Q.The SI unit of energy is J=kg m2s−2; that of speed v is m s−1 and of acceleration a is m s−2. Which of the formulae for kinetic energy (K) given below can you rule out on the basis of dimensional arguments (m stands for the mass of the body):
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Significant Figures Calculation
Significant Figures: The Art of Honest Measurement
Imagine you're measuring the length of a table with a ruler that has marks every millimeter. You see the table edge falls somewhere between 152.3 cm and 152.4 cm. You estimate it as 152.35 cm. But here's the truth: you're certain about 152.3, pretty sure about the 0.05, and guessing about anything beyond that. Significant figures are simply a way to communicate how much of that number you actually know.
The Core Idea
Every measurement has uncertainty. Significant figures (or "sig figs") are the digits in a number that carry meaningful information about its precision. They include all the digits you're sure of, plus one more that you estimate.
A digit is "significant" if removing it would change the precision of the measurement. Zeros can be tricky — they might just be placeholders.
The Rules (Memorize These)
1. Non-zero digits are always significant
123.45 has 5 sig figs. Simple.
2. Zeros between non-zero digits are significant
1002 has 4 sig figs. The zeros are "sandwiched" — they're part of the measurement.
3. Leading zeros are never significant
0.00123 has 3 sig figs. Those zeros just tell you where the decimal point is.
4. Trailing zeros are significant only if there's a decimal point
- 1200 has 2 sig figs (no decimal — zeros are placeholders)
- 1200. has 4 sig figs (decimal tells us those zeros were measured)
- 1200.0 has 5 sig figs
5. Exact numbers have infinite sig figs
If you count 5 apples, that's exactly 5 — no uncertainty. Conversion factors like 1 m=100 cm are exact by definition.
When in doubt, write the number in scientific notation. 1.20×103 clearly has 3 sig figs, while 1.2×103 has 2.
Why This Matters: Calculations
When you multiply or add measurements, the uncertainty propagates. You can't claim more precision than your least precise measurement.
Multiplication and Division
The result should have the same number of sig figs as the measurement with the fewest sig figs.
3.14×2.5=7.85 but you report 7.9 (2 sig figs, because 2.5 has only 2)
Addition and Subtraction
The result should have the same decimal places as the measurement with the fewest decimal places.
12.11+18.0=30.11 but you report 30.1 (one decimal place, because 18.0 has one) …
Why this formula?
Significant Figures: Why the Rules Work
Let’s start with the core idea: significant figures (sig figs) are a way to honestly report how precise a measurement is. The rules for addition/subtraction and multiplication/division aren’t arbitrary — they come directly from how uncertainty propagates through calculations.
1. The Fundamental Idea: Uncertainty is the Key
Every measurement has an uncertainty (error). When we say a length is 12.3 cm, we mean:
- The true value lies somewhere between 12.25 cm and 12.35 cm (assuming ±0.05 cm uncertainty).
- The last digit (3) is uncertain; the digits before it (1 and 2) are certain.
Why this matters: When we combine measurements, the uncertainty in the result depends on the uncertainties of the inputs. Sig fig rules are a shortcut for this uncertainty propagation.
2. Rule for Addition and Subtraction
Statement: The result should have the same number of decimal places as the measurement with the fewest decimal places.
Example:
12.3+4.56=16.86 → round to 16.9 (one decimal place, like 12.3)
Why this holds
Consider two measurements:
- A=12.3±0.05 (uncertainty in the tenths place)
- B=4.56±0.005 (uncertainty in the hundredths place)
When we add:
- Certain digits: 12.3 has certainty up to the tenths place. 4.56 has certainty up to the hundredths place.
- The weaker link: The tenths place of A is uncertain. So in the sum, the hundredths place (from B) is meaningless — because we don’t even know the tenths place of A exactly.
Mathematically, the absolute uncertainty in the sum is:
Δ(A+B)=(ΔA)2+(ΔB)2≈0.052+0.0052≈0.0502
This uncertainty is ~0.05, which affects the tenths place. So reporting the hundredths place is false precision.
Key takeaway: The result’s last significant digit is in the same decimal place as the least precise measurement’s last digit.
3. Rule for Multiplication and Division
Statement: The result should have the same number of significant figures as the measurement with the fewest significant figures.
Example:
12.3×4.56=56.088 → round to 56.1 (three sig figs, like both inputs)
Why this holds
Let’s use relative uncertainty (percentage error):
- A=12.3±0.05 → relative uncertainty = 12.30.05≈0.00407 (0.407%)
- B=4.56±0.005 → relative uncertainty = 4.560.005≈0.00110 (0.110%)
For multiplication, relative uncertainties add (approximately):
A×BΔ(A×B)≈(AΔA)2+(BΔB)2
Plugging in:
≈0.004072+0.001102≈0.00422 (0.422%)
Now, the absolute uncertainty in the product:
Δ(A×B)≈0.00422×(12.3×4.56)≈0.00422×56.088≈0.237
This uncertainty (~0.2) affects the tenths place of the result. So the result 56.088 has uncertainty in the first decimal — meaning only three digits (5, 6, and the uncertain 1) are meaningful. That’s three sig figs, matching the input with fewer sig figs (both have three here).
