are independent when the occurrence of one does not affect the probability of the other occurring. Mathematically, events AA and BB are independent if and only if:

P(A∩B)=P(A)⋅P(B)P(A \cap B) = P(A) \cdot P(B)

Equivalently, independence means P(A∣B)=P(A)P(A \mid B) = P(A) (when P(B)>0P(B) > 0) and P(B∣A)=P(B)P(B \mid A) = P(B) (when P(A)>0P(A) > 0). The events "don't care" about each other.

Why the Assertion Fails

Now let's examine what P(A∩B)=0P(A \cap B) = 0 actually tells us.

1. What does P(A∩B)=0P(A \cap B) = 0 mean?

This condition says that events AA and BB cannot occur simultaneously—they are mutually exclusive or disjoint. If one happens, the other cannot.

2. Testing for independence

For AA and BB to be independent, we need P(A∩B)=P(A)⋅P(B)P(A \cap B) = P(A) \cdot P(B). If P(A∩B)=0P(A \cap B) = 0, then independence requires:

0=P(A)⋅P(B)0 = P(A) \cdot P(B)

This equation holds only if at least one of P(A)P(A) or P(B)P(B) equals zero—meaning at least one event is impossible.

3. The typical case

If both AA and BB have positive probabilities (both are possible events), then P(A)⋅P(B)>0P(A) \cdot P(B) > 0. But we're told P(A∩B)=0P(A \cap B) = 0. This means:

P(A∩B)=0≠P(A)⋅P(B)P(A \cap B) = 0 \neq P(A) \cdot P(B)

The events are not independent. In fact, they are maximally dependent: knowing one occurred tells you with certainty that the other did not.

Watch out

Mutually exclusive events with positive probabilities are always dependent, not independent. If AA happens, it completely rules out BB—that's maximum dependence, not independence!

4. A concrete example

Consider rolling a fair die. Let AA = "rolling a 2" and BB = "rolling a 5." …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.