Q.In a Young's double slit experiment, the source is white light. One of the holes is covered by a red filter and another by a blue filter. In this case

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 on this concept.

1. CBSE 2026Set 55/1/11 markMCQ
   Q.The shape of the interference fringes in Young's double-slit experiment, when the distance between the slit and the screen is very large as compared to the slit-separation, is nearly (A) straight (B) parabolic (C) circular (D) hyperbolic

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   When the screen is very far from the slits compared to their separation, points of constant path difference lie on nearly straight lines parallel to the slits, making the fringes straight.

   The key to understanding fringe shape lies in recognizing what an interference fringe actually represents: it is the locus of all points on the screen where the path difference from the two slits is constant.

   In Young's double-slit experiment, we have two coherent sources $S_1$ and $S_2$ separated by distance $d$. A point $P$ on the screen at distance $D$ from the slits will show constructive or destructive interference depending on the path difference $\Delta = |S_2P - S_1P|$.

   For a bright fringe of order $n$, we need $\Delta = n\lambda$. The question is: what is the shape of the curve connecting all points $P$ that satisfy this condition?

   Geometry of path difference

   Consider a point $P$ on the screen at coordinates $(x, y)$ if we place the origin midway between the slits. The two slits are at positions roughly $(0, \pm d/2, 0)$ in 3D space, and the screen is at distance $D$ along the perpendicular.

   The exact path difference is:

   $\Delta = \sqrt{D^2 + (y - d/2)^2 + x^2} - \sqrt{D^2 + (y + d/2)^2 + x^2}$

   This is the general equation for a hyperbola in the $xy$-plane. So strictly speaking, fringes are hyperbolic curves.

   The far-field approximation

   Now comes the crucial condition: $D \gg d$ (screen distance much larger than slit separation).

   When $D$ is very large, we can use the binomial approximation. For the path from $S_2$ to $P$:

   $S_2P = D\sqrt{1 + \frac{(y-d/2)^2 + x^2}{D^2}} \approx D + \frac{(y-d/2)^2 + x^2}{2D}$

   Similarly for $S_1P$. The path difference becomes:

   $\Delta \approx \frac{(y-d/2)^2 - (y+d/2)^2}{2D} = \frac{-2yd}{2D} = -\frac{yd}{D}$

   (The $x^2$ terms cancel out.)

   For constant path difference $\Delta = n\lambda$, we get:

   $y = -\frac{n\lambda D}{d} = \text{constant}$

   This is the equation of a straight line parallel to the $x$-axis (parallel to the slits).

   Tip

   The transition from hyperbolic to straight fringes happens because in the far field, the rays from the two slits to any point on the screen become nearly parallel. The path difference then depends only on the perpendicular distance from the central axis.

   Watch out

   Close to the slits (near-field or Fresnel region), the fringes retain their hyperbolic character. The straight-line approximation is valid only in the Fraunhofer (far-field) regime where $D \gg d$.

   The standard textbook treatment of Young's experiment always assumes this far-field condition, which is why we routinely write the fringe width as $\beta = \frac{\lambda D}{d}$ and observe equally-spaced straight fringes on the screen.

   ✓Final answer

   The correct option is (A) straight.

2. CBSE 2026Set 55/2/11 markMCQ
   Q.Two statements are given – one labelled Assertion (A) and the other Reason (R). Select the correct answer from the codes below: (A) Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A). (B) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A). (C) (A) is true, but (R) is false. (D) (A) is false and (R) is also false. Assertion (A) : Light added to light can produce darkness. Reason (R) : When two coherent light waves interfere, there is darkness at the position of destructive interference.

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Interference of coherent light waves can indeed produce darkness at points of destructive interference; both statements are true and the reason correctly explains the assertion. The answer is (A).

   Why light can produce darkness

   The assertion sounds paradoxical at first—how can adding light to light create darkness? The resolution lies in understanding that light is a wave phenomenon, and waves don't simply add arithmetically in intensity. Instead, they superpose according to their phase relationship.

   When two coherent light waves (waves with a constant phase relationship) meet, their electric field amplitudes add vectorially. If they arrive in phase, the amplitudes reinforce (constructive interference, brighter light). If they arrive exactly out of phase—crest meeting trough—the amplitudes cancel (destructive interference), and the resultant intensity becomes zero or near-zero. This is darkness produced by adding light to light.

   The reason statement captures precisely this mechanism: destructive interference between coherent waves creates regions of darkness.