Key takeaway: The number of sig figs in the result is limited by the least precise measurement’s number of sig figs, because relative uncertainty is dominated by the measurement with the largest relative error.
4. Why These Rules Are Different …
Concept: Dimensional Analysis — check whether each proposed formula has the same dimensions as energy ([ML2T−2]).
Step 1: Dimensions of given quantities
[m]=M, [v]=LT−1, [a]=LT−2.
Energy K has [K]=ML2T−2.
Step 2: Check each option
- [m2v3]=M2⋅(LT−1)3=M2L3T−3 — not ML2T−2.
- [21mv2]=M⋅(LT−1)2=ML2T−2 — matches.
- [ma]=M⋅LT−2=MLT−2 — not ML2T−2. …
Dimensional analysis checks whether the units on both sides of an equation match. For kinetic energy, the correct dimension is [ML2T−2]. Options (a), (c), and (e) fail this test; (b) and (d) pass, so they cannot be ruled out by dimensions alone.
The key idea here is that any valid physical equation must be dimensionally consistent — the units of the left-hand side must equal the units of the right-hand side. Dimensional analysis can’t tell you if a formula is correct (it can’t distinguish between 21mv2 and 163mv2), but it can tell you if a formula is definitely wrong because its units don’t match.
We are given that energy K has SI unit kg m2s−2, so its dimension is:
[K]=ML2T−2
where M = mass, L = length, T = time.
Now we check each candidate by finding the dimension of its right-hand side and comparing.
-
Option (a): K=m2v3
[m2]=M2
[v3]=(LT−1)3=L3T−3
So [m2v3]=M2L3T−3
Compare with [K]=ML2T−2: the powers of M, L, and T are all different.
Ruled out — dimensions don’t match.
-
Option (b): K=21mv2
The constant 21 is dimensionless, so ignore it.
[m]=M
[v2]=(LT−1)2=L2T−2
So [21mv2]=ML2T−2
This matches [K] exactly.
Cannot be ruled out by dimensional analysis.
-
Option (c): K=ma
[m]=M
[a]=LT−2
So [ma]=MLT−2
Compare with [K]=ML2T−2: the power of L is 1 instead of 2.
Ruled out.
-
Option (d): K=163mv2
163 is dimensionless.
[mv2]=ML2T−2, same as option (b).
Cannot be ruled out — dimensions match, even though the numerical factor differs.
-
Option (e): K=21mv2+ma
This is a sum of two terms. For the sum to be dimensionally consistent, every term must have the same dimension as K. …
Method: Dimensional Analysis
Why this method?
Dimensional analysis checks whether both sides of an equation have the same kind of physical quantity (mass, length, time, etc.). If dimensions don’t match, the formula is definitely wrong — no matter what the numbers say.
Steps
Step 1 – Write the dimension of kinetic energy (K)
From the SI unit given:
[K]=M L2T−2
(where M = mass, L = length, T = time)
Step 2 – Write dimensions of each symbol
- [m]=M
- [v]=L T−1
- [a]=L T−2
Step 3 – Check each option by substituting dimensions
(a) K=m2v3
[m2v3]=M2⋅(L T−1)3=M2L3T−3
Compare with [K]=M L2T−2 → Mismatch → Rule out
(b) K=21mv2
[mv2]=M⋅(L T−1)2=M L2T−2
Matches [K] exactly → Dimensionally correct (the 21 is dimensionless)
(c) K=ma
[ma]=M⋅L T−2=M L T−2
Compare: M L T−2 vs M L2T−2 → Mismatch → Rule out
(d) K=163mv2 …
🧠 The Core Idea
Dimensional analysis checks whether the units (dimensions) on both sides of an equation match.
If they don’t match, the formula is definitely wrong.
If they do match, the formula could be correct (but might still be wrong for other reasons).
✓ Step 1: Write dimensions of each quantity
-
Energy K (SI unit: kg m2s−2)
→ [K]=ML2T−2
-
Mass m → [m]=M
-
Speed v → [v]=LT−1
-
Acceleration a → [a]=LT−2
✗ Common Mistake #1: Forgetting that constants like 21 are dimensionless
The mistake: Students think 21 or 163 affects dimensions.
Truth: Pure numbers have no dimensions — they don’t change the dimensional formula.
✓ How to avoid: Always ignore numerical constants when doing dimensional analysis. Only look at variables and physical constants.
✗ Common Mistake #2: Not checking each term separately in sums
The mistake: In option (e), K=21mv2+ma, students check only the first term and assume the whole formula is fine.
