Q.What is the SI unit of mass? How is it defined?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Unit Conversion
Unit Conversion: Why 1 Metre and 100 Centimetres Are the Same Thing
Imagine you're measuring the length of your desk. You pull out a ruler marked in centimetres and find it's 120 cm long. Your friend, using a metre stick, says it's 1.2 m. You're both right — you've just used different units to describe the same physical length.
That's the core idea: unit conversion is the process of changing how you express a quantity without changing the quantity itself.
The Intuition: Same Quantity, Different Labels
Think of a pizza. Whether you call it "one pizza" or "8 slices," the amount of pizza hasn't changed. You've just used a different unit (pizza vs. slice) to describe it.
Similarly, 1 metre and 100 centimetres are the same length — just like 1 pizza and 8 slices are the same amount. The number changes (1 becomes 100, or 1 becomes 8), but the actual thing being measured stays identical.
This is the most important idea to hold onto: conversion changes the number, not the quantity. If you ever feel like the quantity has changed, you've made a mistake.
The Precise Statement
Unit conversion is the multiplication of a quantity by a conversion factor — a fraction equal to 1 — that cancels the old unit and introduces the new one.
A conversion factor looks like this:
old unitnew unit=1
For length: 100 cm1 m=1 and 1 m100 cm=1.
Why are these fractions equal to 1? Because 1 metre is 100 centimetres. The numerator and denominator describe the same physical length, so their ratio is exactly 1.
How to Convert: The Only Rule You Need
Multiply by a conversion factor that cancels the unit you have and leaves the unit you want.
Let's convert 120 cm to metres:
- Start with what you have: 120 cm
- Choose the conversion factor that has "cm" in the denominator (to cancel it) and "m" in the numerator: 100 cm1 m
- Multiply:
120 cm×100 cm1 m=100120 m=1.2 m
The "cm" units cancel just like numbers do: cmcm=1.
Always write the units explicitly. If the units don't cancel correctly, you've used the wrong conversion factor. This catches 90% of conversion mistakes.
The Reverse: Metres to Centimetres
Now convert 1.2 m to cm. This time, you want "cm" to remain and "m" to cancel. Use 1 m100 cm:
1.2 m×1 m100 cm=1.2×100 cm=120 cm
Notice: when going from a larger unit (m) to a smaller unit (cm), the number gets larger (1.2 → 120). When going from smaller to larger, the number gets smaller (120 → 1.2). This is a useful sanity check.
Common Conversion Factors You'll Use
| Quantity | Relationship | Conversion Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 1 m = 100 cm | 100 cm1 m, 1 m100 cm |
| Mass | 1 kg = 1000 g | 1000 g1 kg, 1 kg1000 g |
| Time | 1 h = 60 min | 60 min1 h, 1 h60 min |
| Speed | 1 km/h = 36001000 m/s | 1 km1000 m×3600 s1 h |
Why this formula?
Dimensional Analysis: Why the Key Principles Hold
Dimensional Analysis is a powerful tool in physics and engineering that lets us check the consistency of equations, derive relationships, and convert units. But why does it work? Let's build the reasoning from the ground up.
1. The Core Idea: Physical Quantities Have Dimensions
Every physical quantity (like length, time, mass) can be expressed in terms of fundamental dimensions. The most common set in mechanics is:
- L = Length
- M = Mass
- T = Time
For example:
- Speed has dimensions [LT−1]
- Force has dimensions [MLT−2]
- Energy has dimensions [ML2T−2]
Why this matters: Two quantities can only be meaningfully compared or equated if they have the same dimensions. You cannot add apples to oranges — and you cannot add length to time.
2. The Principle of Dimensional Homogeneity
The key formula that underpins everything is:
Every valid physical equation must be dimensionally homogeneous.
This means: the dimensions on the left-hand side must equal the dimensions on the right-hand side.
Why must this hold?
Consider an equation like:
v=u+at
- Left side: [v]=LT−1
- Right side: [u]=LT−1, [at]=(LT−2)(T)=LT−1
Both sides have dimensions LT−1. If they didn't match, the equation would be physically meaningless — you'd be comparing quantities that cannot be equal in any real experiment.
