Q.A famous relation in physics relates 'moving mass' to the 'rest mass' of a particle in terms of its speed and the speed of light, . (This relation first arose as a consequence of special relativity due to Albert Einstein). A boy recalls the relation almost correctly but forgets where to put the constant . He writes: . Guess where to put the missing .
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The correct relativistic mass formula is , so the missing must be placed in the denominator inside the square root, dividing by to make the expression dimensionally consistent.
The boy’s guess — — is almost right, but it has a serious problem: the term inside the square root is subtracted from 1. Since has dimensions of velocity (say, m/s), has dimensions of (velocity). You cannot subtract a dimensional quantity from the pure number 1. That’s like asking “what is 1 metre minus 3 seconds?” — it’s meaningless. The expression must be dimensionally homogeneous: every term inside the square root must be dimensionless.
The fix is to divide by , because is also a speed. Then is a pure number, and makes perfect sense. So the correct relativistic mass formula is:
Let’s walk through the reasoning step by step.
-
Identify the dimensions.
Mass and rest mass both have dimension . Speed has dimension , and has the same dimension. The number 1 is dimensionless. For the fraction to give a mass, the denominator must be dimensionless — that means the “something” must also be dimensionless.
-
Check the boy’s version.
He wrote . Here has dimension , which is not dimensionless. So the expression is dimensionally illegal. The only way to fix it is to introduce in such a way that the subtracted term becomes , a pure number.
-
Where does go?
The boy already has nowhere — he forgot it entirely. We need to insert so that is divided by . That means the correct form is:
Could go elsewhere? For instance, is the same thing. Could it be ? That would give dimensions of , not mass. Could it be ? Again, wrong dimensions. The only placement that makes the denominator dimensionless and preserves mass dimension is dividing by inside the square root. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.