Q.2 g of benzoic acid (C6H5COOH) dissolved in 25 g of benzene shows a depression in freezing point equal to 1.62 K. Molal depression constant for benzene is 4.9 K kg mol−1. What is the percentage association of acid if it forms dimer in solution?
Concept understanding — Colligative Properties Association
Colligative Properties: The Intuition First
Imagine you're at a party. The room is full of people dancing — that's your solvent molecules, moving freely. Now, someone brings in a few heavy, slow-moving guests who just stand in one spot — those are your solute particles. They don't dance, they don't interact much, they just take up space.
What happens? The dancers now have less room to move. They bump into the standing guests more often. The whole atmosphere changes — the dancers can't move as freely, they can't escape the room as easily, and the overall "energy" of the party shifts.
That's the core idea of colligative properties. When you add a non-volatile solute (like salt) to a solvent (like water), the solute particles don't do anything special — they just exist in the solution. But their mere presence changes four measurable properties of the solvent:
- Vapour pressure decreases
- Boiling point increases
- Freezing point decreases
- Osmotic pressure increases
The key insight: these changes depend only on the number of solute particles, not on what kind of particles they are. One molecule of sugar and one ion of salt (if they don't dissociate) affect these properties identically — provided they're the same number of particles.
This is why "colligative" comes from the Latin colligatus meaning "bound together" — the properties are bound to the quantity of solute, not its identity.
The Precise Statement
Colligative properties are properties of a solution that depend solely on the ratio of the number of solute particles to the number of solvent molecules in a given solution, and not on the chemical nature of the solute.
Mathematically, for a dilute solution of a non-volatile, non-electrolyte solute:
ΔP=P0⋅x2
ΔTb=Kb⋅m
ΔTf=Kf⋅m
Π=i⋅MRT
Where:
- ΔP = lowering of vapour pressure
- P0 = vapour pressure of pure solvent
- x2 = mole fraction of solute
- ΔTb = elevation in boiling point
- Kb = ebullioscopic constant (depends only on solvent)
- m = molality of solution
- ΔTf = depression in freezing point
- Kf = cryoscopic constant (depends only on solvent)
- Π = osmotic pressure
- i = van't Hoff factor (accounts for dissociation/association)
- M = molarity
- R = gas constant
- T = absolute temperature
The Crucial Distinction: Association vs. Dissociation
Now, here's where the association part comes in — and it's the twist that catches most students.
The formulas above assume the solute particles remain as individual, independent particles. But in reality:
- Dissociation: Some solutes break apart into smaller particles (e.g., NaCl → Na⁺ + Cl⁻). This increases the number of particles, so the colligative effect is larger than expected.
- Association: Some solutes clump together into larger particles (e.g., acetic acid in benzene forms dimers: 2 CH₃COOH → (CH₃COOH)₂). This decreases the number of particles, so the colligative effect is smaller than expected.
A common mistake: students think "association" means the solute interacts with the solvent. No — association means solute particles bind to each other, reducing the effective particle count. Solvent-solute interactions affect non-colligative properties like solubility.
The van't Hoff Factor i
To account for these real-world effects, we introduce the van't Hoff factor:
i=Number of formula units dissolvedActual number of particles in solution
For a non-electrolyte that doesn't associate or dissociate: i=1
For dissociation (e.g., NaCl): i>1 (ideally 2 for NaCl)
For association (e.g., acetic acid dimerizing): i<1
The corrected formulas become:
ΔTb=i⋅Kb⋅m
ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m
Π=i⋅MRT
A Concrete Example
Consider acetic acid (CH₃COOH) dissolved in benzene. In benzene, acetic acid molecules form hydrogen-bonded dimers:
2CH3COOH⇌(CH3COOH)2
If you dissolve 1 mole of acetic acid, you might end up with only 0.6 moles of particles (0.4 moles of dimers + 0.2 moles of monomers). So i=0.6.
The freezing point depression will be only 60% of what you'd calculate assuming no association. If you didn't account for this, your experimental ΔTf would be smaller than predicted — and you'd know something is "associating" the particles.
Why This Matters for Exams
In Indian competitive exams (JEE, NEET, etc.), you'll often be asked to:
- Calculate i from given association/dissociation data
- Compare colligative effects for different solutes (e.g., which has higher boiling point: 0.1 M NaCl or 0.1 M glucose?)
