Q.If f(x)=x2, find (1.1−1)f(1.1)−f(1).
Concept understanding — Difference Quotient
The Difference Quotient: What It Is and Why It Matters
Imagine you're tracking the distance a car has travelled over time. At 2:00 PM, the odometer reads 40 km. At 2:30 PM, it reads 70 km. How fast was the car going on average during that half-hour?
You'd calculate: 0.5 hours70−40=60 km/h.
That fraction — change in distance divided by change in time — is the average rate of change. The difference quotient is just a formal, algebraic way of writing that same idea for any function.
The Intuition: Slope of a Secant Line
Take any function f(x). Pick two points on its graph: (x,f(x)) and (x+h,f(x+h)), where h is some horizontal step (positive or negative). The line that cuts through both points is called a secant line.
The slope of that secant line is:
slope=runrise=(x+h)−xf(x+h)−f(x)=hf(x+h)−f(x)
That expression — hf(x+h)−f(x) — is the difference quotient.
The name comes from "difference" (you subtract two function values) and "quotient" (you divide by h). It's literally a quotient of differences.
The Precise Statement
hf(x+h)−f(x),h=0
This gives the average rate of change of f over the interval from x to x+h. Geometrically, it's the slope of the secant line through (x,f(x)) and (x+h,f(x+h)).
Key restrictions:
- h cannot be zero (you can't divide by zero).
- x and x+h must both be in the domain of f.
A Concrete Example
Let f(x)=x2. Compute the difference quotient at x=3 with h=0.1:
0.1f(3+0.1)−f(3)=0.1(3.1)2−9=0.19.61−9=0.10.61=6.1
This tells us: over the interval [3,3.1], the function x2 increases at an average rate of 6.1 units per unit change in x.
If you shrink h to 0.01, you'd get 6.01. As h gets smaller, the average rate approaches 6 — which is exactly the instantaneous rate of change (the derivative) of x2 at x=3.
The difference quotient is the bridge between average rates (which you can compute with simple algebra) and instantaneous rates (which require limits). When you take the limit as h→0, you get the derivative.
Why You'll See It Everywhere
The difference quotient isn't just a classroom exercise. It's the foundation of calculus:
- Derivatives: f′(x)=h→0limhf(x+h)−f(x)
- Physics: average velocity → instantaneous velocity
- Economics: average cost change → marginal cost
- Any field that studies how things change
Every time you see a derivative, you're looking at the limit of a difference quotient. Master this one expression, and you've unlocked the core idea of differential calculus.
A common mistake: forgetting that h is the change in the input, not the output. The numerator f(x+h)−f(x) is the change in the output. Keep them straight: ΔinputΔoutput.
The difference quotient is the direct precursor to the formal definition of a derivative in the NCERT Class 11 Mathematics chapter on Limits and Derivatives, and "difference quotient formula and examples" is a commonly searched topic for CBSE board and JEE Main preparation. Understanding it as the slope of a secant line is essential groundwork for the "limits and derivatives important questions" that build up to differentiation in Class 12.
The key idea is the difference quotient, which gives the slope of the secant line between two points on a function.
Step 1: Compute f(1.1) and f(1).
Since f(x)=x2, we have:
f(1.1)=(1.1)2=1.21
f(1)=12=1
Step 2: Substitute into the difference quotient.
The denominator is 1.1−1=0.1.
So the expression becomes:
0.11.21−1=0.10.21
Step 3: Simplify.
0.10.21=2.1
The value is 2.1.
The expression is the difference quotient of f(x)=x2 at x=1 with a step of 0.1. It simplifies to 0.11.21−1=0.10.21=2.1, which is the slope of the secant line through (1,1) and (1.1,1.21).
The core idea here is the difference quotient — the ratio of the change in a function's output to the change in its input. For any function f, the expression
hf(a+h)−f(a)
gives the slope of the secant line between the points (a,f(a)) and (a+h,f(a+h)). In this problem, a=1 and h=0.1, so we're finding the average rate of change of f(x)=x2 over the interval from x=1 to x=1.1.
Why does this matter? Because this quotient is the foundation of the derivative — as h shrinks to zero, the secant slope approaches the instantaneous slope (the derivative). Here, h is fixed at 0.1, so we just compute directly.
Let's work through it step by step.
-
Identify the pieces.
We have f(x)=x2, so f(1)=12=1 and f(1.1)=(1.1)2.
Compute (1.1)2: 1.1×1.1=1.21.
