Q.Two charges 5×10−8 C and −3×10−8 C are located 16 cm apart. At what point(s) on the line joining the two charges is the electric potential zero? Take the potential at infinity to be zero.
Concept understanding — Electric Potential
Electric Potential
The Idea
When you lift a book onto a shelf you do work against gravity, and the book gains gravitational potential energy that depends on where it sits. Electric charges behave the same way in an electric field. Electric potential is the electrical analogue of "height" in a gravitational field: it tells you the potential energy a unit charge would have at a given point.
Formally, the electric potential at a point is the work done in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to that point, slowly (without giving it kinetic energy), against the electric field.
V=q0W
Here W is the work done to move a small test charge q0 from infinity to the point. Because both W and q0 are scalars, electric potential is a scalar quantity — it has magnitude but no direction. Its SI unit is the volt:
1 V=1 J/C
Potential Due to a Point Charge
For a single point charge q, the potential at a distance r from it is
V=4πε01rq
Notice it falls off as 1/r, whereas the electric field of a point charge falls off as 1/r2. The potential is taken as zero at infinity, our chosen reference. A positive charge makes the potential around it positive; a negative charge makes it negative.
Potential Difference
Usually we care about the potential difference between two points A and B:
VA−VB=q0WB→A
the work per unit charge needed to move a charge from B to A. This is the quantity a voltmeter reads and the "voltage" that drives current in a circuit.
Relation Between Field and Potential
Field and potential are two views of the same thing. The electric field is the negative rate of change of potential with distance:
E=−drdV
The minus sign says the field points from high potential toward low potential — a positive charge, left free, rolls "downhill" in potential. Where the potential changes steeply, the field is strong.
Superposition
Because potential is a scalar, the potential due to several charges is just the algebraic sum of their individual potentials — no vectors, no angles:
V=4πε01(r1q1+r2q2+⋯)
This makes potential far easier to compute than the field, which needs vector addition. Once you have V everywhere, you can get the field by differentiating.
Equipotential Surfaces
An equipotential surface is a surface on which the potential has the same value everywhere.
- No work is done in moving a charge along an equipotential surface (since ΔV=0).
- The electric field is always perpendicular to an equipotential surface.
- For a point charge, equipotentials are concentric spheres; for a uniform field, they are parallel planes.
Do not confuse potential with potential energy. Electric potential V is energy per unit charge (volts); electric potential energy U=qV is the actual energy (joules) a charge q possesses at that point.
A Quick Example
Find the potential 3 cm from a charge q=2 nC (4πε01=9×109 N⋅m2/C2):
V=0.03(9×109)(2×10−9)=600 V
The Bottom Line
Electric potential is the work per unit charge to bring a charge from infinity to a point — a scalar measured in volts. For a point charge V=kq/r, potentials add as simple numbers, the field is E=−dV/dr, and equipotential surfaces are always perpendicular to the field.
Electric potential and its relationship to the electric field via E = -dV/dr is one of the foundational topics of the NCERT Class 12 Physics chapter on electrostatic potential and capacitance, tested in nearly every CBSE board paper and in JEE Main/NEET. Students searching "electric potential due to point charge formula class 12 physics" will find this derivation and the equipotential-surface rules match the NCERT treatment closely.
Concept: Electric Potential — The potential due to a point charge is V=rkq, and potentials add as scalars. We want the net potential to be zero.
Let the two charges be q1=+5×10−8 C and q2=−3×10−8 C, separated by d=0.16 m. Place q1 at x=0 and q2 at x=d.
Step 1: For a point on the line joining them, the potential is zero when:
r1kq1+r2kq2=0⇒r1q1=−r2q2
Since q2 is negative, −r2q2 is positive, so the point must lie outside the segment between the charges, closer to the smaller magnitude charge.
Step 2: Let the point be at distance x from q1 on the side of q2 (beyond q2). Then r1=d+x, r2=x. The equation becomes:
d+x5×10−8=x3×10−8
Cancel 10−8 and solve:
5x=3(d+x)⇒5x=3d+3x⇒2x=3d⇒x=23d=0.24 m
So the point is 24 cm from q2 (or 40 cm from q1).
Step 3: Check if a point between the charges works. If between them, r1=x, r2=d−x, then:
x5=d−x3⇒5(d−x)=3x⇒5d=8x⇒x=85d=0.1 m
This gives r1=10 cm, r2=6 cm. Check: V=k(0.15×10−8+0.06−3×10−8)=k(5×10−7−5×10−7)=0. So this point also works.