   Examining the statements

   1. Assertion (A): "Light added to light can produce darkness"

      This is experimentally verified in phenomena like Young's double-slit experiment, thin-film interference, and Newton's rings. At certain positions on the screen or observation plane, the intensity drops to zero despite light arriving from two sources. The statement is true.

   2. Reason (R): "When two coherent light waves interfere, there is darkness at the position of destructive interference"

      Destructive interference occurs when the path difference between two coherent waves is an odd multiple of half-wavelengths:

   $\Delta = \left(m + \frac{1}{2}\right)\lambda, \quad m = 0, 1, 2, \ldots$

   At these positions, the phase difference is $(2m+1)\pi$, the waves are in anti-phase, and the resultant amplitude is zero (for equal-amplitude waves). This statement is also true.

   3. Does (R) correctly explain (A)? The reason directly addresses how light added to light produces darkness: through the mechanism of destructive interference between coherent waves. It is not merely a related fact; it is the physical explanation of the assertion.

   Tip

   Coherence is essential. Incoherent sources (like two independent bulbs) produce rapidly fluctuating phase differences, averaging out to uniform illumination—no stable dark regions appear.

   Watch out

   A common misconception is that "adding light always means more brightness." This ignores the wave nature of light. Intensity depends on the square of the resultant amplitude after superposition, not on a simple sum of individual intensities.

   ✓Final answer

   The correct option is (A): Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).

3. CBSE 2026Set A1 markMCQ
   Q.The phase difference φ is related to path difference λ by (A) (λ/π)φ (B) (π/λ)φ (C) (λ/2π)φ (D) (2π/λ)φ

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Phase difference = (2π/λ) × path difference.

   The fundamental relation between phase difference (Δϕ) and path difference (Δx) is

   $\Delta\phi = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda}\,\Delta x.$

   A path difference of one full wavelength λ corresponds to a phase difference of 2π. Among the given options the factor connecting them is $\dfrac{2\pi}{\lambda}$.

   ✓Final answer

   (D) (2π/λ)φ — i.e. phase difference and path difference are linked by the factor 2π/λ.

4. CBSE 2026Set A1 markMCQ
   Q.For destructive interference, the path difference should be equal to (A) nλ (B) (2n+1)λ/2 (C) zero (D) infinity

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Destructive interference occurs when the path difference is an odd multiple of λ/2.

   Two waves interfere destructively (cancel) when they arrive exactly out of phase, i.e. a phase difference of $\pi,3\pi,5\pi,\dots$. In terms of path difference this means an odd multiple of half a wavelength:

   $\Delta x=(2n+1)\frac{\lambda}{2},\qquad n=0,1,2,\dots$

   (By contrast, constructive interference needs $\Delta x=n\lambda$.)

   ✓Final answer

   (B) (2n+1)λ/2.

5. CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 mark
   Q.The displacement of water molecules at any instant on the surface of water at nodal lines is ______.

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Nodal lines are where two overlapping waves are always exactly out of phase, so their displacements cancel completely at every instant, leaving zero net displacement.

   When two coherent water-wave sources produce overlapping ripples, at points on a nodal line the crest of one wave always coincides with the trough of the other (path difference = odd multiple of half wavelength), so destructive interference occurs continuously. The resultant displacement of the water surface at any instant on a nodal line is therefore always zero.

   ✓Final answer

   zero.

6. CBSE 2025Set 55/5/11 markMCQ
   Q.Two coherent light waves, each having amplitude $a$, superpose to produce an interference pattern on a screen. The intensity of light as seen on the screen varies between: (A) 0 and $2a^{2}$ (B) 0 and $4a^{2}$ (C) $a^{2}$ and $2a^{2}$ (D) $2a^{2}$ and $4a^{2}$

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   When two coherent waves of equal amplitude $a$ interfere, the resultant amplitude varies from $0$ (destructive) to $2a$ (constructive); since intensity is proportional to the square of amplitude, the intensity range is 0 to $4a^2$.

   The heart of this problem lies in understanding how wave superposition affects intensity. When two coherent waves meet, they don't simply add their intensities — instead, their amplitudes add vectorially, and the resulting intensity depends on the square of this net amplitude.

   For light waves, intensity $I$ is proportional to the square of the amplitude: $I \propto A^2$. If we set the proportionality constant to unity for simplicity (which is standard when comparing relative intensities), then $I = A^2$.

   Now let's trace what happens when two coherent waves, each with amplitude $a$, interfere.

