Q.A short bar magnet of magnetic moment m=0.32 J T−1 is placed in a uniform magnetic field of 0.15 T. If the bar is free to rotate in the plane of the field, which orientation would correspond to its
Concept understanding — Magnetic Poles
Magnetic Poles: The Intuition First
Imagine you have a bar magnet — the kind you might have stuck on your refrigerator. If you bring two of them close, something interesting happens. Sometimes they snap together with a satisfying click. Other times, they push each other away, refusing to touch no matter how hard you try.
That's not random. Every magnet has two special regions, one at each end, where the magnetic force is strongest. These are its magnetic poles.
The word "pole" comes from the Greek polos, meaning "pivot" or "axis" — the Earth itself has a North Pole and a South Pole, and it behaves like a giant magnet.
The Two Types of Poles
Every magnet has exactly two poles: a north pole and a south pole. You cannot have a magnet with only one pole — cut a bar magnet in half, and each half immediately becomes a complete magnet with its own north and south poles.
The rule of interaction is simple and memorable:
- Unlike poles attract: north pulls south, south pulls north.
- Like poles repel: north pushes north away; south pushes south away.
This is the fundamental behaviour. No exceptions.
The Precise Statement
Magnetic poles are the regions of a magnet where the external magnetic field is strongest. Every magnet has exactly two poles — a north pole and a south pole — that cannot be isolated. Like poles repel; unlike poles attract.
The key points to remember for exams:
- Poles always come in pairs — there is no magnetic monopole (a single isolated pole) in nature, despite decades of searching.
- The north pole is defined as the pole that points toward Earth's geographic north when the magnet is freely suspended.
- The south pole points toward Earth's geographic south.
A Common Confusion (Watch Out)
Earth's geographic North Pole is actually a magnetic south pole. Why? Because the north pole of a compass needle (which is a magnetic north pole) is attracted to it. And unlike poles attract. So the Earth's north pole behaves like a magnetic south pole. This often trips students up in exams.
Why This Matters
Magnetic poles are the starting point for understanding everything from simple compasses to electric motors, generators, and MRI machines. The idea that "opposites attract" in magnetism is the same principle that makes electric charges behave the way they do — but with one crucial difference: you can have a single positive or negative electric charge, but you can never have a single magnetic pole.
That asymmetry is one of the deepest facts about magnetism.
The behaviour of magnetic poles — always in pairs, with like poles repelling and unlike poles attracting — is covered in the NCERT Class 12 Physics chapter on magnetism and matter, a frequent source of short-answer CBSE board questions. Searches for "magnetic poles and Earth's magnetism class 12 physics" will find this north-south pole explanation, including the Earth's-north-pole-is-a-magnetic-south-pole detail, matches the NCERT textbook's own framing.
Why this formula?
Magnetic Poles: Why the Key Formulas Hold
Let's build this from first principles — understanding why a magnetic pole behaves the way it does, not just memorizing the result.
1. What Is a Magnetic Pole?
A magnetic pole is a conceptual point where the magnetic field appears to originate or terminate. In reality, magnetic poles always come in north-south pairs (no isolated monopoles exist in nature), but we treat them as idealized sources for calculations.
- North pole: source of magnetic field lines (outward)
- South pole: sink of magnetic field lines (inward)
2. The Key Formula: Force Between Two Magnetic Poles
The force between two magnetic poles of strengths m1 and m2, separated by distance r, is:
F=4πμ0⋅r2m1m2
Why this form?
This is a Coulomb's law analog — and that's not a coincidence. Here's the reasoning:
-
Experimental observation: Magnetic poles attract/repel with a force that:
- Varies as 1/r2 (inverse square law)
- Is proportional to the product of pole strengths
- Depends on the medium (via μ0, the permeability of free space)
-
Mathematical analogy: The magnetic field B at distance r from a single pole m is:
B=4πμ0⋅r2m
This comes from Gauss's law for magnetism applied to a point source.
- Force derivation: The force on pole m2 in the field of pole m1 is:
F=m2⋅B1=m2⋅(4πμ0⋅r2m1)
Hence:
F=4πμ0⋅r2m1m2
Key insight: The 1/r2 dependence is not arbitrary — it follows from the geometry of 3D space (flux spreads over a sphere of area 4πr2).
