What is a Proof?
A proof is a sequence of statements, each justified by a definition, an axiom, or a previously established proposition, using only allowed logical rules. Every proof is a chain of deductive arguments. Proofs are of two main types:
- Direct Proof – starts directly from what is given in the proposition.
- Indirect Proof – proves an equivalent proposition instead of the original one.
Direct Proof
Begin with the given hypothesis and apply a chain of logical arguments — using axioms, definitions, and already proved theorems — to reach the conclusion.
(i) Straightforward Approach
A direct chain of arguments from the given assumption to the conclusion.
Example: Show that if x2−5x+6=0, then x=3 or x=2.
- Given x2−5x+6=0, factor: (x−3)(x−2)=0.
- Using ab=0⇒a=0 or b=0 (for a,b∈R): x−3=0 or x−2=0.
- Hence x=3 or x=2.
Symbolic form: starting with p, we deduce p⇒r⇒s⇒⋯⇒q, proving p⇒q.
Example: Prove f:R→R defined by f(x)=2x+5 is one-one.
- A function is one-one if f(x1)=f(x2)⇒x1=x2.
- 2x1+5=2x2+5⇒2x1=2x2⇒x1=x2. Hence the function is one-one.
(ii) Mathematical Induction
Based on the axiom: for a subset S of N, if 1∈S and k+1∈S whenever k∈S, then S=N.
Principle of Mathematical Induction: if S(n) is true for n=1 (or some starting point j), and S(k)⇒S(k+1) for all k≥j, then S(n) is true for all n≥j.
Example: Show that if A=[cosθ−sinθsinθcosθ], then An=[cosnθ−sinnθsinnθcosnθ].
- Base case P(1): A1=[cosθ−sinθsinθcosθ] is true.
- Inductive step: assume P(k): Ak=[coskθ−sinkθsinkθcoskθ]. Then
Ak+1=Ak⋅A=[coskθ−sinkθsinkθcoskθ][cosθ−sinθsinθcosθ].
- Multiplying and applying the angle-sum identities gives
Ak+1=[cos(k+1)θ−sin(k+1)θsin(k+1)θcos(k+1)θ],
so P(k+1) is true. By induction, P(n) is true for all n≥1.
(iii) Proof by Cases (Exhaustion)
When the hypothesis p splits into cases p=r∨s∨t (where ∨ means "OR"), prove each case leads to the conclusion q. If r⇒q, s⇒q, and t⇒q, then (r∨s∨t)⇒q, so p⇒q.
Example: Show that in any triangle ABC, a=bcosC+ccosB.
- Case 1 (∠C acute): BD=ccosB and CD=bcosC, so a=BD+CD=ccosB+bcosC.
- Case 2 (∠C obtuse): BD=ccosB and CD=−bcosC (since cos(180∘−C)=−cosC), so a=BD−CD=ccosB+bcosC.
- Case 3 (∠C right angle): a=ccosB and bcosC=bcos90∘=0, so a=bcosC+ccosB.
All three cases give the same result, so the statement holds for any triangle.
Indirect Proof
Instead of proving p⇒q directly, we prove an equivalent proposition.
(i) Proof by Contradiction (Reductio Ad Absurdum)
Assume the given statement is false; deriving a contradiction shows the assumption is wrong, so the original statement is true.
Example: Show that the set of all prime numbers is infinite.
- Assume the primes are finite: P1,P2,P3,…,Pk. Consider N=(P1P2P3…Pk)+1.
- If N is prime, it is a prime not in the list. If N is composite, its prime divisor cannot be any listed prime (each leaves remainder 1).
- Both cases contradict the assumption, so the set of primes is infinite.
(ii) Proof Using Contrapositive
Instead of proving p⇒q, prove its contrapositive ∼q⇒∼p (formed by interchanging and negating hypothesis and conclusion).
Example: Prove f(x)=2x+5 is one-one using the contrapositive.
- Contrapositive: x1=x2⇒f(x1)=f(x2). …