So f(1.1)=1.21.
-
Write the numerator.
The numerator is f(1.1)−f(1)=1.21−1=0.21.
-
Write the denominator.
The denominator is 1.1−1=0.1.
-
Form the quotient and simplify.
1.1−1f(1.1)−f(1)=0.10.21=10021÷101=10021×110=100210=2.1.
Notice that 0.21/0.1 is just moving the decimal: 0.21÷0.1=2.1. A quick check: 0.1×2.1=0.21, so it's correct.
A common mistake is to compute f(1.1) incorrectly — remember (1.1)2=1.21, not 1.1 or 1.01. Also, don't forget the denominator is 0.1, not 1.
So the secant slope from x=1 to x=1.1 is 2.1. This makes sense: the derivative of x2 at x=1 is 2, and since h=0.1 is small but not zero, the secant slope is slightly larger than 2 — exactly 2.1.
The value is 2.1.
- KCET 2025Set A-11 markMCQQ.The function f(x)={ex+ax,b(x−1)2,x<0x≥0 is differentiable at x=0. Then (A) a=1,b=1 (B) a=3,b=1 (C) a=−3,b=1 (D) a=3,b=−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiability at a junction of a piecewise function forces two conditions — the values must agree (continuity) and the one-sided derivatives must agree — giving two equations for a and b.
f(x)={ex+ax,b(x−1)2,x<0x≥0
Step 1 — Continuity at x=0 (necessary for differentiability).
limx→0−f(x)=e0+a(0)=1,f(0)=b(0−1)2=b.
A differentiable function is always continuous, so these must be equal:
b=1
Step 2 — Left-hand derivative at x=0. For x<0, f′(x)=ex+a, so
LHD=limx→0−(ex+a)=1+a.
Step 3 — Right-hand derivative at x=0. For x≥0, f′(x)=2b(x−1), so
RHD=2b(0−1)=−2b=−2(using b=1).
Step 4 — Equate them. Differentiability at 0 means LHD=RHD:
1+a=−2⟹a=−3.
Step 5 — Check. With a=−3, b=1: left branch ex−3x has value 1 and slope 1−3=−2 at 0; right branch (x−1)2 has value 1 and slope 2(0−1)=−2. Value and slope both match. ✓
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — a=−3, b=1.
ANSWER: C
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.Evaluate: limx→0x31+x−31−x (A) 1 (B) 0 (C) 32 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
This limit is a derivative in disguise: the expression is the difference quotient for the cube‑root function at x=0. The limit equals 32, which corresponds to option (C).
The core idea is that a limit of the form
limx→0xf(0+x)−f(0−x)
is actually twice the derivative of f at 0, provided the derivative exists. Here f(t)=3t=t1/3, so we can avoid messy algebra by using the derivative rule.
- Recognize the derivative structure Write the limit as
limx→0x31+x−31−x.
Let f(t)=3t. Then the numerator is f(1+x)−f(1−x). For small x,
f(1+x)≈f(1)+f′(1)x,f(1−x)≈f(1)−f′(1)x,
so their difference is approximately 2f′(1)x. Dividing by x gives 2f′(1).
- Compute the derivative f(t)=t1/3 so f′(t)=31t−2/3. At t=1,
f′(1)=31⋅1−2/3=31.
Hence the limit is 2⋅31=32.
- Verify with algebraic manipulation (optional) Use the identity a3−b3=(a−b)(a2+ab+b2) with a=31+x,b=31−x. Multiply numerator and denominator by a2+ab+b2:
xa−b=x(a2+ab+b2)a3−b3=x(a2+ab+b2)(1+x)−(1−x)=x(a2+ab+b2)2x=a2+ab+b22.
As x→0, a→1 and b→1, so the denominator tends to 1+1+1=3. Thus the limit is 32.
Watch outA common mistake is to treat the cube root as linear and think the limit is 0, or to incorrectly apply L’Hôpital’s rule without checking the form. The expression is 00, so L’Hôpital works too: differentiate numerator and denominator to get 131(1+x)−2/3+31(1−x)−2/3, which at x=0 gives 31+31=32.
TipThe pattern limx→0xf(a+x)−f(a−x)=2f′(a) is a quick shortcut for any differentiable f. It saves time on symmetric difference quotients.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.Find the value of h→0limh(a+h)2sin(a+h)−a2sina (A) −a2sina (B) 0 (C) 1 (D) a2cosa+2asina
›Reveal solutionSolution
This limit is the definition of the derivative of f(x)=x2sinx at x=a. The derivative is 2xsinx+x2cosx, so the limit equals a2cosa+2asina, which is option (D).