- Determine the degree of association from experimental ΔTf or ΔTb data
For association problems, remember: if n molecules associate to form one aggregate, and α is the degree of association, then:
i=1−α+nα
For dimerization (n=2): i=1−2α
The Big Picture
Colligative properties are a beautiful example of how statistical behaviour emerges from simple counting. The solvent doesn't care if the solute is sugar, salt, or sand — it only cares how many particles are in its way. Association and dissociation are the real-world corrections that make the theory match experiment, and the van't Hoff factor is the elegant tool that bridges the gap.
When you see a colligative property problem, always ask yourself first: "How many particles are actually floating around in this solution?" That number — not the formula units you started with — is what determines the answer.
"Van't Hoff factor association and dissociation examples" and "colligative properties class 12 chemistry important questions" are frequent searches, both anchored in the Solutions chapter of the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Chemistry curriculum. Distinguishing association from dissociation is a classic conceptual trap tested repeatedly in JEE Main and NEET.
Why this formula?
Colligative Properties & Association: Why the Formula Holds
Let's build this from first principles — understanding why association changes colligative properties, not just memorizing the formula.
The Core Idea: What Are Colligative Properties?
Colligative properties depend only on the number of solute particles in solution, not on their chemical identity. The four key ones are:
- Vapor pressure lowering
- Boiling point elevation
- Freezing point depression
- Osmotic pressure
When a solute associates (e.g., two molecules dimerize), the effective number of particles decreases. This is the entire reason the formula changes.
The van't Hoff Factor: The Bridge
We define the van't Hoff factor i as:
i=number of formula units dissolvedactual number of particles in solution
For a non-electrolyte that does not associate, i=1.
For association, i<1.
Example: Dimerization of Benzoic Acid in Benzene
Benzoic acid (C6H5COOH) forms dimers in benzene:
2C6H5COOH⇌(C6H5COOH)2
If we dissolve n moles of monomer, but only n/2 moles of dimer exist, then:
i=nn/2=0.5
Deriving the Modified Formula
Step 1: Start with the Normal Colligative Formula
For freezing point depression (the most common exam case):
ΔTf=Kf⋅m
where m is the molality of the solute (moles per kg solvent).
Step 2: Replace m with Effective Molality
Because only the number of particles matters, we replace m with i⋅m:
ΔTf=Kf⋅(i⋅m)
This is the general formula for any colligative property when association or dissociation occurs.
Step 3: Express i in Terms of Degree of Association
Let:
- α = degree of association (fraction of molecules that associate)
- n = number of molecules that combine to form one associated particle (e.g., n=2 for dimerization)
For a dimerization (n=2):
- Initially: 1 mole of monomer
- After association: (1−α) moles remain as monomer, and α/2 moles of dimer form
- Total particles = (1−α)+2α=1−2α
Thus:
i=11−2α=1−2α
General formula for association of n molecules:
i=1−α+nα=1−α(1−n1)
Why This Makes Physical Sense
- Association reduces particle count → i<1 → colligative effect is smaller than expected.
- If α=0 (no association), i=1 → back to normal formula.
- If α=1 (complete association into dimers), i=0.5 → half the freezing point depression.
Key Exam Formula Summary
For any colligative property with association:
ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m
where
i=1−α(1−n1)
- n = number of molecules associating (e.g., 2 for dimer, 3 for trimer)
- α = degree of association (between 0 and 1)
Common Pitfall to Avoid
Do not confuse association with dissociation:
- Dissociation (e.g., NaCl → Na⁺ + Cl⁻) → i>1
- Association (e.g., dimerization) → i<1
Both use the same modified formula ΔT=i⋅K⋅m, but the expression for i differs.
Final Takeaway
The formula holds because colligative properties count particles, and association reduces that count. The van't Hoff factor i is simply the ratio of actual particles to expected particles — and the derivation above shows exactly how association changes that ratio.
Concept: Colligative properties (freezing-point depression) combined with association equilibrium. When benzoic acid dimerizes in benzene, the effective number of particles decreases, reducing the observed depression below the theoretical value.