3. The Magnetic Field of a Bar Magnet (Two Poles)
For a bar magnet of length 2l with poles +m and −m, the field at a point on the axis at distance x from the center is:
B=4πμ0⋅(x2−l2)22ml
Why this form?
-
Superposition principle: The total field is the vector sum of fields from the north pole (+m) and south pole (−m).
-
Field from north pole at distance (x−l):
BN=4πμ0⋅(x−l)2m(away from north)
- Field from south pole at distance (x+l):
BS=4πμ0⋅(x+l)2m(toward south)
- Net field (both along same direction on axis):
B=BN−BS=4πμ0m[(x−l)21−(x+l)21]
- Simplify using algebra:
(x−l)21−(x+l)21=(x2−l2)24xl
Therefore:
B=4πμ0⋅(x2−l2)24mxl
But for a bar magnet, the magnetic moment is M=m⋅(2l) (pole strength × separation). So 2ml=M, giving:
B=4πμ0⋅(x2−l2)22Mx
Key insight: The field is not simply 1/r2 because we have two poles — the net effect is a dipole field, which falls off as 1/r3 at large distances.
4. The Far-Field Approximation (Dipole Formula)
For x≫l (far from the magnet), x2−l2≈x2, so:
B≈4πμ0⋅x32M
Why 1/x3?
- A single pole gives 1/r2
- Two opposite poles separated by distance d give a dipole — the fields nearly cancel at large distances, leaving a weaker 1/r3 dependence
- This is a universal property of dipoles (electric or magnetic)
5. Torque on a Magnetic Dipole in a Uniform Field
τ=MBsinθ
Why this form?
-
Force on each pole: In uniform field B, north pole feels F=mB along field, south pole feels F=mB opposite field.
-
Torque calculation: These equal and opposite forces form a couple:
- Lever arm = 2lsinθ (perpendicular distance between forces)
- Torque = force × lever arm = (mB)×(2lsinθ)
-
Using magnetic moment M=m⋅2l:
τ=MBsinθ
Key insight: The torque tries to align the magnet with the field — this is why a compass needle points north.
Summary Table: Why Each Formula Has Its Form
| Formula | Key Reason |
|---|---|
| F∝1/r2 | Flux spreads over sphere area 4πr2 |
| F∝m1m2 | Force is proportional to source strength (linear response) |
| B∝1/x3 (dipole) | Two opposite poles nearly cancel; residual is dipole field |
| τ=MBsinθ | Lever arm depends on sinθ in a couple |
Remember: Every formula in magnetism is either a Coulomb analog (for poles) or a superposition of such analogs. The 1/r2 law is the foundation — everything else builds on it.
Concept: Magnetic Poles — A magnetic dipole in a uniform field experiences a torque that tries to align it with the field. Stable equilibrium occurs when the dipole is parallel to the field (lowest potential energy), and unstable equilibrium when it is antiparallel (highest potential energy).
Reasoning:
- Potential energy of a magnetic dipole in a uniform field: U=−mBcosθ, where θ is the angle between m and B.
- For stable equilibrium, U is minimum → cosθ=+1 → θ=0∘ (parallel).
- For unstable equilibrium, U is maximum → cosθ=−1 → θ=180∘ (antiparallel).
- Compute U: m=0.32 J T−1, B=0.15 T → mB=0.048 J.
- Stable equilibrium at θ=0∘ with U=−0.048 J;
- unstable equilibrium at θ=180∘ with U=+0.048 J.
A magnetic dipole in a uniform field has minimum potential energy (stable equilibrium) when aligned parallel to the field, and maximum potential energy (unstable equilibrium) when anti-parallel. For the given magnet, stable orientation gives U=−0.048 J, unstable gives U=+0.048 J.
The key idea is that a magnetic dipole — like a bar magnet — in a uniform external field experiences a torque that tries to align it with the field. But the real story is about energy. The potential energy of a magnetic dipole in a uniform field is given by U=−m⋅B=−mBcosθ, where θ is the angle between the magnetic moment vector m and the field B.
