Q.An electron microscope uses electrons accelerated by a voltage of 50 kV. Determine the de Broglie wavelength associated with the electrons. If other factors (such as numerical aperture, etc.) are taken to be roughly the same, how does the resolving power of an electron microscope compare with that of an optical microscope which uses yellow light?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — De Broglie Wavelength
De Broglie Wavelength: When Particles Start Acting Like Waves
You already know that light behaves like a wave (interference, diffraction) and like a particle (photoelectric effect). That's wave-particle duality for light. De Broglie's radical idea in 1924 was: if light can be both, why can't matter be both too?
He proposed that every moving particle — an electron, a proton, even a cricket ball — has a wavelength associated with it. The faster it moves, the shorter that wavelength becomes.
The Intuition
Think of a wave on a string. Its wavelength is the distance between two consecutive crests. Now imagine an electron moving through space. De Broglie said that the electron's motion itself creates a "matter wave" — a wave of probability that guides where the electron is likely to be found.
You never see this wavelength in everyday life because for large objects it's unimaginably tiny. A cricket ball moving at 30 m/s has a de Broglie wavelength of about 10−34 m — far smaller than an atomic nucleus. That's why macroscopic objects behave like particles.
The Precise Statement
The de Broglie wavelength λ of a particle is given by:
λ=ph
where:
- h is Planck's constant (6.626×10−34 J⋅s)
- p is the momentum of the particle (p=mv for non-relativistic speeds)
Key point: The wavelength depends only on momentum, not on charge, mass, or any other property. A fast electron and a slow proton can have the same wavelength if their momenta are equal.
What This Means Physically
-
For electrons in atoms: The de Broglie wavelength of an electron in a hydrogen atom is roughly the size of the atom itself (≈10−10 m). This is why electrons form standing waves around the nucleus — only certain wavelengths "fit" into the orbit, which explains quantised energy levels.
-
For experiments: If you fire electrons through a crystal, they diffract just like X-rays. This was confirmed by Davisson and Germer in 1927 — a Nobel-winning experiment that proved de Broglie right.
-
For large objects: The wavelength is so small that wave behaviour is undetectable. A car moving at 100 km/h has λ≈10−38 m — you'd need a slit smaller than an atom to see diffraction.
A common mistake is to think the de Broglie wavelength is the size of the particle. It is not. It is the wavelength of the probability wave associated with the particle. The particle itself remains point-like.
Worked Example
Question: What is the de Broglie wavelength of an electron moving at 2.0×106 m/s? (Mass of electron me=9.11×10−31 kg)
Solution:
First, find momentum:
p=mv=(9.11×10−31)(2.0×106)=1.822×10−24 kg⋅m/s
Then apply de Broglie's formula: …
Why this formula?
De Broglie Wavelength: Why Matter Has a Wave Nature
The idea that a moving particle has a wavelength is one of the most radical shifts in physics. It came from Louis de Broglie in 1924, who asked a simple question: if light — which we thought was a wave — can behave like a particle (the photon), then why can't a particle behave like a wave?
The Core Insight: Symmetry in Nature
De Broglie started from Einstein's relation for a photon. For light, the energy E and momentum p of a photon are linked to its wave properties — frequency f and wavelength λ — by:
E=hfandp=λh
where h is Planck's constant. These are not arbitrary; they come from the fact that light is an electromagnetic wave, and Planck had already shown that energy comes in quanta hf.
De Broglie's reasoning was a leap of symmetry: if nature treats light and matter on equal footing (as Einstein's special relativity suggests), then any moving particle should also have a wavelength associated with it. He proposed that the same relation holds for matter:
λ=ph
where p=mv is the momentum of the particle (for non-relativistic speeds). This is the de Broglie wavelength.
Why This Formula Makes Sense: A Simple Derivation
There is no rigorous "derivation" from first principles — de Broglie's hypothesis was a postulate. But we can see why it is plausible by combining two key ideas from relativity and quantum theory.