Step 1: Calculate theoretical molality (assuming no association)
Molar mass of benzoic acid = 122g mol−1
mtheoretical=1222×251000=30502000=0.656mol kg−1
Step 2: Find observed molality from experimental data
Using ΔTf=Kf⋅mobserved:
mobserved=4.91.62=0.331mol kg−1
Step 3: Apply van't Hoff factor and association formula
i=mtheoreticalmobserved=0.6560.331=0.504
For dimerization (2A⇌A2), if α is the degree of association:
i=1−2α
0.504=1−2α⟹α=2(1−0.504)=0.992
Percentage association = 0.992×100=99.2%
The percentage association of benzoic acid is 99.2%.
Benzoic acid dimerizes in benzene through hydrogen bonding. By comparing the observed freezing-point depression with the theoretical value (assuming no association), we find the van't Hoff factor i=0.504, which corresponds to 99.2% association into dimers.
Why colligative properties reveal molecular association
Freezing-point depression depends only on the number of solute particles, not their identity. When benzoic acid molecules associate into dimers through hydrogen bonding, the total particle count drops below what we'd expect from isolated molecules. The van't Hoff factor i captures this deviation: i<1 signals association, and by measuring how much smaller i is, we can calculate the fraction of molecules that have paired up.
The key relationship is:
ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m
where m is the molality calculated as if no association occurred.
Step-by-step solution
1. Calculate the theoretical molality (assuming no association)
The molar mass of benzoic acid C6H5COOH is:
M=7(12)+6(1)+2(16)=122 g mol−1
Moles of benzoic acid dissolved:
n=1222=0.01639 mol
Molality (moles per kg of solvent):
m=0.0250.01639=0.6557 mol kg−1
2. Find the van't Hoff factor from observed depression
The observed freezing-point depression is ΔTf=1.62 K. Rearranging the colligative property equation:
i=Kf⋅mΔTf=4.9×0.65571.62=3.2131.62=0.504
This matches the book's own route: the experimentally observed molar mass is Mobs=1.62×254.9×2×1000=241.98 g mol−1, so i=241.98122=0.504.
A common mistake is to use the actual (associated) molality instead of the theoretical molality in this calculation. The van't Hoff factor compares observed behavior to ideal (non-associated) behavior.
3. Relate the van't Hoff factor to the degree of association
When benzoic acid forms dimers:
2C6H5COOH⇌(C6H5COOH)2
Let α be the degree of association (fraction of molecules that dimerize). Starting with 1 mole:
- Monomers remaining: 1−α
- Dimers formed: 2α
- Total particles: (1−α)+2α=1−2α
The van't Hoff factor is:
i=1−2α
4. Solve for the degree of association
0.504=1−2α
2α=1−0.504=0.496
α=0.992
5. Convert to percentage
Percentage association:
Association=0.992×100=99.2%
For dimerization, i ranges from 0.5 (complete association) to 1.0 (no association). Our value of 0.504 is very close to 0.5, indicating nearly complete dimerization—consistent with the strong hydrogen bonding capability of carboxylic acids in non-polar solvents like benzene.
The percentage association of benzoic acid is 99.2%.
Method: Van't Hoff Factor Approach for Association
This problem uses the Van't Hoff factor (i) to account for the association of benzoic acid into dimers in benzene.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1: Calculate the theoretical (expected) molality
If no association occurred, the molality would be:
- Molar mass of benzoic acid (C6H5COOH) = 7×12+6×1+2×16=122 g/mol
- Moles of acid = 1222=0.01639 mol
- Mass of benzene = 25 g = 0.025 kg
Theoretical molality:
mtheoretical=0.0250.01639=0.6556 mol/kg
Step 2: Calculate the observed (actual) molality from freezing point depression
Using ΔTf=Kf×mobserved:
mobserved=KfΔTf=4.91.62=0.3306 mol/kg
Step 3: Find the Van't Hoff factor
i=mtheoreticalmobserved=0.65560.3306=0.504
(This is the same i the book obtains via the observed molar mass: i=241.98122=0.504.)