Reasoning: Physical laws describe relationships between measurable quantities. If the dimensions don't match, the equation cannot represent a real physical relationship, because the numerical value would depend on the arbitrary choice of units.
3. The Buckingham Pi Theorem: Why We Can Derive Relationships
This is the deeper mathematical reason. The Buckingham Pi Theorem states:
If a physical problem involves n variables and k fundamental dimensions, then it can be reduced to n−k independent dimensionless groups (called π groups).
Why does this work?
Imagine you have a relationship:
f(Q1,Q2,…,Qn)=0
where each Qi has dimensions. Because the equation must be dimensionally homogeneous, we can rearrange it into a function of dimensionless products only:
F(π1,π2,…,πn−k)=0
The reasoning: Dimensions act as constraints. Each fundamental dimension (M, L, T) gives one constraint. So if you have n variables and k constraints, you only have n−k independent dimensionless combinations.
Example: For a simple pendulum, the period T depends on length L, mass m, and gravity g. That's 4 variables with 3 dimensions (M, L, T). So 4−3=1 dimensionless group: π=LT2g. This tells us T∝L/g without solving any differential equation.
4. Why We Can Convert Units Using Dimensional Analysis
The conversion factor formula:
Value in new unit=Value in old unit×(new unitold unit)dimension exponent
Why this works: …
The key idea is Unit Definition, specifically for the SI base unit of mass.
The SI unit of mass is the kilogram (kg). Historically, it was defined by the mass of a physical artifact, the International Prototype of the Kilogram (IPK). Since May 20, 2019, the kilogram is defined by fixing the numerical value of the Planck constant, h, to be exactly 6.62607015×10−34 when expressed in the unit J s (which is equivalent to kg m2 s−1). This definition links the kilogram t …
The SI unit of mass is the kilogram (kg), which is now defined by fixing the numerical value of the Planck constant (h).
The International System of Units (SI) provides a globally accepted framework for measurement. It's crucial for scientific and engineering consistency, ensuring that a measurement taken in one part of the world is understood and reproducible elsewhere. At its core, the SI system defines seven base units, from which all other units are derived. Mass is one of these fundamental quantities, and its base unit, the kilogram, has a particularly interesting history and a very modern definition.
Understanding why the definition of the kilogram changed helps appreciate the precision and universality sought in modern metrology. Historically, many units were defined by physical artifacts, but these have inherent limitations.
Here's how the SI unit of mass is defined:
-
Identifying the SI Unit of Mass: The SI unit of mass is the kilogram, denoted by the symbol kg. It is one of the seven base units of the SI system.
-
Historical Definition (and its limitations): For a long time, the kilogram was unique among the SI base units because its definition relied on a physical artifact. From 1889 until 2019, one kilogram was defined as the mass of the International Prototype of the Kilogram (IPK), a cylinder made of a platinum-iridium alloy, stored in a vault at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in Sèvres, France.
Watch outRelying on a physical artifact like the IPK had significant drawbacks:
- Instability: The mass of the IPK could subtly change over time due to surface contamination or cleaning, making the definition inherently unstable.
- Accessibility: It was difficult to make precise comparisons with the IPK, and its physical nature meant it couldn't be universally accessed or perfectly replicated.
- Lack of Universality: Its definition was tied to a specific object, not a fundamental constant of nature.
-
Modern Definition (since 2019): To overcome these limitations, the kilogram was redefined on May 20, 2019, based on a fundamental physical constant. The kilogram is now defined by fixing the numerical value of the Planck constant (h).
ImportantThe Planck constant, h, is defined to be exactly 6.62607015×10−34 J⋅s (joule-seconds).
Since a joule (J) is defined as kg⋅m2⋅s−2, the Planck constant can also be expressed as 6.62607015×10−34 kg⋅m2⋅s−1.
This means that the kilogram is now defined in terms of h, along with the definitions of the metre (m) and the second (s), which are themselves defined by other fundamental constants:
- The speed of light in vacuum (c) defines the metre. …
SI Unit of Mass: The Kilogram
1. Concept First — The Idea Being Tested
This question tests your understanding of SI base units — the seven fundamental units from which all other units are derived. Mass is one of the most intuitive physical quantities: it measures how much matter an object contains. But defining it precisely for science and trade is surprisingly tricky.
