Skip to content
Activity · Q1

Q.Ruchica's father is the sole proprietor of 'Friends Gifts', a firm engaged in the sale of gift items. In the process of preparing financial statements, the accountant of the firm Mr. Goyal fell ill and had to proceed on leave. Ruchica's father was urgently in need of the statements as these had to be submitted to the bank, in pursuance of a loan of ₹5 lakh applied for the expansion of the business of the firm. Ruchica who is studying Accounting in her school, volunteered to complete the work. On scrutinising the accounts, the banker found that the value of building bought a few years back for ₹7 lakh has been shown in the books at ₹20 lakh, which is its present market value. Similarly, as compared to the last year, the method of valuation of stock was changed, resulting in value of goods to be about 15 per cent higher. Also, the whole amount of ₹70,000 spent on purchase of personal computer (expected life 5 years) during the year had been charged to the profits of the current year. The banker did not rely on the financial data provided by Ruchica. Advise Ruchica for the mistakes committed by her in the preparation of financial statements in the context of basic concepts in accounting.

Jharkhand JacTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★est
27% · 4/15 Questions
✓ Free question

Three errors: (1) the building is shown at market value (₹20 lakh) instead of its cost (₹7 lakh) — a Cost Concept violation; (2) the stock-valuation method was changed from the previous year — a Consistency violation; (3) the entire ₹70,000 computer cost was charged to one year instead of being depreciated over its 5-year life — a Matching violation. These are exactly the kind of basic-concept errors CBSE/NCERT Class 11 Accountancy questions test.

The three mistakes and the concepts they break

1. Building shown at market value — violates the Cost Concept.

A fixed asset is recorded and carried at its historical (purchase) cost, which is objective and verifiable from the purchase documents. Restating the building from its ₹7 lakh cost to its ₹20 lakh present market value overstates the assets by ₹13 lakh and records an unrealised gain — which also offends the Objectivity concept, since a market value is a changing, subjective estimate. The building should stay at ₹7 lakh.

2. Changing the method of stock valuation — violates the Consistency Concept.

Accounting methods, once chosen, should be applied uniformly from year to year so that results are comparable. Switching the stock-valuation method (making the goods about 15% more valuable) makes this year's profit incomparable with last year's and can be used to inflate profit. A change is allowed only if it gives a truer view and is fully disclosed — neither of which was done here.

3. Charging the whole ₹70,000 computer to this year — violates the Matching Concept.

The computer is a fixed asset with a useful life of 5 years, so its cost benefits five accounting periods, not one. Under the matching concept (and the going-concern assumption), only the portion consumed this year should be charged as depreciation — ₹70,000 ÷ 5 = ₹14,000 — and the remaining ₹56,000 carried forward and written off over the next four years. Charging the full ₹70,000 now understates this year's profit and the asset's value.

Advice to Ruchica

Restate the building at its ₹7 lakh cost, revert to the earlier stock-valuation method (or disclose and justify any change), and charge only ₹14,000 depreciation on the computer this year. Correcting these will make the statements reliable and comparable, so the banker can depend on them.

✓Final answer

The mistakes are: building at market value instead of cost (Cost Concept), changing the stock-valuation method (Consistency Concept), and charging the whole computer cost to one year instead of depreciating it over five years (Matching Concept).

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.