If $\oint_S \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S} = 0$ over a surface, then (a) the electric field inside the surface and on it is zero. (b) the electric field inside the surface is necessarily uniform. (c) the number of flux lines entering the surface must be equal to the number of flux lines leaving it. (d) all charges must necessarily be outside the surface.

If ointS vecE· dvecS = 0 over a surface, then (a) the electric field inside the surface and on it is zero. (b)

NCERT Exemplar · Q8

\oint_S \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S} = 0

(a) the electric field inside the surface and on it is zero.

(b) the electric field inside the surface is necessarily uniform.

(d) all charges must necessarily be outside the surface.

Gujarat GsebMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★

64% · 43/67 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Gauss Law

Gauss's Law is a shortcut. Instead of adding up the Coulomb contribution of every charge — a nightmare of vectors and integrals — it lets you read the field straight off the symmetry of a problem. The whole idea rests on one quantity: electric flux.

Flux — field-lines counted through a surface. For a uniform field E crossing a flat area A, the flux is Φ = E·A = EA cosθ, where θ is the angle between the field and the normal to the surface. Picture the field as a bundle of lines; flux is how many pierce the surface. When E is edge-on (θ = 90°) nothing passes through and Φ = 0; when E is ⊥ to the surface (θ = 0) the count is maximal. For a closed surface, Φ is the net number of lines leaving it — lines that enter and exit cancel.

The law itself. Gauss's law states that the net flux out of any closed surface depends only on the charge trapped inside:

Φ = q_enclosed / ε₀.

Two consequences do most of the work. First, only enclosed charge counts — a charge outside sends as many lines in as out, so its net contribution is exactly zero. Second, the surface's shape is irrelevant; move the charge around inside or deform the surface, and Φ never changes.

Why symmetry makes it powerful. By itself Φ = q/ε₀ has E buried in an integral. It becomes a tool only when you pick a Gaussian surface matched to the symmetry — one where E is constant and everywhere either ⊥ to the surface (so Φ = EA) or ∥ to it (contributing nothing). Then E slides out and you solve in one line. This works for exactly three geometries:

1 — Infinite line charge (linear density λ). Use a coaxial cylinder: E = λ / 2πε₀r, falling off as ∝ 1/r.

2 — Infinite sheet (surface density σ). Use a pillbox pierced through the sheet: E = σ / 2ε₀ — uniform and completely independent of distance. The field near a large charged plane simply doesn't weaken as you step back. …

Why this formula?

Gauss's Law: Why It Holds

Gauss's Law is one of the four Maxwell's equations and a cornerstone of electromagnetism. Let's build the understanding from the ground up — not just the formula, but the why.

1. The Core Idea: Flux as "Flow" of Field

Imagine an electric field $\vec{E}$ passing through a small patch of area $dA$ . The electric flux through that patch is:

d\Phi_E = \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = E \, dA \cos\theta

where $\theta$ is the angle between $\vec{E}$ and the outward normal to the surface.

Why this definition?

If $\vec{E}$ is perpendicular to the surface ( $\theta = 0$ ), maximum field "flows through".
If $\vec{E}$ is parallel ( $\theta = 90^\circ$ ), no flux — the field just slides along the surface.

Total flux through a closed surface $S$ is:

\Phi_E = \oint_S \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A}

2. The Key Insight: Flux Depends Only on Enclosed Charge

Consider a single point charge $+q$ at the centre of a spherical surface of radius $r$ .

By Coulomb's law, at every point on the sphere: $E = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2}$ , radially outward.
The area vector $d\vec{A}$ is also radially outward.
So $\vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = E \, dA$ everywhere.

The total flux:

\Phi_E = \oint E \, dA = E \oint dA = \left( \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2} \right) (4\pi r^2) = \frac{q}{\varepsilon_0}

Notice: The $r^2$ cancels! The flux is independent of the radius.

3. Why Shape Doesn't Matter

Now, what if the surface is not spherical but any closed shape enclosing the charge?

Draw a small cone from the charge to the surface.
The flux through a patch $dA$ at distance $r$ is $d\Phi = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2} \cos\theta \, dA$ .
But $\frac{\cos\theta \, dA}{r^2}$ is exactly the solid angle $d\Omega$ subtended by $dA$ at the charge.