Why does this matter?
- Without a standard unit, measurements from different labs or countries wouldn't match.
- Mass affects everything from grocery scales to satellite orbits.
- The definition has evolved as measurement technology improved — from a physical object to a fundamental constant.
The key idea: The SI unit of mass is the kilogram (kg), and its modern definition is based on a fixed value of Planck's constant, not a physical object.
2. Step-by-Step — Understanding the Definition
Step 1: What is the SI unit of mass?
The SI unit of mass is the kilogram, symbol kg.
- It is one of the seven SI base units.
- Note: The kilogram is the only base unit with a prefix (kilo-) built into its name. This is a historical quirk — the gram was originally the base, but the kilogram became the practical standard.
Step 2: How was it defined historically?
From 1889 to 2019, the kilogram was defined by a physical artifact:
- The International Prototype of the Kilogram (IPK), a cylinder of platinum-iridium alloy kept in a vault near Paris.
- All mass measurements worldwide were traceable to this single object.
Problem: The IPK's mass changed slightly over time (due to surface contamination, wear, etc.), causing inconsistencies. This motivated a shift to a definition based on an invariant constant of nature.
Step 3: The modern definition (since 20 May 2019)
The kilogram is now defined by fixing the numerical value of Planck's constant h:
The kilogram is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of Planck's constant h to be 6.62607015×10−34 when expressed in the unit J⋅s, which is equal to kg⋅m2⋅s−1.
What does this mean in plain language?
- Planck's constant h is a fundamental constant from quantum mechanics.
- By fixing h exactly, we define the kilogram in terms of the second (time) and the metre (length), which are themselves defined by atomic clocks and the speed of light.
- This makes the kilogram universal and unchanging — no physical object to degrade.
Step 4: How is this definition realized in practice?
The definition is realized using a Kibble balance (formerly called a watt balance):
- A mass is placed on one side of a balance.
- An electric current through a coil in a magnetic field produces a force to balance the weight.
- By measuring the current, voltage, and velocity of the coil, the mass can be calculated from h, the metre, and the second. …
Common Mistakes: SI Unit of Mass — and How to Avoid Them
The Correct Answer First
- SI unit of mass: kilogram (kg)
- Definition: The kilogram is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the Planck constant h to be 6.62607015×10−34 when expressed in the unit J⋅s, which is equal to kg⋅m2⋅s−1, where the metre and the second are defined in terms of c and ΔνCs.
(This is the current definition, revised in 2019. The old definition — the mass of the international prototype kilogram — is no longer valid.)
Mistake #1: Writing "gram" instead of "kilogram"
What students do wrong:
They write "gram (g)" as the SI unit of mass.
Why it's wrong:
The SI base unit of mass is the kilogram, not the gram. The gram is a submultiple (1 kg = 1000 g), but it is not the base unit.
How to avoid:
- Memorise: kg is the only SI base unit with a prefix (kilo-) built in.
- Remember the mnemonic: "The kilogram is the king of mass units."
Mistake #2: Giving the old definition (the "Paris prototype")
What students do wrong:
They say: "One kilogram is the mass of the international prototype kilogram kept at Sèvres, France."
Why it's wrong:
This definition was replaced in 2019. The prototype is no longer the standard — it was retired because its mass changed slightly over time.
How to avoid:
- Know the 2019 revision — the kilogram is now defined using the Planck constant h.
- Use the phrase: "Defined in terms of fundamental constants, not a physical object."
Mistake #3: Confusing mass with weight
What students do wrong:
They say: "The SI unit of mass is the newton (N)" or "Mass is measured in newtons."
Why it's wrong:
The newton is the SI unit of force (weight), not mass. Mass is a scalar quantity; weight is a force that depends on gravity.
How to avoid:
- Remember: kg for mass, N for weight.
- Think: "Mass is what you are; weight is what the scale shows under gravity."
Mistake #4: Omitting the Planck constant in the definition
What students do wrong:
They give a vague definition like: "It is defined using the Planck constant." — without the exact value or the equation.