The electric potential is zero at two points: 10 cm from the positive charge (between the charges) and 24 cm from the negative charge (outside, on the side of the negative charge).
The electric potential is a scalar quantity, so the zero-potential point is found by setting the sum V=kq1/r1+kq2/r2=0. On the line joining the two charges, there are two such points: one between the charges (closer to the smaller charge) and one outside, beyond the smaller charge. The distances from the 5×10−8 C charge are 10 cm (between) and 40 cm (outside).
The electric potential at a point due to a point charge is V=kq/r, where k=9×109 N m2/C2 and r is the distance from the charge. Potential is a scalar — it adds algebraically, not as a vector. That makes finding zero-potential points simpler than finding zero-field points: you just solve V1+V2=0, with careful attention to signs.
Here, q1=+5×10−8 C and q2=−3×10−8 C, separated by d=16 cm=0.16 m. We want points on the line joining them where the total potential is zero.
Because the charges have opposite signs, the potential can be zero in two distinct regions: between the charges (where one distance is small, the other large) and outside the smaller charge (where both distances are large but the signs differ). Let’s find both.
- Set up the coordinate system. Place q1 at x=0 and q2 at x=0.16 m. Let the point of interest be at distance x from q1, so its distance from q2 is ∣0.16−x∣. The potential at that point is
V=k(xq1+∣0.16−x∣q2).
Setting V=0 and cancelling k (nonzero) gives
xq1+∣0.16−x∣q2=0.
- Case 1: Point between the charges (0<x<0.16). Here ∣0.16−x∣=0.16−x (positive). The equation becomes
x5×10−8+0.16−x−3×10−8=0.
Multiply through by 108:
x5−0.16−x3=0⇒x5=0.16−x3.
Cross-multiply: 5(0.16−x)=3x ⇒ 0.8−5x=3x ⇒ 0.8=8x ⇒ x=0.1 m=10 cm.
So one zero-potential point is 10 cm from the positive charge, between the charges.
- Case 2: Point outside the charges, beyond q2 (x>0.16). Here ∣0.16−x∣=x−0.16. The equation is
x5−x−0.163=0⇒x5=x−0.163.
Cross-multiply: 5(x−0.16)=3x ⇒ 5x−0.8=3x ⇒ 2x=0.8 ⇒ x=0.4 m=40 cm.
So the second point is 40 cm from the positive charge, on the side of the negative charge.
- Case 3: Point outside, beyond q1 (x<0). Here ∣0.16−x∣=0.16−x (since 0.16−x>0). The equation becomes
x5−0.16−x3=0.
But x is negative, so x5 is negative. The term 0.16−x3 is positive. For the sum to be zero, the magnitudes must match, but solving gives 5(0.16−x)=3x ⇒ 0.8−5x=3x ⇒ 0.8=8x ⇒ x=0.1, which is positive — a contradiction. So no solution exists on this side. (Intuitively, both terms would be negative if x<0, so they can’t sum to zero.)
A common mistake is to forget the absolute value in the distance and blindly write 0.16−x even when x>0.16, which gives a negative distance. Always check the sign of (0.16−x) in each region.
Because potential is scalar, you can also solve using ratios: V=0 means kq1/r1=−kq2/r2, so r1/r2=∣q1/q2∣=5/3. For the between point, r1+r2=16 cm, giving r1=(5/8)×16=10 cm. For the outside point, r1−r2=16 cm (since r1>r2), giving r1=(5/2)×16=40 cm. This is faster!
The electric potential is zero at two points on the line: 10 cm from the 5×10−8 C charge (between the charges) and 40 cm from it (beyond the −3×10−8 C charge).
Method: Finding Where the Potential Is Zero on the Line Joining Two Charges
This method applies whenever two point charges of opposite sign are given and you must find the point(s) on the line joining them where the net potential is zero.
Steps
Step 1: Set up a coordinate axis along the line joining the charges
Place one charge at the origin and the other at x=d (the given separation). Let x be the distance of the test point from the first charge.
Step 2: Write the zero-potential condition
Potential is a scalar, so the contributions simply add:
4πε01(r1q1+r2q2)=0⟹r1q1=−r2q2
Since the charges have opposite sign, this ratio can be positive, so a real solution exists.
Step 3: Look for a solution between the charges
Between the charges, r1+r2=d. Substitute r2=d−r1 and solve the resulting linear equation for r1. This region always has exactly one solution when the charges have opposite sign, because the potential smoothly changes sign as you cross from one charge's side to the other.