Step 4: Relate i to degree of association (α)
For dimerization: 2A⇌A2
If α fraction of acid associates into dimers:
- Moles of monomer left = 1−α
- Moles of dimer formed = α/2
- Total moles after association = (1−α)+α/2=1−α/2
The Van't Hoff factor is:
i=moles before associationmoles after association=1−2α
Step 5: Solve for α
0.504=1−2α
2α=0.496
α=0.992
Step 6: Express as percentage
Percentage association=α×100=99.2%
Final Answer:
99.2% of benzoic acid molecules associate into dimers in benzene solution.
Here are the common mistakes students make on this exact problem, along with how to avoid each one.
1. Confusing Observed Molar Mass with Normal Molar Mass
The Mistake:
Students often plug the given mass (2 g) and mass of solvent (25 g) directly into the formula for molar mass without first calculating the observed molar mass from the freezing point depression.
How to Avoid:
Always separate the two steps:
- Find observed molar mass (Mobs) using:
Mobs=ΔTf×wsolventKf×wsolute×1000
where wsolute=2 g, wsolvent=25 g, Kf=4.9 K kg mol−1, ΔTf=1.62 K.
- Find normal molar mass (Mnormal) from the molecular formula:
Mnormal=7(12)+6(1)+2(16)=122 g/mol
Only then compare them.
2. Using the Wrong Formula for Association
The Mistake:
Students sometimes use the dissociation formula (i=1+α) for association problems.
How to Avoid:
For dimer formation (2 molecules → 1 dimer), the van’t Hoff factor is:
i=1−2α
where α is the fraction of molecules that associate.
- If all molecules dimerize (α=1), then i=0.5.
- If none dimerize (α=0), then i=1.
3. Forgetting the Relationship Between i and Molar Mass
The Mistake:
Students calculate i but then don’t connect it correctly to α.
How to Avoid:
Remember:
i=MobsMnormal
Then set:
MobsMnormal=1−2α
Solve for α:
α=2(1−MobsMnormal)
4. Calculation Errors in Mobs
The Mistake:
Mixing up units — especially forgetting to convert grams of solvent to kilograms.
How to Avoid:
Always write the formula with units:
Mobs=1.62×254.9×2×1000
- Kf is in K kg mol⁻¹ → solvent mass must be in kg (hence ×1000).
- Double-check arithmetic: Numerator = 4.9×2×1000=9800 Denominator = 1.62×25=40.5 Mobs=40.59800≈241.98 g/mol
5. Interpreting the Percentage Incorrectly
The Mistake:
Stopping at α=0.5 and writing “50%” without checking if it’s the percentage of molecules associated.
How to Avoid:
- α is the fraction of molecules that associate.
- Percentage association = α×100%.
- In this problem:
i=241.98122≈0.504
0.504=1−2α⇒α=0.992
Percentage association = 99.2% (nearly complete dimerization).
Quick Checklist to Avoid Mistakes
| Step | What to Do |
|---|---|
| 1 | Calculate Mobs from ΔTf data |
| 2 | Calculate Mnormal from formula |
| 3 | Find i=Mnormal/Mobs |
| 4 | Use i=1−α/2 for dimerization |
| 5 | Solve for α and multiply by 100% |
Final Answer:
99.2%
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.A 5% solution (by mass) of cane sugar in water has a freezing point of 271 K . The freezing point of a 5% solution (by mass) of glucose in water is: [freezing point of pure water: 273.15 K ] (A) 271 K (B) 259 K (C) 269 K (D) 273 K
›Reveal solutionSolution
Freezing-point depression depends on molality, not mass percent — since glucose has a smaller molar mass than sucrose, a 5% glucose solution has more solute particles per kg of water, giving a larger depression. Using the given sugar-solution data as a reference (without needing water's real Kf), the glucose solution's freezing point works out to about 269 K, option (C).
Concept and Intuition
For a non-electrolyte, ΔTf=Kf⋅m, where m is molality. Both solutions here are 5% by mass (5 g solute per 100 g solution, so 95 g water), but sucrose (C12H22O11, M≈342) is much heavier per mole than glucose (C6H12O6, M≈180), so the same mass of glucose gives more moles — and a bigger depression. Since Kf is the same for both solutions (same solvent), we can find the glucose depression as a ratio of the sugar depression, without needing water's textbook Kf value.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Depression for the sugar solution.