Step 1: Energy of a particle from relativity
For a particle with rest mass m0, the total energy in special relativity is:
E=p2c2+m02c4
For a photon, m0=0, so E=pc. This matches the photon's wave relation E=hf and p=h/λ.
Step 2: Assume the same wave-particle duality for matter
If a massive particle also has a wave associated with it, then its energy should also be E=hf, where f is the frequency of the matter wave. Equating the relativistic energy with the quantum energy:
hf=p2c2+m02c4
For a particle moving at non-relativistic speeds (v≪c), the momentum p=mv is small compared to m0c, so we can expand:
E≈m0c2+2m0p2
The first term is rest energy, which is constant. The second term is kinetic energy K=p2/(2m). The wave frequency f then corresponds to the kinetic part (since rest energy doesn't contribute to motion). But the key relation we want is between wavelength and momentum.
Step 3: The wavelength from the wave speed
For any wave, the speed vwave=fλ. For a matter wave, de Broglie proposed that the wave speed equals the particle's speed v (this is the phase velocity). So:
v=fλ
Now use E=hf and E=21mv2 (non-relativistic kinetic energy). Then:
f=hE=2hmv2
Substitute into v=fλ:
v=2hmv2λ⇒λ=mv2h
This gives λ=2h/p, which is wrong by a factor of 2. The correct formula is λ=h/p. …
A 50 kV accelerating voltage gives electrons a de Broglie wavelength thousands of times shorter than visible light, and since resolving power improves as wavelength shrinks, an electron microscope can resolve details far finer than any optical microscope. …
A 50 kV potential gives electrons momentum p=2meeV and hence λ=h/p≈5.5 pm — about 10^5 times shorter than yellow light's ~590 nm — so, since resolving power scales as 1/λ, the electron microscope resolves roughly 10^5 times finer detail.
Step 1 — de Broglie wavelength of the 50 kV electrons.
KE=eV=(1.6×10−19)(5×104)=8×10−15 J
p=2meKE=2(9.11×10−31)(8×10−15)=1.458×10−44≈1.207×10−22 kg m/s
λ=ph=1.207×10−226.63×10−34≈5.49×10−12 m
Step 2 — Compare with yellow light.
Yellow light has a wavelength of about λyellow≈5.9×10−7 m.
Resolving power (the ability to distinguish two close points) is inversely proportional to the probing wavelength — a shorter wavelength resolves finer detail. So the ratio of resolving powers is …
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 on this concept.
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.The basic principle used behind the working of electron microscope is: (A) Using charged mirrors to achieve the desired magnification. (B) Wave nature of electrons. (C) Electrostatic field created by a beam of electrons. (D) Magnifying power of very thin aperture convex lenses.
›Reveal solutionSolution
The electron microscope relies on the wave nature of electrons to achieve high resolution, far beyond what light microscopes can offer. The correct answer is (B).
The key insight is that resolution in any microscope is fundamentally limited by the wavelength of the probing radiation. Light microscopes are limited by the wavelength of visible light (about 400–700 nm). To see smaller objects (like viruses or molecules), we need a "probe" with a much shorter wavelength. Electrons, when accelerated, behave as waves (de Broglie wavelength) that can be thousands of times shorter than light waves. This wave nature is what makes electron microscopy possible — not mirrors, electrostatic fields from the beam itself, or thin lenses.
-
Why not (A) "charged mirrors"?
Electron microscopes use magnetic coils (electromagnetic lenses) to focus electrons, not charged mirrors. While electrostatic lenses exist, they are not the core principle; the resolution comes from the electron wavelength.
-
Why not (C) "electrostatic field created by a beam of electrons"?
The beam's own field is a nuisance (causes beam spreading), not the operating principle. The microscope uses external magnetic fields to shape the beam.
-
Why not (D) "magnifying power of very thin aperture convex lenses"?
Convex lenses are for light. Electrons are focused by magnetic fields. Apertures are used to block scattered electrons, but they don't provide magnification.