Step 4: Look for a solution beyond the smaller-magnitude charge
Outside the segment, on the far side of the charge with the smaller magnitude, r1−r2=d (or vice versa, depending on which side). Solve the same ratio equation with this new distance relationship. There is no solution on the far side of the larger-magnitude charge — check this by testing the sign of each term for that case.
Step 5: Report both distances, and verify by direct substitution
State each answer as a distance from a clearly-named reference charge, and as a sanity check substitute the numbers back into q1/r1 and q2/r2 to confirm they are equal in magnitude.
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 on this concept.
- CBSE 2026Set 55/1/11 markMCQQ.A conducting wire connects two charged metallic spheres A and B of radii r1 and r2 respectively. The distance between the spheres is very large compared to their radii. The ratio of electric fields, (EBEA) at the surfaces of spheres A and B will be (A) r2r1 (B) r1r2 (C) r22r12 (D) r12r22
›Reveal solutionSolution
When two widely separated conducting spheres are connected by a wire, they reach the same electric potential. Since surface field E=r2kQ and potential V=rkQ, combining these gives E∝1/r. Therefore the ratio of surface fields is EA/EB=r2/r1, which corresponds to option (B).
The key insight here is about what happens when conductors are connected by a wire. Charge flows until both spheres are at the same electric potential — that's the fundamental condition for electrostatic equilibrium in a conductor. Once you grasp that, the rest is just algebra.
Let's think about why potential equality is the right starting point. A conducting wire means the two spheres form a single conductor. In electrostatics, the entire surface of a conductor is an equipotential. So spheres A and B must have the same potential V.
Now, for an isolated conducting sphere of radius r carrying charge Q, the potential at its surface (taking infinity as zero) is:
V=4πϵ01rQ
And the electric field just outside its surface is:
E=4πϵ01r2Q
Notice the relationship: E=V/r. That's a neat shortcut we'll use.
TipFor any isolated conducting sphere, E=V/r directly. This saves you from carrying the Q through the algebra — just remember it comes from V=kQ/r and E=kQ/r2.
Let's work through it step by step.
- Set potentials equal. Since the wire connects them, VA=VB. Using V=kQ/r (where k=1/4πϵ0):
kr1QA=kr2QB
Cancel k and rearrange:
QBQA=r2r1
- Write the surface field ratio. For each sphere, E=kQ/r2. So:
EBEA=kQB/r22kQA/r12=QBQA⋅r12r22
- Substitute the charge ratio. From step 1, QA/QB=r1/r2:
EBEA=r2r1⋅r12r22=r1r2
That's it. The larger sphere has the smaller surface field.
Watch outA common mistake is to assume the charges become equal (they don't — the larger sphere holds more charge) or to directly use E∝1/r2 without accounting for the charge redistribution. Always start from potential equality, not charge equality.
NoteThe condition "distance between spheres is very large compared to their radii" ensures we can treat each sphere as isolated — no mutual induction effects. If they were close, the charge distribution would become non-uniform and this simple analysis would break down.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) r1r2.
- CBSE 2026Set 55/3/11 markMCQQ.A particle of mass m and charge q starts from rest and moves in an electric field E=E0i^. After travelling a distance x in the field along the x-axis, the kinetic energy of the particle will be : (A) qE0x2 (B) qE0x (C) q2E0x (D) 2q2E0x
›Reveal solutionSolution
Work done by a constant electric field equals force times displacement; since the particle starts from rest, all that work converts to kinetic energy, giving K=qE0x.
The heart of this problem is the work-energy theorem: the work done by all forces on a particle equals its change in kinetic energy. When a charged particle moves through an electric field, the field exerts a force that does work, and if the particle starts from rest, every joule of work becomes kinetic energy.
A uniform electric field E=E0i^ exerts a force F=qE on a charge q. This force is constant in magnitude and direction, so the work done is simply force times displacement along the direction of the force.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Identify the force on the particle. The electric force on a charge q in field E is
F=qE=qE0i^
The magnitude is F=qE0, directed along the positive x-axis.
- Calculate the work done by this force. The particle moves a distance x along the x-axis, in the same direction as the force. Work done by a constant force is
W=F⋅d=qE0⋅x=qE0x
- Apply the work-energy theorem. The particle starts from rest, so initial kinetic energy Ki=0. The work-energy theorem states
W=ΔK=Kf−Ki
Therefore,
Kf=W=qE0x
The kinetic energy after travelling distance x is simply the work done by the electric field.
