Q.Integrate the following function: xcos−1x
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Integration by Parts
Integration by Parts
The idea: reverse the product rule
Some integrands are a product of two very different functions — xex, xcosx, logx, xsin−1x — where substitution gets you nowhere. Integration by parts is the tool for these. It comes straight from reversing the product rule for differentiation.
Starting from dxd(uv)=uv′+u′v and integrating both sides gives the working formula:
∫udxdvdx=uv−∫vdxdudx.
In words: integral of (first × derivative-of-second) = first × integral-of-second − integral of (derivative-of-first × integral-of-second).
Choosing u: the ILATE rule
The whole game is picking which factor is u (to differentiate) and which is dv (to integrate). Pick u by ILATE — the first type that appears:
- Inverse trig (sin−1x), Logarithmic (logx), Algebraic (x2), Trigonometric (sinx), Exponential (ex).
Whatever comes first in ILATE becomes u; the rest is dv. This makes the new integral ∫vdu simpler than the one you started with.
Worked idea
For ∫xexdx: algebraic before exponential, so u=x, dv=exdx. Then du=dx, v=ex:
∫xexdx=xex−∫exdx=xex−ex+C=ex(x−1)+C. …
Idea: integration by parts with the inverse-trig factor as u (its derivative is algebraic).
Let u=cos−1x,dv=xdx, so du=−1−x21dx,v=2x2:
I=2x2cos−1x+21∫1−x2x2dx.
Write x2=1−(1−x2): …
Integrate by parts with u=cos−1x; the leftover integral is a standard 1−x2x2 form, giving 2x2cos−1x+41sin−1x−4x1−x2+C.
Why integration by parts
We have a product of an algebraic factor x and an inverse-trig factor cos−1x. There's no product rule for integrals, so we use integration by parts, ∫udv=uv−∫vdu. Choose u=cos−1x because its derivative −1−x21 is algebraic and simplifies the problem.
Step 1 — Apply the formula
u=cos−1x,dv=xdx⇒du=−1−x21dx,v=2x2.
∫xcos−1xdx=2x2cos−1x−∫2x2(−1−x21)dx=2x2cos−1x+21∫1−x2x2dx.
Step 2 — The leftover integral
Split the numerator as x2=1−(1−x2):
∫1−x2x2dx=∫1−x2dx−∫1−x2dx.
The first is sin−1x; the second is the standard result ∫1−x2dx=2x1−x2+21sin−1x. Therefore …
Method: Integration by parts with an inverse-cosine factor
For xncos−1x, differentiate the inverse-cosine (ILATE: Inverse first) to remove it, leaving an algebraic-radical integral.
Steps
Step 1: Assign parts by ILATE.
u=cos−1x,dv=xdx.
Step 2: Differentiate and integrate.
du=−1−x21dx,v=2x2.
Note the minus sign in the derivative of cos−1x — it is the single most common slip.
Step 3: Apply the formula.
∫xcos−1xdx=2x2cos−1x+21∫1−x2x2dx, …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Using dxdcos−1x=+1−x21.
Why it's wrong: the derivative of cos−1x carries a negative sign; dropping it flips the sign of every following term. Correct approach: dxdcos−1x=−1−x21.
Mistake 2: Trying to integrate 1−x2x2 by naive substitution only. …
- KCET 2022Set C-41 markMCQQ.∫01(2+x)3xexdx is equal to (A) 271e+81 (B) 91e+41 (C) 91e−41 (D) 271e−81
›Reveal solutionSolution
Use the standard result ∫ex[f(x)+f′(x)]dx=exf(x)+c after splitting x as (2+x)−2.
Step 1 — Why this form is the right tool.
An integrand shaped like ex[f(x)+f′(x)] integrates in one line to exf(x), because dxd(exf(x))=exf(x)+exf′(x). Our job is to massage (2+x)3xex into that shape.
Step 2 — Split the numerator.
Write x=(2+x)−2:
(2+x)3xex=ex[(2+x)3(2+x)−2]=ex[(2+x)21−(2+x)32].
Step 3 — Recognise f and f′.
Take
f(x)=(2+x)21⟹f′(x)=−(2+x)32.
So the bracket is precisely f(x)+f′(x), and
∫(2+x)3xexdx=exf(x)+c=(2+x)2ex+c.
Step 4 — Apply the limits 0 to 1. …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] ∫(1+x)2logxdx
(A) x+1logx−logx+1x+C (B) −x+1logx+logx+1x+C (C) −x+1logx−logx+1x+C (D) x+1logx+logxx+1+C›Reveal solutionSolution
This integral is solved by integration by parts, choosing u=logx and dv=(1+x)−2dx. The result simplifies to −1+xlogx+log1+xx+C, which matches option (B).
The key insight: when you see a product of a logarithm and a rational function, integration by parts is almost always the way. The logarithm’s derivative is simple (1/x), and the rational part often integrates nicely. Here, (1+x)−2 is the derivative of −1/(1+x), so letting u=logx and dv=dx/(1+x)2 is natural.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Set up integration by parts. Let
u=logx,dv=(1+x)2dx.