Why it's wrong:
Exams expect precision. The definition must include:
- The fixed value: h=6.62607015×10−34 J⋅s
- The relationship: kg=6.62607015×10−34 m2s−1h
How to avoid:
- Write the definition in two parts:
- "The kilogram is defined by fixing h=6.62607015×10−34 J⋅s."
- "This implies 1 kg=6.62607015×10−34h m−2s."
- Practise writing it exactly as in the official SI brochure.
Mistake #5: Forgetting the role of the metre and second
What students do wrong:
They define the kilogram in isolation, without mentioning that the definition depends on the definitions of the metre and second.
Why it's wrong: …
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 on this concept.
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.The dimensional formula for specific resistance is: (A) [ML3T3A2] (B) [ML3T−3A−2] (C) [ML−3T−2A−2] (D) [ML3T−3A2]
›Reveal solutionSolution
Specific resistance (resistivity) is derived from resistance using R=ρAL, so its dimensional formula is [ML3T−3A−2], which corresponds to option (B).
Concept & Intuition
Specific resistance, or resistivity (ρ), is a material property that quantifies how strongly it opposes current flow. The key is to start from something familiar: resistance R, which obeys Ohm’s law V=IR. We know the dimensions of voltage (V), current (I), and length (L), and the relation R=ρAL ties them together. By finding the dimensions of R first, then isolating ρ, we get the answer cleanly.
Step-by-step derivation
- Recall the formula linking resistance and resistivity For a uniform conductor of length L and cross-sectional area A,
R=ρAL.
So resistivity is
ρ=R⋅LA.
If we find the dimensions of R, A, and L, we can combine them.
- Find the dimensions of resistance R from Ohm’s law
Ohm’s law: V=IR, so R=V/I.
- Current I has dimension [A] (amperes).
- Voltage V is work per unit charge: V=W/Q. Work W has dimensions of energy: [ML2T−2]. Charge Q=I⋅t, so [Q]=[AT]. Hence [V]=[AT][ML2T−2]=[ML2T−3A−1].
- Therefore,
[R]=[I][V]=[A][ML2T−3A−1]=[ML2T−3A−2].
- Combine with area and length
From ρ=R⋅LA:
- Area A has dimension [L2]. …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.In the equation X=G−1/2h1/2c5/2, where G- universal gravitation constant, h - Planck's constant and c - velocity of light, the dimensions of X are that of (A) Stress (B) Energy (C) Upthrust (D) Momentum
›Reveal solutionSolution
Substituting the dimensions of G, h and c into X=G−1/2h1/2c5/2 and adding exponents gives [X]=ML2T−2, the dimension of energy — option (B).
Concept
Every physical constant carries a dimensional formula in terms of mass M, length L and time T. Raising each to its power in the expression and summing the exponents base by base gives the dimensions of X:
[G]=M−1L3T−2,[h]=ML2T−1,[c]=LT−1.
Solution
- Apply each exponent:
[G−1/2]=(M−1L3T−2)−1/2=M1/2L−3/2T1,
[h1/2]=(ML2T−1)1/2=M1/2L1T−1/2,
[c5/2]=(LT−1)5/2=L5/2T−5/2.
- Multiply and collect exponents:
- Mass: 21+21=1.
- Length: −23+1+25=2.
- Time: 1−21−25=−2.
[X]=M1L2T−2. …
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.Match the following types of nuclei with examples shown Column-I \hspace{1cm} Column-II \ A. Isotopes \hspace{1cm} i. LiX7, BeX7 \ B. Isobars \hspace{1cm} ii. OX18, FX19 \ C. Isotopes \hspace{1cm} iii. HX1, HX2 (A) A-ii, B-iii, C-i (B) A-i, B-iii, C-ii (C) A-iii, B-ii, C-i (D) A-iii, B-i, C-ii
›Reveal solutionSolution
Classify each nuclide pair by what it holds constant — proton number (isotopes), mass number (isobars), or neutron number (isotones) — and match.
Step 1 — The three definitions.
For a nuclide ZAX, with Z = proton number, A = mass number and N=A−Z = neutron number:
Family Same Different Isotopes Z (same element) A (and hence N) Isobars A Z and N Isotones N Z and A (Column-I lists "Isotopes" twice; the third entry, C, must be Isotones — otherwise two rows would be identical and only one Column-II pair could satisfy them. The three Column-II pairs are exactly one of each family, which confirms the reading.)