ΔTf(sugar)=273.15−271=2.15 K
- Ratio of molalities. For the same mass of solute (5 g) in the same mass of water (95 g), molality is inversely proportional to molar mass:
msugarmglucose=MglucoseMsugar=180342=1.9
- Depression for glucose. Since Kf is common to both, ΔTf∝m:
ΔTf(glucose)=1.9×2.15≈4.09 K
- Freezing point of the glucose solution.
Tf(glucose)=273.15−4.09≈269.1 K≈269 K
TipYou never need the actual value of Kf here — the ratio of molar masses directly gives the ratio of depressions, since Kf cancels out.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C): 269 K.
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Identify the correct statement (A) A hypotonic solution is more concentrated with respect to the other solution separated from it by a semi permeable membrane (B) At the freezing point of a solution containing a non-volatile solute, the vapour pressure of the liquid solvent becomes less than that of the solid solvent (C) In case of dissociation of solute particles in a solution, the van't Hoff factor is more than unity because the observed molar mass has a lesser value (D) The molal boiling point elevation constant for a solvent is directly proportional to its enthalpy of vaporisation
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to test each statement against fundamental solution chemistry: osmosis, freezing-point depression, van’t Hoff factor, and boiling-point elevation. Only statement (C) is correct.
Concept and Intuition
This question checks your understanding of four distinct topics in physical chemistry:
- Hypotonic vs. hypertonic solutions (osmosis)
- Freezing point depression (vapour pressure of solid vs. liquid solvent)
- Van’t Hoff factor (effect of dissociation on colligative properties)
- Molal boiling point elevation constant (its relation to enthalpy of vaporisation)
Each statement must be evaluated carefully — common pitfalls arise from mixing up definitions or misremembering proportionalities.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Statement (A):
“A hypotonic solution is more concentrated with respect to the other solution separated from it by a semipermeable membrane.”
- A hypotonic solution has a lower solute concentration than the solution on the other side of the membrane.
- Water moves from the hypotonic (less concentrated) side to the hypertonic (more concentrated) side.
- Therefore, a hypotonic solution is less concentrated, not more. ➜ False.
-
Statement (B):
“At the freezing point of a solution containing a non-volatile solute, the vapour pressure of the liquid solvent becomes less than that of the solid solvent.”
- At the freezing point of a pure solvent, the vapour pressures of solid and liquid are equal.
- For a solution, the vapour pressure of the liquid solvent is lowered by the solute (Raoult’s law).
- At the new freezing point, the vapour pressure of the liquid solvent equals that of the solid solvent (both are lower than the pure solvent’s freezing point).
- So the vapour pressure of the liquid is not less than that of the solid — they are equal at equilibrium. ➜ False.
-
Statement (C):
“In case of dissociation of solute particles in a solution, the van't Hoff factor is more than unity because the observed molar mass has a lesser value.”
- Van’t Hoff factor i=number of formula units dissolvedactual number of particles in solution.
- For dissociation, i>1 (e.g., NaCl → 2 ions, so i≈2).
- Colligative properties depend on particle count. Observed molar mass Mobs=iMtheoretical.
- Since i>1, Mobs<Mtheoretical.
- The statement correctly links dissociation → i>1 → observed molar mass is smaller. ➜ True.
-
Statement (D):
“The molal boiling point elevation constant for a solvent is directly proportional to its enthalpy of vaporisation.”
- The formula is Kb=1000ΔHvapRTb2M, where M is molar mass of solvent.
- Kb is inversely proportional to ΔHvap, not directly proportional.
- A higher enthalpy of vaporisation means it’s harder to boil, so boiling point elevation per molal solute is smaller. ➜ False.
Watch outA common mistake in (B) is forgetting that at the freezing point, the vapour pressures of solid and liquid must be equal — the solute lowers the liquid’s vapour pressure, but equilibrium still requires equality.
TipFor (C), remember: dissociation increases particle count → i>1 → observed molar mass drops. Association (e.g., dimerisation) does the opposite.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.When 0.4 gCH3COOH is added to 40 g of Benzene to form a solution, the freezing point is depressed by 0.45∘C. If Acetic acid undergoes dimerisation in Benzene ( Kf=5.12 K kg/mol ) what is the percentage association of the acid in Benzene? (A) 50.12 (B) 47.2 (C) 94.54 (D) 20.10
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem uses freezing-point depression to find the van’t Hoff factor for acetic acid in benzene, then relates that factor to the degree of dimerisation. The percentage association is about 94.54%, so the correct option is (C).