The key insight is recognizing that the expression
limh→0h(a+h)2sin(a+h)−a2sina
is exactly the definition of the derivative of the function f(x)=x2sinx evaluated at x=a.
So instead of manipulating the limit directly, we can differentiate f(x) and then plug in x=a.
- Identify the function and the derivative definition The general definition of the derivative is
f′(a)=limh→0hf(a+h)−f(a).
Here, f(x)=x2sinx, so f(a+h)=(a+h)2sin(a+h) and f(a)=a2sina.
Thus the given limit is simply f′(a).
- Differentiate f(x)=x2sinx Use the product rule:
f′(x)=(x2)′sinx+x2(sinx)′=2xsinx+x2cosx.
- Evaluate at x=a
f′(a)=2asina+a2cosa.
- Match with the options The expression a2cosa+2asina is exactly option (D).
Watch outA common mistake is to try to expand (a+h)2 and sin(a+h) separately and then simplify the limit algebraically. That works but is much longer and error-prone. Recognizing the derivative definition saves time and reduces mistakes.
TipWhenever you see a limit of the form hf(a+h)−f(a), immediately think “derivative.” It’s one of the most powerful pattern-recognition tricks in calculus.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
ANSWER: D
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] The value of limx→0xsin(a+x)−sin(a−x) is
(A) 1 (B) 0 (C) 2cosa (D) 2sina›Reveal solutionSolution
This limit is the definition of the derivative of sinx at x=a, but with a symmetric difference. The value is 2cosa, so the correct option is (C).
The key insight is that the numerator sin(a+x)−sin(a−x) is a difference of two sines. Instead of memorizing formulas, think: as x→0, both sin(a+x) and sin(a−x) approach sina, so we have a 00 form. The natural tool is either the sine difference identity or recognizing this as a derivative.
- Use the sine difference identity Recall: sinP−sinQ=2cos(2P+Q)sin(2P−Q). Here P=a+x, Q=a−x. Then
sin(a+x)−sin(a−x)=2cos(2(a+x)+(a−x))sin(2(a+x)−(a−x))
Simplify:
=2cos(22a)sin(22x)=2cosa⋅sinx.
- Rewrite the limit The original limit becomes
limx→0x2cosa⋅sinx=2cosa⋅limx→0xsinx.
- Apply the fundamental limit We know x→0limxsinx=1. Therefore,
limx→0xsin(a+x)−sin(a−x)=2cosa⋅1=2cosa.
TipNotice this is exactly 2cosa, which is also the derivative of sinx at a times 2: because sin′(a)=cosa, and the symmetric difference quotient 2hf(a+h)−f(a−h) gives the derivative directly. Here we have h=x and no factor of 2 in the denominator, so we get 2f′(a).
Watch outA common mistake is to think the limit equals cosa (the derivative from one side) or 0 (because the numerator seems to cancel). But the symmetric difference doubles the derivative.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.limx→0xa(a+x)a+x−a equals to (A) a−23 (B) 2a231 (C) 21 (D) 2a−23
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit simplifies by rationalizing the numerator and cancelling the factor of x, yielding 2a3/21; the correct option is (B).
We are asked to evaluate
limx→0xa(a+x)a+x−a.
The direct substitution x=0 gives 00, an indeterminate form. The presence of square roots suggests rationalizing the numerator — a classic trick that turns a difference of square roots into an expression where the x cancels cleanly.
- Rationalize the numerator Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate a+x+a:
xa(a+x)a+x−a⋅a+x+aa+x+a=xa(a+x)(a+x+a)(a+x)−a.
- Simplify the numerator The numerator becomes (a+x)−a=x. So we have:
xa(a+x)(a+x+a)x.
- Cancel the common factor x (valid for x=0, which is fine since we take the limit):
a(a+x)(a+x+a)1.
- Take the limit as x→0 Now substitute x=0:
a(a+0)(a+0+a)1=a2(a+a)1.
Since a>0 (implied by the square roots in the original expression), a2=a. Thus:
a⋅(2a)1=2a3/21.
TipNotice that the denominator originally had a(a+x), which at x=0 becomes a2=a. This is why the final exponent is 3/2: one factor of a from that square root, and another a from the sum of square roots.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget the extra a from the conjugate sum, leading to an answer like a3/21 (option A) instead of the correct 2a3/21.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B).