-
Why (B) is correct: The wave nature of electrons
In 1924, Louis de Broglie proposed that particles have a wavelength:
λ=ph
where h is Planck’s constant and p is momentum. For an electron accelerated through a voltage V,
-
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.What is the ratio of de Broglie wavelength of an electron to that of proton if the velocity of proton is 61 the velocity of electron? (A) 603:1 (B) 306:1 (C) 1:306 (D) 1:603
›Reveal solutionSolution
The de Broglie wavelength is inversely proportional to momentum. Given the velocity ratio and known masses, the wavelength ratio of electron to proton is 306:1, so the correct option is (B).
The key idea is the de Broglie relation:
λ=ph=mvh
where h is Planck’s constant, m is mass, and v is velocity.
Since h is constant, the ratio of wavelengths depends only on the ratio of momenta.
We are told the proton’s velocity is 61 the electron’s velocity, so we need the mass ratio of proton to electron.
- Write the ratio of wavelengths
λpλe=h/(mpvp)h/(meve)=mevempvp
- Insert the given velocity relation vp=61ve, so
λpλe=mevemp⋅61ve=6memp
- Use the known mass ratio The proton mass is about 1836 times the electron mass:
mp≈1836me
Therefore,
λpλe=61836=306
- Interpret the ratio …
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.If we consider an electron and a photon of same de-Broglie wavelength, then they will have same (A) Angular momentum (B) Energy (C) Velocity (D) Momentum
›Reveal solutionSolution
λ=h/p links wavelength to momentum alone, so equal de Broglie wavelength forces equal momentum — and nothing else.
Step 1 — The de Broglie relation.
For any particle (matter or photon), the de Broglie wavelength is
λ=ph
This is a universal relation: it involves Planck's constant and the momentum, and no other property — not mass, not charge, not speed.
Step 2 — Apply the given condition.
We are told λe=λph=λ. Therefore
pe=λh=pph
So the momenta are equal. That already identifies the answer, but let us check that the other three quantities are not forced to be equal — this is what makes the question worth asking.
Step 3 — Energy is different.
- Photon (massless, moves at c): Eph=pc=λhc.
- Electron (non-relativistic, mass m): Ee=2mp2=2mλ2h2.
These have completely different dependences on λ (1/λ versus 1/λ2) and are equal only by accident, not in general. In fact for typical wavelengths Eph≫Ee.
Step 4 — Velocity is different. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Two subatomic particles 1 and 2, with the same kinetic energies have their de- Broglie wavelengths as λ1&λ2 and masses as 3 m and 6 m respectively. Determine the ratio λ1:λ2. (A) 2:1 (B) 1:2 (C) 2:1 (D) 1:2
›Reveal solutionSolution
For particles with equal kinetic energy, de Broglie wavelength is inversely proportional to the square root of mass. Since masses are 3m and 6m, the ratio λ₁:λ₂ = √(6m/3m) = √2:1, so option (C).
Concept & Intuition
The de Broglie wavelength of a particle is given by λ = h/p, where h is Planck’s constant and p is momentum. When two particles have the same kinetic energy, their momenta are not equal — heavier particles move slower for the same kinetic energy. Since kinetic energy K = p²/(2m), we have p = √(2mK). So λ = h/√(2mK). With K constant, λ ∝ 1/√m. That’s the key: wavelength is inversely proportional to the square root of mass.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Write the de Broglie relation
λ = h / p, where p is momentum.
-
Express momentum in terms of kinetic energy
Kinetic energy K = p²/(2m) ⇒ p = √(2mK).
So λ = h / √(2mK).
-
Apply to both particles
For particle 1 (mass m₁ = 3m): λ₁ = h / √(2·3m·K).
For particle 2 (mass m₂ = 6m): λ₂ = h / √(2·6m·K).