Truth: You can only add or subtract quantities with the same dimensions.
- First term: 21mv2 → M(LT−1)2=ML2T−2 ✓ (matches energy)
- Second term: ma → M(LT−2)=MLT−2 ✗ (does not match energy)
Since the two terms have different dimensions, the sum is dimensionally invalid.
✓ How to avoid: For any formula with a sum, check every term separately. If any term has different dimensions, the whole formula is wrong.
✗ Common Mistake #3: Confusing v2 with v3 or v
The mistake: Students mis-calculate powers of T when squaring or cubing speed.
Example:
- v has [v]=LT−1
- v2 → L2T−2
- v3 → L3T−3
If you accidentally treat v3 as L3T−1, you’ll get wrong conclusions.
✓ How to avoid: Write dimensions step-by-step:
[vn]=(LT−1)n=LnT−n
✗ Common Mistake #4: Thinking “it looks like the known formula” means it’s correct
The mistake: Option (b) K=21mv2 is the correct formula, but students sometimes reject (d) K=163mv2 because “the constant is weird.” …
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.Select the INCORRECT statement/s from the following:(a) 22 books have infinite significant figures(b) In the answer of calculation 2.5×1.25 has four significant figures(c) Zero's preceding to first non-zero digit are significant(d) In the answer of calculation 12.11+18.0+1.012 has three significant figures (A) b, c and d only (B) b and c only (C) b and d only (D) a and b only
›Reveal solutionSolution
Evaluate each of the four statements against the significant-figure rules (exact numbers, multiplication rule, leading zeros, addition rule) and collect the false ones.
Statement (a): "22 books have infinite significant figures."
"22 books" is an exact counted number, not a measurement. Counting is not subject to measurement uncertainty — there are precisely 22, not 22±0.5. Exact numbers (and defined constants such as 1 km=1000 m) are treated as having infinite significant figures, so they never limit the precision of a calculation.
⇒ (a) is CORRECT.
Statement (b): "In the answer of 2.5×1.25 there are four significant figures."
The multiplication/division rule: the result carries as many significant figures as the factor with the fewest.
- 2.5 has 2 significant figures.
- 1.25 has 3 significant figures.
The raw product is
2.5×1.25=3.125
but it must be rounded to the smaller count, 2 significant figures:
⇒3.1
The claim of four significant figures is wrong (it just reports every digit the calculator shows).
⇒ (b) is INCORRECT.
Statement (c): "Zeros preceding the first non-zero digit are significant."
Leading zeros are never significant — they are placeholders that merely fix the decimal point. For example 0.0025 has only 2 significant figures (2 and 5); writing it as 2.5×10−3 makes this obvious, since the leading zeros vanish entirely in scientific notation.
⇒ (c) is INCORRECT.
Statement (d): "In the answer of 12.11+18.0+1.012 there are three significant figures." …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.An electric motor raises a mass of 1.5 kg, a distance of 1.128 m in time of 4.79 s. Calculate the power to an appropriate significant figures. (take g=9.81 ms−2) (A) 3.465 W (B) 3.47 W (C) 3.46 W (D) 3.5 W
›Reveal solutionSolution
P=tmgh=3.465W. The least precise datum (mass 1.5kg, two significant figures) fixes the precision, so the answer to the appropriate significant figures is 3.5W — option (D).
Concept
The motor lifts the load against gravity, so the work done equals the gain in gravitational potential energy, W=mgh, and the power is that work divided by the time, P=mgh/t. The phrase "appropriate significant figures" is the real point of the question: a calculated result can carry no more significant figures than the least precise measurement used.
Solution
- Formula: P=tmgh.
- Substitute: P=4.791.5×9.81×1.128.
- Evaluate: 1.5×9.81=14.715; 14.715×1.128=16.59852J; 16.59852/4.79=3.465W. …
- KCET 2023Set D-21 markMCQQ.A metal crystallises in a body centered cubic lattice with the metallic radius 3 Å. The volume of the unit cell in m3 is (A) 64×10−29 (B) 4×10−29 (C) 6.4×10−29 (D) 4×10−10
›Reveal solutionSolution
Use the BCC body-diagonal contact relation to get the edge a from the radius, then cube it — and convert Å to metres carefully.
1. The BCC radius–edge relation
In a body-centred cubic cell the atoms touch along the body diagonal, whose length is 3a and which contains 4 radii:
4r=3a⟹a=34r
2. Substitute r=3 Å
a=34×3=4 A˚
The 3 was chosen precisely so that it cancels — a clean edge length of 4 Å.
3. Volume of the cubic cell
V=a3=(4 A˚)3=64 A˚3
4. Convert to m3
Since 1 A˚=10−10 m,
1 A˚3=(10−10)3=10−30 m3
V=64×10−30 m3=6.4×10−29 m3
5. Reading the distractors …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.