Step 2 — Analyse each Column-II pair.
(i) Li7 and Be7
- 37Li: Z=3, A=7, N=4
- 47Be: Z=4, A=7, N=3
Same mass number (A=7), different Z ⇒ ISOBARS.
(ii) O18 and F19
- 818O: Z=8, A=18, N=18−8=10
- 919F: Z=9, A=19, N=19−9=10
Different Z, different A, but the same neutron number (N=10) ⇒ ISOTONES.
(iii) H1 and H2 …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.What is the dimensional formula for electric flux? (A) [M1 L3 T−2 A−1] (B) [M2 L3 T−3 A−1] (C) [M1 L2 T−3 A−1] (D) [M1 L3 T−3 A−1]
›Reveal solutionSolution
Electric flux is defined as ΦE=E⋅A, so its dimension is the product of electric field and area. The electric field has dimensions [M1L1T−3A−1], and area has [L2], giving electric flux dimensions [M1L3T−3A−1], which corresponds to option (D).
The key is to recall that electric flux measures the "flow" of electric field through a surface. Since it's the dot product of electric field E and area vector A, its dimension is simply the product of their dimensions.
-
Start with the definition
Electric flux ΦE=E⋅A. So [ΦE]=[E]⋅[A].
-
Find the dimension of electric field E
From Coulomb’s law: F=4πε01r2q1q2, so E=qF.
Force F has dimensions [MLT−2], and charge q has dimensions [AT] (since current I=q/t).
Thus [E]=[AT][MLT−2]=[M1L1T−3A−1].
-
Find the dimension of area A
Area is length squared: [A]=[L2].
-
Multiply them
[ΦE]=[M1L1T−3A−1]×[L2]=[M1L3T−3A−1]. …
-
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.In the expression P=El2 m−5G−2 where E,1, m and G represent Energy, Angular Momentum, Mass and Gravitational Constant, the dimensions of P are (A) [M1 L2 T−2] (B) [M0 L2 T−2] (C) [M0 L0 T0] (D) [M0 L0 T−2]
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to substitute the fundamental dimensions of energy, angular momentum, mass, and the gravitational constant into the given expression and simplify. The result shows that P is dimensionless, so the correct option is (C).
We are given:
P=El2m−5G−2
where E = energy, l = angular momentum, m = mass, and G = gravitational constant. We need the dimensions of P.
Why this approach works
Every physical quantity can be expressed in terms of the fundamental dimensions: mass [M], length [L], and time [T]. By writing each given quantity in these dimensions, we can combine them algebraically to find the dimensions of P. If all dimensions cancel, P is dimensionless.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Dimensions of energy (E) Energy = work = force × distance. Force = mass × acceleration, so:
[E]=[MLT−2]×[L]=[ML2T−2]
- Dimensions of angular momentum (l) Angular momentum = moment of inertia × angular velocity, or more directly:
l=mass×velocity×radius
Velocity has dimensions [LT−1], so:
[l]=[M]×[LT−1]×[L]=[ML2T−1]
- Dimensions of mass (m) Simply:
[m]=[M]
- Dimensions of gravitational constant (G) From Newton’s law: F=Gr2m1m2. Rearranging:
G=m1m2Fr2
Force has dimensions [MLT−2], so:
[G]=[M2][MLT−2][L2]=[M−1L3T−2]
- Combine into the expression for P
[P]=[E]×[l]2×[m]−5×[G]−2
Substitute each:
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.The unit of universal gravitational constant is : (A) Nm2 kg2 (B) Nm−2 kg−2 (C) Nm−2 kg2 (D) Nm2 kg−2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The universal gravitational constant G appears in Newton’s law F=Gr2m1m2. Solving for G gives units of Nm2kg−2, so the correct choice is (D).
The key is to remember that units must balance in any physical equation. Newton’s law of gravitation tells us the force between two masses depends on their product and the inverse square of the distance. The constant G is the proportionality factor that makes the numbers work — so its units are whatever is needed to turn the right‑hand side into newtons.