-
Take the ratio …
-
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.de Broglie wave length associated with an electron accelerated through a potential difference ' V ' is ' λ '. If the accelerating potential is halved, what will be the new wave length associated with the charged particle? (A) 2λ (B) 2λ (C) 2λ (D) 2λ
›Reveal solutionSolution
The de Broglie wavelength of an electron accelerated through a potential V is inversely proportional to the square root of V. Halving V multiplies the wavelength by 2, so the new wavelength is 2λ. The correct option is (D).
The key idea here is the de Broglie relation for a charged particle accelerated from rest. When an electron is accelerated through a potential difference V, it gains kinetic energy equal to eV. This kinetic energy determines its momentum, and the de Broglie wavelength is inversely proportional to momentum. Since momentum depends on the square root of kinetic energy, it depends on the square root of V. Halving V therefore changes the wavelength by a factor of 2.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Relate kinetic energy to accelerating potential An electron of charge e accelerated from rest through a potential difference V gains kinetic energy:
K=eV
This is the energy it has when it reaches the target.
- Express momentum in terms of kinetic energy For a non-relativistic electron (which is valid for typical accelerating potentials up to a few thousand volts), the kinetic energy is related to momentum p by:
K=2mp2
where m is the electron’s mass. Solving for p:
p=2mK=2meV
- Apply the de Broglie relation The de Broglie wavelength λ is:
λ=ph=2meVh
Here h is Planck’s constant. Notice that λ is inversely proportional to V.
- Halve the accelerating potential If the new potential is V′=2V, then the new wavelength λ′ is:
λ′=2me⋅(V/2)h=2meV⋅21h=2meV⋅21h
Simplify: …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.A particle of mass M at rest decays into masses m1 and m2 with non-zero velocities. The ratio of de Broglie wavelengths λ1 and λ2 of the particles is (A) m1m2 (B) m2m1 (C) m2m1 (D) 1:1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The de Broglie wavelength depends only on momentum, and in a decay from rest, momentum is conserved so the two particles have equal and opposite momenta. Therefore their wavelengths are equal, giving ratio 1:1.
The key concept here is conservation of momentum combined with the de Broglie relation.
A common mistake is to think wavelength depends on mass or energy, but the de Broglie wavelength is λ=h/p, where p is momentum. Since the parent particle is at rest, its total momentum is zero. After decay, the two daughter particles must have equal and opposite momenta to conserve momentum. Thus their momenta are equal in magnitude, and so their de Broglie wavelengths are equal — regardless of their masses.
-
Recall the de Broglie relation
For any particle, λ=ph, where h is Planck’s constant and p is the magnitude of its momentum.
-
Apply conservation of momentum
The parent particle is initially at rest, so total momentum is zero. After decay,
p1+p2=0⇒p1=−p2.
Hence the magnitudes are equal: p1=p2.
- Compare wavelengths Since λ1=h/p1 and λ2=h/p2, and p1=p2, we get
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.The velocity of an electron so that its momentum is equal to that of a photon of wavelength 660 nm is (A) 109.88 cm s−1 (B) 1098 ms−1 (C) 1098 cm s−1 (D) 109 ms−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Setting the electron momentum equal to the photon momentum h/λ gives an electron speed of about 1098 m s−1.
Photon momentum:
p=λh=660×10−96.626×10−34=1.004×10−27 kg m s−1.
Electron speed (p=mev): …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.A particle of mass 2mg has the same wavelength as a neutron moving with a velocity of 3×105 ms−1. The velocity of the particle is (mass of neutron is 1.67×10−27Kg) (A) 2.5×10−16 ms−1 (B) 1.5×10−13 ms−1 (C) 2.5×10−13 ms−1 (D) 1.5×10−16 ms−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Same λ⇒ same mv; the 2mg particle moves at ≈2.5×10−16 m/s.
de Broglie: λ=mvh. Equal wavelengths give equal momenta:
mpvp=mnvn
Mass of particle =2 mg=2×10−6 kg. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.Given below are 4 subatomic particles travelling with the same velocity "v". Which of them will have the shortest wavelength? [A]= Proton [B]= Neutron. [C]= Alpha particle. [D]= Electron. (A) [B] (B) [D] (C) [C] (D) [A]
›Reveal solutionSolution
At a fixed velocity the de Broglie wavelength is inversely proportional to mass. The alpha particle has the largest mass, so it has the shortest wavelength — the correct option is (C).
