Q.General electronic configuration of actinoids is (n−2)f1−14(n−1)d0−2ns2. Which of the following actinoids have one electron in 6d orbital?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Actinoid Contraction Greater
The Intuition First
Imagine you're holding a rope that runs through a series of rings. As you pull the rope tighter, the rings get squeezed closer together. Something similar happens inside the atoms of the actinoid elements — but instead of a rope, it's the pull of the nucleus, and instead of rings, it's the electron cloud.
The actinoid series runs from thorium (Z=90) to lawrencium (Z=103). As you go from one element to the next, you add one proton to the nucleus and one electron to the 5f subshell. That extra proton yanks harder on all the electrons. But here's the key: the 5f orbitals are shaped like little dumbbells that poke inside the atom, very close to the nucleus. They don't shield the outer electrons well from the growing nuclear charge.
So the outer electrons feel a stronger and stronger pull as you move right across the series. The entire electron cloud shrinks. The atomic radius decreases — steadily, noticeably. That's the actinoid contraction.
The Precise Statement
Actinoid contraction is the steady decrease in atomic (and ionic) radii across the actinoid series (from Th to Lr), caused by the poor shielding ability of 5f electrons.
The contraction is greater than what you see in the lanthanoid series (the 4f elements). Why? Two reasons:
-
The 5f orbitals are more diffuse and penetrate less than 4f orbitals. They sit further from the nucleus on average, so they shield even more poorly. Each added 5f electron does almost nothing to cancel the pull of the new proton.
-
Relativistic effects become significant for heavy nuclei (Z > 90). The 5f and 6d electrons move at speeds close to the speed of light, which contracts their orbitals further. This is a subtle but real effect that amplifies the contraction.
The result: the total decrease in ionic radius across the actinoid series is about 0.03–0.04 Å — roughly 10–15% larger than the lanthanoid contraction.
Why It Matters …
Why this formula?
Actinoid Contraction: Why It Is Greater Than Lanthanoid Contraction
Let’s build this from the ground up — understanding the why before the what.
1. What Is Actinoid Contraction?
Actinoid contraction is the steady decrease in atomic and ionic radii across the actinoid series (from Th to Lr, atomic numbers 90–103).
It is greater in magnitude than the analogous lanthanoid contraction (across the lanthanoids, Ce–Lu).
Key result: The contraction per element is larger in actinoids (~2–3 pm per element) than in lanthanoids (~1–2 pm per element).
2. The Core Reason: Poorer Shielding by 5f Electrons
The Shielding Effect
- Electrons in inner shells shield the outer electrons from the full nuclear charge.
- The effective nuclear charge (Zeff) felt by an electron is:
Zeff=Z−S
where Z = atomic number, S = shielding constant.
Why 5f Shielding Is Weaker Than 4f
- 4f orbitals (lanthanoids) are more penetrating — they have a small but significant probability near the nucleus. This gives them better shielding ability.
- 5f orbitals (actinoids) are more diffuse and less penetrating. They are spread farther from the nucleus, so they shield the outer electrons less effectively.
Result: For the same increase in Z, the Zeff increases more in actinoids than in lanthanoids.
A larger Zeff pulls the electron cloud inward more strongly → greater contraction.
3. Mathematical Expression of the Trend
The contraction is described by the change in radius per added proton:
For lanthanoids:
Δr4f≈−1 to −2 pm per element
For actinoids:
Δr5f≈−2 to −3 pm per element
The ratio of contraction is roughly:
Δr4fΔr5f≈1.5 to 2
4. Why the Difference in Shielding? — Orbital Shape Matters
| Property | 4f orbital (lanthanoids) | 5f orbital (actinoids) |
|---|---|---|
| Principal quantum number (n) | 4 | 5 |
| Radial extent | More compact | More diffuse |
| Penetration near nucleus | Higher (has a small lobe near nucleus) | Lower (less probability near nucleus) |
| Shielding efficiency | Better | Poorer |
The radial distribution function shows that 4f electrons have a secondary maximum close to the nucleus, while 5f electrons lack this — they are more "spread out."