   The amplitude addition principle

   At any point on the screen, the two waves arrive with some phase difference $\delta$ (which depends on the path difference). The resultant amplitude is found by vector addition:

   $A_{\text{net}} = a_1 + a_2$

   where $a_1$ and $a_2$ are the individual wave amplitudes treated as phasors. For two waves of equal amplitude $a$ with phase difference $\delta$:

   $A_{\text{net}} = \sqrt{a^2 + a^2 + 2a \cdot a \cos\delta} = a\sqrt{2(1 + \cos\delta)}$

   Using the identity $1 + \cos\delta = 2\cos^2(\delta/2)$:

   $A_{\text{net}} = 2a\left|\cos\frac{\delta}{2}\right|$

   Finding the intensity extremes

   1. Maximum amplitude (constructive interference): When $\delta = 0, 2\pi, 4\pi, \ldots$ (waves in phase), we have $\cos(\delta/2) = 1$, so:

   $A_{\max} = 2a$

   The maximum intensity is:

   $I_{\max} = A_{\max}^2 = (2a)^2 = 4a^2$

   2. Minimum amplitude (destructive interference): When $\delta = \pi, 3\pi, 5\pi, \ldots$ (waves out of phase), we have $\cos(\delta/2) = 0$, so:

   $A_{\min} = 0$

   The minimum intensity is:

   $I_{\min} = A_{\min}^2 = 0$

   3. The full range: As the phase difference varies continuously across the screen (due to varying path differences), the resultant amplitude sweeps from $0$ to $2a$, and consequently the intensity varies from $0$ to $4a^2$.

   Watch out

   A common mistake is to add intensities directly: $I_{\text{total}} = I_1 + I_2 = a^2 + a^2 = 2a^2$. This is wrong for coherent sources! Coherent waves interfere, so you must add amplitudes first, then square to get intensity.

   ✓Final answer

   The correct option is (B): the intensity varies between $0$ and $4a^2$.

7. CBSE 2025Set 55/6/11 markMCQ
   Q.Two coherent waves, each of intensity $I_0$, produce interference pattern on a screen. The average intensity of light on the screen is: (A) zero (B) $I_0$ (C) $2I_0$ (D) $4I_0$

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Interference redistributes light energy across the screen but cannot create or destroy it, so the average intensity equals the sum of the two individual intensities: $I_0 + I_0 = 2I_0$. The correct option is (C).

   When two coherent waves meet, they produce bright and dark fringes. At some points they add constructively (bright), at others destructively (dark). The question asks for the average intensity over the whole screen — not the maximum or minimum at any particular point.

   The key insight is energy conservation. The two sources together deliver a fixed amount of energy to the screen. Interference only redistributes this energy — concentrating it in bright fringes and depleting it in dark ones — it cannot create or destroy energy. So the average over the pattern must equal what the two waves would deliver independently.

   Let's confirm this with the intensity formula.

   1. Write the resultant intensity at a point. For two coherent waves of intensity $I_0$ each, meeting with phase difference $\delta$:

   $I = I_0 + I_0 + 2\sqrt{I_0 \cdot I_0}\,\cos\delta = 2I_0(1 + \cos\delta)$

   This varies from $I_{\text{max}} = 4I_0$ (at $\delta = 0, 2\pi, \ldots$) down to $I_{\text{min}} = 0$ (at $\delta = \pi, 3\pi, \ldots$).

   2. Average over the pattern. As you move across the screen, the phase difference $\delta$ sweeps uniformly through all values from $0$ to $2\pi$:

   $\langle I \rangle = 2I_0\left(1 + \langle\cos\delta\rangle\right)$

   3. Evaluate the average of cosine.

      Over a complete cycle, $\langle\cos\delta\rangle = 0$.

   4. Conclude.

   $\langle I \rangle = 2I_0(1 + 0) = 2I_0$

   This makes physical sense: if the two sources were incoherent (no stable interference pattern), the intensities would simply add to give $I_0 + I_0 = 2I_0$ everywhere on the screen. Coherence rearranges that energy into maxima ($4I_0$) and minima ($0$), but the spatial average stays exactly $2I_0$.

   Watch out

   Don't confuse the maximum intensity $4I_0$ with the average. The bright fringes reach $4I_0$ only because the dark fringes give up their share — averaged over the whole pattern, the intensity is still $2I_0$.

   Tip

   For any number of coherent sources of equal intensity, the average intensity over the interference pattern equals the sum of the individual intensities — interference redistributes energy spatially but conserves it globally.

