Q.Consider the following Linear Programming Problem: Minimise Z=x+2y Subject to 2x+y≥3, x+2y≥6, x,y≥0. Show graphically that the minimum of Z occurs at more than two points.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Multiple Optimal Solutions
Multiple Optimal Solutions
Imagine climbing to the highest point of a mountain range and finding two peaks of exactly the same height, joined by a flat ridge. You have not found one best spot — you have found many, all equally high. That is the picture behind multiple optimal solutions: a problem where more than one choice gives the same best value of the objective.
A concrete example
Maximise Z=2x+2y subject to x+y≤10, x,y≥0.
Since Z=2x+2y=2(x+y) and x+y≤10, the largest value is Z=20. But which point achieves it? Every point on the line x+y=10 in the first quadrant — (10,0), (0,10), (5,5), (3,7) — gives Z=20. There is not one optimal point but a whole edge of optimal points.
Why it happens
In graphical linear programming, multiple optimal solutions occur when the objective line is parallel to one of the boundary edges of the feasible region. As you slide the objective line outward, its final contact with the region is that whole edge, not a single corner — so every point on the edge (including both its corner endpoints) is optimal.
How to recognise it
Using the graphical method:
- Draw the feasible region.
- Draw the objective line ax+by=constant for any value.
- Slide it parallel to itself in the direction of improvement.
- If the last contact is a line segment rather than a single corner, the problem has multiple optimal solutions.
A quick algebraic hint: if the objective Z=ax+by gives the same optimal value at two adjacent corners, then every point on the edge joining them is also optimal.
Why it matters …
Concept: Graphical Method – Unboundedness and Multiple Optimal Solutions
The feasible region is unbounded (open away from the origin), but the objective function has a lower bound. The minimum occurs along an entire edge of the region, not at a single corner.
Steps:
-
Plot the constraints:
2x+y≥3 (line through (0,3) and (1.5,0))
x+2y≥6 (line through (0,3) and (6,0))
x,y≥0 (first quadrant).
-
The feasible region is the intersection of the half-planes above both lines, in the first quadrant. The corner points are A(0,3) and B(6,0).
-
Evaluate Z=x+2y at the corners:
At A(0,3): Z=0+6=6
At B(6,0): Z=6+0=6
Both give the same value. …
The minimum value is Z=6, attained at every point of the line segment joining (0,3) and (6,0) — infinitely many points, hence at more than two.
Draw the constraint boundaries.
- 2x+y=3 meets the axes at (1.5,0) and (0,3).
- x+2y=6 meets the axes at (6,0) and (0,3).
Both inequalities are "≥", so the feasible region lies above/right of each line, with x,y≥0. The region is unbounded, and its two corner points are (0,3) and (6,0).
Evaluate Z=x+2y at the corners.
Z(0,3)=0+2(3)=6,Z(6,0)=6+2(0)=6.
Both corners give the same value, Z=6.
Why the minimum repeats along a whole edge. …
Method: Detecting Infinitely Many Optima (Objective Parallel to an Edge)
Use this when asked to show that an optimum is attained at more than one point.
Steps
Step 1: Build the feasible region and list its corners.
Plot the constraint lines, shade with the origin test, and find the vertices where boundaries meet.
Step 2: Evaluate Z=ax+by at the corners and look for a tie.
If two adjacent corners give the same optimal value, the objective is not optimised at a single point.
Step 3: Confirm the objective is parallel to that edge. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Reporting a single optimal corner.
Why it's wrong: both (0,3) and (6,0) give Z=6, and the objective x+2y is parallel to the edge x+2y=6, so the whole segment is optimal — naming just one point misses the point of the question. Correct approach: after finding the tie, state that every point on the joining edge is a minimiser.
Mistake 2: Shading the wrong side of the ≥ constraints. …
- KCET 2026Set UNKNOWN1 markMCQQ.The corner points of the feasible region determined by the system of linear constraints are (0,10), (5,5), (15,15), (0,20). Let z=px+qy, where p,q>0. The relation between p and q, so that the maximum z occurs at both points (15,15) and (0,20) is (A) p=q (B) p=2q (C) q=2p (D) q=3p
›Reveal solutionSolution
If z=px+qy has its maximum simultaneously at (15,15) and (0,20), the value of z at both points must be equal — set the two expressions equal and solve for the ratio q:p.
Step 1 — Set up the equal-value condition
Since the maximum of z occurs at both (15,15) and (0,20), the objective function must give the same value there:
z(15,15)=z(0,20).
Step 2 — Substitute the coordinates
p(15)+q(15)=p(0)+q(20)
15p+15q=20q.
Step 3 — Solve for the relation between p and q
15p=20q−15q=5q
15p=5q⟹q=3p. …
- KCET 2026Set UNKNOWN1 markMCQQ.In Linear Programming Problem (LPP), the objective function Z=ax+by has the same maximum value at two corner points. The number of points at which Zmax occurs is (A) 1 (B) 2 (C) 0 (D) Infinity
›Reveal solutionSolution
A linear function is constant along any line segment joining two points at which it takes equal values, so if two corner points share the maximum, the whole edge between them does too — giving infinitely many optimal points.
Step 1 — Recall the theorem on optimal solutions in LPP
For a linear objective function Z=ax+by over a convex feasible region, if Z attains the same maximum value M at two distinct corner points P1 and P2, then Z attains the value M at every point on the line segment P1P2.
Step 2 — Why this is true
Any point on the segment joining P1=(x1,y1) and P2=(x2,y2) can be written as
(x,y)=(λx1+(1−λ)x2, λy1+(1−λ)y2),0≤λ≤1.
Substituting into Z=ax+by and using ax1+by1=ax2+by2=M gives …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.The corner points of the feasible region determined by the system of linear constraints are (0,3),(1,1) and (3,0), If objective function is Z=px+qy,p,q>0 then the condition on p and q so that the minimum of Z occurs at (3,0) and (1,1) is (A) p=3q (B) 3p=q (C) p=2q (D) p=2q
›Reveal solutionSolution
If a linear objective attains its minimum at two corner points, it is constant along the edge joining them; equating Z at (3,0) and (1,1) gives 2p=q, i.e. p=2q — option (C).
Concept
In a linear programming problem the feasible region is a convex polygon and Z=px+qy is linear, so its optimum occurs at a corner point. If the same minimum is reached at two different corners, then every point on the segment between them gives that identical minimum value — i.e. Z is constant along that edge. That single fact provides one equation relating p and q.
Solution
The minimum is attained at (3,0) and (1,1), so evaluate Z at each and set them equal.
- At (3,0):
Z=p(3)+q(0)=3p.
- At (1,1):
Z=p(1)+q(1)=p+q.
- Both are the minimum, so …
- KCET 2022Set C-41 markMCQQ.The corner points of the feasible region of an LPP are (0, 2), (3, 0), (6, 0), (6, 8) and (0, 5), then the minimum value of z=4x+6y occurs at (A) infinite number of points (B) only one point (C) only two points (D) finite number of points
›Reveal solutionSolution
The minimum value of z is achieved at two adjacent corner points, and by the corner-point theorem it is then achieved at every point of the line segment joining them — infinitely many points.
Step 1 — Evaluate z=4x+6y at each corner point.
Corner z=4x+6y (0,2) 0+12=12 (3,0) 12+0=12 (6,0) 24 (6,8) 24+48=72 (0,5) 30 Step 2 — Identify the minimum. The smallest value is zmin=12, and it occurs at two corner points: (0,2) and (3,0). …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.