So $d\Phi = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} d\Omega$ .

Integrating over the entire closed surface: $\oint d\Omega = 4\pi$ (total solid angle around a point).

Hence:

\Phi_E = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \cdot 4\pi = \frac{q}{\varepsilon_0}

Result: For any closed surface enclosing $q$ , the flux is $\frac{q}{\varepsilon_0}$ .

4. Multiple Charges: Superposition

If there are many charges $q_1, q_2, \dots, q_n$ inside the surface, the total electric field is the vector sum of individual fields:

\vec{E} = \vec{E}_1 + \vec{E}_2 + \dots + \vec{E}_n

Flux is linear: …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Zero net flux through a closed surface means, by Gauss's law, that the net charge enclosed is zero — and "net flux equals zero" is exactly the statement that as many field lines enter the surface as leave it. Among the four options, that is option (c).

Working from Gauss's law

Gauss's law for any closed surface $S$ states

\oint_S \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S} = \frac{q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0}.

Here we are told $\oint_S \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S} = 0$ , so directly $q_{\text{enc}} = 0$ — the total charge enclosed is zero (equal amounts of positive and negative charge inside, or none at all).

Checking each option against this

"the electric field inside the surface and on it is zero." False. A zero-charge enclosure does not force $\vec{E}=0$ . Example: place a dipole ( $+q$ and $-q$ ) inside $S$ . The enclosed charge is zero, so the flux is zero — but $\vec{E}$ is clearly non-zero at most points on and inside $S$ (it points strongly near each charge).
"the electric field inside the surface is necessarily uniform." False, for the same dipole example: the field near $+q$ points outward, near $-q$ it points inward — nowhere close to uniform. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Here are the common mistakes students make when interpreting $\oint_S \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S} = 0$ , along with how to avoid each.

Mistake 1: Assuming the Electric Field is Zero Everywhere on the Surface

The error:

Students conclude that if the flux is zero, then $\vec{E} = 0$ at every point on $S$ .

Why it’s wrong:

Flux is the net sum of $\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S}$ . Field lines can enter on one side and leave on another, giving zero net flux even though $\vec{E}$ is non-zero everywhere.

How to avoid:

Remember:

Zero flux $\neq$ zero field.

Think of a uniform field passing through a closed cylinder — flux in one end equals flux out the other, so net flux is zero, but $\vec{E}$ is constant and non-zero.

Mistake 2: Concluding No Charge Exists Anywhere

The error:

Students apply Gauss’s law and say $Q_{\text{enc}} = 0$ , then assume there is no charge at all in the universe.

Why it’s wrong:

Gauss’s law only tells you about the net charge enclosed inside $S$ . Charges outside $S$ contribute to $\vec{E}$ on the surface but not to $Q_{\text{enc}}$ .

How to avoid:

Always write:

\oint_S \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S} = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0}

So $\oint = 0$ means $Q_{\text{enc}} = 0$ — not that no charges exist anywhere.

Mistake 3: Forgetting the Surface Must Be Closed

The error:

Students apply the reasoning to an open surface (like a disk or a square).

Why it’s wrong:

The symbol $\oint$ means a closed surface. Gauss’s law only holds for closed surfaces. An open surface can have zero flux without any special condition on enclosed charge.

How to avoid:

Check the integral symbol:

$\oint$ = closed surface (Gauss’s law applies)
$\int$ = open surface (no such law)

Mistake 4: Thinking the Field is Zero Inside the Volume

The error:

Students conclude $\vec{E} = 0$ everywhere inside the volume bounded by $S$ .

Why it’s wrong:

Zero net flux does not imply zero field inside. For example, a dipole inside a closed surface gives zero net flux but a non-zero field inside.

How to avoid:

Use Gauss’s law only for flux, not for the field at interior points. To find $\vec{E}$ inside, you need symmetry or other methods (like superposition).

Mistake 5: Ignoring the Sign of $d\vec{S}$

The error: …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 on this concept.

GUJCET 2026Set x1 markMCQ
$q$
›Reveal solutionSolution
[!TLDR]

The numerator is the derivative of the denominator, so the integral is $\log|e^{x}+e^{-x}|+C$ — option (C).