Concept & Intuition
Freezing-point depression is a colligative property: it depends on the number of solute particles in solution, not their identity. When acetic acid dimerises in benzene, two molecules join to form one dimer, reducing the total particle count. The observed depression is smaller than expected for monomeric acid. By comparing the experimental van’t Hoff factor i (actual particles per formula unit) with the ideal value of 1, we can calculate the fraction of acid that has dimerised.
Step-by-step solution
-
Calculate the expected freezing-point depression if no dimerisation occurred
Mass of acetic acid = 0.4 g
Molar mass of CH3COOH = 60 g/mol
Moles of acid = 600.4=0.006667 mol
Mass of benzene = 40 g=0.040 kg
Molality (if monomeric) = 0.0400.006667=0.1667 mol/kg
Using ΔTf=Kf⋅m:
ΔTf(ideal)=5.12×0.1667=0.8533 ∘C
-
Find the van’t Hoff factor i from the observed depression
Observed ΔTf=0.45 ∘C
The van’t Hoff factor is defined as:
i=ideal ΔTfobserved ΔTf=0.85330.45=0.5274
This i<1 confirms association (dimerisation).
- Relate i to the degree of dimerisation
Let α be the fraction of acetic acid molecules that dimerise.
For every 2 monomers that react, we get 1 dimer.
Start with 1 mole of monomer:
- Moles that dimerise = α → these form α/2 moles of dimer
- Moles that remain monomer = 1−α Total moles after dimerisation = (1−α)+2α=1−2α The van’t Hoff factor is the ratio of final particles to initial particles:
i=1−2α
- Solve for α
0.5274=1−2α
2α=1−0.5274=0.4726
α=0.9452
Percentage association = 0.9452×100%=94.52%
- Match to the given options The closest value is 94.54%, which corresponds to option (C).
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that dimerisation reduces the particle count, so i<1. Using i=1+α (as for dissociation) would give a wrong answer.
TipThe relation i=1−2α comes from the stoichiometry: each dimerisation event removes two particles and adds one, so net loss of one particle per two monomers that react.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.A solute X is found to exist as a dimer in water. A 4 molal solution of X shows a boiling point of 101.04∘C. What is the percentage association of X ? (Kb for water =0.52 K/m). (A) 75 (B) 100 (C) 80 (D) 40
›Reveal solutionSolution
ΔTb gives van't Hoff factor i=0.5; for dimerisation i=1−α/2, so α=1=100%.
ΔTb=101.04−100=1.04 ∘C
Using ΔTb=iKbm:
i=KbmΔTb=0.52×41.04=0.5
For association of n monomers into one particle, i=1−α(1−n1). For a dimer n=2:
i=1−2α⟹0.5=1−2α⟹α=1
So the degree of association is α=1, i.e. 100%.
✓Final answerPercentage association =100% — option (B).
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.What is the amount of ice that separates out on cooling a solution containing 60 g of Ethylene glycol in 250 g of water to −9.3∘C ? Kf of H2O=1.86 K/m; MM of ethylene glycol= 62 amu (A) 90.2 g (B) 56.45 g (C) 195 g (D) 193.55 g
›Reveal solutionSolution
A freezing-point depression of 9.3∘C needs a 5 m solution, which requires only 193.55 g of water to stay liquid, so 250−193.55=56.45 g of ice separates out — option (B).
Concept
As the solution is cooled, pure ice crystallises out. Ice keeps forming until the remaining liquid water is concentrated enough that its freezing point equals the bath temperature. So we find how much liquid water is needed to give a freezing-point depression of 9.3∘C; the rest of the original water has frozen.
Step 1 — Molality required for ΔTf=9.3 K
ΔTf=Kf⋅m⇒m=KfΔTf=1.869.3=5 mol kg−1
Step 2 — Moles of ethylene glycol (non-volatile solute, does not freeze)
n=6260=0.9677 mol
Step 3 — Mass of water that remains liquid
m=kg of liquid watern⇒kg water=50.9677=0.19355 kg=193.55 g
Step 4 — Ice separated
ice=250−193.55=56.45 g
✓Final answerMass of ice that separates out =56.45 g — option (B).