ANSWER: B
- KCET 2023Set A-21 markMCQQ.If f(x) and g(x) are two functions with g(x)=x−x1 and fog(x)=x3−x31 then f′(x)= (A) 3x2+x43 (B) x2−x21 (C) 1−x21 (D) 3x2+3
›Reveal solutionSolution
Rewrite x3−x31 as a cubic in g(x)=x−x1; that identifies f explicitly, and then f′ is immediate.
Step 1 — What we are given.
g(x)=x−x1,(f∘g)(x)=f(g(x))=x3−x31
To find f′ we must first know f as a function of its own argument — so we must express x3−x31 purely in terms of (x−x1).
Step 2 — Use the algebraic identity.
Recall (a−b)3=a3−b3−3ab(a−b). Put a=x, b=x1 (so ab=1):
(x−x1)3=x3−x31−3(x−x1)
Rearranging,
x3−x31=(x−x1)3+3(x−x1)
Step 3 — Read off f.
The right-hand side is written entirely in terms of g(x):
f(g(x))=[g(x)]3+3g(x)
Since this holds for every x (and g takes all real values), the rule of f is
f(t)=t3+3t.
Step 4 — Differentiate.
f′(t)=3t2+3⟹f′(x)=3x2+3
Step 5 — Verify with the chain rule (independent check).
dxd(x3−x31)=3x2+x43, and g′(x)=1+x21. The chain rule demands f′(g(x))g′(x)=3x2+x43, i.e.
f′(g(x))=1+x213x2+x43=x2x2+13(x2+x41)=x2(x2+1)3(x6+1)⋅11⋅x21⋅x2
Simplifying, x2(x2+1)3(x6+1)=3(x2−1+x21)+3⋅1=3(x−x1)2+3, which is exactly 3[g(x)]2+3 ✓ — confirming f′(t)=3t2+3.
(Option (A) 3x2+x43 is the trap: that is dxd(f∘g), not f′.)
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) 3x2+3.
ANSWER: D
- KCET 2023Set A-21 markMCQQ.If f(x)=1+nx+2n(n−1)x2+6n(n−1)(n−2)x3+…+xn then f′′(1)= (A) n(n−1)2n−2 (B) n(n−1)2n (C) 2n−1 (D) (n−1)2n−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Recognise the series as (1+x)n, differentiate twice, then substitute x=1.
Step 1 — Identify the function.
The coefficients 1,n,2n(n−1),6n(n−1)(n−2),…,1 are precisely (0n),(1n),(2n),(3n),…,(nn), because
(2n)=2!n(n−1)=2n(n−1),(3n)=3!n(n−1)(n−2)=6n(n−1)(n−2).
So by the binomial theorem
f(x)=∑k=0n(kn)xk=(1+x)n.
This is the key move: instead of differentiating a long polynomial term by term, we collapse it to a closed form.
Step 2 — Differentiate twice.
Using the power/chain rule,
f′(x)=n(1+x)n−1,
f′′(x)=n(n−1)(1+x)n−2.
Step 3 — Substitute x=1.
f′′(1)=n(n−1)(1+1)n−2=n(n−1)2n−2.
(Sanity check with n=2: f(x)=1+2x+x2, so f′′(x)=2 for all x. The formula gives 2⋅1⋅20=2. ✓)
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — n(n−1)2n−2.
ANSWER: A
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] limx→0xax−bx is equal to
(A) logab (B) logb (C) logba (D) loga›Reveal solutionSolution
Using limx→0xax−1=loga, the limit equals loga−logb=logba.
Write
xax−bx=x(ax−1)−(bx−1).
As x→0, xax−1→loga and xbx−1→logb, so
limx→0xax−bx=loga−logb=logba.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — logba
- KCET 2022Set C-41 markMCQQ.If f(1)=1, f′(1)=3 then the derivatives of f(f(f(x)))+(f(x))2 at x=1 is (A) 33 (B) 35 (C) 12 (D) 10
›Reveal solutionSolution
Chain rule on the triple composite plus power rule on (f(x))2; because f(1)=1 is a fixed point, every inner argument stays 1 and every factor becomes f′(1)=3.
Step 1 — Note the key fact: x=1 is a fixed point
We are given f(1)=1. Therefore
f(f(1))=f(1)=1,f(f(f(1)))=1
So whenever we substitute x=1, every inner argument collapses to 1, and every derivative factor becomes f′(1)=3. This is what makes the problem tractable without knowing f.