Concept

Whenever an integrand has the form $\dfrac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$ , the integral is $\log|f(x)|+C$ . Here take $f(x)=e^{x}+e^{-x}$ , whose derivative is exactly $e^{x}-e^{-x}$ .

Solution

Let $u=e^{x}+e^{-x}$ . Then $du=(e^{x}-e^{-x})\,dx$ , and

$\int \frac{e^{x}-e^{-x}}{e^{x}+e^{-x}}\,dx=\int \frac{du}{u}=\log|u|+C=\log|e^{x}+e^{-x}|+C.$ …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. A point charge of 2.0 microC is at the centre of a cubic Gaussian surface 9.0 cm on edge. The net electric flux through the surface is ___ Nm^2/C.$
(a) 2.2 x 10^-6
(b) 2.2 x 10^5
(c) 2.2 x 10^6
(d) 2.2 x 10^-5
›Reveal solutionSolution

Gauss's law states the net electric flux through any closed surface is q_enclosed / epsilon_0, regardless of the surface's shape or size (as long as it encloses the same charge).

phi = q / epsilon_0

Given q = 2.0 microC = 2.0 x 10^-6 C, epsilon_0 = 8.85 x 10^-12 C^2/(N m^2).

phi = (2.0 x 10^-6) / (8.85 x 10^-12) = 2.26 x 10^5 N m^2/C

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GUJCET 2025Set 031 markMCQ
$2q$
›Reveal solutionSolution
[!TLDR]

Using the shell theorem, $E' = 4kq/r^2 = 2E$ .

Concept

A uniformly charged thin spherical shell produces, at any external point, the same field as if all its charge were concentrated at the centre: $E = \dfrac{kQ}{d^2}$ .

Solution

For the point charge: $E = \dfrac{k(2q)}{r^2} = \dfrac{2kq}{r^2}$ . …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. Consider a uniform electric field E = 3 x 10^3 î N/C. What is the flux of this field through a square of 10cm on a side whose plane is parallel to the xy plane?$
(a) 30 Nm^2/C
(b) Zero
(c) 15 Nm^2/C
(d) 60 Nm^2/C
›Reveal solutionSolution

Electric flux Φ = E·A = EA cosθ, where θ is the angle between the field and the surface's normal vector.

E = 3 × 10³ x̂ N/C is directed along x. The square lies in a plane parallel to the xy-plane, so its normal vector is along z — perpe …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2025Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. A charge q is placed at the center of one of the faces of a cube. The electric flux linked with the cube is ______.$
(a) q/ε0
(b) q/6ε0
(c) q/2ε0
(d) q/4ε0
›Reveal solutionSolution

Gauss's law gives total enclosed charge → flux, but here the charge sits exactly on a face, not fully inside the cube.

Imagine a second identical cube placed mirror-symmetric on the other side of that face, so together the two cubes fully enclose the charge q. By symmetry, each cube receives exactly half the total flux …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GUJCET 2024Set 131 markMCQ
$M^1L^3T^{-3}A^1$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Electric field has dimensions $MLT^{-3}A^{-1}$ ; multiplying by area $L^2$ gives electric flux $= M^1L^3T^{-3}A^{-1}$ .

Concept. Electric flux $\Phi_E = E\cdot A$ . Electric field $E=\dfrac{F}{q}$ has dimensions $\dfrac{MLT^{-2}}{AT}=MLT^{-3}A^{-1}$ . …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GUJCET 2024Set 131 markMCQ
$9 \times 10^4$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Using $E=\dfrac{2K\lambda}{r}$ , solve for $\lambda = \dfrac{Er}{2K}=10^{-7}$ C/m $=0.1\,\mu$ C/m.

Concept. The field of an infinite line charge is $E=\dfrac{2K\lambda}{r}=\dfrac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 r}$ .

Steps. With $E=9\times10^4$ N/C, $r=0.02$ m, $K=9\times10^9$ : …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2024Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. If an electric charge 'q' is placed at the centre of a cube, then the flux associated with each surface of the cube is ___.$
(a) q/ε0
(b) q/6ε0
(c) q/4ε0
(d) q/2ε0
›Reveal solutionSolution

By Gauss's law, total flux through a closed surface enclosing charge q is q/ε0; a cube has 6 identical faces symmetric about the centre.