- Start with the defining equation Newton’s law:
F=Gr2m1m2
Here F is force (in newtons, N), m1 and m2 are masses (in kg), and r is distance (in m).
- Rearrange to isolate G
G=m1m2Fr2
-
Substitute the base SI units
- Force F has units of N (newton).
- Distance r has units of m.
- Masses have units of kg.
So:
Units of G=(kg)(kg)(N)(m2)=Nm2kg−2
- Match with the options
- (A) Nm2kg2 → mass squared in numerator, wrong.
- (B) Nm−2kg−2 → distance in denominator, wrong.
- (C) Nm−2kg2 → both distance and mass inverted, wrong. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.Two physical quantities having the same dimensional formula [M1 L−1 T−2] are (A) Thrust and Strain (B) Moment of force and Thrust (C) Stress and Pressure (D) Work and thrust
›Reveal solutionSolution
The dimensional formula [M1 L−1 T−2] corresponds to pressure or stress — force per unit area. Among the options, only stress and pressure share this formula, so the correct choice is (C).
The key idea is that dimensional analysis lets us match physical quantities by their fundamental units. Here, the given formula [M1 L−1 T−2] means: one power of mass, one inverse power of length, and two inverse powers of time. That’s exactly the combination you get when you take force (mass × acceleration, [MLT−2]) and divide it by area ([L2]). So any quantity that is “force per unit area” will have this formula. The classic examples are pressure and stress. Let’s check each option.
-
Option (A): Thrust and Strain
- Thrust is a force (e.g., from a rocket engine), so its dimension is [MLT−2].
- Strain is a ratio of lengths (change in length / original length), so it is dimensionless: [M0L0T0].
- They do not match the given formula. So (A) is wrong.
-
Option (B): Moment of force and Thrust
- Moment of force (torque) is force × distance, so its dimension is [ML2T−2].
- Thrust, as above, is [MLT−2].
- These are different from each other and from the target formula. So (B) is wrong.
-
Option (C): Stress and Pressure
- Stress = force / area, and pressure = force / area. Both have dimension [MLT−2]/[L2]=[ML−1T−2].
- This matches exactly. So (C) is correct.
-
Option (D): Work and Thrust …
-
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.If R and L denote resistance and inductance of a material, then the dimension of LR will be: (A) M2L4T−5A−4 (B) MLTA−1 (C) M0L0T0A0 (D) M−1L4TA−3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Computing [L] and [R] from their defining relations and multiplying gives M2L4T−5A−4, matching option (A).
Concept & Intuition
Inductance appears in the energy stored by an inductor, U=21LI2; resistance appears in Ohm's law, V=IR. Using energy (ML2T−2), current (A), and voltage as energy per charge, both dimensions follow directly.
Step-by-step derivation
-
Dimension of L.
From U=21LI2: [L]=[I]2[U]=A2ML2T−2=ML2T−2A−2.
-
Dimension of R.
Voltage is energy per charge: [V]=ATML2T−2=ML2T−3A−1. From V=IR: [R]=[I][V]=ML2T−3A−2.
-
Multiply.
[LR]=(ML2T−2A−2)(ML2T−3A−2)=M2L4T−5A−4 …
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.If units of mass, length and gravitational constant are chosen to fundamental units, the dimensions of time would be (A) M1/2 L1/2G−1/2 (B) M1 L1/2G2 (C) M−1/2 L3/2G−1/2 (D) M−1 L3G−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
We treat mass (M), length (L), and the gravitational constant (G) as fundamental dimensions, then solve for the dimension of time (T) by expressing G in terms of M, L, T and inverting the relation. The result is that time has dimensions M−1/2L3/2G−1/2, which corresponds to option (C).
The key idea is that we are redefining the set of fundamental units. Normally, mass (M), length (L), and time (T) are fundamental, and the gravitational constant G has derived dimensions. Here, the problem says: choose M, L, and G as the fundamental units. That means we must express the dimension of time in terms of M, L, and G. So we need to find exponents a,b,c such that:
[T]=MaLbGc
We know the usual dimensions of G from Newton’s law of gravitation: F=Gr2m1m2. Force has dimensions MLT−2, so:
[G]=[m1][m2][F][r2]=M2(MLT−2)(L2)=M−1L3T−2
Now we treat this as an equation relating dimensions. We want to solve for [T] in terms of M,L,G.
