Skip to content
MCQs · Q6

Q.The 'paradox of value' (water–diamond paradox) is best explained by which of the following?

(a) Water has high value in exchange but low value in use
(b) Diamonds have high value in use but low value in exchange
(c) Water has high value in use but low value in exchange, while diamonds have low value in use but high value in exchange
(d) Both water and diamonds have equal value in use and in exchange
ChseodishaTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★est
36% · 12/33 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Why (c) is correct: The paradox of value points out that water, though enormously useful (high value in use), commands a very low price (low value in exchange), whereas diamonds, of little practical use (low value in use), command a very high price (high value in exchange). The explanation lies in scarcity and marginal utility: water is abundant, so an extra unit adds little at the margin and its price is low; diamonds are scarce, so an extra unit is highly valued and its price is high. This shows exchange value is not decided by usefulness alone.

Why the distractors are wrong: …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.