Watch outA common mistake is to confuse the distance x with the square of distance. The work done by a constant force is linear in displacement, not quadratic. Option (A) incorrectly includes x2, which would arise only if the force itself depended on position — but here E0 is constant.
TipYou can also verify dimensions: kinetic energy has units of energy (joules). Check option (B): [qE0x]=C⋅(N/C)⋅m=N⋅m=J ✓. Option (A) would give J⋅m, which is wrong.
✓Final answerThe kinetic energy of the particle after travelling distance x is qE0x, so the correct option is (B).
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.SI unit of electric potential is:(a) Ohm(b) Volt(c) Coulomb(d) Ampere
›Reveal solutionSolution
Electric potential is defined as work done per unit charge, so its SI unit is the Volt.
Electric potential at a point is V=qW, i.e. the work done in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to that point. Since work is measured in joules (J) and charge in coulombs (C), the unit of potential is J/C, which is given the special name Volt (V).
✓Final answerSI unit of electric potential is the Volt (option b).
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.[Case study, continued] The charges q1 and q2 produce a potential, which at any point P will be(a) V1,2 = 1/(4πε₀) × (q1/r1P² + q2/r2P²)(b) V1,2 = 1/(4πε₀) × (q1/r1P + q2/r2P)(c) V1,2 = 1/(4πε₀) × (q1/r1P - q2/r2P)(d) V1,2 = 1/(4πε₀) × (2q1/r1P + 3q2/r2P)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The potential due to a group of point charges at any point is just the plain algebraic (scalar) sum of the potentials each charge produces there — the superposition principle for potential.
Electric potential obeys the superposition principle: the total potential at any point due to several charges equals the SCALAR sum (not vector sum, since potential is a scalar) of the potentials due to each individual charge, each given by V=4πε01rq (distance to the first power).
For two charges q1 (at distance r1P from P) and q2 (at distance r2P from P):
V1,2=4πε01(r1Pq1+r2Pq2)
This rules out option (a), which wrongly squares the distances (that would be a field-like expression, not potential), and option (d), which has arbitrary extra numerical coefficients (2, 3) not present in the actual physics. Option (c) wrongly subtracts instead of adding (there is no reason to subtract unless one charge is explicitly negative, which is already accounted for by the sign of q2 itself).
✓Final answer(b) V1,2=4πε01(r1Pq1+r2Pq2)
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.The standard potential of earth is :(a) Zero(b) Infinite(c) One(d) None of the above
›Reveal solutionSolution
The Earth is the chosen reference for potential, so its standard potential is taken as zero.
Electric potential is always measured relative to some reference. Because the Earth is a very large conductor whose potential is practically unaffected by adding or removing charge, it is universally chosen as the reference (zero) level of potential.
Hence the standard potential of the Earth is taken to be zero, and any conductor connected to earth (grounded) is brought to zero potential.
✓Final answer(a) Zero.
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.Match the Column A with Column B and write the correct pair. Column A: Potential gradient. Column B:(i) μ₀nI,(ii) Volt × second,(iii) μ₀nI/2,(iv) Volt × meter,(v) Volt × meter⁻¹,(vi) Volt.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Potential gradient dV/dx has unit V/m = Volt × metre⁻¹, option (v).
The potential gradient is the rate of change of electric potential with distance, dV/dx. Its SI unit is volt per metre (V/m), i.e. Volt × metre⁻¹. In magnitude it equals the electric field intensity (E = −dV/dx). This matches Column B entry (v).
✓Final answer(v) Volt × meter⁻¹.
- CBSE 2025Set 55/5/11 markMCQQ.The electric field at a point in a region is given by E=r2αr^ (a radial field), where α is a constant and r is the distance of the point from the origin. The magnitude of the potential at the point is: (A) rα (B) 2αr2 (C) 2r2α (D) −rα
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a radial electric field E=r2αr^, integrate −E⋅dl along a radial path from infinity to find the potential; the magnitude is rα.
The connection between electric field and potential is one of the most fundamental relationships in electrostatics. The electric field points in the direction of steepest decrease of potential, and its magnitude tells us how rapidly the potential drops. Mathematically, E=−∇V, or in one dimension, E=−drdV for a radial field.
To find the potential at a point, we integrate the electric field along a path. The potential difference between two points is:
V(r)−V(r0)=−∫r0rE⋅dl
We conventionally choose r0=∞ as our reference point where V(∞)=0, so:
V(r)=−∫∞rE⋅dl
Now let's work through this problem step by step.
-
Set up the line integral for a radial field.