- Write the dimensional equation. We have [T]=MaLbGc. Substitute the known dimensions of G:
[T]=MaLb(M−1L3T−2)c
Simplify:
[T]=Ma−cLb+3cT−2c
-
Match exponents on both sides.
The left side is T1, which in terms of M, L, T is M0L0T1. So we equate exponents:
- For M: a−c=0
- For L: b+3c=0
- For T: −2c=1
-
Solve the system.
From the T-equation: −2c=1⇒c=−21.
Then from M: a−(−21)=0⇒a=−21. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.The dimension [ML−1 T−2] is the physical quantity of (A) Pressure × Area (B) PressureForce (C) Power × Time (D) Energy density
›Reveal solutionSolution
The dimension [ML−1T−2] matches energy density (energy per unit volume). The correct option is (D).
We are given the dimensional formula [ML−1T−2] and asked which physical quantity it represents. The key is to recall the dimensions of common physical quantities and see which one matches exactly.
Concept and intuition:
Dimensions are like the "DNA" of a physical quantity — they tell us how it depends on mass (M), length (L), and time (T). If we know the dimensions of a quantity, we can identify it by comparing with known formulas. Here, [ML−1T−2] looks like pressure (force per area) but let's check each option carefully.
- Option (A): Pressure × Area Pressure has dimensions [ML−1T−2] (force per area). Multiplying by area ([L2]) gives:
[ML−1T−2]×[L2]=[ML1T−2]
That is the dimension of force, not [ML−1T−2]. So (A) is incorrect.
- Option (B): Force / Pressure Force has dimensions [MLT−2]. Dividing by pressure [ML−1T−2] gives:
[ML−1T−2][MLT−2]=[L2]
That is area, not the given dimension. So (B) is incorrect.
- Option (C): Power × Time Power has dimensions [ML2T−3] (energy per time). Multiplying by time [T] gives:
[ML2T−3]×[T]=[ML2T−2]
That is energy (or work), not [ML−1T−2]. So (C) is incorrect.
- Option (D): Energy density …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.Joule second is the unit of (A) Energy (B) Power (C) Angular momentum (D) Linear momentum
›Reveal solutionSolution
Joule-second =kgm2s−1, the dimensions of angular momentum (and of Planck's constant).
Energy has units J=kgm2s−2, so
J⋅s=kgm2s−1
Angular momentum L=Iω has units (kgm2)(s−1)=kgm2s−1=J⋅s. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.Find the value of 'n' in the given equation P=ρnv2 where 'P' is the pressure, 'ρ' density and 'v' velocity. (A) n=21 (B) n=1 (C) n=3 (D) n=2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem is solved by dimensional analysis: pressure has dimensions [ML−1T−2], density [ML−3], and velocity [LT−1]; equating exponents gives n=1, so the correct option is (B).
Concept & Intuition
When an equation relates physical quantities, the dimensions on both sides must match — this is the principle of dimensional homogeneity. Here we’re told P=ρnv2, but we don’t yet know n. By writing each quantity in terms of mass (M), length (L), and time (T), we can solve for the exponent n that makes the dimensions balance. This is a classic trick: instead of memorizing formulas, let the units guide you.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Write the dimensions of each quantity
- Pressure P is force per area. Force = mass × acceleration, so [P]=[L2][MLT−2]=ML−1T−2.
- Density ρ is mass per volume: [ρ]=ML−3.
- Velocity v is length per time: [v]=LT−1.
-
Set up the dimensional equation
The given equation is P=ρnv2. Taking dimensions:
[P]=[ρ]n⋅[v]2
Substitute the dimensional forms:
M1L−1T−2=(M1L−3)n⋅(L1T−1)2
- Simplify the right-hand side
M1L−1T−2=MnL−3n⋅L2T−2
Combine the length terms:
M1L−1T−2=MnL−3n+2T−2
- Equate exponents for each base
- For mass M: 1=n → n=1.
- For length L: −1=−3n+2. Substitute n=1: −1=−3(1)+2=−1, which checks. …
-
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.