Q.Prove that the function f defined by f(x)=⎩⎨⎧∣x∣+2x2x,k,x=0x=0 remains discontinuous at x=0, regardless the choice of k.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Continuity At A Point
Continuity at a Point
Imagine drawing the graph of a function and putting your pen down at x=a. If the function is continuous there, you can draw straight through that point without lifting your pen — no jump, no hole, no break. That is the intuition; here is the precision.
The Three-Condition Test
For f(x) to be continuous at x=a, all three must hold. If even one fails, f is discontinuous there.
Continuity at x=a requires:
- f(a) is defined,
- x→alimf(x) exists (left- and right-hand limits are equal),
- x→alimf(x)=f(a).
Condition 1 says a is in the domain — the pen must have somewhere to land. Condition 2 says the curve approaches a single value from both sides — no jump. Condition 3 says that common approach value actually matches the function's value at a — no misplaced point.
Why All Three Are Needed
f(x)=x−1x2−1 has limx→1f(x)=2, yet f(1) is undefined (zero denominator). Condition 1 fails, leaving a hole at (1,2).
A piecewise function shows the opposite can be fine:
f(x)=⎩⎨⎧x+13x+1x<2x=2x>2
Here f(2)=3, both one-sided limits equal 3, and they match f(2) — so all three hold and f is continuous at x=2.
Common Pitfalls
"Limit exists" does not mean "continuous." The hole example has a limit but no continuity — the limit must equal the function value.
"Defined everywhere" does not mean "continuous." A piecewise function can have a value at every point and still jump. Always check the one-sided limits.
A Quick Check …
Concept: Continuity at a point — if the one-sided limits differ, no value of k can restore continuity.
Left of 0 (x<0, so ∣x∣=−x):
f(x)=−x+2x2x=x(−1+2x)x=−1+2x1x→0−−11=−1.
Right of 0 (x>0, so ∣x∣=x):
f(x)=x+2x2x=x(1+2x)x=1+2x1x→0+1. …
Splitting on the sign of x gives a right-hand limit of 1 and a left-hand limit of −1 — a finite jump — so limx→0f(x) does not exist and no choice of k makes f continuous at x=0.
Why the choice of k can't help
k only sets the single value f(0). Continuity needs the limit to exist and equal that value. If the left and right limits disagree, the limit itself fails to exist, and then there is nothing f(0) can match — k is powerless.
The absolute value ∣x∣ makes f behave differently on the two sides of 0, so we examine each side.
Step-by-step
1. Right side (x>0). Here ∣x∣=x, so
f(x)=x+2x2x=x(1+2x)x=1+2x1.
Cancelling x is legal because x=0. As x→0+, 1+2x→1, so
limx→0+f(x)=1.
2. Left side (x<0). Here ∣x∣=−x, so
f(x)=−x+2x2x=x(−1+2x)x=−1+2x1.
As x→0−, −1+2x→−1, so
limx→0−f(x)=−1. …
Method: Proving Discontinuity Is Unavoidable for Every Value of a Parameter
This method applies when a problem asks you to show that no choice of a constant k (used to define f(a)) can make a piecewise function continuous at a — the constant only controls the function's value at the point, not the limit approaching it.
Steps
Step 1: Recognise what the constant can and cannot fix
A constant like k defined as f(a)=k only sets the single value at the point. It cannot change what the function does on either side of a. So continuity is only possible if x→alimf(x) exists in the first place — if it doesn't, no k can rescue continuity.
Step 2: Split the expression by sign and simplify each branch …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Sign error when replacing ∣x∣ on the two sides of the point
Why it's wrong: students often use ∣x∣=x on both sides, or forget that ∣x∣=−x for x<0 — this silently changes the algebra and can make a genuine jump discontinuity look removable. Correct approach: explicitly write ∣x∣=−x for x<0 and ∣x∣=x for x>0 before simplifying, treating the two cases completely separately.
Mistake 2: Believing the constant k could still "fix" a jump discontinuity …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.The function f(x)={x∣x∣, if x=00, if x=0 is discontinuous at (A) x=0 (B) x>1 (C) x>0 (D) x<0
›Reveal solutionSolution
The function f(x) is essentially the sign function (signum) for x=0, with a jump at x=0 where the left-hand limit is −1 and the right-hand limit is +1, but f(0)=0; thus it is discontinuous only at x=0, so the answer is (A).
Concept & Intuition
This function is a classic example of a piecewise-defined function that behaves like the sign of x for all nonzero inputs. For x>0, ∣x∣/x=x/x=1; for x<0, ∣x∣/x=(−x)/x=−1. At x=0, the function is defined separately as 0. The key question is: does the function have a limit as x approaches 0? Because the left-hand and right-hand limits are different, the limit does not exist, so the function cannot be continuous at 0. Everywhere else, the function is constant (1 or −1), so it is continuous there.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Simplify the expression for x=0
For x>0, ∣x∣=x, so f(x)=x/x=1.
For x<0, ∣x∣=−x, so f(x)=(−x)/x=−1.
Thus, for all x=0, f(x) is either 1 (if x>0) or −1 (if x<0).
