A polythene piece rubbed with wool is found to have a negative charge of 3 × 10⁻⁷C. (a) Estimate the number of

Exercises · 1.11

3 \times 10^{-7}\,\text{C}

(a) Estimate the number of electrons transferred (from which to which?)

(b) Is there a transfer of mass from wool to polythene?

Dnh Dd CbseNCERTSubjective· 2mImportance★★★★★

34% · 23/67 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Photoelectric Effect

The Photoelectric Effect: When Light Knocks Electrons Loose

Imagine you're throwing tennis balls at a wall covered in loose pebbles. If you throw hard enough, a pebble might get knocked off. That's the basic picture — but the photoelectric effect is the quantum version of this, and it completely shattered classical physics.

The Intuition

Light is made of tiny packets of energy called photons. Each photon carries a specific amount of energy, determined by its colour (frequency). When a photon hits a metal surface, it can transfer its energy to an electron inside the metal. If that energy is enough, the electron breaks free and flies out.

Think of electrons in a metal like people in a room with a high window. To escape, they need enough energy to reach the window sill. A photon is like a boost — but only if it gives enough energy in one shot. No amount of weak boosts (dim light) will work if each individual boost is too small.

The Precise Statement

E_{\text{photon}} = hf = \phi + K_{\text{max}}

Where:

$E_{\text{photon}} = hf$ is the energy of a photon (Planck's constant $h = 6.63 \times 10^{-34} \ \text{J·s}$ , $f$ is frequency)
$\phi$ is the work function — the minimum energy needed to remove an electron from that metal
$K_{\text{max}}$ is the maximum kinetic energy of the ejected electron

What Classical Physics Got Wrong

Before Einstein (1905), physicists thought light was a continuous wave. They expected:

Brighter light → more energy per electron → faster electrons
Any colour would eventually eject electrons if you waited long enough

But experiments showed the opposite:

Observation	Classical Prediction	Actual Result
Effect of intensity	Brighter light → faster electrons	Brighter light → more electrons, same speed
Threshold frequency	None — any light works eventually	Below a certain frequency, no electrons no matter how bright
Time delay	Electrons need time to absorb energy	Electrons appear instantly (within $10^{-9}$ s)

The Key Insight

Einstein said: light behaves like a stream of particles (photons), each with energy $hf$ . One photon interacts with one electron. If $hf < \phi$ , the electron cannot escape — period. If $hf > \phi$ , the excess energy becomes kinetic energy:

K_{\text{max}} = hf - \phi

This is why:

Increasing intensity (more photons) ejects more electrons, but each electron still gets the same energy per photon — so their speed doesn't change.
Below threshold frequency, even a trillion photons per second can't help — each one is too weak individually.

Important

The photoelectric effect proved that light is quantized — it comes in discrete packets. This was the birth of quantum mechanics. Einstein won the 1921 Nobel Prize for this, not for relativity.

A Worked Example

Note

Problem: A metal has work function $\phi = 2.0 \ \text{eV}$ . Light of frequency $f = 6.0 \times 10^{14} \ \text{Hz}$ shines on it. Find the maximum kinetic energy of ejected electrons. ( $h = 4.14 \times 10^{-15} \ \text{eV·s}$ )

Step 1: Photon energy

$E = hf = (4.14 \times 10^{-15})(6.0 \times 10^{14}) = 2.48 \ \text{eV}$ …

Why this formula?

Photoelectric Effect: Why the Key Formulas Hold

The photoelectric effect is a cornerstone of quantum physics. It showed that light behaves as particles (photons) , not just waves. Let's build the reasoning step-by-step.

1. The Core Idea: Energy Conservation

When a photon hits a metal surface, it transfers all its energy to a single electron inside the metal.

The photon's energy is $E = hf$ , where $h$ is Planck's constant and $f$ is the frequency of light.
The electron needs a minimum energy to escape the metal — this is called the work function, $\phi$ .

Why only one electron?

Einstein proposed that light is quantized into discrete packets (photons). A single photon cannot split its energy among multiple electrons — it interacts with one electron at a time.

2. The Photoelectric Equation

If the photon's energy is greater than the work function, the excess energy becomes the electron's kinetic energy after escape:

hf = \phi + K_{\text{max}}

Where:

$hf$ = energy of incident photon
$\phi$ = work function (minimum energy to remove electron)
$K_{\text{max}}$ = maximum kinetic energy of ejected electron

Why "maximum" kinetic energy?

Electrons inside the metal have different binding energies.
Some electrons are near the surface (loosely bound) → get maximum $K$ .
Others are deeper → lose energy in collisions before escaping → lower $K$ .

3. The Stopping Potential Connection

We measure $K_{\text{max}}$ using a stopping potential $V_s$ :

K_{\text{max}} = eV_s

Where $e$ is the electron charge. This is because:

An electric field opposing the electron's motion does work $eV_s$ to stop it.
At the stopping potential, the electron's kinetic energy is exactly balanced by the electric potential energy.

Combining:

hf = \phi + eV_s

This is the Einstein photoelectric equation in its most testable form.

4. Why the Threshold Frequency Exists

From the equation:

hf = \phi + eV_s

If $f$ is too low, $hf < \phi$ . Then:

The photon cannot supply enough energy to overcome the work function.
No electron is ejected, regardless of light intensity.

