Q.An index number which accounts for the relative importance of the items is known as
Concept understanding — Weighted Price Relative Index
Weighted Price Relative Index – A First Look
Imagine you're tracking how the cost of your monthly shopping basket changes. You buy 10 eggs, 2 litres of milk, and 1 packet of biscuits. If the price of eggs doubles, your total bill goes up a lot. If the price of biscuits doubles, the effect is smaller — because you buy fewer biscuits. A simple average of price changes would treat both items equally, which is misleading. That's where the weighted price relative index comes in.
The Core Idea
A price relative is simply the ratio of the current price of a commodity to its base-year price, usually expressed as a percentage:
Price Relative=P0P1×100
where P1 is the price in the current year and P0 is the price in the base year.
Now, to combine price relatives for multiple commodities, we need to give each commodity its proper importance — its weight. The weight reflects how much of that commodity is consumed or how significant it is in the total expenditure.
The weighted price relative index is then:
I=∑W∑(W×P0P1×100)
where:
- I = index number for the current year
- W = weight assigned to each commodity
- P1 = current year price
- P0 = base year price
- ∑ = sum over all commodities
I=∑W∑W⋅P0P1×100
This is the weighted arithmetic mean of price relatives.
Why the Weighting Matters
Without weights, a 50% rise in the price of salt (which you buy in tiny quantities) would count the same as a 50% rise in the price of rice (which you buy in bulk). That would give a distorted picture of inflation. Weighting corrects this by ensuring that items with greater economic importance have a proportionally larger influence on the index.
The weights are usually based on expenditure patterns from a base-period survey. For example, in a consumer price index, food might get a weight of 50%, housing 20%, transport 10%, and so on. These weights sum to 100 (or 1, depending on how you set them).
A Concrete Example
Suppose in the base year, a family spends ₹200 on wheat and ₹100 on oil. In the current year, wheat costs 1.5 times its base price, and oil costs 2 times its base price.
| Commodity | Base Price (P0) | Current Price (P1) | Price Relative (P0P1×100) | Weight (W) – base expenditure | W× Price Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat | ₹10/kg | ₹15/kg | 150 | ₹200 | 30,000 |
| Oil | ₹100/litre | ₹200/litre | 200 | ₹100 | 20,000 |
| Total | ₹300 | 50,000 |
The weighted price relative index is:
I=30050,000=166.67
This means the overall price level has risen by about 66.67% from the base year. Notice that if you had taken a simple average of the price relatives (150 and 200), you'd get 175 — an overestimate, because the simple average ignores that wheat (with a smaller price rise) had twice the weight of oil.
Where You'll See This
This method is the foundation of most official price indices, including the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) in India. The weights are fixed for a period (say, 5–10 years) based on a comprehensive survey of household consumption or wholesale trade. The index then tracks how the cost of a fixed basket changes over time.
The weighted price relative index is a Laspeyres-type index when base-year quantities are used as weights. It answers the question: "How much more (or less) would the base-year basket cost today?"
A Common Mistake to Avoid
Students often confuse the weight with the price relative. The weight is not the price — it's the importance attached to the commodity, usually based on quantity consumed or expenditure share. The price relative is the pure price change. You multiply them, not add them.
Never use current-year quantities as weights in this formula unless you are explicitly computing a Paasche index. The weighted price relative index as taught in Class 11/12 uses base-year weights (quantities or expenditures).
The Big Picture
The weighted price relative index is a tool for measuring the average change in prices while respecting the fact that not all price changes affect us equally. It turns a messy reality — thousands of goods, each with its own price movement — into a single, meaningful number. That number tells you, at a glance, whether your rupee is buying more or less than it used to.
An index number can either treat every included item as equally important, or it can attach a weight to each item reflecting its actual share in total expenditure.
(i) weighted index.
An index that accounts for the relative importance of items assigns each item a weight, which is exactly what a weighted index number does.
The correct option is (i) weighted index — weights are precisely how an index number reflects the differing importance of items.
Reasoning
A simple (unweighted) index treats every commodity as equally important. But in reality a change in the price of food matters far more to a household than an equal change in the price of a minor item.