Since both E and the path element dl point radially (we choose a radial path for simplicity), we have:
E⋅dl=Erdr=r2αdr
- Evaluate the integral from infinity to r.
V(r)=−∫∞rr2αdr
Reversing the limits to make the calculation cleaner:
V(r)=∫r∞r2αdr
- Perform the integration.
V(r)=α∫r∞r21dr=α[−r1]r∞
V(r)=α(0−(−r1))=rα
-
Interpret the result.
The potential is positive when α>0 (a repulsive field, like that of a positive point charge) and negative when α<0. The question asks for the magnitude of the potential, which is rα.
Watch outDon't confuse the sign convention. Option (D) gives −rα, which would be correct only if α itself were defined with the opposite sign convention. The magnitude depends on whether we're asked for ∣V(r)∣ or just the functional form.
TipFor any radial field E=f(r)r^, the potential is always V(r)=−∫∞rf(r′)dr′. The 1/r2 field gives 1/r potential, just like a point charge.
Since the problem asks for "the magnitude of the potential" and our result is V(r)=rα, the magnitude is rα (assuming α is taken as a positive constant in the context of this problem).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) rα.
-
- CBSE 2025Set IMPROVEMENT1 markMCQQ.Electron volt is the unit of which of the following?(a) Electric Potential(b) Energy(c) Electric Field(d) Electric Current
›Reveal solutionSolution
Electron volt (eV) is a unit of energy, not of potential, field or current.
By definition, 1 electron volt is the amount of kinetic energy gained (or lost) by a single electron when it is accelerated (or decelerated) through a potential difference of 1 volt. Since work done W=qV, for q=e=1.6×10−19C and V=1volt, 1 eV=1.6×10−19J, which is clearly a unit of energy.
✓Final answer(b) Energy — 1 eV is the kinetic energy gained by an electron accelerated through a potential difference of 1 volt.
- CBSE 2025Set D1 markMCQQ.The speed of an electron accelerated from rest under a potential difference V is (A) proportional to V (B) proportional to √V (C) proportional to 1/V (D) proportional to V^2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The kinetic energy gained equals eV; since ½mv² = eV, the speed v ∝ √V.
An electron accelerated from rest through a potential difference V gains kinetic energy equal to the work done by the field:
eV=21mv2
Solving for the speed:
v=m2eV
Since e and m are constants, v∝V — the speed is proportional to the square root of the accelerating voltage.
✓Final answer(B) proportional to √V.
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Two charges 1C and -1C are placed 1 m apart. The potential at the centre of the line joining the two charges will be(a) 2 V(b) -2 V(c) zero(d) 0.5 V
›Reveal solutionSolution
At the midpoint of the line joining equal-and-opposite charges, the two charges are equidistant, so their potential contributions are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign and cancel exactly.
Electric potential due to a point charge q at distance r is V = kq/r (k = 1/4-pi-epsilon0).
The two charges are q1 = +1 C and q2 = -1 C, separated by 1 m, so each is r = 0.5 m from the midpoint.
V = k(+1)/0.5 + k(-1)/0.5 = 2k - 2k = 0
Note that potential is a scalar, so it simply adds algebraically (unlike the electric field at that point, which does NOT vanish - the fields from the two charges point in the same direction there and add up).
✓Final answer(c) zero.
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.When a photon is accelerated (from rest) through a potential difference of one volt, the kinetic energy gained by it is equal to(a) 1837eV(b) 1 eV(c) 18371 eV(d) none of the above.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Energy gained by a charge accelerated through a potential difference depends only on charge × voltage, not on mass — so it is 1 eV regardless of which particle is being accelerated.
Work-energy theorem for a charge q accelerated from rest through potential difference V:
KE=qV
For an elementary charge q=e=1.6×10−19 C and V=1 V:
KE=(1.6×10−19)(1)=1.6×10−19 J=1 eV (by definition of the electron-volt)
This result does not involve mass at all — the 1837 factor (proton-to-electron mass ratio) is a distractor; it would only matter if the question asked for the final speed or momentum, not the kinetic energy.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (b) 1 eV.
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Electric potential 'V' at a distance 'r' from a point charge is directly proportional to ______.(a) r(b) r²(c) 1/r(d) 1/r²
›Reveal solutionSolution
The electric potential of a point charge falls off as the inverse of the distance from it.
The electric potential at a distance r from a point charge q is
V=4πε01rq
Since q and 4πε01 are constants for a given charge, V∝r1. (This is different from the electric field, which varies as 1/r2.)
✓Final answer(c) 1/r.
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.