Step 2 — Differentiate the composite f(f(f(x)))
Apply the chain rule from the outside in:
dxdf(f(f(x)))=f′(f(f(x)))⋅f′(f(x))⋅f′(x)
Evaluate at x=1:
=f′(f(f(1)))⋅f′(f(1))⋅f′(1)=f′(1)⋅f′(1)⋅f′(1)=3×3×3=27
Step 3 — Differentiate (f(x))2
Power rule + chain rule:
dxd(f(x))2=2f(x)⋅f′(x)
At x=1:
=2f(1)f′(1)=2×1×3=6
Step 4 — Add (derivative is linear)
dxd[f(f(f(x)))+(f(x))2]x=1=27+6=33
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 33.
ANSWER: A
- KCET 2022Set C-41 markMCQQ.limy→0y33+y3−3= (A) 321 (B) 23 (C) 32 (D) 231
›Reveal solutionSolution
Put t=y3 to turn the expression into the standard ta+t−a form, then rationalise the numerator to kill the 00 indeterminacy.
Step 1 — Recognise the indeterminate form
L=limy→0y33+y3−3
As y→0, the numerator →3−3=0 and the denominator y3→0: the form is 00, so direct substitution is not allowed.
Step 2 — Substitute to simplify
Notice that y appears only as y3. Put
t=y3so that y→0⟺t→0
L=limt→0t3+t−3
Step 3 — Rationalise the numerator
The standard tool for a surd difference is multiplication by the conjugate, because (A−B)(A+B)=A−B removes the radicals from the numerator:
t3+t−3×3+t+33+t+3=t(3+t+3)(3+t)−3=t(3+t+3)t
Since t=0 in the limiting process, cancel t:
=3+t+31
Step 4 — Now substitute t=0
The expression is continuous at t=0, so
L=3+0+31=3+31=231
Step 5 — Cross‑check with the derivative definition
t→0limtf(3+t)−f(3)=f′(3) with f(x)=x. Since f′(x)=2x1, we get f′(3)=231. ✓ Same value.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 231.
ANSWER: D
- KCET 2018Set A-11 markMCQQ.If f(x)={x1+kx−1−kxx−12x+1if −1≤x<0if 0≤x≤1 is continuous at x=0, then the value of k is (A) k=1 (B) k=−1 (C) k=0 (D) k=2
›Reveal solutionSolution
For continuity at x=0, the left-hand limit must equal the right-hand limit, which is f(0)=−1. Evaluating the left-hand limit using rationalisation gives 1k=k, so k=−1.
The key idea here is that continuity at a point means the function's value at that point equals the limit from both sides. For a piecewise function, we must check the boundary where the definition changes — here, x=0.
The left-hand piece (−1≤x<0) involves a difference of square roots, which is a classic indeterminate form 00 when x→0. The right-hand piece (0≤x≤1) is a rational function, and at x=0 it gives a finite value directly.
Let's work through it step by step.
- Find f(0) from the right-hand definition. Since 0≤x≤1 includes x=0, we use the second piece:
f(0)=0−12(0)+1=−11=−1.
For continuity, the left-hand limit must also equal −1.
- Set up the left-hand limit. For −1≤x<0, we have
f(x)=x1+kx−1−kx.
As x→0−, both numerator and denominator approach 0, so we need to simplify.
- Rationalise the numerator. Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate:
x1+kx−1−kx⋅1+kx+1−kx1+kx+1−kx.
The numerator becomes:
(1+kx)−(1−kx)=2kx.
So the expression simplifies to:
x(1+kx+1−kx)2kx=1+kx+1−kx2k.
- Take the limit as x→0−. As x→0, both 1+kx and 1−kx approach 1=1. So:
limx→0−f(x)=1+12k=22k=k.
- Equate for continuity. We need limx→0−f(x)=f(0), so:
k=−1.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that the left-hand limit is taken from the negative side, but here the algebraic simplification is valid for any x=0 near zero, so the sign of x doesn't affect the limit value — only the expression itself matters. The real pitfall is forgetting to check that f(0) is defined by the second piece, not the first.
TipNotice that the rationalisation step eliminated the x in the denominator entirely, leaving a clean expression. This is the standard trick for limits involving differences of square roots — always multiply by the conjugate.
✓Final answerThe value of k is −1, which corresponds to option (B).
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.