- KCET 2023Set D-21 markMCQQ.A sample of water is found to contain 5.85%(ww) of AB (molecular mass 58.5) and 9.50%(ww) XY2 (molecular mass 95). Assuming 80% ionisation of AB and 60% ionisation of XY2, the freezing point of water sample is [Given: Kf for water 1.86 K kg mol−1, Freezing point of pure water is 273 K and A, B and Y are monovalent ions] (A) 264.25 K (B) 265.56 K (C) 280.44 K (D) 281.75 K
›Reveal solutionSolution
Work with 100 g of solution, get the moles of each solute, apply the van't Hoff factor for partial ionisation, compute the molality in the water only, and use ΔTf=iKfm.
1. Take a 100 g basis of the solution
Because the strengths are given as % (w/w):
- mass of AB =5.85 g
- mass of XY2=9.50 g
- mass of water (solvent) =100−5.85−9.50=84.65 g =0.08465 kg
2. Moles of each solute
nAB=58.55.85=0.1 mol,nXY2=959.50=0.1 mol
3. van't Hoff factors (partial ionisation)
For a solute giving n particles with degree of ionisation α:
i=1+(n−1)α
AB →A++B−, so n=2, α=0.80:
iAB=1+(2−1)(0.80)=1.8
XY2 →X2++2Y− (Y is monovalent, so X must be divalent), n=3, α=0.60:
iXY2=1+(3−1)(0.60)=1+1.2=2.2
4. Total effective (particle) moles
neff=iABnAB+iXY2nXY2=(1.8)(0.1)+(2.2)(0.1)=0.18+0.22=0.40 mol
5. Effective molality
meff=0.08465 kg0.40 mol=4.725 mol kg−1
6. Depression of freezing point
Freezing-point depression is a colligative property — it counts particles, which is exactly why the ionisation had to be folded in:
ΔTf=Kf×meff=1.86×4.725=8.79 K
7. Freezing point of the sample
Tf=Tf∘−ΔTf=273−8.79=264.2 K≈264.25 K
The answer must lie below 273 K (solutes always depress the freezing point), which immediately eliminates (C) 280.44 K and (D) 281.75 K.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) 264.25 K.
ANSWER: A
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-M1 markMCQQ.Abnormal colligative properties are observed only when the dissolved non-volatile solute in a given dilute solution (A) is a non-electrolyte (B) offers an intense colour (C) associates and dissociates (D) offers no colour
›Reveal solutionSolution
Abnormal colligative properties occur because association or dissociation changes the actual number of solute particles relative to the number of formula units dissolved.
Colligative properties (relative lowering of vapour pressure, boiling-point elevation, freezing-point depression, osmotic pressure) depend only on the number of solute particles, not their nature.
When a solute dissociates (e.g. NaCl→Na++Cl−), the particle count increases, so the observed colligative property is larger than expected (van't Hoff factor i>1).
When a solute associates (e.g. dimerisation of benzoic acid in benzene), the particle count decreases, so the observed value is smaller than expected (i<1).
Either way, the measured molar mass and colligative property deviate from the ideal (non-electrolyte, no association) value — these are the “abnormal” colligative properties. A colour, or its absence, is irrelevant.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — associates and dissociates
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.The mole fraction of the solute in a dilute aqueous solution of glucose with a vapour pressure of 750 mm at 373 K is : (A) 1/35 (B) 1/76 (C) 1/25 (D) 1/80
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Raoult's law, xsolute=(P0−P)/P0=10/760=1/76.
At 373 K (100 °C) the vapour pressure of pure water P0=760 mm.
Relative lowering of vapour pressure = mole fraction of solute:
xsolute=P0P0−P=760760−750=76010=761.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 1/76
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.A metal exists as an oxide with formula M0.96O. Metal M can exist as M+2 and M+3 in its oxide M0.96O. The percentage of M+3 in the oxide is, nearly (A) 9.6% (B) 8.3% (C) 4.6% (D) 5%
›Reveal solutionSolution
Impose electrical neutrality on the non-stoichiometric oxide and solve for the number of M3+ ions.