The threshold frequency $f_0$ is when $K_{\text{max}} = 0$ :

hf_0 = \phi \quad \Rightarrow \quad f_0 = \frac{\phi}{h}

Why intensity doesn't matter for ejection?

Intensity = number of photons per second.
Each photon still has energy $hf$ . If $hf < \phi$ , even a billion photons won't eject an electron — each photon is individually too weak.

5. Why Kinetic Energy Depends on Frequency, Not Intensity

From $K_{\text{max}} = hf - \phi$ :

Frequency $f$ directly determines $K_{\text{max}}$ .
Intensity only affects the number of electrons ejected (more photons → more electrons), not their individual energy.

This was the key experimental contradiction with classical wave theory:

Classical: Higher intensity = bigger wave amplitude = more energy to electrons.
Reality: Higher frequency = more energy per electron; intensity only changes current.

6. Summary of Key Relationships …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Number of electrons $=q/e=\dfrac{3\times10^{-7}}{1.6\times10^{-19}}\approx1.9\times10^{12}$ , transferred from wool to polythene; the mass transferred (wool $\to$ polythene) is about $1.7\times10^{-18}$ kg.

Electrons transferred. The polythene ends up negatively charged, so it has gained electrons; electrons move from wool to polythene. With $q=3\times10^{-7}$ C and $e=1.6\times10^{-19}$ C, $n=\frac{q}{e}=\frac{3\times10^{-7}}{1.6\times10^{-19}}=1.875\times10^{12}\ \text{electrons}\ (\approx1.9\times10^{12}).$
Mass transfer. Yes. Since electrons carry mass, the electrons moving to the polythene carry mass with them, so there is a transfer of mass from wool to polythene. Using $m_e=9.1\times10^{-31}$ kg, …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Common Mistakes in Photoelectric / Charge Transfer Problems

Students often confuse this electrostatics problem with the photoelectric effect. Let's clarify: this is a charge transfer (triboelectric) problem, not photoelectric effect. Here are the common mistakes and how to avoid them.

Mistake 1: Confusing the direction of electron transfer

The error: Students think electrons move from polythene to wool because polythene becomes negative.

Why it's wrong:

A negative charge means an excess of electrons. Polythene becomes negative → it gains electrons. Therefore, electrons are transferred from wool to polythene.

How to avoid:

Remember the rule:

Negative charge = gained electrons
Positive charge = lost electrons

So here:

Polythene: negative → gains electrons (from wool)
Wool: positive → loses electrons (to polythene)

Mistake 2: Using the wrong formula for number of electrons

The error: Using $n = \frac{Q}{e}$ but with wrong sign or wrong value of $e$ .

How to avoid:

Use the magnitude of charge:

n = \frac{|Q|}{e}

where

$Q = 3 \times 10^{-7}\,\text{C}$
$e = 1.6 \times 10^{-19}\,\text{C}$ (elementary charge)

So:

n = \frac{3 \times 10^{-7}}{1.6 \times 10^{-19}} = 1.875 \times 10^{12}

Answer: $\mathbf{1.875 \times 10^{12}}$ electrons transferred from wool to polythene.

Mistake 3: Forgetting that electrons have mass

The error: Saying "no mass is transferred because electrons are massless."

Why it's wrong:

Electrons do have mass: $m_e = 9.1 \times 10^{-31}\,\text{kg}$ . Since electrons move, mass is transferred.

How to avoid:

Calculate the mass transferred:

\text{Mass transferred} = n \times m_e = (1.875 \times 10^{12}) \times (9.1 \times 10^{-31})

= 1.706 \times 10^{-18}\,\text{kg}

Answer: Yes, a tiny mass ( $\approx 1.7 \times 10^{-18}\,\text{kg}$ ) is transferred from wool to polythene.

Mistake 4: Confusing this with photoelectric effect

The error: Trying to use $E = hf$ , work function, or threshold frequency.

Why it's wrong: …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous question1.10 — An electric dipole with dipole moment 4 × 10⁻⁹C m is aligned at 30^° w…→Next question1.12 — (a) Two insulated charged copper spheres A and B have their centres se…

Q.A polythene piece rubbed with wool is found to have a negative charge of $3 \times 10^{-7}\,\text{C}$ .

Concept understanding — Photoelectric Effect

The Photoelectric Effect: When Light Knocks Electrons Loose

The Intuition

The Precise Statement

What Classical Physics Got Wrong

The Key Insight

A Worked Example

Why this formula?

Photoelectric Effect: Why the Key Formulas Hold

1. The Core Idea: Energy Conservation

Why only one electron?

2. The Photoelectric Equation

Why "maximum" kinetic energy?

3. The Stopping Potential Connection

Combining:

4. Why the Threshold Frequency Exists

Why intensity doesn't matter for ejection?

5. Why Kinetic Energy Depends on Frequency, Not Intensity

6. Summary of Key Relationships …

Method: Quantisation of Charge

Steps

Common Mistakes in Photoelectric / Charge Transfer Problems

Mistake 1: Confusing the direction of electron transfer

Mistake 2: Using the wrong formula for number of electrons

Mistake 3: Forgetting that electrons have mass

Mistake 4: Confusing this with photoelectric effect

Q.A polythene piece rubbed with wool is found to have a negative charge of 3×10−7 C3 \times 10^{-7}\,\text{C}3×10−7C.

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.A polythene piece rubbed with wool is found to have a negative charge of $3 \times 10^{-7}\,\text{C}$ .

Unlock everything free for 14 days