Why does this matter for equilibrium? Because nature always seeks the lowest energy state. When the magnet is aligned with the field (θ=0∘), cosθ=1, so U=−mB — the most negative, hence lowest, energy. That’s stable equilibrium: if you nudge it, it will return. When it’s anti-aligned (θ=180∘), cosθ=−1, so U=+mB — the highest energy. That’s unstable: the slightest push sends it spinning toward the stable orientation.
Let’s work through the numbers.
-
Identify the given data
Magnetic moment, m=0.32 J T−1
Magnetic field strength, B=0.15 T
The magnet is free to rotate in the plane of the field, so θ can vary from 0∘ to 180∘.
-
Write the potential energy formula
U=−mBcosθ
- Stable equilibrium This occurs at the minimum of U. Since cosθ is maximum at θ=0∘, we have:
Ustable=−mBcos0∘=−mB
Substitute:
Ustable=−(0.32)(0.15)=−0.048 J
The orientation: the magnet’s north pole points in the direction of the external field.
- Unstable equilibrium This occurs at the maximum of U, at θ=180∘:
Uunstable=−mBcos180∘=−mB(−1)=+mB
So:
Uunstable=+0.048 J
The orientation: the magnet’s north pole points opposite to the external field.
A common mistake is to think that stable equilibrium corresponds to the lowest potential energy magnitude — but energy is signed. −0.048 J is lower than +0.048 J, so the negative value is indeed the minimum. Don’t drop the sign!
You can remember this as: “Like poles repel, opposite poles attract.” In stable equilibrium, the magnet’s south pole is closer to the external field’s north pole (attraction), so the system has lower energy. In unstable, like poles face each other (repulsion), giving higher energy.
The stable equilibrium orientation is parallel to the field with potential energy −0.048 J, and the unstable equilibrium orientation is anti-parallel with potential energy +0.048 J.
Method: Potential Energy Analysis for a Magnetic Dipole in a Uniform Field
This problem uses the potential energy method for a magnetic dipole in a uniform external field. The key idea: a system is in stable equilibrium when its potential energy is minimum, and in unstable equilibrium when its potential energy is maximum.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1: Recall the potential energy formula
For a magnetic dipole (bar magnet) of magnetic moment m placed in a uniform magnetic field B, the potential energy is:
U=−m⋅B=−mBcosθ
where θ is the angle between m and B.
Step 2: Identify the equilibrium conditions
-
Stable equilibrium: U is minimum → cosθ is maximum → cosθ=+1 → θ=0∘
(magnetic moment aligned parallel to the field)
-
Unstable equilibrium: U is maximum → cosθ is minimum → cosθ=−1 → θ=180∘
(magnetic moment anti-parallel to the field)
Step 3: Calculate the potential energies
Given:
m=0.32 J T−1
B=0.15 T
- Stable equilibrium (θ=0∘, cosθ=1):
Ustable=−mBcos0∘=−mB=−(0.32)(0.15)
Ustable=−0.048 J
- Unstable equilibrium (θ=180∘, cosθ=−1):
Uunstable=−mBcos180∘=−mB(−1)=+mB=(0.32)(0.15)
Uunstable=+0.048 J
Final Answer Summary
| Equilibrium type | Orientation (θ) | Potential energy |
|---|---|---|
| Stable | 0∘ (parallel) | −0.048 J |
| Unstable | 180∘ (anti-parallel) | +0.048 J |
Key insight: The negative sign in U=−mBcosθ is crucial — it makes the aligned orientation energetically favourable (lower energy), which is why a freely rotating magnet always settles parallel to the field.
Here are the common mistakes students make on this magnetic poles / torque & potential energy question, and how to avoid each.
Mistake 1: Confusing stable and unstable equilibrium orientations
The error:
Students often think the magnet aligns perpendicular to the field for stable equilibrium, or they swap the two orientations.
Why it happens:
They memorise “stable = minimum energy” but forget the actual angular dependence.
How to avoid:
- Stable equilibrium → magnetic moment m is parallel to B (angle θ=0∘).
- Unstable equilibrium → m is antiparallel to B (θ=180∘).