Step 1 — The concept: metal-deficiency defect. In an oxide written M0.96O the metal sites are deficient (a cation vacancy defect, as in FeO / wüstite). The crystal must still be electrically neutral, so some cations are oxidised from M2+ to M3+ to make up the missing positive charge.
Step 2 — Set up the balance. Take 1 mol of the oxide: it contains 0.96 mol of metal and 1 mol of O2− (total negative charge =2).
Let
- a = mol of M2+,
- b = mol of M3+.
Then
a+b=0.96(total metal)
2a+3b=2(charge neutrality: total + charge=2)
Step 3 — Solve. From the first equation a=0.96−b. Substituting:
2(0.96−b)+3b=2
1.92−2b+3b=2
b=2−1.92=0.08.
Step 4 — Convert to a percentage of the metal present.
%M3+=a+bb×100=0.960.08×100=8.33%≈8.3%.
(Check: a=0.88, and 2(0.88)+3(0.08)=1.76+0.24=2 ✓.)
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 8.3%.
ANSWER: B
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.Solute 'X' dimerises in water to the extent of 80%. 2.5g of 'X' in 100g of water increases the boiling point by 0.3 °C. The molar mass of 'X' is [Kb=0.52 K kgmol−1] (A) 26 (B) 13 (C) 52 (D) 65
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molar mass of X=26 g mol−1 — option (A).
X dimerises: 2X⇌X2, degree of association α=0.80. The van't Hoff factor is
i=1−2α=1−20.80=0.60.
Elevation of boiling point: ΔTb=iKbm, with molality m=0.1002.5/M=M25 mol kg−1.
0.3=0.60×0.52×M25=M7.8⇒M=0.37.8=26.
✓Final answerOption (A): molar mass of X=26 g mol−1.
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.A non-volatile solute, 'A' tetramerises in water to the extent of 80%. 2.5 g of 'A' in 100 g of water, lowers the freezing point by 0.3 °C. The molar mass of A in mol L−1 is (Kf for water = 1.86 K kg mol−1) (A) 62 (B) 155 (C) 221 (D) 354
›Reveal solutionSolution
The solute tetramerises, so the van’t Hoff factor is less than 1. Using the observed freezing point depression and the formula ΔTf=iKfm, we find the apparent molar mass, then correct for association to get the true molar mass. The answer is 62 g/mol.
The key idea: when a solute associates (forms larger molecules), the number of particles in solution is less than the number of formula units dissolved. The freezing point depression depends on the actual number of particles, so we first find the apparent molar mass from the given ΔTf, then use the degree of association to find the true molar mass.
For tetramerisation, 4 molecules of A combine to form one tetramer. If the degree of association is α, the van’t Hoff factor i is given by:
i=1−α+nα
where n=4 here. With α=0.80 (80% association), we can compute i directly.
-
Calculate the van’t Hoff factor i
For tetramerisation: n=4, α=0.80.
i=1−α+4α=1−0.80+0.20=0.40
So only 40% of the original number of particles remain, on average.
-
Find the apparent molar mass from the observed depression
The freezing point depression is:
ΔTf=iKfm
where m is the molality of the solution if no association occurred (i.e., using the formula mass of A). Let the true molar mass of A be M g/mol.
Molality (if no association) = 0.1002.5/M=M25 mol/kg.
Plug into the equation:
0.3=0.40×1.86×M25
- Solve for M
0.3=0.40×1.86×M25
First compute 0.40×1.86=0.744.
Then 0.744×25=18.6.
So:
0.3=M18.6
M=0.318.6=62
The true molar mass of A is 62 g/mol.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget the van’t Hoff factor and directly use ΔTf=Kfm with the observed data. That would give an apparent molar mass of 62×0.40=24.8 g/mol, which is not among the options — and more importantly, it’s physically wrong because it ignores the association.
TipNotice that i=0.40 means the observed depression is only 40% of what it would be without association. So the apparent molar mass (from the raw data) is 62×0.40=24.8 g/mol, and the true molar mass is 24.8/0.40=62 g/mol. This is a quick check.
✓Final answerThe molar mass of A is 62 g/mol, which corresponds to option (A).
-
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.