5. The Chain of Reasoning (Step-by-Step)
- Add a proton → nuclear charge Z increases by 1.
- Add a 5f electron → it shields poorly because of its diffuse shape.
- Net effect: Zeff increases more than it would for a 4f electron. …
The key idea is that the actinoid contraction (poor shielding by 5f electrons) makes the 6d orbital slightly higher in energy, so electrons fill the 5f subshell first. For the early actinoids, the 6d orbital gets one electron before 5f filling begins.
Reasoning:
- The general configuration is [Rn]5f1−146d0−27s2. For atomic numbers 90–95, the 5f and 6d levels are very close.
- Thorium (Z=90) is 6d27s2; protactinium (Z=91) is 5f26d17s2. From uranium onward, the 5f subshell starts filling preferentially. …
Both U (i) and Np (ii) have one electron in the 6d orbital; Pu and Am fill the 5f subshell instead and have an empty 6d.
Ground-state configurations of the early actinoids:
- U (Z = 92): [Rn]5f36d17s2 — one 6d electron.
- Np (Z = 93): [Rn]5f46d17s2 — one 6d electron.
- Pu (Z = 94): [Rn]5f67s2 — no 6d electron.
- Am (Z = 95): [Rn]5f77s2 — no 6d electron. …
Method: Electronic Configuration Writing Using Aufbau Principle
This method uses the Aufbau principle (filling orbitals in order of increasing energy) along with the general electronic configuration of actinoids to determine which elements have a 6d¹ configuration.
Steps:
Step 1: Recall the general configuration pattern
Actinoids follow:
(n−2)f1−14(n−1)d0−2ns2
For actinoids, n=7, so:
5f1−146d0−27s2
Step 2: Write the expected configuration for each element
Start from the base: Radon (Z=86) has configuration [Rn]. Then add electrons in order:
- First fill 7s2
- Then 5f orbitals
- Then 6d orbitals (if any electrons remain)
Step 3: Apply to each element
-
Uranium (Z = 92):
92−86=6 electrons beyond Rn
7s2 (2 e⁻) + 5f3 (3 e⁻) + 6d1 (1 e⁻) = 6 e⁻
→ Has 6d¹ ✓
-
Neptunium (Z = 93):
93−86=7 electrons beyond Rn …
Common Mistakes Students Make on This Question
Mistake 1: Forgetting the Order of Filling (Aufbau Principle)
The error: Students often write the electronic configuration by simply filling the 5f orbitals first, without considering that the 6d orbital can be occupied before 5f in some cases.
How to avoid: Remember the Aufbau order:
For actinoids, the general sequence is:
1s→2s→2p→3s→3p→4s→3d→4p→5s→4d→5p→6s→4f→5d→6p→7s→5f→6d
So 7s fills first, then 5f, then 6d — but only after 5f is partially filled.
Mistake 2: Assuming All Actinoids Have Zero 6d Electrons
The error: Many students think that because the general configuration shows (n−1)d0−2, the 6d orbital is always empty for early actinoids.
The truth: For Uranium (Z=92) and Neptunium (Z=93), one electron actually occupies the 6d orbital before the 5f subshell is fully populated.
How to avoid: Write the actual configurations step-by-step:
-
U (92):
[Rn]5f36d17s2 — one electron in 6d ✓
-
Np (93):
[Rn]5f46d17s2 — one electron in 6d ✓
-
Pu (94):
[Rn]5f67s2 — no 6d electron ✗
-
Am (95):
[Rn]5f77s2 — no 6d electron ✗
Mistake 3: Confusing with Lanthanoid Contraction Analogy
The error: Students incorrectly apply the lanthanoid pattern (where 4f fills before 5d) to actinoids, assuming 5f always fills before 6d.
The key difference:
In actinoids, the 5f and 6d orbitals are closer in energy than 4f and 5d in lanthanoids. This causes early actinoids (U, Np) to have a 6d electron. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.