Total flux through the cube (Gauss's law) = q/ε0.

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GSEB Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) Examination 2024Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. If two infinite plane sheets having same surface charge density σ are placed parallel to each other, then the electric field between the two sheets is ___.$
(a) zero
(b) σ/ε0
(c) σ/2ε0
(d) 2σ/ε0
›Reveal solutionSolution

Each infinite charged sheet produces a uniform field of magnitude σ/2ε0 pointing away from it (for positive σ) on both sides.

Between the two sheets, the field due to the left sheet points away from it (rightward, into the gap) with magnitude σ/2ε0, while the field due to the right sheet points away from it (leftward, into the gap) with the same magnitude σ/2ε0. Since both sheets carry the same sign and magnitude of charge d …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GUJCET 2023Set 091 markMCQ
$\vec{E} = 3 \times 10^3\,\hat{k}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
[!TLDR]

The field is along $\hat{k}$ while the area vector is along $\hat{i}$ , so the flux is zero.

Concept

Electric flux through a flat surface is $\Phi = \vec{E}\cdot\vec{A} = EA\cos\theta$ , where $\theta$ is the angle between the field and the outward normal (area vector).

Solution

The square lies in a plane parallel to the yz-plane, so its normal (area vector) is along the x-axis, $\vec{A} = A\,\hat{i}$ .

The field is $\vec{E} = 3\times10^{3}\,\hat{k}$ N/C. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GUJCET 2023Set 091 markMCQ
$Q. Figure shows the electric field lines of four point charges A, B, C and D. [FIGURE: A has 3 field lines; B and C are joined by many field lines (dipole-like) with C also having outward lines; D has 4 field lines] Which charge has the maximum magnitude? (A) C charge (B) B charge (C) A charge (D) D charge$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Field-line count ∝ $|q|$ ; charge C has the most lines, so the largest magnitude.

Concept — field lines and charge magnitude. The number of electric field lines starting from (or ending on) a charge is proportional to the magnitude of that charge. Counting: A has 3 lines, D has 4 lines, while charges B and C are linked by many lines (a dipole-like pair) with C additionally showing outg …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
GUJCET 2022Set 171 markMCQ
$M^1 L^{-3} T^{-3} A^{-1}$
›Reveal solutionSolution

$\Phi_E=E\cdot A$ ; with $[E]=MLT^{-3}A^{-1}$ and area $L^2$ , flux is $M^1L^3T^{-3}A^{-1}$ .

Concept: Electric field $E=\dfrac{\text{force}}{\text{charge}}=\dfrac{MLT^{-2}}{AT}=MLT^{-3}A^{-1}$ . …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous questionQ7 — A hemisphere is uniformly charged positively. The electric field at a …→Next questionQ9 — The electric field at a point is (a) always continuous. (b) continuous…

Q.If $\oint_S \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S} = 0$ over a surface, then

Concept understanding — Gauss Law

Why this formula?

Gauss's Law: Why It Holds

1. The Core Idea: Flux as "Flow" of Field

2. The Key Insight: Flux Depends Only on Enclosed Charge

3. Why Shape Doesn't Matter

4. Multiple Charges: Superposition

Working from Gauss's law

Checking each option against this

Concept: Gauss's Law in Electrostatics

Method: Direct Application of Gauss's Law

Interpretation …

Mistake 1: Assuming the Electric Field is Zero Everywhere on the Surface

Mistake 2: Concluding No Charge Exists Anywhere

Mistake 3: Forgetting the Surface Must Be Closed

Mistake 4: Thinking the Field is Zero Inside the Volume

Mistake 5: Ignoring the Sign of $d\vec{S}$

Concept

Solution

Concept

Solution

Concept

Solution

Q.If ∮SE⃗⋅dS⃗=0\oint_S \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S} = 0∮S​E⋅dS=0 over a surface, then

Working from Gauss's law

Checking each option against this

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.If $\oint_S \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S} = 0$ over a surface, then

Unlock everything free for 14 days