To capture this, we attach a weight to each item — usually its share in total expenditure. An index built this way is a weighted index number.
- (i) weighted index — accounts for relative importance ✓
- (ii) simple aggregative index ✗ — ignores importance
- (iii) simple average of relatives ✗ — also unweighted
(i) weighted index.
- JKBOSE Class 11 (Commerce) 2022Set ANNUAL8 marksQ.What is an Index Number ? Find out the index number of the following data with Laspeyre's method :
Commodity 2003 Price 2003 Qty. 2004 Price 2004 Qty. A 70 7 80 6 B 62 3 74 2 (OR)Batsman X and Y score following runs in different innings they played in test series. Which one of the two is a better scorer ? Who is more consistent ?X Y 12 47 115 12 6 76 73 42 7 4 19 51 119 37 36 48 84 13 29 0 ›Reveal solutionSolution
An Index Number is a composite measure of relative change in a group of variables. Laspeyre's method, using base-year (2003) quantities as weights, gives a price index of ~115.68 for 2004 over 2003. The OR alternative uses mean and coefficient of variation to show Batsman X scores more on average while Batsman Y is more consistent.
What is an Index Number?
An Index Number is a specialised type of average that measures the net percentage change in a group of related variables (such as prices or quantities of a basket of commodities) between two different time periods or places, with the base period conventionally set to 100. It summarises complex, multi-commodity change into a single comparable figure, e.g. a Consumer Price Index or Wholesale Price Index.
Laspeyre's Method - calculation:
Laspeyre's Price Index uses BASE YEAR quantities (q0) as weights:
P01(L) = (Sum(p1.q0) / Sum(p0.q0)) x 100
Commodity p0 (2003 price) q0 (2003 qty) p1 (2004 price) p1.q0 p0.q0 A 70 7 80 80x7 = 560 70x7 = 490 B 62 3 74 74x3 = 222 62x3 = 186 Total Sum(p1.q0) = 782 Sum(p0.q0) = 676 P01(L) = (782 / 676) x 100 = 115.68 (approx.)
This means, using 2003 quantities as weights, prices rose by about 15.68% from 2003 to 2004.
✓Final answerIndex Number = a specialised average measuring relative change in a group of related variables between two situations. Laspeyre's Price Index for this data = (782/676) x 100 ~ 115.68.
OR - Which batsman is better / more consistent? (X vs Y runs across 10 innings)
X Y 12 47 115 12 6 76 73 42 7 4 19 51 119 37 36 48 84 13 29 0 Step 1 - Mean (x-bar = Sum(x)/N, N=10):
- Sum(X) = 12+115+6+73+7+19+119+36+84+29 = 500 -> Mean X = 500/10 = 50
- Sum(Y) = 47+12+76+42+4+51+37+48+13+0 = 330 -> Mean Y = 330/10 = 33
A higher mean score indicates the better overall scorer: X (mean 50) scores more on average than Y (mean 33).
Step 2 - Standard Deviation (sigma = sqrt[Sum(x-x-bar)^2/N]):
For X (mean 50): squared deviations = 1444, 4225, 1936, 529, 1849, 961, 4761, 196, 1156, 441 -> Sum = 17498
sigma_X = sqrt(17498/10) = sqrt(1749.8) ~ 41.83
For Y (mean 33): squared deviations = 196, 441, 1849, 81, 841, 324, 16, 225, 400, 1089 -> Sum = 5462
sigma_Y = sqrt(5462/10) = sqrt(546.2) ~ 23.37
Step 3 - Coefficient of Variation (CV = sigma/x-bar x 100), lower CV = more consistent:
CV_X = (41.83/50) x 100 ~ 83.66%
CV_Y = (23.37/33) x 100 ~ 70.82%
Since CV_Y (~70.82%) < CV_X (~83.66%), Batsman Y is more consistent, even though Batsman X scores more on average.
✓Final answerBatsman X is the better scorer (mean 50 runs vs 33 for Y). Batsman Y is the more consistent scorer (CV ~ 70.82% vs X's CV ~ 83.66% - lower CV = more consistency).
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.