   ✓Final answer

   The average intensity on the screen is $2I_0$ — option (C).

8. CBSE 2025Set X11 markMCQ
   Q.Which one of the following statements is WRONG about interference of light?

   (a) Light waves of same wavelength coming from two independent sources can be coherent and can produce interference

   (b) When the path difference between two interfering waves in $n\lambda$, bright fringe is produced (Here $n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots$ and $\lambda$ is the wavelength of light)

   (c) When the phase difference between two interfering waves is $(2n+1)\pi$, dark fringe is produced (Here $n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots$)

   (d) In Young's double slit experiment, dark and bright fringes are equally spaced

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   (a) — this is the WRONG statement. Two independent sources cannot maintain a constant phase relationship, so they are not coherent and cannot produce a stable interference pattern; coherent sour

   ✓Final answer

   (a) — this is the WRONG statement.

   Two independent sources cannot maintain a constant phase relationship, so they are not coherent and cannot produce a stable interference pattern; coherent sources are obtained from a single source (e.g. Young's double slit). Statements (b) bright when path difference $= n\lambda$, (c) dark when phase difference $=(2n+1)\pi$, and (d) equally spaced fringes are all correct.

9. CBSE 2025Set D1 markMCQ
   Q.Two light waves of equal amplitude and equal wavelengths are superimposed. The amplitude of the resultant wave will be maximum when phase difference between them is (A) zero (B) π/4 (C) π/2 (D) π

   ›Reveal solutionSolution

   Two equal-amplitude waves add to a maximum when they are in phase, i.e. phase difference = 0.

   For two waves of amplitude a with phase difference φ, the resultant amplitude is

   A = √(a² + a² + 2a·a·cosφ) = 2a·cos(φ/2)

   This is maximum when cos(φ/2) = 1, i.e. φ/2 = 0 → φ = 0. Then A = 2a (constructive interference).

   At φ = π the waves cancel (A = 0, destructive); φ = π/4 or π/2 give intermediate values.

   ✓Final answer

   (A) zero.

10. CBSE 2025Set D1 markMCQ
    Q.The bubble of soap appears coloured due to (A) diffraction (B) polarization (C) interference (D) reflection

    ›Reveal solutionSolution

    Thin-film interference between the two reflected rays gives colour, since which wavelength interferes constructively depends on the film thickness.

    A soap film is a very thin layer of liquid. Light reflected from its front surface interferes with light reflected from its back surface (thin-film interference).

    Whether a given colour is reinforced or cancelled depends on the film thickness and the angle of viewing (path difference = 2μt). Different thicknesses reinforce different wavelengths, so the bubble appears multicoloured.

    This is interference, not diffraction, polarization or ordinary reflection.

    ✓Final answer

    (C) interference.

11. CBSE 2025Set A1 mark
    Q.Fill in the blank with appropriate word: ______ of light shows redistribution of energy.

    ›Reveal solutionSolution

    Interference of light merely redistributes energy between bright and dark regions; it does not create or destroy energy.

    When two coherent light waves superpose, they produce a pattern of alternating bright and dark fringes. At points of constructive interference, the resultant intensity is greater than the sum of individual intensities (extra brightness), while at points of destructive interference the resultant intensity is less (often close to zero). Averaged over the whole pattern, however, the total energy is exactly conserved — energy is simply redistributed from the dark regions to the bright regions. This is why interference is described as a redistribution-of-energy phenomenon, consistent with the law of conservation of energy.

    ✓Final answer

    Interference.

12. CBSE 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
    Q.Two waves whose intensity ratio is 9:1 produce interference. The ratio of maximum and minimum intensities will be

    (a) 10:8

    (b) 9:1

    (c) 4:1

    (d) 2:1

    ›Reveal solutionSolution

    In interference, I_max and I_min depend on the square root of the individual intensities, so a 9:1 intensity ratio does NOT give a 9:1 max:min ratio - it gives 4:1.

    For two coherent sources of intensities I1 and I2, the resultant intensity varies between:

    I_max = (sqrt(I1) + sqrt(I2))^2

    I_min = (sqrt(I1) - sqrt(I2))^2

    Given I1:I2 = 9:1, take I1 = 9, I2 = 1, so sqrt(I1) = 3, sqrt(I2) = 1:

    I_max = (3+1)^2 = 16

    I_min = (3-1)^2 = 4

    I_max : I_min = 16 : 4 = 4 : 1

    ✓Final answer

    (c) 4:1.