Then
du=x1dx,v=∫(1+x)2dx=−1+x1.
(Check: derivative of −1/(1+x) is 1/(1+x)2.)
- Apply the formula ∫udv=uv−∫vdu:
∫(1+x)2logxdx=−1+xlogx−∫(−1+x1)⋅x1dx.
The minus signs give:
=−1+xlogx+∫x(1+x)1dx.
- Simplify the remaining integral using partial fractions. Write
x(1+x)1=xA+1+xB.
Multiply through by x(1+x):
1=A(1+x)+Bx.
For x=0: 1=A.
For x=−1: 1=−B⇒B=−1.
So
x(1+x)1=x1−1+x1.
- Integrate term by term:
∫x(1+x)1dx=∫x1dx−∫1+x1dx=log∣x∣−log∣1+x∣+C.
Combine the logs:
=log1+xx+C.
- Put it all together:
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.∫logx2dx= (A) logx2+x+c (B) xlogx2−1+c (C) xlogx2+x+c (D) xlogx2−2x+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The integral ∫logx2dx is solved by rewriting logx2=2logx and then integrating by parts, yielding xlogx2−2x+C. The correct choice is (D).
The key insight is that logx2 is not (logx)2; it's 2logx. This simplifies the integral into a standard form that integration by parts handles cleanly. Many students mistakenly try to integrate logx2 as if it were a square, but the logarithm's power rule saves the day.
- Rewrite the integrand Using the logarithm property logab=bloga, we have:
logx2=2logx
So the integral becomes:
∫logx2dx=∫2logxdx=2∫logxdx
- Integrate ∫logxdx by parts Recall the integration by parts formula: ∫udv=uv−∫vdu. Choose:
u=logxanddv=dx
Then:
du=x1dxandv=x
So:
∫logxdx=xlogx−∫x⋅x1dx=xlogx−∫1dx=xlogx−x+C
- Multiply by 2 and express in original form 2∫logxdx=2(xlogx−x)+C=2xlogx−2x+C …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] ∫logx(logx+2)dx equals to
(A) x[1+(logx)2]+C (B) x(1+logx)2+C (C) 2xlogx+C (D) x(logx)2+C›Reveal solutionSolution
The integrand simplifies to (logx)2+2logx, which is the derivative of x(logx)2 up to a constant, so the answer is x(logx)2+C, matching option (D).
We start by noticing that the integrand is logx(logx+2)=(logx)2+2logx. This looks like something that might be the derivative of a product involving logx. A classic trick: the derivative of x(logx)n gives terms like n(logx)n−1+(logx)n. Here, if we try n=2, we get exactly the pattern we need.
Let’s verify step by step.
- Simplify the integrand
logx(logx+2)=(logx)2+2logx.
- Guess a candidate antiderivative Consider F(x)=x(logx)2. Differentiate using the product rule:
F′(x)=1⋅(logx)2+x⋅2logx⋅x1=(logx)2+2logx.
This matches exactly the integrand.
- Conclude the indefinite integral Since F′(x) equals the integrand, we have ∫[(logx)2+2logx]dx=x(logx)2+C. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] ∫ex[(x+1)2x2+1]dx is equal to
(A) −x+1ex+C (B) ex(x+1x−1)+C (C) x+1ex+C (D) x+1xex+C›Reveal solutionSolution
Write the integrand in the form ex(f(x)+f′(x)) with f(x)=x+1x−1, so the integral is exx+1x−1+C.
Recall the standard result
∫ex(f(x)+f′(x))dx=exf(x)+C.
We must split (x+1)2x2+1 as f(x)+f′(x). Try
f(x)=x+1x−1.
Then
f′(x)=(x+1)2(x+1)−(x−1)=(x+1)22.
Adding: …
- CA Foundation 2024Set sep-20241 markMCQQ.∫logexdx is equal to : (A) xloge(ex)+c (B) xloge(ex)+c (C) xloge(xe)+c (D) loge(ex)+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
∫ln x dx = x ln x − x + c = x·ln(x/e) + c.
Step 1 — Integration by parts
Take u=lnx, dv=dx, so du=x1dx, v=x:
∫lnxdx=xlnx−∫x⋅x1dx
Step 2 — Complete the integral
=xlnx−∫1dx=xlnx−x+c
Step 3 — Rewrite in the option's form
Factor x and use 1=lne:
x(lnx−1)=x(lnx−lne)=xln(ex)
∫lnxdx=xloge(ex)+c
Why the other options are wrong: (A) x·ln(ex) = x(ln x + 1) has the wrong sign; (C) x·ln(e/x) reverses the ratio; (D) drops the leading x factor. Only (B) matches x ln x − x. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] ∫ex(1+tanx+tan2x)dx is equal to
(A) excosx+c (B) exsinx+c (C) extanx+c (D) exsecx+c›Reveal solutionSolution
(Check by differentiating: d/dx [e^x tan x] = e^x tan x + e^x sec^2 x = e^x (1 + tan x + tan^2 x). Correct.)