Concept
Every moving particle has an associated de Broglie wavelength
λ=ph,
where h is Planck's constant and p the momentum. Because all four particles move with the same velocity v, each momentum is p=mv, so
λ=mvh.
With h and v common to all, the wavelength is inversely proportional to the mass: the heavier the particle, the shorter its wavelength.
Solution
Compare the masses:
- Electron — ≈9.11×10−31kg; lightest, so the longest wavelength.
- Proton — about 1836 times the electron mass.
- Neutron — essentially the same mass as a proton.
- Alpha particle — two protons and two neutrons, roughly four proton masses; the heaviest of the four. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.The mass of a particle A is double that of the particle B and the kinetic energy of B is 81th that of A then the ratio of the de- Broglie wavelength of A to that of B is: (A) 1 : 2 (B) 2 : 1 (C) 1 : 4 (D) 4 : 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The de Broglie wavelength depends on momentum, which we get from kinetic energy and mass. Using the given ratios, the wavelength ratio is 1:4, so option (C).
The de Broglie wavelength of a particle is given by λ=ph, where h is Planck’s constant and p is the momentum. Since kinetic energy K=2mp2, we can express momentum as p=2mK. Therefore, the wavelength becomes λ=2mKh. The ratio of wavelengths for two particles depends only on their masses and kinetic energies.
Let’s denote:
- Mass of A: mA=2m (since A is double B)
- Mass of B: mB=m
- Kinetic energy of B: KB=81KA (since B’s KE is 1/8th of A’s)
We want λBλA.
- Write the wavelength formula for each particle
λA=2mAKAh,λB=2mBKBh
- Take the ratio
λBλA=h/2mBKBh/2mAKA=mAKAmBKB
- Substitute the given ratios mA=2m, mB=m, and KB=81KA.
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.A particle at rest decays in to two particles of mass m1 and m2 and move with velocities v1 and v2. The ratio of their de Broglie wave length λ2λ1 is: (A) 1 : 4 (B) 1 : 1 (C) 1 : 2 (D) 2 : 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
So lambda1 : lambda2 = 1 : 1, whatever the masses and speeds individually are.
Concept: conservation of linear momentum in a decay from rest, plus the de Broglie relation lambda = h/p.
The parent particle is at rest, so total momentum before = 0. After the decay,
m1 v1 + m2 v2 = 0 => the two fragments fly apart with momenta EQUAL IN MAGNITUDE (and opposite in direction):
|p1| = |p2| = p.
de Broglie wavelength: lambda = h / p. …
- COMEDK 2022Set 20221 markMCQQ.Ultraviolet light of wavelength 99 mm falls on a metal plate of work function 1.0 eV. If the mass of the electron is 9.1 × 10−31 kg, the wavelength of the fastest photoelectron emitted is (A) 0.63 nm (B) 0.66 nm (C) 0.33 nm (D) 0.36 nm
›Reveal solutionSolution
(Equivalently lambda = h/sqrt(2mK): K = 11.53 x 1.6e-19 = 1.845e-18 J; sqrt(2 x 9.1e-31 x 1.845e-18) = 1.833e-24 kg m/s; lambda = 6.626e-34/1.833e-24 = 3.6e-10 m.)
Concept: Einstein's photoelectric equation gives the maximum kinetic energy, then the de Broglie relation gives the wavelength of the fastest electron. (The '99 mm' is a misprint for 99 nm - only a nanometre-scale UV wavelength makes sense.)
Photon energy:
E = 1240 eV nm / 99 nm = 12.53 eV
Maximum kinetic energy:
K = E - phi = 12.53 - 1.0 = 11.53 eV
de Broglie wavelength of an electron of kinetic energy K (in eV):
lambda = 1.226 / sqrt(K) nm …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.