-
Check continuity at x=0
A function is continuous at a point if the left-hand limit, right-hand limit, and the function value at that point all agree.
- Right-hand limit: limx→0+f(x)=limx→0+1=1.
- Left-hand limit: limx→0−f(x)=limx→0−(−1)=−1.
- Function value: f(0)=0. Since 1=−1=0, the limit does not exist, so f is discontinuous at x=0.
-
Check continuity for x>0 (any positive number)
For any a>0, there is an interval around a that stays positive (e.g., (a/2,2a)). On that interval, f(x)=1 (constant). A constant function is continuous everywhere. So f is continuous at every x>0.
-
Check continuity for x<0 (any negative number)
Similarly, for any b<0, there is an interval around b that stays negative. On that interval, f(x)=−1 (constant). So f is continuous at every x<0. …
-
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.Rolle's theorem is not applicable in which one of the following cases? (A) f(x)=x2−4x+5 in [1,3] (B) f(x)=x2−x in [0,1] (C) f(x)=∣x∣ in [−2,2] (D) f(x)=[x] in [2.5,2.7]
›Reveal solutionSolution
Rolle’s theorem requires continuity on the closed interval, differentiability on the open interval, and equal function values at the endpoints. The function f(x)=∣x∣ on [−2,2] fails differentiability at x=0, so the answer is (C).
Rolle’s theorem is a special case of the Mean Value Theorem. It says: if a function f is continuous on [a,b], differentiable on (a,b), and f(a)=f(b), then there exists at least one c in (a,b) such that f′(c)=0.
To check where the theorem is not applicable, we test each condition — continuity, differentiability, and equal endpoints — for every option. The moment any one condition fails, Rolle’s theorem does not apply.
Let’s go through each case.
-
Option (A): f(x)=x2−4x+5 on [1,3]
This is a polynomial — continuous and differentiable everywhere.
Check endpoints: f(1)=1−4+5=2, f(3)=9−12+5=2. So f(1)=f(3).
All conditions satisfied. Rolle’s theorem applies.
-
Option (B): f(x)=x2−x on [0,1]
Again a polynomial — continuous and differentiable everywhere.
Endpoints: f(0)=0, f(1)=1−1=0. So f(0)=f(1).
All conditions satisfied. Rolle’s theorem applies.
-
Option (C): f(x)=∣x∣ on [−2,2]
This is the absolute value function. It is continuous everywhere, including at x=0.
Endpoints: f(−2)=2, f(2)=2 — equal.
But is it differentiable on (−2,2)? No — at x=0, the graph has a sharp corner. The left-hand derivative is −1, the right-hand derivative is +1, so f is not differentiable at x=0, which lies inside the open interval.
Since differentiability fails, Rolle’s theorem does not apply. …
-
- KCET 2024Set A-11 markMCQQ.limx→4πcotx−12cosx−1 is equal to (A) 2 (B) 2 (C) 21 (D) 21
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit is a 00 form that simplifies using trigonometric identities and rationalization; the final value is 21.
The core idea here is that direct substitution gives 00, so we need to manipulate the expression algebraically. The presence of 2cosx−1 suggests rationalizing by multiplying numerator and denominator by the conjugate 2cosx+1, and the cotx−1 in the denominator can be rewritten in terms of sinx and cosx to reveal cancellations.
Let’s work through it step by step.
-
Check the form at x=4π
cos4π=21, so 2cos4π=2⋅21=1, making the numerator 1−1=0.
cot4π=1, so the denominator is 1−1=0.
This is a 00 indeterminate form, so we proceed with algebraic manipulation.
-
Rationalize the numerator
Multiply numerator and denominator by 2cosx+1:
cotx−12cosx−1⋅2cosx+12cosx+1=(cotx−1)(2cosx+1)2cos2x−1
because (2cosx)2−12=2cos2x−1.
-
Simplify 2cos2x−1
Recall the double-angle identity: cos2x=2cos2x−1. So the numerator becomes cos2x.
-
Rewrite the denominator in terms of sine and cosine
cotx−1=sinxcosx−1=sinxcosx−sinx.
So the expression is now:
sinxcosx−sinx⋅(2cosx+1)cos2x=(cosx−sinx)(2cosx+1)cos2x⋅sinx
- Use another identity for cos2x cos2x=cos2x−sin2x=(cosx−sinx)(cosx+sinx). This is perfect because it cancels the (cosx−sinx) factor in the denominator:
(cosx−sinx)(2cosx+1)(cosx−sinx)(cosx+sinx)⋅sinx=2cosx+1(cosx+sinx)sinx
provided cosx=sinx (which holds near x=π/4 except at the point itself). …
-
- KCET 2026Set UNKNOWN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)={x2−1x+1if x≥2if x<2, then limx→2+f(x)+limx→2−f(x)= (A) 7 (B) 5 (C) 6 (D) 9
›Reveal solutionSolution
Evaluate the two one-sided limits at x=2 using the branch of f that applies on each side, then add them.
Step 1 — Right-hand limit
For x≥2, f(x)=x2−1, so
limx→2+f(x)=22−1=3
Step 2 — Left-hand limit
For x<2, f(x)=x+1, so
limx→2−f(x)=2+1=3 …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.