Think of a compass needle: it points along the field (stable). Flipping it 180° is unstable — the slightest nudge makes it swing back.
Mistake 2: Using the wrong formula for potential energy
The error:
Using U=−mBcosθ but forgetting the negative sign, or using U=+mBcosθ.
Why it happens:
Misremembering the sign convention.
How to avoid:
The potential energy of a magnetic dipole in a uniform field is:
U=−m⋅B=−mBcosθ
- At θ=0∘: cos0=1 → U=−mB (minimum → stable)
- At θ=180∘: cos180=−1 → U=+mB (maximum → unstable)
Check: Minimum energy = stable; maximum energy = unstable.
Mistake 3: Forgetting to include units or misreading given data
The error:
Writing U=−0.32×0.15=−0.048 but omitting the unit (Joules), or misreading m as 0.32 J T−1 and B as 0.15 T.
How to avoid:
Always write the full calculation with units:
Ustable=−mB=−(0.32 J T−1)(0.15 T)=−0.048 J
Uunstable=+mB=+0.048 J
Pro tip: In exams, box your final answer with the correct unit.
Mistake 4: Thinking torque is zero only in stable equilibrium
The error:
Stating that torque is zero only for θ=0∘, forgetting θ=180∘ also gives zero torque.
Why it happens:
Torque τ=mBsinθ — students see sin0=0 but forget sin180=0 too.
How to avoid:
Torque is zero at both θ=0∘ and θ=180∘. The difference is:
- θ=0∘ → stable (restoring torque if displaced)
- θ=180∘ → unstable (torque away from equilibrium if displaced)
Quick Summary Table
| Equilibrium | Orientation | Angle θ | Potential Energy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stable | m∥B | 0∘ | U=−mB=−0.048 J |
| Unstable | m∥−B | 180∘ | U=+mB=+0.048 J |
Final tip: Draw a quick diagram — arrow for m and arrow for B — before writing the answer. It prevents orientation errors every time.
- CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.If magnetic monopoles existed then write the equation of Gauss's law for magnetism.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Currently Gauss's law for magnetism states the net magnetic flux through any closed surface is zero (no monopoles); if monopoles existed, the right side would instead equal mu0 times the enclosed pole strength, just like the electric case.
Gauss's law for magnetism in its present form is: the closed surface integral (over any closed surface S) of B . dA = 0, reflecting the experimental fact that isolated magnetic poles (monopoles) have never been observed - magnetic field lines always form closed loops with no starting/ending point (no magnetic 'charge'). If magnetic monopoles did exist, with an isolated pole strength qm enclosed by the surface, this law would take a form exactly analogous to Gauss's law for electric charge:
closed-surface integral of B . dA = mu0 * qm_enclosed
i.e. the net magnetic flux through a closed surface would be proportional to the net magnetic 'charge' enclosed, just as electric flux is proportional to enclosed electric charge (qenclosed/epsilon0).
✓Final answerClosed-surface integral of B.dA = mu0 * (net enclosed pole strength qm), instead of zero.
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.The value of magnetic induction at a distance r from a single pole is inversely proportional to(a) r(b) r^2(c) 1/r(d) 1/r^2
›Reveal solutionSolution
An isolated magnetic pole of strength m produces B = (mu0/4pi)(m/r^2), an inverse-square law, so the magnetic induction is inversely proportional to r^2.
The magnetic field (magnetic induction) at a distance r from a single magnetic pole of pole strength m is given by Coulomb's law of magnetism:
B = (mu0 / 4*pi) * (m / r^2)
The distance r appears in the denominator as r^2, so B decreases as the square of the distance - if r is doubled, B falls to one quarter. In the wording of the question, "inversely proportional to" is therefore completed by r^2. This mirrors the inverse-square fall-off of a point charge's electric field.
[!ANSWER]
(b) r^2.
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.The ultimate individual unit of magnetism in any magnet is :(a) north pole(b) south pole(c) magnetic dipole(d) quadrupole
›Reveal solutionSolution
Isolated magnetic monopoles (single north or south poles) do not exist in nature; magnetic poles always occur in pairs, so the magnetic dipole is the basic unit of magnetism.