Concept: the standard form integral of e^x [ f(x) + f'(x) ] dx = e^x f(x) + c.
Rewrite the bracket using 1 + tan^2 x = sec^2 x:
1 + tan x + tan^2 x = tan x + (1 + tan^2 x) = tan x + sec^2 x.
So the integral is
integral e^x [ tan x + sec^2 x ] dx.
Here f(x) = tan x and f'(x) = sec^2 x, exactly the required pattern. …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.The value of ∫(1+x)2xexdx is equal to (A) ex(1+x)+c (B) ex(1+x2)+c (C) ex(1+x)2+c (D) 1+xex+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
Split (1+x)2x into f+f′ form and apply the standard result ∫ex[f(x)+f′(x)]dx=exf(x)+c.
Step 1 — The concept
The standard result comes straight from the product rule:
dxd[exf(x)]=exf(x)+exf′(x)=ex[f(x)+f′(x)]
So whenever an integrand is ex times (some function + its own derivative), the answer is simply exf(x)+c. Our job is to force (1+x)2x into that shape.
Step 2 — Split the rational part
Write the numerator as x=(1+x)−1:
(1+x)2x=(1+x)2(1+x)−1=1+x1−(1+x)21
Step 3 — Identify f and f′
Take
f(x)=1+x1⟹f′(x)=−(1+x)21
Then exactly
(1+x)2x=f(x)+f′(x)
Step 4 — Integrate …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.The value of ∫ex[1+cosx1+sinx]dx is equal to (A) extan2x+c (B) extanx+c (C) ex(1+cosx)+c (D) ex(1+sinx)+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The integral simplifies using the identity 1+cosx1+sinx=21sec22x+tan2x, then applying the standard form ∫ex[f(x)+f′(x)]dx=exf(x)+c to get extan2x+c, which matches option (A).
The key insight here is that the integrand ex⋅1+cosx1+sinx is a product of ex with a trigonometric expression. Integrals of the form ∫ex[f(x)+f′(x)]dx have a neat closed form: exf(x)+c. So if we can rewrite 1+cosx1+sinx as f(x)+f′(x) for some function f(x), the integral becomes trivial.
Let’s see if that works.
- Simplify the trigonometric fraction. Use the half-angle identities: sinx=2sin2xcos2x, cosx=2cos22x−1=1−2sin22x, and 1+cosx=2cos22x. Then
1+cosx1+sinx=2cos22x1+2sin2xcos2x.
- Split the numerator.
2cos22x1+2cos22x2sin2xcos2x=21sec22x+tan2x.
- Recognise the f(x)+f′(x) pattern. Let f(x)=tan2x. Then
f′(x)=21sec22x.
So indeed
1+cosx1+sinx=f′(x)+f(x).
- Apply the standard result. The integral becomes …
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.∫(1+x21−x)2exdx= (A) 1+x2ex+c (B) (1+x2)2ex+c (C) (1+x2)2−ex+c (D) 1+x2−2ex+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The integral is 1+x2ex+c.
Use ∫ex(f(x)+f′(x))dx=exf(x)+c. Take f(x)=1+x21, so f′(x)=(1+x2)2−2x. Then
f+f′=(1+x2)2(1+x2)−2x=(1+x2)2(1−x)2=(1+x21−x)2, …
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.∫x3sin3xdx= (A) −3x3cos3x−3x2sin3x+92xcos3x−272sin3x+C (B) 3x3cos3x+3x2sin3x−92xcos3x−272sin3x+C (C) −3x3cos3x+3x2sin3x+92xcos3x−272sin3x+C (D) −3x3cos3x+3x2sin3x−92xcos3x+272sin3x+C
›Reveal solutionSolution
Apply integration by parts three times, taking x3 (then x2, then x) as the first function each time, and assemble the four terms.
Step 1 — First integration by parts.
With u=x3, dv=sin3xdx⇒v=−3cos3x:
∫x3sin3xdx=−3x3cos3x+33∫x2cos3xdx=−3x3cos3x+∫x2cos3xdx.
Step 2 — Second integration by parts.
With u=x2, dv=cos3xdx⇒v=3sin3x:
∫x2cos3xdx=3x2sin3x−32∫xsin3xdx.
Step 3 — Third integration by parts.
With u=x, dv=sin3xdx⇒v=−3cos3x:
∫xsin3xdx=−3xcos3x+31∫cos3xdx=−3xcos3x+9sin3x.
Step 4 — Back-substitute into Step 2.
∫x2cos3xdx=3x2sin3x−32(−3xcos3x+9sin3x)=3x2sin3x+92xcos3x−272sin3x.
Step 5 — Back-substitute into Step 1.
∫x3sin3xdx=−3x3cos3x+3x2sin3x+92xcos3x−272sin3x+C.
Step 6 — Verify by differentiation (spot-check). …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.