Unlike electric charge, where an isolated positive or negative charge can exist, no isolated magnetic 'monopole' has ever been observed. If a bar magnet is cut into pieces, each piece becomes a smaller magnet with its own north and south pole — the poles can never be separated. This means the fundamental, indivisible unit of magnetism is always a pair of poles, i.e., a magnetic dipole (analogous to an electric dipole), not a single north or south pole.
✓Final answerThe magnetic dipole is the ultimate individual unit of magnetism — option (c).
- CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markQ.The strength of bar magnet is maximum at its center. (T/F)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This statement is False — the strength (pole strength) of a bar magnet is maximum at its two ends (poles), not at its centre.
A bar magnet's magnetism is concentrated near its two ends, called the north and south poles, where the pole strength m is maximum. At the exact centre of the magnet, the effects of the two equal and opposite poles (north and south) tend to cancel, so the net magnetic effect (and hence the 'strength' measurable there) is minimum, not maximum. So the correct statement should be that the strength is maximum at the poles/ends.
✓Final answerFalse — the strength of a bar magnet is maximum at its poles (ends), not its centre.
- CBSE 2024Set A1 markMCQQ.The value of magnetic potential at a distance r from a pole strength m is (A) (μ₀/4π)(m/r) (B) (μ₀/4π)(m/r^2) (C) (μ₀/4π)(m/r^3) (D) zero
›Reveal solutionSolution
Magnetic scalar potential of a pole falls as 1/r: V = (μ₀/4π)(m/r).
By analogy with electrostatics, a magnetic pole of strength m produces a field that falls off as 1/r2:
B=4πμ0r2m,
and a magnetic scalar potential that falls off as 1/r:
V=4πμ0rm.
Just as the electric potential (∝1/r) is the integral of the field (∝1/r2), the magnetic potential varies as 1/r while the field varies as 1/r2. So the correct expression is (μ0/4π)(m/r).
✓Final answer(A) (μ₀/4π)(m/r).
- CBSE 2022Set I1 markMCQQ.S.I. unit of pole strength is (A) Am^-1 (B) Am^-2 (C) Am (D) Fm
›Reveal solutionSolution
SI unit of magnetic pole strength = ampere-metre (A·m).
The magnetic dipole moment of a bar magnet is m = (pole strength) × (magnetic length), i.e. M = q_m × 2l. The SI unit of magnetic moment is A·m² (same as current × area). Since the magnetic length has unit metre:
qm=2lM=mAm2=Am
So pole strength has the unit ampere-metre.
✓Final answer(C) Am.
- CBSE 2021Set A1 markMCQQ.S.I. unit of magnetic pole strength is (A) N (B) N/A.m (C) A.m (D) A.m/N
›Reveal solutionSolution
Magnetic pole strength has SI unit ampere·metre (A·m).
Magnetic pole strength m is related to magnetic moment by M = m × 2l, where 2l is the magnetic length. Since magnetic moment has unit ampere·metre² (A·m²) and length has unit metre, pole strength has unit:
[m]=mA⋅m2=A⋅m
So the SI unit of pole strength is ampere-metre (A·m).
✓Final answer(C) A.m.
- CBSE 2019Set ANNUAL1 markQ.________ Law for magnetism establishes that monopoles do not exist.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Gauss's Law for magnetism states the net magnetic flux through any closed surface is always zero — the direct proof that isolated magnetic monopoles do not exist.
Gauss's law for magnetism is written as:
∮B⋅dA=0
for any closed surface. This is in contrast to Gauss's law for electric fields, ∮E⋅dA=qenc/ε0, which is non-zero whenever a net electric charge (monopole) is enclosed.
Because magnetic field lines always form closed loops (they emerge from a north pole and re-enter at a south pole, continuing through the magnet back to the north pole), every field line that enters a closed surface must also leave it. So the net outward flux is always exactly zero — meaning there is no magnetic 'charge' (monopole) that field lines can originate from or terminate on, unlike electric charge.
✓Final answerGauss's Law for magnetism (∮B⋅dA=0) establishes that isolated magnetic monopoles do not exist.
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.